I feel like I'm missing something there.
Yes you are.
Lets say your checkbox Name is myChkBox
Once the user clicks submit your checkbox values will look like
form.myChkBox=1,3,5,9,10
Now insert into the DB.
cfloop index=i from=1 to=#listlen(form.myChkBox)#
cfquery name=someQuery datasource=
I'm looking for an application (or looking to make one if none exists) that
allows you to take an automatic snapshot (thumbnail) of a web site when a
user specifies a URL.
Does any one know of any that currently exists?
Any suggestions are appreciated...
Thanks,
Pablo Varando
You don't need to close the application tag.
Always feels like you should but, you don't have to.
---
OUR NEW SITE IS NOW LIVE
Visit our new website at http://www.rawnet.com/ and
race around the beautiful Bracknell streets at
Hmmm not sure but, try the cfx_image tag
---
OUR NEW SITE IS NOW LIVE
Visit our new website at http://www.rawnet.com/ and
race around the beautiful Bracknell streets at http://xmas.rawnet.com/
Only a few more days of early registration left!
Help us make MX on the Rocks a sold out event. Space is running out for this 2
day event about ColdFusion, Flash and Design, where you can learn the latest
techniques and methodologies to get the most out of your Internet development
and
Maybe there has already been a post, if not there is now! :)
The new Macromedia.com has been launched and its looks excellent (if a
little slow in places).
Well done MM.
~|
Archives:
All,
We've just moved a development website over to the production server.
The problem is that after about 2 hours, the production server just went
keeled over with 100% CPU. This didnt happen on the development server
The production server win 2K, twin Xeon processor, with hyper threading.
A few additions:
You don't really need the conditional logic around the cferror tag.
It might be wise to also include a request error handler e.g.
cferror type=request...
Although you are restricted to the number of variables you can use in
this template (and you can't log/mail etc.) it
CF_Europe: European Macromedia User Group Developer Conference,
29-30, May 2003
~
Join us for CF_Europe!
The UK ColdFusion User Group is teaming up with many other
European Macromedia User Groups to host a two-day event:
CF_Europe. Register before
On Wednesday, Mar 5, 2003, at 02:02 US/Pacific, Jason Lees (National
Express) wrote:
We've just moved a development website over to the production server.
The problem is that after about 2 hours, the production server just
went
keeled over with 100% CPU. This didnt happen on the development
I'm looking for anyone interested in managing www.divepuertorico.com
It's a scuba shop in Puerto Rico, It probably doesn't pay much, but you'd
get all the free diving or snorkling you could handle should you visit.
Please respond off-line, and I apologize for using this forum for this, but
time
Sorry, we're a bit rushed switching back to the old production server.
webserver - IIS
DB - MSSQL 2K, SP3 with the Generic Windows ODBC drivers.
Jason Lees
Development Team Leader
National Express Coaches Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi Lee,
Sorry, combination of slow brain and lack of sleep.
Can you just overview in a little more detail what you are doing here? It
looks very interesting as an error handling strategy.
Cheers
Will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Pity the top toolbar on the home page doesn't work how it's supposed to
:)
Other than that, looks great. I wouldn't like to load it over a modem
though!
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Cookson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 09:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: New Macromedia.com
I have to dynamically generate a drop-down list, so that if a column in
a data table contains a certain type, it is included in the drop down
list. So far no problem.
For example, the drop down list has to include all the different types
in the type column.
But where I'm stumped is that if the
I like the new design, but it still suffers from the old back button problem
which is a real usability issue; I preferred the old site : much cleaner.
-Original Message-
From: Andre Mohamed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 10:59
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: New Macromedia.com
I went into the accessibility section, and turned on the HTML version which
is much faster and therefore more useful for my main need for the site,
which is looking up support and product information... you don't have to
twiddle your thumbs for 10 seconds every time you go back to the home page.
More a question than an answer... as no time to test
Would this work?
SELECT DISTINCT (PR_SIDE || || PR_TYPE)
FROMPRODUCTS
Ie concantenate them and use distinct on that?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 11:05
To: CF-Talk
Hello,
Has anyone had any luck with using cferror with type=request to catch
404 errors ?
---
OUR NEW SITE IS NOW LIVE
Visit our new website at http://www.rawnet.com/ and
race around the beautiful Bracknell streets at http://xmas.rawnet.com/
select distinct pr_side,pr_type
At 11:55 AM 3/5/2003 +, you wrote:
More a question than an answer... as no time to test
Would this work?
SELECT DISTINCT (PR_SIDE || || PR_TYPE)
FROMPRODUCTS
Ie concantenate them and use distinct on that?
-Original Message-
From: Michael
I hadn't thought about concatenating them. Good idea. But no it wont
work because the second column is only relevant for types that have the
word 'drum' in them. All other types, the second column has nothing to
do with it.
Cheers,
Michael Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.macromedia.com
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Sabir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 11:32
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: New Macromedia.com launched!
I went into the accessibility section, and turned on the HTML version which
is much
Oh yeah that'd be right. The most obvious answer. And that's the one I
haven't tried. DER! (smacks forehead with palm of hand)
Thanks Jim, you're right.
blush sheepish grin
Cheers,
Michael Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks.
Note to self: KEAR YOU BLOODY IDIOT - TRY THE OBVIOUS
http://www.macromedia.com/bin/webfeedback.cgi
Why is this not .cfm?
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4
LOL!!!
Old Skool
--
Bruce H. Beinert
p.808-637-0727m.917-627-4035
Web Development and Consulting:
http://www.siliconmaui.com
Weblog:
http://www.bruceandwende.com
-Original Message-
From: Everett, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
it must work good then :-)
-Original Message-
From: Bruce H. Beinert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 7:34 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: New MM.com
LOL!!!
Old Skool
--
Bruce H. Beinert
p.808-637-0727m.917-627-4035
Web Development and Consulting:
On 3/5/03, Dave Lyons penned:
if you have a problem with MM tell them about it, I don't understand why you
feel you need to come here and do it. Do you think this group has magic
powers and if you cry for them long enough, they will fix your every whim?
lol
Maybe not EVERY whim, but we
Ryan Sabir wrote:
I went into the accessibility section, and turned on the HTML version which
Unfortunately, the downloads section appears to ignore the
mediaprefs=gif cookie (and the downloads section is completely
inaccessible in every Lynx version I have).
Jochem
Yes, I agree that if a decent discussion is started about it then it seems
like Sean Christian jump right in a get something done.
But this guy was taking it way to far!
And then starts insulting members and saying that he wants to aggravate us.
If the guy had a brain cell and a half he'd realize
Paul Hastings wrote:
i come from a rather bandwidth poor part of the world was prepared for
p*ss-poor performance. i was surprised at how well bandwidth was used, even
the slower portions didn't seem that slow.
Overall, I find the site rather slow when using the Flash version. I
don't know
Joe Eugene wrote:
If the issue is a CFMX issue, then you do not have to pay anything.
What else do u think it is?
The other option is a bug in the Oracle ODBC drivers.
The CF MX ODBC Service is the most likely candidate for being the cause
of this problem, but I don't think it is the only
Joe Eugene wrote:
I got the JDBC driver working. The purpose of this whole post
is to find out why the CFMX ODBC Agent/Server is not working/stable?
I never saw any MM documentation saying that CFMX ODBC Connections are
NOT Stable or NOT supposed to work.
How much documentation do you
~sends you to the feedback page on the MM site~
http://www.macromedia.com/bin/webfeedback.cgi
Tell them not us.
Stephen
CF-Europe 2003
May 29-30th 2003
Olympia Conference Centre London
http://www.cf-europe.org/
- Original Message -
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
LOL!
- Original Message -
From: Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: ODBC Problems?
Joe Eugene wrote:
I got the JDBC driver working. The purpose of this whole post
is to find out why the CFMX ODBC
samcfug wrote:
While you may post what are obvious bugs to a wish list, that is not in reality
a bug tracking system.
If you have a bug, call Macromedia. Yes, they ask for your creditcard
number. No, they won't bill you if it is really a bug (I have *never*
been billed and Macromedia
Hello Keith,
I'm interested in doing this, pending some clarification.
If they are just looking for HTML based updates I do that for $20/hr
Canadian. If they are looking for a dynamic backend to be developed (a
la ColdFusion) I do that for $40/hr Canadian.
I've done web editing/design and
Please accept my apologies for posting my reply to this to the list. I
truly regret that.
Truly,
Guy J. McDowell, M.M.C.P.
(705) 324-9144 ex 3422
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sir Sandford Fleming College
Frost Campus
P.O. Box 8000
Lindsay, Ontario
K9V 5E6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using ColdFusion 5 Enterprise Edition. I have 2 separate oracle
databases that cannot communicate to each other, but the web server can
communicate to them individually. I am pulling back data from to queries as
such.
Query 1:
Machine1 null Loc1
Machine2 null Loc2
Hey all,
Have a Rate of Returns report that uses a simple CFGRAPH to turn the results into a
pie chart.
I then use the HTML generated within the HTMLDOCS custom tag CF_HTML2PDF3 to convert
the report into a PDF
Gives me errors like
Unable to read image file
A while ago I downloaded the aforementioned tag.
Does anyone know where it can be downloaded again and where I can find documentation
for it?
Tks/Rgds
Paolo Cesana
IT Development Mgr.
Electricity is not the result of a series of upgrades to the candle
Auth. unknown
Miami International
Greetings,
I have a job where I need to create a file on a client
PC and populate it with data pulled off an sql server.
How can I create a file on a client PC?
How shoud I go about this in a CF / IE environment?
Thanks
Mike
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Congratulations to Sean and all the team.
The new site is great.
I like very much the new design and the way the site and the information are
organized.
One little simple detail that I enjoy, it remembers your latest selection in
the home page.
For example, if you have choosen Products
You can not create a file on the client smachine for obvious security reasons.
However, you can create a file on the server.
-Original Message-
From: mike sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Interact with client file system
Thank you for all the reponses. The web management position has been
filled, but it sure makes me feel like I'm not alone with all the great
correspondence I received. Thanks to each and every one of you!
~|
Archives:
Actually,
It is possible both on netscape and IE, however it does depend on the
security settings.
WG
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 14:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Interact with client file system
You can not create a
AHHH nobody seems to have mentioned the fact the site looks like horses*it
to me ;)
The stupid flash just loops loading over and over.
I cant even see it with opera, and if they don't have a QA Dept then i'm a
little worried.
If they also don't care about 10% and growing portion of the browser
I think that the key here is running CFMX as a
named user. I couldn't get it to work when it
ran as system.
I suspect this is because you're using a trusted connection with your SQL
Server ODBC connection. If you use a native SQL Server login, you should be
able to run CFMX as whatever you
Are you in a position where the ie clients have activex enabled and
will trust the site, and what kind of file are you creating?
CF has no ability to interact with the client file system, but you
could use some client side jscript/vbscript and the
System.FileSyetemObject, or something like
I've been using Mercury mail for almost a year without any real problems.
Two things though, it doesn't run as a service and the support for it is not
that great. I'm looking for a new server because I'm not that happy with my
experiance.
Phillip B.
- Original Message -
From: jon roig
Yeah, not to add fuel to the fire, but I can't see it at all in Opera 7.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/05/03 08:00AM
AHHH nobody seems to have mentioned the fact the site looks like
horses*it
to me ;)
The stupid flash just loops loading over and over.
I cant even see it with opera, and if they don't
I am not the ONLY person that has complained about
CFMX ODBX Problems, others here have reported the
problem as well. Switching to a JDBC driver is not
the answer to CFMX ODBC problems.
It might be, actually. I would recommend that you try
it out, if you have a JDBC driver
Marcromedia needs to stop it with all their flash everywhere... it's bad design, slow
and confusing in many regards...
They keep changing the groupings of things as well ... quite a pain this morning to
find the Exchanges... had to use the site map
That corner loading/initiaing thing is
Me neither...
:-(
Yves
-Original Message-
From: Willy Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 5, 2003 11:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: New MM.com
Yeah, not to add fuel to the fire, but I can't see it at all in Opera 7.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/05/03 08:00AM
AHHH nobody seems to
You should be able to find cfx_jzip on the macromedia exchange site. I think you have
to pay for that one, but I wrote a similar tag called jcompress which is written in
java and is free on the mm exchange. Or you could use cfobject to use the winzip or
pkzip executable.
Jeff
yea i'm opera 7.01
- Original Message -
From: Willy Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: New MM.com
Yeah, not to add fuel to the fire, but I can't see it at all in Opera 7.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/05/03 08:00AM
AHHH
I can't say I am too happy with the new site (it was nice to look at first
off and in all honesty: It seems a gimmick), but I cant see how you could
have failed to find the exchanges : www.macromedia.com/exchange
-Original Message-
From: paris lundis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05
To clairfy,
The data or file is processed by a custom 3rd party
driver for a output device slaved to the client PC.
I talked to the dirver developer and he wants a file
that he can process with his VB program without
getting into http gets (I think the best way to go
would be to cffile the
Is it for intranet usage?
Could you perhaps put the file on a share on the client machine then?
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
I like the new site a lot. MM had to make a big MX statement and they've
certainly done that. Congrats to everyone involved.
Although, I am disappointed that it doesn't validate to w3c standards...
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.macromedia.com
--
Kay Smoljak
Sure, but you might want to apply a bit of common sense. Macromedia isn't
going to say ODBC connections don't work, but they do say they
won't work as
well as pure JDBC connections.
There is no COMMON Sense to apply here. Everything worked while
we were testing CFMX. Obviously..since we didnt
How much documentation do you need? I see not recommended and I
interpret that as code language for has a 50% chance of failure.
Can you point me to the CFMX Release Notes that says
ODBC Connections are not recommended in CFMX?
Joe Eugene
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten
I'm surprised MM would launch this site given:
- Jakob Neilson (and other usability professionals) are going to
be watching
- They are trying to 'sell sell sell' the idea that Flash has
matured and is now faster, friendlier, etc.
For my own interest, I checked out the site in several
Come on guys... it is a Beta version.
Is there only never happy people on this list?
Marcromedia needs to stop it with all their flash everywhere...
it's bad design, slow and confusing in many regards...
I disagree about the bad design and confusing things arguments (...
agree about the slow
You know, I tried this and it did work, I am just not
convinced that it is the best way. I am really trying
to eliminate prossible client problems (hidden share
maybe?)
Mike
--- Hugo Ahlenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it for intranet usage?
Could you perhaps put the file on a share on the
I suspect the browsers which are failing such as Netscape is due to the fact
the Flash Player is out of date (I think we are up to 6,0,79,0 or
something?!)
-Original Message-
From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 15:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: New
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 10:11 AM, paris lundis wrote:
They keep changing the groupings of things as well ... quite a pain
this morning to find the Exchanges... had to use the site map
The locations of sections and applications on the site should not have
changed, although in many
Well, the only way to driectly interact with the client's file system
from a browser is going to be ActiveX/.Net, or a java applet.
How about sending the file as a file type that opens by default in
this guys program though? Just like acrobat will open if you click on
a pdf, or winamp opens when
Costas
When you say connections are you talking about simultaneous concurrent
requests?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Costas Piliotis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 00:42
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: win 2000 professional for web server?
Actually, win2k pro will
You can do it the other way around: map a share on the server out to the
clients...
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
If you have a bug, call Macromedia. Yes, they ask for your creditcard
number. No, they won't bill you if it is really a bug (I have *never*
been billed and Macromedia support is on the speed dial).
If you have a feature request, submit it to the wishform.
I hope you are not suggesting i call
Joe Eugene wrote:
How much documentation do you need? I see not recommended and I
interpret that as code language for has a 50% chance of failure.
Can you point me to the CFMX Release Notes that says
ODBC Connections are not recommended in CFMX?
Not release notes, the normal manuals.
quote
The new macromedia.com is certainly a next generation site, and
unfortunately, there are going to be issues like the ones you mention
below. I hope people can take the time to let us know when they find
things like this by going to the following URL:
The best why to do this is to give the file to download a extension .myext
and associate the VB app with that file. So when downloading the file the
browser will
* save this file
* open with myVBapp
Choose 2 and off you go
WG
-Original Message-
From: mike sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL
Well, yeah, but shouldn't it decay properly, and let me know I don't
have the latest plugin? Instead, I get a blank page. I'd get fired for
deploying a page that didn't properly detect my plugin version. I
develop in ColdFusion *and Flash*! My plugin is pretty current.
Willy
[EMAIL
Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 11:02:27 AM, you wrote:
CC We know there are still some rough edges, and we will get them worked
CC out. Just keep in mind that this project was a massive effort, so it
CC will take a little time to get all the kinks worked out.
This would be the crux of the matter to
jon said:
Well, the only way to driectly interact with the client's file system
from a browser is going to be ActiveX/.Net, or a java applet.
Actually that isn't fully correct, it is possible to access the local file
system via Javascript.
Both by design and accident. Depends on permissions.
Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 7:02:08 AM, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Overall, I find the site rather slow when using the Flash version. ...
I agree. I really dislike the new site.
As a result, I switched to the HTML version.
I guess I missed the option to do this. Where is it?
--
Chris
If it's a beta version, why is it public then?
I mean, I wouldn't think that it's a good practice to put your beta's
directly out to the public.
Just my 2 cents.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Benoit Hediard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:00 AM
To:
That is an interesting idea.
--- jon hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the only way to driectly interact with the
client's file system
from a browser is going to be ActiveX/.Net, or a
java applet.
How about sending the file as a file type that opens
by default in
this guys program
Joe Eugene wrote:
If you have a bug, call Macromedia. Yes, they ask for your creditcard
number. No, they won't bill you if it is really a bug (I have *never*
been billed and Macromedia support is on the speed dial).
If you have a feature request, submit it to the wishform.
I hope you are not
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 10:59 AM, Benoit Hediard wrote:
They keep changing the groupings of things as well ... quite a
pain this morning to find the Exchanges... had to use the site map
Not very hard...
Select Product ColdFusion MX on the home page, and then you'll get
a
Tried to use opera 7 and it just keeps reloading the main page.
-Original Message-
From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: New Macromedia.com launched!
Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 11:02:27 AM, you wrote:
CC We know
Does MM really think that all developers have broadband??? I'm on a lan
now, and it takes a while to load. I can't imagine how long it will
take my home PC on a dial-up.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Cookson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 4:45 AM
To:
Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 11:18:36 AM, you wrote:
jon said:
Well, the only way to driectly interact with the client's file system
from a browser is going to be ActiveX/.Net, or a java applet.
w Actually that isn't fully correct, it is possible to access the local file
w system via Javascript.
One thing to keep in mind is that while Opera may have 10% of the market
(does it?), that does not mean that 10% of people who visit the Macromedia
site have it. It may be a much smaller percentage.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Bill Wheatley [EMAIL
The exchange is linked from the Download page, which itself is linked from
virtually every page on the site.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: paris lundis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They keep changing the groupings of things as well ... quite a pain this
morning to
I noticed on the product page that Homesite is referred to as The HTML
hand-coding tool with a cult following Cult following? Stable, fast and
easy-to-use now qualify for marginalized status? Man, this Kool-Aid is
delicious!
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: Chris Montgomery
Benoit -
First point, if it's beta, why is it on their production site? Furthermore, it fails
some of the most basic requirements (i.e. document validity). Moreover, it doesn't
even have alt tags on some images.
Second, Flash, in of itself, may not be bad design or confusing, but it certainly
Yeah, just what I was saying.
I migrated 1ish users for an isp (a generated dailup config file
depending on location, username etc) like this.
Worked well. That was in CF2 I think!!!
WG
-Original Message-
From: mike sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 16:25
To:
If it's a beta version, why is it public then?
Sometimes when you are trying to experiment new things, you don't have any
choices than to experiment live.
Look at Google News (http://news.google.com/), it has been launch to the
public several months ago (nearly a year) and it is still Google
Buried under accessibility, unfortunately.
Mike Wokasch
**
Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 7:02:08 AM, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Overall, I find the site rather slow when using the Flash version. ...
I agree. I really dislike the new site.
As a result, I
And that matters why exactly? More to the point, it could also mean that the
percentage could be higher.
It's still not an excuse for it not working or validating.
Mike Wokasch
**
One thing to keep in mind is that while Opera may have 10% of the market
That is the biggest load of BS i've heard all day. Its a website!
Test the crap before you upload it, if you dont have a QA deptment get one.
If you do have one fire the people because they obviously don't know what
they are doing.
You can't release a site that doesn't even let you see the front
And nothing against you Christian i'm sure if it was upto you
they would test these things first so you didn't have to listen to us
complain :)
- Original Message -
From: Christian Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:12 AM
Subject:
Would that be a reason why the 10% doesn't visit the site then?
-s
-Original Message-
From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: New MM.com
One thing to keep in mind is that while Opera may have 10% of the market
My reaction would be to bitch. My solution would be to only use CFCs
after rigorous testing
LOL.. Interesting...quite different approaches!.
Anyways.. to end the topic... I already submitted the problem..
right after Sean/Mike gave me the Bug forum/Wish List site link.
The only 2 confirmations
Yea but the issue with the mm home page is that it takes initially a
while to load, then every click I make has this sluggishness to it, and
most of the buttons create a page request which seems contradict
macromedia flashes power of reducing http requests.
On a few flash lists I am active on
Not release notes, the normal manuals.
How many of us have read the entire CFMX Manual?
Should have in the Release notes in BOLD like.
We do not Expect ODBC Connections to work properly in CFMX,
We recommend you use JDBC drivers
Joe Eugene
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van
I appreciate that you guys are getting hammered here. I should have
thought you'd have expected it. I also hear you getting defensive, and
I can really understand that, too. I've been there.
That not withstanding, what you've essentially said here is this:
Whatever percentage the Opera
-- Original Message --
From: Benoit Hediard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Come on guys... it is a Beta version.
If it's truly a Beta version as it says, then going to http://www.macromedia.com
should not go to the new site. It should go to the old site with a Check
1 - 100 of 284 matches
Mail list logo
