expect to help and contribute to the process to make
that happen.
Which, contrary to what is stated now, was an essential part in the start
and growth of the CentOS project.
Anyay, goodbye and thanks for all the fish !
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux
See also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing
to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would
take no more than 1 month ?
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors
:)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/5/2011 4:22 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
and it would automatically create a bootable image with your system's
layout and the backuppc software/configuration, and even the necessary
commands to automatically recover your system when doing:
I don't
having two discussion sessions
for developers and users on Wednesday and Thursday.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/5/2011 3:37 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
I can recommend ReaR (Relax and Recover) for migrations and cloning
systems. I have been working wit the Relax and Recover project for the
past few months together with a colleague and it now covers a lot
with the opportunity to improve. And since
you have to verify it works exactly the same, there's a good chance both
performance and correctness are guaranteed.
The original author may not have a reference to compete against.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux
/pub/packages/nmon/
Hi Simon,
Thanks for posting that SRPM. It seems the nmon version in RPMforge lost
track of nmon development. They do not appear to report new releases
on freshmeat :-/
I have updated the release in RPMforge based on your SRPM.
Thanks again,
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/11/2011 05:07 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/11/2011 4:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote:
/putting on asbestos pants.
each release is more complex than the last. The web
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Plus, I think it was the timing of the post regarding DAGs RHEL like
project.
There is no DAG RHEL like project.
It's a tweet. If I would ever start a DAG RHEL like project, I wouldn't
announce it over twitter :-)
--
-- dag wieers, d
is reading into something that isn't there. I do
retain the rights to start my own RHEL rebuild project if I feel I want to
though :-)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact
, is that
there was low feedback of your testing framework proposal (of which no
information is in the Wiki). Well, ever thought that this particular item
was not itching anyone ? Because maybe the bigger picture is missing ?
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i
. There is no wish to
change how the project is taking care of things.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
I also don't see what the size of my (past) contributions to CentOS has to
do with this whole discussion. I would much rather discuss why the QA
process needs to be closed, why you think opening up the process
. It's actually better than not
asking the question ;-)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing
provide a critical voice. I no longer expect any change.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
Considering you follow the it's released when it's ready mantra, what
[ ... ]
I no longer expect any change.
Then why are you always coming back here to voice your concerns
if you don't
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Digimer wrote:
On 04/11/2011 03:10 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
Considering you follow the it's released when it's ready mantra, what
[ ... ]
I no longer expect any change
CentOS community ...]
Yes, let's all do the same thing, and stumble over the same problems,
while they may already have fixed in the closed QA builds.
Sounds like one crazy plan !
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:48:18PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
4) back to your genuine inquiry how can I help it be ready faster?
Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report
back
what
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:00:57PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
right: you are locked inside a maze, there is one exit somewhere.
Everyone start from the same place, eveyone benefit from the
person who find the exit. We
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
...
My maze is the build order (ie dependancy order of the SRPMS),
What are yours? how do you get to that number of mazes?
The build order is not what
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
I only see wasted time talking, no actions. I will be happy to be proven
wrong.
We are more alike than it seems at first. I don't see actions either, I
only see the output of actions because the process is deliberately closed.
--
-- dag wieers, d
in doing RHEL packages together with RPMForge back
then, the Fedora project then saw this additional task a risk to their new
Fedora Extras repository.
4 years after that they did start EPEL, but too much conflicts for us to
even attempt to fix any issues. And here we are :-/
--
-- dag wieers, d
to stop.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
for the whole I resign issue with Dag and the project.
He's stirring up trouble for the sake of stirring up trouble.
Yes, and CentOS does not have issues ! It's all Dag that's making it up.
Without Dag releases would be more timely :) Pigs can fly !
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Keith Keller wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:08:29AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, John R. Dennison wrote:
Except for the whole I resign issue with Dag and the project.
He's stirring up trouble for the sake of stirring up trouble.
Yes
. Or it is simple and the CentOS developers have been slacking ?
Anyone from the QA team interested to share some information on what
happened during QA ?
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling
either.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
and Karanbir will have to work harder.
It doesn't have to be like this, but it feels like certain forces want to
keep things framed like this in discussions.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact
yOn Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/04/2011 11:14 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Nobody else really can give an update, the process is pretty much closed
to the general public. So if the only person why can provide information
is off by 2 months, I'd rather have no information at all
. People
want to help with where the problems are, which is fixing builds so a
release can be more timely.
Why are we avoiding this again and again ?
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling
yOn Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/06/2011 09:53 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
That's not hard to do - stop reading them then.
And once again we are avoiding a proper solution.
No, once again you dont understand the issues, the problem or the
efforts going into the solution.
And you
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/06/2011 11:37 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
And you do not seem to provide me with the answers. Same old, same old.
Actually, i dont need to provide *you* with anything :)
Correct, but if you claim I don't know anything about the issues, the
problem
posted,
Markmail seemed to sort it out okay as did the OP who posted.
We are all waiting for the first sucker to tell you to stop this thread
because if you keep Karanbir busy it will make the CentOS 6.0 release late !
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux
the latest development release have a better success rate than the
stable release, but if you are unsure, download both and test your
use-case with both toroughly :)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/04/11 2:41 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Beware that RPMforge contains the stable releases (1.2.2) and the RPMforge
testing repository is at 1.3.7, but I am doing a 1.3.17 build right now.
Often the latest development release have a better success rate
is off by 2 months, I'd rather have no information at all.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]___
CentOS
be relied upon. The whole when it's
ready mantra works well for academic/individual users, but you can't
plan business processes based on it.
That may have been the whole point of this exercise. Red Hat profits !
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Hendrik wrote:
2011/4/5 Dag Wieers d...@wieers.com:
You are one of the few who care to give updates, so thanks for that.
Nobody else really can give an update, the process is pretty much closed to
the general public. So if the only person why can provide information
. But that's the problem, there's
no way anyone can help the releases moving forward... Good luck waiting :)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst
delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past
133 days delay, an all time record
would solve most of the issues.
You pick, build and sign what you like from a shared pool of information.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
days delay, an all time record (not counting CentOS 2 :-)).
So the trend is a decline in release speed and maybe we should lower our
expectations. CentOS users have been spoiled in the past.
Kind regards,
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i
that.
Does Novell provide their own updates (RHEL rebuilds) or how does this
exactly work ? I doubt Novell can redistribute RHEL binaries in this case.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact
as
you plan to migrate to SLES. But they expect you to migrate to SLES in the
next three years...
So this is not related to OpenSUSE.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact
reasonable questions politely
should be castigated for doing so.
It has been suggested that asking such questions makes the release even
later. So that's why people frantically condemn such threads, we are
all being collectively punished !
(Include mandatory smiley) :-)
--
-- dag wieers, d
, nobody knows ;-)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
.
Interesting, could you shed a light on what exact XML is needed ?
It used to be qemu-spice though in past Fedora releases, that's why I was
expecting the same.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors
. It is
very likely a RHEL 6.1 Beta is out before CentOS-6.0. Early RHEL 6.1 Beta
access has been offered by Red Hat to RHCE's already.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact
for RPMforge is using an mrepo setup that synchronizes yum
repositories from RHN using rhnget. Then point my buildsystem to those
repositories. You can do the same with mock.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/20/2011 07:30 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/16/2011 04:31 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 15/02/11 17:25, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Let's see. 7 weeks after a RHEL release, we have:
For RHEL6, lets make
103 days after RHEL6.0
Source: wikipedia
Granted, RHEL6 is larger than RHEL5 which was larger than RHEL4, still...
PS And this time I am not off-by-1 (month) ;-)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
The FIRST build of a distribution (the .0 of 4.0 or 5.0) takes MUCH
longer than the subsequent rebuilds. This is because you have NOTHING
to start from except SRPMS
if
people still have the dkms module installed and/or use ELRepo's fuse
kernel module they can safely remove it :)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
there are not better Ext3/Ext4 drivers that integrate properly into
Windows.
Something similar to ntfs-3g must be easier to write for ext3 on Windows
(as the ext3 format is well-known).
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net
/clamav-users/2010-10/msg00086.html
And ClamAV 0.96.4 was available from RPMforge since yesterday, so if all
is well updating your system should fix this (harmless) message.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Shad L. Lords wrote:
Can we get a refresh of the drbd packages to 8.3.8.1
There was a fix to the resync protocol. 8.3.8 would stall under certain
circumstances.
If you haven't tried the ELRepo DRBD packages yet, could you please
for
both cases ?
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Shad L. Lords wrote:
Can we get a refresh of the drbd packages to 8.3.8.1
There was a fix to the resync protocol. 8.3.8 would stall under certain
circumstances.
If you haven't tried the ELRepo DRBD packages yet, could you please
available from:
http://elrepo.org/bugs/
Thanks in advance,
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
their RHN Extras/Supplementary
channel. I guess licensing is one reason why it is not public, although it
does give Red Hat some added value for Enterprises, I am sure :-)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission
not include me).
We also discussed some other improvements:
- using AUTHPRIV intead of AUTH for logging
- including shield-trigger-iptables
- Fixes to Makefile
- Including manual pages
- Fixes to INSTALL
- Both registered bugs
Kind regards,
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http
or rpmforge.
Or maybe the answer is more simple. The libraries once were available in
RHEL, but have been replaced by newer/incompatible ones ?
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
like su, screen, reboot,
etc... If you understand what pam_shield does (eg. read the
documentation), you'd never want to enable it for all PAM services that
use system-auth. EVER.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact
scenarios and test in a sandbox environment.
You can whitelist known IP addresses (or FQDNs), but indeed there is the
possibility that someone else (from your IP address) can DOS you as it is
IP-based. Although that risk is limited, you need to understand how it
works :)
--
-- dag wieers
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rob Kampen wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
pam_shield is available from RPMforge and requires a minimum of
configuration.
Never heard of this one before - just installed and simple to configure.
I note that version 0.9.3 was released April 2010 and includes a
supposed
somewhere. Not good though.
Was this with the 0.9.2 release, or the 0.9.3 release ?
Please provide this information to the author, he might help you find the
cause and fix it in pam_shield.
Thanks for reporting,
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling
(and newer) devices. It does have an incompatibility
with dbus, but works fine for my HP PhotoSmart printer that wouldn't work
otherwise.
You can find those packages here:
http://packages.sw.be/hplip/
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling
incompatiblities:
error: Unable to load dbus - Automatic status updates in HPLIP Device
Manager will be disabled.
I've looked into the problem, but only a dbus update could fix the issue
at hand :-/ Everything else works for me without a problem though.
--
-- dag wieers, d
(preferably on the ELRepo bug-tracker / mailinglist to
not cause even more controversy).
Kind regards,
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 19/06/2010 02:32, Dag Wieers wrote:
We are not sending every announcement to the CentOS list, that should be
apparent from looking at the ELRepo lists (where actual announcements
are being posted in more detail).
But you are still making
at:
http: //lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
http: //elrepo.org/bugs/main_page.php
Kind regards,
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 18/06/2010 09:12, Dag Wieers wrote:
I would like to announce a set of OCFS2 kABI-tracking kernel module
packages for RHEL5, Scientific Linux 5 and CentOS-5 and kernels.
Can you please stop spamming this list ? A one time announcement here
welcome your feedback on our mailinglist and bug-tracker, respectively
at:
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
http://elrepo.org/bugs/main_page.php
Kind regards,
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact
of
making it a supported option for the remaining 5 years of RHEL5. I guess
testing with RHEL6 beta and then moving to CentOS 6 eventually is the
safest option for production use.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission
expect someone else to do it for you...
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
practice.
We can fix this in the future if we get a conflict.
The package is available from RPMforge tomorrow.
Thanks Steve !
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
. Especially if you are using automounting
it might still pick ntfs-3g as mount.ntfs ships with ntfs-3g (or when
using gnome even gnome-vfs2-ntfs) over kmod-ntfs.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
:-/ And without a detailed changelog and no access to previous versions
of the document you may get paranoid or get into discussions based on
different copies of that document.
I've been there too :-)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact
are that you are taking something for granted that is caused by
the current rules, to keep those rules in place.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]___
CentOS-docs
( = South France).
The repositories are fine. The website is strictly speaking as well, but
redirects to:
https://rpmrepo.org/RPMforge
And the rpmrepo infrastructure is unavailable now for a week or so ?
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors
modifications to livecd-creator to make it work
with a newer syslinux. A newer syslinux has various advantages. I'll
probably make some more modifications to it after FrOSCon.
Kind regards,
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact
is now leading) to highlight
success stories. Show who helped contributing and how one could
contribute. Give credit where credit is due. More positivism...
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
. But this was not the only reason to leave
the team, if it was I would have left earlier.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/install/manual/distros/redhatenterprise.html
I have more recent hplip packages (and willing to update them if
necessary) at:
http://packages.sw.be/hplip/
(Or from the test repository)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors
either have to decide if you release parts of the
upcoming version or to wait. In such a case I personally would prefer
to wait.
I guess the best strategy is to release as soon as 'possible'(*).
(*) Where 'possible' means something quicker than 2 months after Red Hat :)
--
-- dag wieers, d
in Fedora.
Red Hat sees the desktop as the next step in revenue, but not in the
consumer market. They see it in the enterprise market. That's crystal
clear for me.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, JohnS wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 21:59 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
snips
We started more than one thread regarding this back in January:
[CentOS-docs] Improving the PageRank of individual wiki pages
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/2009-January
about lots of packages that fail to rebuild, but if I
ask what these are I only get 2 items:
- audacious has a missing dependency (audacious-plugins)
- comix SRPM does not rebuild
That's 2 packages, I think we do quite well if that is it :)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http
plotted in time. Not because I think it shows something fantastic,
but rather to give us a better target to meet.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]___
CentOS
that it is better to focus on
quality it is better to day that 7600 have problems, but you are actually
lying because you only know about 2 broken packages.
Besides we don't have 8000 unique packages, more like 5000 I think. But
that is beside the point.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
- audacious has a missing dependency (audacious-plugins)
- comix SRPM does not rebuild
That's 2 packages, I think we do quite well if that is it :)
But this is only because I am not crazy
heard of any other. Did you say 7600 packages failed ? Can you
please list them. I like statistics.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing
guess we are both very alike, we want each other to fix those things
for free :)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Hrbáč wrote:
Dag Wieers napsal(a):
The difference is that you can only install one distribution, but you can
install tons of incompatible repositories.
And the believe that one repo will rule them all (which is what Fedora and
EPEL wants you to believe) is just
subversion so you can maintain those
things from within RPMforge if you like.
Maybe this discussion can induce some change in how we work or who we
accept.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
repository from the scratch.
I am all for a solution, but unless it already works I would not call it a
solution, but a short-term (and possibly long-term) risk.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors
where they validate compatibility before making available.
Now, I always thought that RPMforge wouldn't have the resources to
start making the repositories compatible, but apparently the Fedora
projecy is simply not even interested in doing this.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http
1 - 100 of 368 matches
Mail list logo
