Bernd Bartmann wrote:
Hi,
the C5 updates to openoffice.org-2.0.4-5.4.26 are available on the
mirrors, but no announcement has come through the centos-announce
mailing list yet.
I'm sure they will
Also, upstream has released gnome-screensaver-2.16.1-5.el5_1.1 and
Robert Becker Cope wrote:
Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CentOS is *not* for users new to Linux or Unix-like operatings
systems. It isn't. Full stop.
Hopefully what you mean is that it isn't designed specifically for users that
are new to Linux. It is a perfectly fine distribution for
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's easy
to forget there is now a whole generation of computer users who have known
nothing but the GUI and completely missed out on DOS or CP/M, and never
owned a Spectrum/Commodore/BBC Micro etc.
Wow
MHR wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:02 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mamun wrote:
Guys,
I already installed CentOs,but can anyone give a sample of repo files and
priorities.conf file.
As for this 2 files i am unable to install mplayer.
See http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories
Hi list,
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday,
10th May).
I don't run the automated yum-updated and didn't run a yum update
yesterday, and no packages were installed. Obviously the entries are old.
I was wondering if anyone could offer an explanation?
John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ned Slider
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 5:27 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Today's log - yum entries
Hi list,
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday,
10th May).
- yum Begin
Packages Installed:
lzo.i386 1.08-4.2.el5.rf
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday,
10th May).
I don't run the automated yum-updated and didn't run a yum update
yesterday, and no packages were
Robert Nichols wrote:
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for
yesterday,
10th May).
I don't run the automated yum-updated and didn't run a yum update
yesterday
Karanbir Singh wrote:
David Hláčik wrote:
Thanks i firured it out , sorry for stupid silly question, but why
project pages are not working?
D.
David, the machines that host projects.centos.org were moved a few days
back, and were not totally back into production as yet.
It should all be
Clint Dilks wrote:
Hi People,
I know this may seem off topic, but I thought for those of us who might
have Debian users generating key pairs that they put on CentOS systems
people should be aware that
everybody who generated a public/private keypair or an SSL
cert request on Debian or
Daniel de Kok wrote:
Furthermore, all DSA keys ever used on affected Debian systems for
signing or authentication purposes should be considered compromised;
the Digital Signature Algorithm relies on a secret random value used
during signature generation.
Take care,
Daniel
SANS have more on
Juan C. Valido wrote:
Well, I guess everyone's experience is different, I've got 2 GA-P35-DS3
with Core 2 duos and a GA-MA770-GS3 with a Phenom 9600 and I love them.
I've never had a problem with a Gigabyte Motherboard. Some people love
Asus and I've had several go bad on me, you figure.
On
Johnny Tan wrote:
I saw this in Logwatch today for one of my servers:
- yum Begin
Packages Installed:
samba-common.i386 3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2
samba.i386 3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2
Packages Erased:
samba-common
samba
Johnny Tan wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
and the cause is likely similar. Checking /var/log/yum.log for entries
1 year ago should confirm this.
Ned/Alan:
You guys hit it on the head. Thanks. I wasn't aware of this little oddity.
Thanks,
johnn
You're welcome
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johnny Tan wrote:
I saw this in Logwatch today for one of my servers:
Checking /var/log/yum.log for entries 1
year ago should confirm this.
As this bit me once and I've just seen two people
William L. Maltby wrote:
But keep in mind you were only a virtual ass. Not really one. And the
person who labeled you as an ass may have been, in fact, the ass.
Regardless, his was only a virtual opinion. And unless you have a
personal relationship and really care what he felt...
So that
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Saturday 24 May 2008 10:25:41 Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 23 May 2008 21:31, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Actually I have written a small tutorial on iptables, but I haven't
translated it into english. I'll let you know when it's done. Hopefully
it will be useful for
Jerry Geis wrote:
I have found this link http://owlriver.com/tips/tiny-centos
for installing centos on a minimal system. I am looking at putting
centos on a 1 GIG flash drive. The above page talks about removing packages
after install to attain the small size.
however, I am getting blocked at
Joe Pruett wrote:
i had previously been having issues with automount being slow with this
new kernel and i tracked it down to dns delays which were being caused
by ipsec not working. i have spent a few hours poking around and ipsec
seems quite broken with this new kernel. esp packets go in
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12 screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with
little memory? Ideally, I
Jerry Geis wrote:
I am looking for the servercd for i386 centos 5.1 on the mirrors.
Not finding it though.
Can someone point me to it. Thanks,
Jerry
There is currently no serverCD for CentOS 5.1, but you can install from
just the first CD if that helps. See here:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Answer: When it's ready.
Suits me - I have a different question (and it's
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this
one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853
that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about
Rogelio wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
CentOS /is/ a distro, there is only one centos 'distribution'.
centos configured with selinux enabled, appropriate firewall rules,
and the minimum number of services required for your application
should be fairly 'hardened' as-is.
Understood. I
Sam Drinkard wrote:
Ok.. I'm way behind the 8-ball on setting things up correctly, but after
going over the protection things in yum, I ran a yum check-update and it
returned with having 318 files excluded because of protection. Is that
too high a number? I have the numerical protection set to
Robert - elists wrote:
Using XEN or Vmware or Both?
Thanks!
- rh
I've run VMware Server (free, as in cost, not as in open source) on
CentOS to host WinXP VMs since it was in beta and have no complaints.
There is an RPM package available on VMware's site:
$ rpm -q VMware-server
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Ned: I was very interested to read that you've run VMWare Server on
systems with only 512 MB of RAM. I haven't tried it, because the box
I can use only has 512 MB of RAM.
Yes, assuming you give 256MB to a single VM guest and allow the CentOS
host 256MB, you'll get
D Steward wrote:
Hi, others have by now addressed your issue, so I'll now have my say.
Please in future, use a better title than the one you have chosen - it
will help others who are searching for a solution to problems similar to
what you were having.
You are lucky this mailing list is so
Gary Richardson wrote:
Do you need to shut your machine down to use clonezilla? After a quick
skim of the site, I can't find anything that says you don't.
Yes, Clonezilla is a LiveCD which you boot from to clone the disk so
your machine will be offline during this process.
Dunc wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
If there is something in the conf file that needs to change (that
worked in 5.1 and does not in 5.2) let us know and we can add it to
the release notes and/or wiki.
It was in the listening section as follows:
# A space separated list of IP or host
Dunc wrote:
Hi
Yes it was written as rpmnew, and indeed the default was the same. But
using the original I was using before, changing nothing, with [::] I
could not connect after the upgrade. I restarted many times, and
eventually changing the original to [*] allowed me to connect.
I then
Dunc wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
Dunc wrote:
Hi
Yes it was written as rpmnew, and indeed the default was the same.
But using the original I was using before, changing nothing, with
[::] I could not connect after the upgrade. I restarted many times,
and eventually changing the original
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
This is my first major version update after using a local repo.
It seems that before I can yum update I have to fetch the complete new
5.2 base? Is this correct?
When I run yum update it now fails with various strange dependency errors
although all the updates are synced.
John R Pierce wrote:
In the past I've used a combination of spamhaus combined RBL's and
Spamassassin with Mailscanner as my spam recipe, but this stopped
working very well for me well over a year ago. As many of the users of
the couple small/personal mail servers I run are NOT technical
Kevin Thorpe wrote:
Hi all,
I have a permissions problem with a samba share which I really
can't fathom out. I'm trying to create a fully group writable share.
Easy or so I thought.
As you can see from my config I am trying all the options to set files
group writable, however when I
Kevin Thorpe wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
Kevin Thorpe wrote:
Hi all,
I have a permissions problem with a samba share which I really
can't fathom out. I'm trying to create a fully group writable share.
Easy or so I thought.
As you can see from my config I am trying all the options to set
Bo Lynch wrote:
just wanted to get some feedback from the community. Over the last few
days I have noticed my web server and email box have attempted to ssh'd to
using weird names like admin,appuser,nobody,etc None of these are
valid users. I know that I can block sshd all together with
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I needed wireshark on a test system; I had not installed it at setup time.
So I did a yum install wireshark
This seemed to have worked, but there is no executable that I can
locate, and wireshark in not in the gnome panel.
So I looked at a system were I had installed
Les Bell wrote:
David Dyer-Bennet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but if there are *any* ports exposed, seems like those are equally
possible.
Sort of. Changing the port used by sshd stops the completely clueless
script kiddies, since they don't even bother looking at anything other than
port
Marc-Andre Levesque wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Mountifield
Does anyone know how a program, script or shell user can best determine
whether the machine is running on bare metal or is a VMware guest?
Cheers
Tony
This
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
List,
I have an 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5xen X86_64 machine that is failing to update
perl. I did not see any bugs reported on the list and was wondering if
anyone else had the same problem with a solution.
Thanks,
Greg Ennis
Updating:
perl
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 10:36 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Oh, Boy. I am in trouble now
I just installed Centos on a USB drive on my corp notebook. To not
TOUCH my corp drive.
I spent time with the drive partitioner to make sure that
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I've been playing and comparing frequency scaling between AMD and Intel
CPUs yesterday and there seem to be great differences between AMD and
Intel and some gotchas. This is all on CentOS 5.2 with latest Xen kernels
(which are supposed to be powersaving-enabled since 5.2).
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ned Slider wrote on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:09:39 +0100:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=15484forum=37
Thanks for the URL, see below!
Bottom line - the power saving between having frequency scaling enabled
or not was surprisingly small (only 2-3W
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
S.Tindall wrote on Sun, 3 Aug 2008 21:47:06 -0400:
The cpuspeed changelog may be relevant:
[quote]
* Thu Mar 06 2008 Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Disable freq scaling by default on AMD rev F and earlier cpus
when running xen, due to clock instability (#435321)
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:57:20 +0200:
I disagree about the reason. I think they are actually not so efficient. At
least not if I compare to a low-voltage CPU.
Just checked how much that AMD 4850e CPU drains under various conditions.
There are *huge*
Yahia Tachwali wrote:
Hello folks,
I am trying to add HDLC module support in the menuconfig. However, I am
facing difficulties in rebuilding the kernel and modules. My main
objective is to get the HDLC supported in kernel 2.6.9. I have a CentOS
4.4 with kernel 2.6.9.42. I need help in
MHR wrote:
Or is there a really good primer on dkms that tells what to put where
and how to create a proper dkms.conf file (and where)?
Did you read the Wiki?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules#head-d313bd351f90d4f25a2143b7bbcff73f927731f0
Ned Slider wrote:
MHR wrote:
Or is there a really good primer on dkms that tells what to put where
and how to create a proper dkms.conf file (and where)?
Did you read the Wiki?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules#head-d313bd351f90d4f25a2143b7bbcff73f927731f0
And one
Sven wrote:
On 8/12/08, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi Karanbir
[...]
Now the question: is there anyway to get something similar for CentOS ? or
is there a process that someone might follow to achieve the same or similar
result ?
I am just curious. What is the use case
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
Sven wrote:
On 8/12/08, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now the question: is there anyway to get something similar for CentOS ? or
is there a process that someone might follow to achieve the same or similar
result ?
I am just curious. What
sbeam wrote:
Maybe enabling selinux but leaving httpd opened up would be appropriate for
the time being. Is that possible or advisable? audit2allow wants to allow a
lot of things.
Try toggling the httpd_disable_trans boolean:
setsebool -P httpd_disable_trans on
That should disable
Linux Man wrote:
Hello.
I need to copy several file from one PC to another over Internet, both
using CentOS.
What file manager that works over console do you recommend me?
Thanks at all
Best Regards
If the client is running X, then konqueror using the fish protocol
(fish://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/)
On 03/12/10 18:22, r...@saf.com wrote:
Any chance this wireless USB can be made to work on 32 bit CentOS 5.5?
[r...@young ~]# /sbin/lsusb
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0846:9030 NetGear, Inc.
Bus 001 Device 001: ID :
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 413c:0108 Dell Computer Corp.
[r...@young ~]#
On 03/12/10 20:57, Alejandro Rodriguez Luna wrote:
I have the need to know how many connection the server has, i run this
command but i don't know how to sum all the results and get a final number.
any ideas?
netstat -an | grep -E 'tcp|udp' | awk '{print $6}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
On 03/01/11 07:23, Ron Blizzard wrote:
Stupid question (I'm guessing). I'm currently tri-booting (or would
like to be) VectorLinux 6 Deluxe, CentOS 5.5 and an evaluation copy of
Red Hat 6. I'm using CentOS's grub. VectorLinux and CentOS boot fine,
but Red Hat won't load. I think I read
On 03/01/11 10:37, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Ned Slidern...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
You don't need to upgrade grub, I'm quite happily dual booting rhel6 GA
on a CentOS-5 system (using C-5 GRUB).
Only thing I did differently is the rhel6 /boot partition is mounted on
On 14/01/11 17:22, mahmoud mansy wrote:
hey every one i got the centos 5.5 and the following problem occuered:
1- the video display doesnot probe my card right.
2- the wireless card doesnot installed .
my laptop is dell studio1569:
(
display card is intel hd arrandle , the wireless card
On 17/01/11 18:44, Jason Brown wrote:
The kernel modules are only for that kernel, so anytime you update it
you also have to reinstall the nvidia drivers.
Alternatively, you could use the nvidia driver packages from elrepo.org:
http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-nvidia
which are kABI-tracking kmod
On 17/01/11 20:08, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:07:03 +, Ned Slider wrote:
On 17/01/11 18:44, Jason Brown wrote:
The kernel modules are only for that kernel, so anytime you update it
you also have to reinstall the nvidia drivers.
Alternatively, you could use
On 19/01/11 18:42, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how it this
not about CentOS?
You are kidding, right?
I do my accounts on
On 04/02/11 22:51, Always Learning wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 21:45 +0530, Jatin wrote:
I just installed the CentOS 5.5 version on my toshiba laptop. I did the
configuration that i had for the wireless settings but still i could not
connect to my home wireless network. So someone please
On 06/02/11 07:00, Chuck Munro wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm having a difficult time trying to figure out why the CPU cooling
fans run at full speed on my Supermicro X8DAL-3 motherboard. There
doesn't seem to be any variable speed (the fans are PWM compatible) ...
they either idle at almost
On 06/02/11 17:15, Chuck Munro wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 12:09:12 + Ned Slider wrote:
On 06/02/11 07:00, Chuck Munro wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm having a difficult time trying to figure out why the CPU cooling
fans run at full speed on my Supermicro X8DAL-3 motherboard. There
doesn't
On 07/02/11 06:08, Stephen Cox wrote:
Is it possible to allow a user to login from an changing hostname like:
username@*hoststringfixed.com
man sshd_config
AllowUsers
This keyword can be followed by a list of user name patterns, separated
by spaces. If specified, login is allowed only for
On 08/02/11 18:13, Stephen Cox wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Gordon Messmeryiny...@eburg.com wrote:
You'll need to set up DNS properly for this to work.
It is mobile Broadband... So that will not be not possible.
Is there a reason you have to include the host part? Why can't you
On 10/02/11 02:05, Larry Vaden wrote:
In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from
scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov:
quote
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahone...@macmahon.me.uk wrote:
I'm a little bit hazy on the details, but there are some slides from
On 18/02/11 15:12, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org wrote:
On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Red Hat still has not put several of the sources in their public tree
On 05/03/11 10:07, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
This post appeared on another forum:
Will CentOS become obsolete now because of the changes Red Hat is
implementing?
snip
But CentOS founder Russ Herold insists the change is not a big issue.
Private local trial builds of the released RHEL 6 sources
On 08/03/11 15:53, Philippe Naudin wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to downgrade to an old version of a package on epel ? I
am in troubles with the new dokuwiki-0-0.6.20101107.a.el5, and cannot
find dokuwiki-0-0.4.20091225.c.el5.noarch...
Thanks,
You will need to install the
On 08/03/11 16:55, Ned Slider wrote:
On 08/03/11 15:53, Philippe Naudin wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to downgrade to an old version of a package on epel ? I
am in troubles with the new dokuwiki-0-0.6.20101107.a.el5, and cannot
find dokuwiki-0-0.4.20091225.c.el5.noarch...
Thanks,
You
On 18/03/11 16:49, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent
/lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ...
root@sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname
-r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37
On 20/03/11 15:23, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are
stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated
in EPEL 5 components. In particular, the php53 package is now
necessary for the drupal6 EPEL components, due
On 23/03/11 03:41, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst
delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past
133 days delay, an all time record (not
On 07/04/11 14:41, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 07/04/11 15:11, Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
On 04/07/2011 03:58 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
On 04/07/2011 08:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Please try to maintain some semblance of professionalism when you post
to this list.
This coming from someone who
On 07/04/11 21:38, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/7/2011 3:04 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
CentOS AIMS to be 100% binary compatible and for the most part it is,
but I'm tired of seeing this misnomer repeated over and over like some
holy grail. Personally I'm with Russ on this one that whilst an
admirable
On 08/04/11 03:06, Lucian wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Jerry Franzjfr...@freerun.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 03:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
The GPL says they must release source. It doesn't say they have to also
release any magic spells they use to compile it.
Actually, it *does*. If
On 08/04/11 19:49, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I just did a test install off a netinstall iso to a mirror repo which left
no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file in place.
So a quick check:
# yum whatprovides /etc/sysconfig/iptables --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=base
--enablerepo=updates
On 08/04/11 20:56, Ned Slider wrote:
On 08/04/11 19:49, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I just did a test install off a netinstall iso to a mirror repo which left
no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file in place.
So a quick check:
# yum whatprovides /etc/sysconfig/iptables --disablerepo=\*
--enablerepo
On 09/04/11 11:36, Mister IT Guru wrote:
Due to recent list traffic, it seems that we need to have a new todo
list! I propose the following
1) Nuke current todo page
2) Create new todo page
3) Clear out ancient todo items
a) Get rid of the items that are no longer relevant
b)
On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote:
/putting on asbestos pants.
each release is more complex than the last. The web of dependency grows,
so the reverse-engineering takes longer and longer.
This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of the
processes involved in
On 11/04/11 22:38, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/11/2011 4:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote:
/putting on asbestos pants.
each release is more complex than the last. The web of dependency grows,
so the reverse-engineering takes longer and longer.
This is just complete
On 12/04/11 00:03, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/11/2011 5:32 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of the
processes involved in rebuilding RHEL. CentOS doesn't reverse-engineer
anything, they simply rebuild
On 09/16/2011 01:00 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications
for all centos releases except for centos6. Is there a reason why or
did the site maintainers just forget about it.
On 09/17/2011 03:23 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 02:54 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
On 09/16/2011 01:00 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications
for all centos
On 09/17/2011 03:44 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 03:32 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
As I said above, this isn't something people can volunteer for - only
a very select few have the appropriate privileges to perform the task.
There are trust issues.
However, you can file
On 25/09/11 10:16, Christian Athon wrote:
I can only find openmotif22 in centos 5 i386. x86_64 has a openmotif. A
mistake I assume?
Christian.
Yes, it's a known issue:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5101
Until the devs get around to fixing this, you can copy the missing i386
On 08/10/11 11:46, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Can someone point me to a howto or an example of a virtual package?
xorg-x11-drivers is an example of a virtual package in the distro. It
pulls in all the xorg-x11-drv-* packages as dependencies. Take a look at
the SRPM.
Hope that helps.
On 08/10/11 14:22, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 10/08/2011 02:34 PM, Timothy Murphy piše:
I don't really understand the function of this repository,
or rather why the RPMs in it are not in the standard repository?
I read the outline at
On 13/10/11 09:35, Toralf Lund wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to access an SD-card using the built-in reader on a Lenovo
T61 Laptop running CentOS 5.7. The unit is recognised by lspci:
# lspci
[ ... ]
15:00.2 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822 SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro
Host Adapter (rev 21)
15:00.3
On 28/10/11 18:31, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Patrick Lists
centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote:
How is, say, being
required to pay a license fee as a consequence different from losing
something you have already contracted and paid for?
It would surprise me if
On 29/10/11 18:41, Ron Loftin wrote:
This may not be the best place to ask, but Google hasn't given me any
useful information.
I have an older laptop that is using the Intel 2200 wireless
interface. I installed CentOS 5 on it some time ago and everything is
fine. When I was reviewing my
On 29/10/11 23:04, Ned Slider wrote:
On 29/10/11 18:41, Ron Loftin wrote:
This may not be the best place to ask, but Google hasn't given me any
useful information.
I have an older laptop that is using the Intel 2200 wireless
interface. I installed CentOS 5 on it some time ago
On 01/11/11 18:27, Bob Hoffman wrote:
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go with
CentOS as long
as there are timely updates. That tells me you dont really care about getting
support from
the vendor. You can
On 01/11/11 22:26, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/01/2011 09:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/11 18:27, Bob Hoffman wrote:
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go with
CentOS as long
as there are timely
On 02/11/11 05:34, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/11 22:26, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/01/2011 09:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/11 18:27, Bob Hoffman wrote:
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go
On 05/11/11 13:22, Olivier BONHOMME wrote:
Hello,
I post here because I have an embarassing issue considering the yum
version provided with CentOS 5.
I am trying to package an application for CentOS. So I wrote my own
specfile which is composed of declaration of various packages (main
On 05/11/11 14:40, Olivier BONHOMME wrote:
Le 05/11/2011 15:29, Ned Slider a écrit :
Please post your spec file to a pastebin for us to see.
Hello,
Here it is : http://ares.ptitoliv.net/~ptitoliv/fusiondirectory.spec
Rather than making the Requires specific to a package:
Requires(postun
On 05/11/11 15:29, Olivier BONHOMME wrote:
Le 05/11/2011 16:19, Ned Slider a écrit :
On 05/11/11 14:40, Olivier BONHOMME wrote:
Le 05/11/2011 15:29, Ned Slider a écrit :
Please post your spec file to a pastebin for us to see.
Hello,
Here it is : http://ares.ptitoliv.net/~ptitoliv
1 - 100 of 694 matches
Mail list logo
