Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a bit confused reading the RHEL System-Administrator-Guide regarding this:
(1) iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to
10.1.2.253:80
(2) iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j
DNAT --to-destination 10.1.2.253:80
My advice for the exams would be don't over think the questions and know
which man pages have examples you can gain experience from. :)
Interestingly the pass rate isn't as high as I would have thought.
Ha! I heard a story from someone back in 2001 that a company sent twelve
of their
I don't have a problem to solve, but I don't know which mail server to
use either. But, like I said, ideally I'd like to use one of the
groupware type mailserver (POP3, SMTP, IMAP, calendar, address book, etc)
What you want is a centralised and yet distributed user information
database
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
I am looking at deploying a directory server in a small network.
Currently looking at Fedora-ds and I noticed that CentOS is currently
working on one. Does anyone know if the CentOS-DS is working well at
However, if I were you, I would look at
Thank you for your input. I can't justify exchange (and don't want MS)
for 10 users. I do want IMAP though, and the calendar address book
would be nice. This IMO has nothing todo with CentOS though, but at the
same time it shouldn't be limited to which Linux distro I'm using. As
you have
re: mail servers specifically, there are two seperate classes of storage
that would need replication... One is the mail spools and queues as
used by the MTA (postfix, sendmail, etc), and the other are the user
mail folder(s) as used by the local delivery agent (procmail or
whattever), and
Neil Muller wrote:
On 18/05/2008, at 4:25 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Neil Muller wrote:
I think it's a java based app. You can download from
http://www.sun.com/download/index.jsp?cat=Identity%20Managementtab=3subcat=Directory%20Server
does it work with openjdk as yet ?
I've only
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Well, that's one of the problems I foresee, but also the fact that
each email has a unique message ID, so I don't know if the backup
server will pickup the changed messages ID's or not? I have been
thinking of running a MySQL backed
No, mail spools/queues do not need replication. Stuff in the queue are
usually deleted in a second and such dynamic change is not worth
replicating. If you do put the queue on a distributed filesystem, in
most cases you cannot have more than one instance running save for
sendmail.
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
No, mail spools/queues do not need replication. Stuff in the queue are
usually deleted in a second and such dynamic change is not worth
replicating. If you do put the queue on a distributed filesystem, in
most cases you cannot have more than one
DRBD works approximately like raid1 mirroring. Unless something breaks
it shouldn't add much latency since the duplicate disk will run at
approximately the same speed as the master.
RAID1 + network latency. Got it.
___
CentOS mailing list
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
I am sorry but I do not share that view for incoming mail. The latency
in getting the mail replicated probably is longer than it takes to do
the actually delivery to the mail store.
I am not sure what you mean by the word 'replication
John R Pierce wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
That default setting is no longer applicable today. Users will scream
if they find out that their mails have been sitting in the queue for a
day. For today's businesses, one day can make or break a deal and so
email, being a much faster form
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Okay, Les helped me with that one. RAID1 on the network. So you would have
to use GFS or something like that with it and have the service down on the
secondary unless it was sendmail you were running.
No and yes. You can just use ext3 on both
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Okay, Les helped me with that one. RAID1 on the network. So you would
have to use GFS or something like that with it and have the service
down on the secondary unless it was sendmail you were running.
No and yes. You can
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
No and yes. You can just use ext3 on both nodes as you normally only
have the one on the primary node mounted - the other one is not accessed
by anything. And yes, with heartbeat you just failover to the second
node
david chong wrote:
Hi,
I am running Centos5.1, trying to configure samba now. I am quite new
in this area and hope help from the list.
Have you ever tried going through the Samba Howto or the Using Samba
book material that comes free with samba in html format?
If you want help, then you
Your way has the advantage of letting you add disks in pairs, but to get
that you get only single-disk redundancy: if a second disk goes out,
your array is gone, no matter which disk it is.
Nah, if you lose both disks that belong to the same stripe array, the
other stripe array is still
And stick with md-raid 10 (also known as software raid) because it is
much more intelligently designed than any
closed-source-embedded-raid-controller.
This was valid until...quite a few years ago.
Nowadays hardware raid frightens me because of the need to have spare
raid-controllers for
I notice in the example running smbclient -L localhost -U% will
output the line below:
ADMIN$ IPC IPC Service (Samba 3.0.20)
but from my C5.1, I don't have this line, other lines are the same,
can anyone explain this line, wondering if this is where the problem
lies.
Run testparm and tell us
david chong wrote:
On 5/23/08, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you ping the Samba Server by the Server name?
Pinging server name, From the server itself can ping.
Irrevelant to network problems FYI.
However from winxp client cannot ping by server name, can only ping by
ip address.
William Warren wrote:
I'm not a fan of RAID 5 at all since it can only tolerate one failure at
all. Go with raid 10 or something like that which is able to handle
more than one failure. Intermittent, uncorrectable sector failures
during rebuilds are becoming an increasing problem with
Why are you still using CentOS 4?
Do you have an issue with Centos 4? I prefer to wait for RH to work most
of the kinks with their new releases. Centos 5 has new versions of
various libraries and software. They have never been able to guarantee
zero breakage. Eg: I have heard of
MHR wrote:
My main system is a CentOS 5.1 64-bit desktop with gobs of disk and a
couple of printers attached that work just fine. I have it set up
with samba so my VMWare guest Windows XP can access most of the files
and the printers.
But, when I try to connect to the printers from a
So they say, and correct me if i'm wrong, that RAID10 is a RAID 1 of
RAID 0. A mirror of stripe sets. You said it's not that, i lost you on
this one.
Heh, I dare say most of us are lost on this one. It is a blinking new
module for md that is not available on Centos 4. This should help
Linux wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Christopher Chan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And stick with md-raid 10 (also known as software raid) because it is
much more intelligently designed than any
closed-source-embedded-raid-controller.
This was valid until...quite a few years ago.
Has
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
William Warren wrote:
I'm not a fan of RAID 5 at all since it can only tolerate one failure at
all. Go with raid 10 or something like that which is able to handle
more than one failure. Intermittent, uncorrectable sector failures
during
Just asking. I don't use CentOS as a desktop OS, so the firefox problem
doesn't bother me at all, but CentOS 5 is an upgrade in many regards,
and I find it very stable. I have yet to try RAID10 with it though, as
soon as I can get my hands on enough spare HDD's :)
I believe you cannot do
Nikolay Ulyanitsky wrote:
I can not comment on most vendors but for the PROGRESS RDBMS RAID5
is definitely not recommended. It will work but you will see a
significant reduction in performance. We strongly recommend that our
clients go with RAID10 (as in RAID 1+0). In-house we only use RAID10.
Linux wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Christopher Chan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe you cannot do it via the installer yet. Can anybody confirm the
presence of raid10 personality in Centos 5?
Installer does not have raid10 as an option. Not sure whether boot cd
has this module
MHR wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Christopher Chan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do they should up if you run the command below in the Linux host?
smbclient -L //localhost
I'm guessing you meant show up and yes, everything looks normal, but
only if I use a -U option with a known user
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
support.
That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or
some other Linux distro.
None of the various free Linux firewalls have IPv6 support. Supposedly
FWBuilder can manage
Matt Shields wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
support.
Not sure about FC6, but in both CentOS 4 5 there is an ip6tables. I
haven't used
gopinath wrote:
can we configure offline file shares in samba as we do on a windows pc
Whatcha mean? Prevent offline caching?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Exactly!!! What he's complaining about is the lack of lazy-man's GUI
tool to configure ip6tables.
I may be ethnic Chinese but I grew in Sierra Leone and English is what I
use from day to day and I cannot read Chinese characters...or do not
recognise enough to claim literacy anyway.
Are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi, i have @server1.domain.com, #server2.domain.com, @server3.domain.com
and @server4.domain.com and i distrib the e-mail users in that four
servers for equal. 2 servers have:
dovecot+sendmail+mailscanner+spamassassin+clamav+ssl/tls+squirrelmail and
other two have:
Victor Padro wrote:
Hello all,
I just been wasting time with an Asus mobo trying to get CentOS/RHEL up
and running for my home lab using Xen Technologies and need an advice in
order to have a fully working Box, got any suggestions?
Use acpi=off or noapic to deal with broken Asus bioses.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok..i can install dovecot+postfix+MYSQL..etc..and maybe the problem it's
resolve.
i don't have problem with the machines, the machines are goods, my problem
is the tranparent receive e-mails to the users than are distributed in
four machines with the same number the
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:37 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Marko Vojinovicvvma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 30 November 2010 20:54:37 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
And about apache... most of those attacks are preventable through
defensive configuration
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:09 AM, ann kok wrote:
Hi all
Anyone can help to let me know how to
ls -1 | lsattr
lsattr `ls -1`
ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $2}' | lsattr
for i in `ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $8}'`; do lsattr /folder/$i; done
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 03:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an
internal design glitch.
Seconded. I have a
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 07:50 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Christopher
Chanchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 03:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 07:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/1/2010 5:44 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Christopher
Chanchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:09 AM, ann kok wrote:
Hi all
Anyone can help to let me know how to
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't
use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500
frames.
Seriously? What switches?
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 08:28 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:22:38 Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we
don't use jumbo
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 08:57 AM, David wrote:
Folks
I have been following the IPV6 comments.
What concerns me with the loss of NAT are the following issues:
1) My friend from half-way around the world comes to visit. He turns
on his IPV6 enabled device (think Ipad), and wants to
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 11:08 AM, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 08:57 AM, David wrote:
Folks
I have been following the IPV6 comments.
What concerns me with the loss of NAT are the following issues:
1) My
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 07:23 PM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
b) Do I get charged by my ISP on a per-device basis?
Heh, if they want to micromanage...
This is no science fiction.
Never said it was.
Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that
can connect to
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 03:11 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 7/12/10 8:33 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Ah, I must pity you who have to live with what you've got in the United
States being under the rule of these tyrants. You guys probably can only
dream of getting a 100MB fibre connection
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 05:10 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
The even more horrendous problem, which is so pervasive it affects
everyone, is the insistence on asymmetric connections. Even when
Australia does get this fabled fibre-to-the-home, it still won't be
symmetric. *sigh*
Fibre
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 09:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/8/10 4:22 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 30/11/10 03:52, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
[...snip...]
As was already mentioned in another post, run in permissive mode, for a
few days
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 03:40 AM, John Hinton wrote:
Has anyone noticed over the years, that every time a major new CentOS
release is just about to happen, suddenly there starts to be a few very
long and drawn out threads?
Really? Interesting.
Has anyone ever considered that the
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:03 PM, William Warren wrote:
On 12/8/2010 9:13 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 09:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/8/10 4:22 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 30/11/10 03:52, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Les
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 05:00 AM, Warren Young wrote:
On 12/8/2010 7:13 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Such [periodic failures] are fairly common
I'd say the main reason someone chooses CentOS (or another Linux flavor
with similar policies, like Ubuntu LTS) is that the distro provider
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 02:55 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
Second, iptables is a de-facto standard for Linux, just as pf is pretty
much the standard firewalling on BSD. Windows and Solaris got their own
firewalling methods as well. My point is, neither of them are any Posix
standards
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 03:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
How many of those use the same commands to
start/stop/save-current-config? Where do they keep the configs? How If
you deployed applications on all of them, how much time would it take to
train the operators that do the install and
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 06:55 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 05:11:23 pm Warren Young wrote:
Let's not drag the desktop user into this discussion, too.
Why not? Are there no CentOS desktop users out there? Are the needs of the
desktop just to be ignored? I
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 08:41 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/8/2010 6:14 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 03:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Or rather stop telling people not to use SELinux and iptables on this
list just because you don't want to use any
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 11:06 AM, Warren Young wrote:
On 12/8/2010 5:00 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 05:00 AM, Warren Young wrote:
I assume you mean to advocate running updates infrequently,
No, I advocate setting up SELinux properly which will take care
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:37:02 pm Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 03:11 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
The even more horrendous problem, which is so pervasive it affects
everyone, is the insistence
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 11:08 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:06:34 pm Warren Young wrote:
That's great if you are wise enough to forsee all problems that an
automatic update can cause.
I am not that wise.
Nor am I; that's why I have testing server VM's on
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 11:39 PM, Tom H wrote:
SELinux came as a result that someone found weaknesses and wanted to try
avoid security issues. Just like when firewalls began to become so
popular 20-30 years ago or so. There was a need to improve something,
and someone did the job.
On Friday, December 10, 2010 03:12 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2010 11:00:58 Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Or would you prefer paying kilobucks per month for a tariffed OC3/12/48
or Gigabit provisioned Metro E
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 10:59 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 06:00:58 am Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Or would you prefer paying kilobucks per month for a tariffed OC3/12/48 or
Gigabit provisioned Metro E
On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 02:28 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Oog... I just looked that up
http://www.thinkgeek.com/homeoffice/kitchen/dea2/?source=google_home_officecpg=ogho1gclid=CLiQtsPt6aUCFRVx5QodJHRAYQ
mark not sure I want to know where no man has cut before
There,
Please turn off troll detectors. Especially those with big automatic
hammers.
http://thecloudmarket.com/stats#/by_platform_definition
Anybody 'extra' bandwidth from the 'Cloud'? Ubuntu installations
currently trumps the combined numbers of Centos, Fedora and RHEL (not
that using
On Thursday, December 23, 2010 11:08 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:12 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Matt wrote:
Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
ext3 for it?
Before
On Friday, December 24, 2010 12:02 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/23/2010 9:08 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:12 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Matt wrote:
Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would
On Friday, December 24, 2010 05:25 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
I'd stick with ext3 + data=journal with the journal either on some uber
fast and large external BBU nvram block device (you can get up to 1TB
with speeds of 750MiB/sec+ if you have a fat enough bus) or on hardware
raid with sufficient
On Friday, December 24, 2010 01:03 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/23/2010 10:28 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Matt wrote:
Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
ext3 for it?
Before committing
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 02:55 AM, compdoc wrote:
XFS is safe - lots of protection for your data, but it cuts write speeds in
half.
When did XFS start looking like reiserfs?
Lots of protection for your data? Let's see, super aggressive caching
and no data journaling only metadata
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:51 AM, compdoc wrote:
Lots of protection for your data? Let's see, super aggressive caching and
no data journaling only metadata journaling, what on earth are you
blabbering about?
Use XFS with anything that has no BBU cache support or barrier support and
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:07 AM, compdoc wrote:
I never said it was native. zfs-fuse.x86_64
Not a Centos or a RHEL package. Please don't bring up experimental
software in threads that are comparing filesystems for production use.
If you want to suggest ZFS, you should suggest that the
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 05:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/25/2011 2:49 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
So what happens when one does the monthly tuesday patches for windoze
and your security door controller running on SQLserver (micro$oft)
fails. Back out all the patches - inform micro$oft -
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:55 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 14:25 -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:20:34 am Always Learning wrote:
Then one day a big bad wolf called Oracle of very expensive Oracle SQL
fame swallowed Red Hat, like they
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:41 PM, Barry Brimer wrote:
Quoting Always Learningcen...@g7.u22.net:
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 13:12 -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
At Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:49:39 + CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org
wrote:
Anyone any idea what kernel version Centos 6 will
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 01:37 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:27 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Surely you mean stuff from the rising sun Illumos and OpenIndiana!
Nope. Not convinced by what I read about them.
Still have my unused Open Solaris disks from 2008.05
On Friday, February 11, 2011 02:36 AM, Chuck Munro wrote:
I'm hoping CentOS-6 doesn't present me with the same problem. Because
I'm not a registered RHEL user, I don't have the ability to submit a bug
report at RedHat.
You don't have to be an RHEL user to file a bug report according to
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 05:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 02/11/11 8:39 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
They have*everything* to do. Look, I*said* this is OT, but since you
insist, the overwhelmingly*bad* design decision was to put the GUI into
ring 0, instead of
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 09:02 PM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Drewdrew@gmail.com wrote:
RHEL and CentOS have much, much tighter basic privilege handling. The
complexity of the NTFS ACL structure, for example, is so frequently
mishandled that it's often
On Sunday, February 13, 2011 03:38 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 09:02 PM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
Anyway, neither in windows nor in unix/linux you want to specify
permissions
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 09:14 PM, Drew wrote:
cheap scsi raid? good luck. maybe something on ebay, but then its
Caveat Emptor, and likely the raid batteries will be dead or dying.
What speed is your scsi backplane? you can't get Ultra/320 speeds
across older backplanes that were
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 10:47 PM, Drew wrote:
The key is the backplane, not the drives. You should be able to get u320
speeds if you have enough u160 drives.
Does five drives count?
I guess that depends on whether they can flood an u320 bus. If they are
10k/15k rpm drives, I'd think
On Sunday, April 10, 2011 04:30 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/09/11 8:11 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 10:47 PM, Drew wrote:
The key is the backplane, not the drives. You should be able to get u320
speeds if you have enough u160 drives.
Does five drives count?
I
On Monday, April 11, 2011 10:53 AM, Brandon Ooi wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Phil Schaffner
philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov mailto:philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote:
S.Tindall wrote on 04/10/2011 01:46 PM:
Just boot the installer with the ext4 option and anaconda will
be
Hi,
On Monday, April 11, 2011 11:06 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
Just new to Centos 5.6.
I'm trying to install an Xvnc server
rpm -qf /usr/bin/Xvnc
vnc-server-4.1.2-14.el5_5.4
Maybe you just install the vnc-server package?
Can somebody point me a solution?
As above
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:12 AM, Antaryami Khuda wrote:
I see um twitter dag's want to start his own RHEL rebuild.
Dag how much monies you do need?
I make contribution of 5.000 rupee if other join.
I'll cough up 5,000 leones when I get them!
Hordes, prepare to move out!
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/12/2011 02:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
There are pages in the wiki that already describe what we are doing
right now.
Really? Where do I look to see what has been tried with packages that are
currently failing QA or not building
Please excuse me.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
umair shakil wrote:
Salam,
Squid actually Proxy will do the trick
Nope. Not if they are installed on those PCs.
Regards,
Umair Shakil
ETD
On 10/19/07, *Arne Pelka* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have two pc using centos 4, these machines need
Karanbir Singh wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
qmail.org site.
or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
and lets not forget the one true MTA to rule them all : Exim!
Where do we join
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
I would really rather make qmail newbies go through the flames and
really learn how qmail works than let them loose with a list
I know that XFS gets all the press about being a great performing file
system ... but if you want the best stability on CentOS, you should at
least consider ext3 instead.
+1
I have worked very hard to get stable code for xfs in centos-4 and
centos-5, and lots of people use it, but (IMHO)
Shawn Everett wrote:
I will be telling them wait for a power loss, wait for the XFS code to
shut down one of its filesystem for no reason, take a good look at the
neverending stream of bug fixes in the mainline kernel, take a look at
those kernel developers who have openly announced they want
Scott Silva wrote:
on 10/22/2007 9:21 PM Christopher Chan spake the following:
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
I would really rather make qmail newbies go through
What I am having a problem is how do I get postfix to transfer the
email to the particular IMAP server that the user account is on. I
know that I need to use lmtp and transport, but all the examples I
have seen show forwarding all email to 1 IMAP server. I would like
Postfix to do a lookup
Matt Shields wrote:
Data changes too frequently to generate the file every x number of
minutes across all smtp servers.
You have to support instantly deliverable mailboxes for new accounts?
The mysql db isn't a single server. It's a master (read/write) with
multiple replicas for read
So, i have been quite moronic in not trying to apply logic initially.
Please leave that term for those who really deserve it. As for not
trying perhaps the lazy label is more suitable :-P
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ah but you cannot just replace it with another radio and expect it to
work...sendmail and postfix have very different interfaces and design. They
have their own ways of handling. Do we have to entertain stuff like
writing/debugging sendmail
I thought the usual ways of doing this were to either use a
high-performance NFS server (netapp filer...) and maildir format so you
can run imap from any client facing server, or to keep the delivery host
information in an LDAP attribute that you find when validating the address.
This is
1 - 100 of 665 matches
Mail list logo
