Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?

2011-01-21 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On 1/21/11, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 20:13 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: This is on software which ran as POS stuff. hmm... how about a vlock -a (or inverse thereof) wrapper? Regards, Rajagopal ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] cloning a server

2011-01-21 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 01/20/2011 07:52 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: Over and over again I see this reco and it makes no sense? If you have access to updates whether they be yours locally cached or remote, you should add a repo line in your ks and install updates from the start. It's faster/cleaner and just plain

[CentOS] how to set imagemagicks tmp folder?

2011-01-21 Thread S Mathias
my /tmp is too small [when i want to use convert]. how can i set imagemagick, to use an other tmp folder, what has enough space? thank you! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] cloning a server

2011-01-21 Thread Joseph L. Casale
The current version of anaconda supports that, but to the best of my recollection, the version used in RHEL 5 did/does not. Your recollection is wrong, I have never done a CentOS install except for the first couple when I was learning without it... ___

Re: [CentOS] how to set imagemagicks tmp folder?

2011-01-21 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Please do not abuse this list for your daily tinky-winky support needs!!! This list is not a replacement for using your brain. Thank you! Google or the search engine of your choice is your friend. I used imagemagick set tmp dir and the very first hit seems to contain the correct answer

[CentOS] oprofile problem in centos with custom kernel

2011-01-21 Thread Yannis Klonatos
Hi! I am trying to profile my custom 2.6.37 linux kernel with oprofile in centos 5.5, and i have encountered the following problem. (Before everyone starts shouting, I know that custom kernels are not supported by centos team, however I really need to run a modified version, due to a

Re: [CentOS] looking for a package

2011-01-21 Thread John Doe
From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us I'm trying to update a workstation, and it wants to update mpeg2-utils. But that has a dependency of libmpeg2-0.5.1-3, for i386. epel doesn't have it, and I tried looking on rpmfusion.org, and I can only find a very few packages there. Anyone have an

Re: [CentOS] how to set imagemagicks tmp folder?

2011-01-21 Thread S Mathias
Google will provide an answer, if someone asks it, and then someone answers it. If someone answers the question on a mailing list, then it wont be asked again on the list, because people could google for it. and mr. let me tell you: you're an idiot. --- On Fri, 1/21/11, Kai Schaetzl

Re: [CentOS] looking for a package

2011-01-21 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
John Doe wrote: From: m.r...@5-cent.usm.r...@5-cent.us I'm trying to update a workstation, and it wants to update mpeg2-utils. But that has a dependency of libmpeg2-0.5.1-3, for i386. epel doesn't have it, and I tried looking on rpmfusion.org, and I can only find a very few packages

Re: [CentOS] how to set imagemagicks tmp folder?

2011-01-21 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Please leave this list, thanks. Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?

2011-01-21 Thread Michael Gliwinski
On Thursday 20 Jan 2011 22:26:08 Bob Eastbrook wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:18 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: But the locked screensaver wants the *same* password that you log in with. I'm having trouble understanding the problem... or is it that many of the users *never* log out?

Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?

2011-01-21 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 05:53:14 pm Ross Walker wrote: I haven't heard of someone lifting a latent oil print and creating a fake out of that. I'm sure with enough ingenuity it can be done. Let me repeat: that is exactly what MythBusters did in the episode I referenced, 'Crime and

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/21/11 12:09 AM, Parshwa Murdia wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Lamar Owenlo...@pari.edu wrote: As Les said, it depends by what you consider to be 'better.' I consider them to be roughly equivalent, with SL having some advantages (mostly of perception in my dayjob, for

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, January 21, 2011 01:09:37 am Parshwa Murdia wrote: What made me think for this comparison was the simple question why did Fermi Labs and CERN chose SL and developing but they didn't go for other distros, keeping in mind always that all the distros have their own pros and cons but

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: MVNCH In retrospect I think the world would be a better place if everyone using RH would have walked away the day they stopped permitting redistribution of binaries to the community that had contributed their code base. But I was too lazy to do that myself and CentOS lets

Re: [CentOS] how to set imagemagicks tmp folder?

2011-01-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 1/21/2011 4:14 AM, S Mathias wrote: my /tmp is too small [when i want to use convert]. how can i set imagemagick, to use an other tmp folder, what has enough space? I'm not going to tell you to go away as some others have done, but I will give you a few tips that will help you get more

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/21/2011 8:55 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: fedora become crazy, Mike? The beginning of '06, when I went to SuSE, I already knew that it was bleeding edge, and that wasn't just my opinion, but the opinion of a number of folks I know, whose technical expertise I respect, including some guy

Re: [CentOS] Is there a difference between RHEL 6 and 5.6?

2011-01-21 Thread Mike Hanby
5.6 also now officially supports ext4 and adds quota support for ext4. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth Porter Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:46 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is there a

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Robert Heller
At Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:55:56 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: MVNCH In retrospect I think the world would be a better place if everyone using RH would have walked away the day they stopped permitting redistribution of binaries to the community that

Re: [CentOS] how to set imagemagicks tmp folder?

2011-01-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/21/2011 9:10 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: 4) Ask the question in the right place. This list is great and has lots of smart people, but it is not the proper place for all questions. Your question about Imagemagick would probably be better asked in an Imagemagick forum. Off-topic questions

Re: [CentOS] how to set imagemagicks tmp folder?

2011-01-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 1/21/2011 11:16 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 1/21/2011 9:10 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: 4) Ask the question in the right place. This list is great and has lots of smart people, but it is not the proper place for all questions. Your question about Imagemagick would probably be better asked in an

Re: [CentOS] how to set imagemagicks tmp folder?

2011-01-21 Thread Keith Keller
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:10:28AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 1/21/2011 4:14 AM, S Mathias wrote: my /tmp is too small [when i want to use convert]. how can i set imagemagick, to use an other tmp folder, what has enough space? I'm not going to tell you to go away as some others have

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, January 21, 2011 11:01:01 am Les Mikesell wrote: The first few RHEL releases sort of looked like the same pattern where there would be 2 fedora versions replacing the X.0, X.1 RH's with the 3rd in the set being RHEL, but it didn't stay that way very long and quickly got to the

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread m . roth
Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, January 21, 2011 11:01:01 am Les Mikesell wrote: The first few RHEL releases sort of looked like the same pattern where there would be 2 fedora versions replacing the X.0, X.1 RH's with the 3rd in the set being RHEL, but it didn't stay that way very long and

Re: [CentOS] how to set imagemagicks tmp folder?

2011-01-21 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 08:45 -0800, Keith Keller wrote: I imagine that, if the OP's posting habits continue, the decision to leave the list may be made for him. I am not normally one for removing people from lists, but the OP is really getting intolerable. +1 Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t

Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?

2011-01-21 Thread Mike McCarty
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: Greetings, On 1/21/11, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 20:13 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: This is on software which ran as POS stuff. hmm... how about a vlock -a (or inverse thereof) wrapper? We wanted to log the user out of the POS

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, January 21, 2011 12:34:57 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Haven't seen the kernel break things, with the exception of *sigh* NVidia drivers I've also seen it reorder ethernet ports, but finally found the simple solution (/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethx, and add the HWADDR)

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/21/11 10:22 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: I'll let the following speak for itself. Read it carefully. It's from a running machine. # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Linux release 5.2 (Apollo) # uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.0.36 #3 Fri Apr 9 15:36:11 EDT 1999 i586 unknown # date

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread m . roth
Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, January 21, 2011 12:34:57 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Haven't seen the kernel break things, with the exception of *sigh* NVidia drivers I've also seen it reorder ethernet ports, but finally found the simple solution (/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethx,

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Stephen Harris
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:29:14AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot) Yer not the only one. this thing is my firewall/gateway/router, also I replaced my old redhat 6 firewall (Pentium Pro) with a wrt54g around 7 years ago when I realised just how much energy that

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/21/2011 12:22 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: I'll let the following speak for itself. Read it carefully. It's from a running machine. # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Linux release 5.2 (Apollo) # uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.0.36 #3 Fri Apr 9 15:36:11 EDT 1999 i586 unknown # date

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, January 21, 2011 01:33:03 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, January 21, 2011 12:34:57 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Haven't seen the kernel break things, with the exception of *sigh* NVidia drivers I've also seen it reorder ethernet ports, but finally

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/21/11 10:35 AM, Stephen Harris wrote: I replaced my old redhat 6 firewall (Pentium Pro) with a wrt54g around 7 years ago when I realised just how much energy that machine was wasting spinning up hard disks and stuff. wrt54's (I have a wrt54gs v1.0 doing my wireless) are awfully slow

[CentOS] [OT] old kit and kaboodle, obFriday (was:Re: Is it okay?)

2011-01-21 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, January 21, 2011 01:29:14 pm John R Pierce wrote: $ cat /proc/cpuinfo ... model name : Pentium III (Katmai) cpu MHz : 451.031 ... Being that it's Friday (note that this output isn't snipped; kernel 2.0.36 doesn't grab the CPU frequency apparently!):

[CentOS] rsync via crontab spawns over 20 processes

2011-01-21 Thread aurfalien
Hi all, I've been running rsync via cron for a while now and all is well. However on one particular new 5.5 box, whenever its runs via crontab, the machine ends up with over 20 rsync processes and a load of ~14 and eventually the machine dies. But when running manually, I see it spawn 3

[CentOS] smartmontools SRPM fails

2011-01-21 Thread Mike McCarty
I want to install smarmontools v 5.40, and so I pulled the SRPM for 5.39 so I could patch and install... $ wget -Nc ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/smartmontools-5.39.1-2.el6.src.rpm However, the install of the source fails. $ rpm -ivh

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread m . roth
Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, January 21, 2011 01:33:03 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, January 21, 2011 12:34:57 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Haven't seen the kernel break things, with the exception of *sigh* NVidia drivers I've also seen it reorder ethernet

Re: [CentOS] [OT] old kit and kaboodle, obFriday

2011-01-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/21/2011 1:28 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: I have a few K6-2 300 systems here that would be ideal for a few uses if I could get something a little more modern than the i586 C4 build running on them... for that matter, perhaps I need the i586 C4 build on them They are Agilent ATMProbes

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, January 21, 2011 02:13:54 pm John R Pierce wrote: The P3-450 running my network now draws about 70 watts average per my Kill-A-Watt, which really isn't that bad. Kaill-a-watts are great little devices If you can find a cast-off Nomadix HotSpot gateway, you can save a lot of

Re: [CentOS] [OT] old kit and kaboodle, obFriday (was:Re: Is it okay?)

2011-01-21 Thread m . roth
Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, January 21, 2011 01:29:14 pm John R Pierce wrote: $ cat /proc/cpuinfo ... model name : Pentium III (Katmai) cpu MHz : 451.031 ... Being that it's Friday (note that this output isn't snipped; kernel 2.0.36 doesn't grab the CPU frequency

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: RH 7.3 was my 'run forever' version - using the update stream from freshrpms while it lasted. I had one run of 4+ years of uptime, interrupted by a server room move, then about that long again before office changes made it obsolete. It was nice to

Re: [CentOS] [OT] old kit and kaboodle, obFriday

2011-01-21 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, January 21, 2011 02:35:40 pm Les Mikesell wrote: On 1/21/2011 1:28 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: For that matter, I'm looking for a distribution I can put on DiskOnChip and run on some embedded PC104 5x86/133 systems I have. :-) Except for things with specialized hardware adapters

Re: [CentOS] rsync via crontab spawns over 20 processes

2011-01-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 1/21/2011 2:30 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've been running rsync via cron for a while now and all is well. However on one particular new 5.5 box, whenever its runs via crontab, the machine ends up with over 20 rsync processes and a load of ~14 and eventually the machine

Re: [CentOS] smartmontools SRPM fails

2011-01-21 Thread Mike McCarty
Mike McCarty wrote: [...] $ rpm -ivh smartmontools-5.39.1-2.el6.src.rpm warning: smartmontools-5.39.1-2.el6.src.rpm: V3 RSA/MD5 signature: NOKEY, key ID fd431d51 Hmm, maybe I need a later version of RPM. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436812 Mike --

Re: [CentOS] rsync via crontab spawns over 20 processes

2011-01-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/21/2011 1:30 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've been running rsync via cron for a while now and all is well. However on one particular new 5.5 box, whenever its runs via crontab, the machine ends up with over 20 rsync processes and a load of ~14 and eventually the machine

Re: [CentOS] smartmontools SRPM fails

2011-01-21 Thread Jay Leafey
Mike McCarty wrote: Mike McCarty wrote: [...] $ rpm -ivh smartmontools-5.39.1-2.el6.src.rpm warning: smartmontools-5.39.1-2.el6.src.rpm: V3 RSA/MD5 signature: NOKEY, key ID fd431d51 Hmm, maybe I need a later version of RPM. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436812 Mike As I

Re: [CentOS] rsync via crontab spawns over 20 processes

2011-01-21 Thread aurfalien
On Jan 21, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 1/21/2011 2:30 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've been running rsync via cron for a while now and all is well. However on one particular new 5.5 box, whenever its runs via crontab, the machine ends up with over 20 rsync

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/21/2011 1:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Yup. That's what most of us jump up and down about, when a user says it's Broke!!!, when they mean something went wrong in a package. And by *now*, I meant that he's working on a project hot and heavy, and will for a week or two or more, and I

Re: [CentOS] rsync via crontab spawns over 20 processes

2011-01-21 Thread aurfalien
On Jan 21, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 1/21/2011 1:30 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've been running rsync via cron for a while now and all is well. However on one particular new 5.5 box, whenever its runs via crontab, the machine ends up with over 20 rsync

Re: [CentOS] rsync via crontab spawns over 20 processes

2011-01-21 Thread Jay Leafey
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: No hard links, some sym links. But I see what you are saying. Here is my crontab entry via /etc/crontab * 22 * * * root rsync --delete -avvH --progress source target - aurf So you want rsync to run every minute in the 10 PM hour? I think that first * needs to

Re: [CentOS] rsync via crontab spawns over 20 processes

2011-01-21 Thread Don Krause
On Jan 21, 2011, at 12:05 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 21, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 1/21/2011 1:30 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've been running rsync via cron for a while now and all is well. However on one particular new 5.5 box, whenever its

Re: [CentOS] rsync via crontab spawns over 20 processes

2011-01-21 Thread Keith Keller
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:05:37PM -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Here is my crontab entry via /etc/crontab * 22 * * * root rsync --delete -avvH --progress source target That will run your rsync at *every minute* of 10pm! Clearly not what you want. Try 0 22 * * * root rsync --delete

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Stephen Harris
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:13:54AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: On 01/21/11 10:35 AM, Stephen Harris wrote: I replaced my old redhat 6 firewall (Pentium Pro) with a wrt54g around 7 years ago when I realised just how much energy that machine was wasting spinning up hard disks and stuff.

Re: [CentOS] rsync via crontab spawns over 20 processes

2011-01-21 Thread aurfalien
On Jan 21, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Jay Leafey wrote: aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: No hard links, some sym links. But I see what you are saying. Here is my crontab entry via /etc/crontab * 22 * * * root rsync --delete -avvH --progress source target - aurf So you want rsync to run every minute in

Re: [CentOS] rsync via crontab spawns over 20 processes

2011-01-21 Thread aurfalien
On Jan 21, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Don Krause wrote: On Jan 21, 2011, at 12:05 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 21, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 1/21/2011 1:30 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've been running rsync via cron for a while now and all is well. However

Re: [CentOS] rsync via crontab spawns over 20 processes

2011-01-21 Thread aurfalien
On Jan 21, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Keith Keller wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:05:37PM -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Here is my crontab entry via /etc/crontab * 22 * * * root rsync --delete -avvH --progress source target That will run your rsync at *every minute* of 10pm! Clearly not

[CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread mattias
Can i run xen and vmware on the same machine? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Missing Dependency

2011-01-21 Thread Terry Hickey
Problem: I am trying to update the php package PHP Version 5.1.6 on CentOS release 4.8 to get rid of a script error: PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined function dom_import_simplexml while running yum update php I get the following -- Running transaction check -- Processing

Re: [CentOS] smartmontools SRPM fails

2011-01-21 Thread Mike McCarty
Jay Leafey wrote: Mike McCarty wrote: Hmm, maybe I need a later version of RPM. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436812 Mike As I understand it, there have been some changes in the checksum methods in the newer versions of RPM. If you want to install package built with the

Re: [CentOS] smartmontools SRPM fails

2011-01-21 Thread Lars Hecking
### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/jmccarty/devtools/RebuildRPM/build/SOURCES/smartd.initd;4d39deaa: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch Is the SRPM corrupted? I've pulled a few from other places for other versions (like Fedora) from

Re: [CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread aurfalien
On Jan 21, 2011, at 11:38 AM, mattias wrote: Can i run xen and vmware on the same machine? No, once you have the Xen kernel loaded on your dom0, then no VMPlayer, etc... - aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] [OT] old kit and kaboodle, obFriday (was:Re: Is it okay?)

2011-01-21 Thread fred smith
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 02:38:28PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, January 21, 2011 01:29:14 pm John R Pierce wrote: $ cat /proc/cpuinfo ... model name : Pentium III (Katmai) cpu MHz : 451.031 ... Being that it's Friday (note that

Re: [CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread mattias
Bad Because My nic will only pic a ip when xen kernel are loaded If I try a no xen kernel The dhclient reply No link check your cable But all cables are connected -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of aurfal...@gmail.com Sent:

Re: [CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 21.01.2011 22:31, schrieb aurfal...@gmail.com: On Jan 21, 2011, at 11:38 AM, mattias wrote: Can i run xen and vmware on the same machine? Not meant to be nitpicking, but VMware is a company and not any specific application or software solution. And you can get very different virtualization

Re: [CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread fred smith
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:40:17PM +0100, mattias wrote: Bad Because My nic will only pic a ip when xen kernel are loaded If I try a no xen kernel The dhclient reply No link check your cable But all cables are connected -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 21.01.2011 21:40, schrieb mattias: Bad Because My nic will only pic a ip when xen kernel are loaded If I try a no xen kernel The dhclient reply No link check your cable But all cables are connected Which NIC is that (lspci -v output for the Ethernet Controller)? Which release of CentOS

Re: [CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread mattias
5.5 But that has worked before A intel card -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:51 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] vmware Am 21.01.2011 21:40, schrieb

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/21/11 12:11 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:13:54AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: On 01/21/11 10:35 AM, Stephen Harris wrote: I replaced my old redhat 6 firewall (Pentium Pro) with a wrt54g around 7 years ago when I realised just how much energy that machine was

Re: [CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread m . roth
mattias wrote: 5.5 But that has worked before A intel card a) stop top posting. b) there are no twits here. Try writing complete sentences, not 140 char twits. c) Twiting is a *great* way to i) irritate me, and ii) lead me to utterly ignore your questions, and not even try to help.

Re: [CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread aurfalien
On Jan 21, 2011, at 12:57 PM, mattias wrote: 5.5 But that has worked before A intel card -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:51 PM To: CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Let's talk about HTTPS Everywhere

2011-01-21 Thread David Sommerseth
On 19/01/11 12:41, John R. Dennison wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:29:12AM -0800, S Mathias wrote: [...snip...] 4) If it's so great why isn't it more prevalent? It's not yet a 1.0 release; this may have something to do with it. The version number doesn't need to say anything

Re: [CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread mattias
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of aurfal...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:05 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] vmware On Jan 21, 2011, at 12:57 PM, mattias wrote: 5.5 But that has worked

Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency

2011-01-21 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Terry Hickey wrote on Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:45:46 -0700: I am trying to update the php package PHP Version 5.1.6 on CentOS release 4.8 to get rid of a script error: 4.8 doesn't have 5.1.6, it has php 4. Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] [OT] old kit and kaboodle, obFriday (was:Re: Is it okay?)

2011-01-21 Thread Benjamin Smith
I would suggest Damn Small Linux. It seems taylor made for stuff like this. On Friday, January 21, 2011 11:28:26 am Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, January 21, 2011 01:29:14 pm John R Pierce wrote: $ cat /proc/cpuinfo ... model name : Pentium III (Katmai) cpu MHz : 451.031

Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency

2011-01-21 Thread Terry Hickey
- Original Message - From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 3:31 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency Terry Hickey wrote on Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:45:46 -0700: I am trying to update the php package PHP Version 5.1.6 on

[CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread mattias
I solved it I installed the openvz kernel without openvz utilites And now vmware works ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] smartmontools SRPM fails

2011-01-21 Thread Mike McCarty
Lars Hecking wrote: ### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/jmccarty/devtools/RebuildRPM/build/SOURCES/smartd.initd;4d39deaa: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch [...] Happens with SRPMS from newer Fedoras. Unpack it manually into

[CentOS] CentOS and Dell MD3200i / MD3220i iSCSI w/ multipath

2011-01-21 Thread Edward Morbius
We've been wrestling with this for ... rather longer than I'd care to admit. Host / initiator systems are a number of real and virtualized CentOS 5.5 boxes. Storage arrays / targets are Dell MD3220i storage arrays. CentOS is not a Dell-supported configuration, and we've had little helpful

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Dell MD3200i / MD3220i iSCSI w/ multipath

2011-01-21 Thread Ross Walker
On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Edward Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote: We've been wrestling with this for ... rather longer than I'd care to admit. Host / initiator systems are a number of real and virtualized CentOS 5.5 boxes. Storage arrays / targets are Dell MD3220i storage arrays.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Dell MD3200i / MD3220i iSCSI w/ multipath

2011-01-21 Thread Edward Morbius
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Edward Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote: We've been wrestling with this for ... rather longer than I'd care to admit. Host / initiator systems are a number of real and virtualized CentOS

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Dell MD3200i / MD3220i iSCSI w/ multipath

2011-01-21 Thread Edward Morbius
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Edward Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote: We've been wrestling with this for ... rather longer than I'd care to admit. Host / initiator systems are a number of real and virtualized CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency

2011-01-21 Thread Tru Huynh
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:38:43PM -0700, Terry Hickey wrote: Well. # php -v PHP 5.1.6 (cli) (built: Jul 31 2008 00:08:07) Copyright (c) 1997-2006 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.1.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2006 Zend Technologies rpm -qa |grep php php-cli-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10

Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency

2011-01-21 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Terry Hickey wrote on Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:38:43 -0700: Well. no, not well. Think a moment when someone tells you something. CentOS 4 does *not* contain php 5. You installed PHP 5 from another repo, likely from centosplus. Maybe you have more repos enabled. Nobody knows because you didn't

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Dell MD3200i / MD3220i iSCSI w/ multipath

2011-01-21 Thread Ross Walker
On Jan 21, 2011, at 7:20 PM, Edward Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Edward Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote: We've been wrestling with this for ... rather longer than I'd care to

[CentOS] [OT] old kit uses, and security stuff (was:Re: Is it okay?)

2011-01-21 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, January 21, 2011 02:35:11 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I have a friend with several RISC 6000's, and of course his MicroVAX. You had a PDP-8? When I was taking an o/s class in the mid-eighties, I was on a PDP-11/780. *Nice* machine, running RSTS, I think it was. Hmm, I wondernope,

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Lamar Owen
On Jan 21, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: If you can find a cast-off Nomadix HotSpot gateway, you can save a lot of power and get something more speedy at the same time. It's a custom-labelled Portwell NAD-2050; if you can find one they're neat. Lot less than 70 watts; closer to 10

Re: [CentOS] smartmontools SRPM fails

2011-01-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Lars Hecking lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: ### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/jmccarty/devtools/RebuildRPM/build/SOURCES/smartd.initd;4d39deaa: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch Is the SRPM

Re: [CentOS] smartmontools SRPM fails

2011-01-21 Thread Lars Hecking
*NEVER DO THIS*. Always, always, always start your development as a normal user, not as root, and use a .rpmmacros that acts accordingly. For example, for user nkadel, in /home/nkadel/.rpmmcros, I have %_topdir /home/nkadel/rpm And I set up a subdirectories there as necessary.

Re: [CentOS] [OT] old kit and kaboodle, obFriday (was:Re: Is it okay?)

2011-01-21 Thread Cia Watson
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:28:26 -0500 Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: On Friday, January 21, 2011 01:29:14 pm John R Pierce wrote: $ cat /proc/cpuinfo ... model name : Pentium III (Katmai) cpu MHz : 451.031 ... I have a few K6-2 300 systems here that would be ideal for a

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Stephen Harris
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 01:57:32PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: On 01/21/11 12:11 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:13:54AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: On 01/21/11 10:35 AM, Stephen Harris wrote: I replaced my old redhat 6 firewall (Pentium Pro) with a wrt54g around 7

Re: [CentOS] vmware

2011-01-21 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/21/11 1:07 PM, mattias wrote: ok part of the etiquette of bottom posting is to trim the superfluous parts of teh original message, including signatures, and just quote the part you are replying to. but you seem to revel in being a twit, and are going on my auto-delete list real soon

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 10:29 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: $ cat /proc/cpuinfo ... model name : Pentium III (Katmai) cpu MHz : 451.031 ... Yer not the only one. this thing is my firewall/gateway/router, also DNS and DHCP, and is quite reasonably hardened. yes, ipchains is

Re: [CentOS] Is it okay?

2011-01-21 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/21/11 6:26 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: But definitely this router can do 10Mbit/s without sweating. If you had trouble doing 10Mbit/s then you had other problems. I was trying to route between two 100Mbit ethernets and seeing ~10Mbit, maybe a little more, when there was traffic going both

Re: [CentOS] [OT] old kit and kaboodle, obFriday (was:Re: Is it okay?)

2011-01-21 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Benjamin, On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:35 -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote: I would suggest Damn Small Linux. It seems taylor made for stuff like this. The problem with many of these special purpose distros is that they are usually poorly maintained wrt updates. A minimal install of a mainstream

Re: [CentOS] ifcfg-rh: error: Unknown connection type 'Bridge'

2011-01-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote: On 01/13/2011 08:26 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: Can anyone tell me why I am seeing these error message? Specifically, why is TYPE=Bridge giving Unknown connection type 'Bridge'? I don't believe NetworkManager supports

Re: [CentOS] ifcfg-rh: error: Unknown connection type 'Bridge'

2011-01-21 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/21/11 7:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: NetworkManager is utterly useless for server grade work, such as pair bonding and bridges. It may be helpful for wireless management or modem connections, but I find it safer to to rip it *out* on CentOS 4 and CentOS 5, and urge turning it off by

Re: [CentOS] ifcfg-rh: error: Unknown connection type 'Bridge'

2011-01-21 Thread Bob Hepple
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 21:40:34 -0800 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: is there a good howto somewhere on how to manually setup wireless connections without NetworkManager ? wifi requires a lot of juju to be setup just so. This works for me (actually on fedora-13, but centos-5

[CentOS] ethernet configuration

2011-01-21 Thread Ritika Garg
I pressed the tab probe by mistake near bind to MAC address in system-administration-network-edit-hardware device. After this the MAC address disappeared. Internet is not working. Shall I write the MAC address and activate again? ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS-es] APOYO

2011-01-21 Thread Xavier Mauricio Tirado L.
Ante cualquier duda en el Ministerio del Ambiente puedes venir cuando gustes en Quito. Acá toda la infraestructura esta basada en software libre sobre CentOS y virtualización. - Mensaje original - De: David Rosado T. bleyckl...@gmail.com Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviados: Jueves,