Re: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-07-10 Thread Michael Givens
I can now confirm (at least on my development server)... the 7.0.2 updater does NOT seem compatible with one of my older web service's WSDL (even upon rolling the older axis.jar back as Tom suggested). The 7.0.2 updater DOES work after making the modification that Andrew has mentioned -

Re: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-07-10 Thread Tom Jordahl
I can now confirm (at least on my development server)... the 7.0.2 updater does NOT seem compatible with one of my older web service's WSDL (even upon rolling the older axis.jar back as Tom suggested). The 7.0.2 updater DOES work after making the modification that Andrew has mentioned -

Re: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-07-10 Thread Michael Givens
Tom, thanks for the feedback. I agree 100% that the WSDL is invalid (Mindreef's Soapscope tool revealed the WSDL to have 6 errors related to message attributes being in the input and output tags. Oddly, but the same invalid WSDL was working on our development server (and still is on our

Re: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-07-10 Thread Michael Givens
Tom, thanks for the feedback. I agree 100% that the WSDL is invalid (Mindreef's SoapScope tool revealed the WSDL to have 6 errors related to message attributes being in the input and output tags). Oddly, but the same invalid WSDL was working on our development server (and still is on our

Re: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-07-07 Thread Tom Jordahl
I ran into the same issue with one of our web services after upgrading to the 7.0.2 Updater. Could not generate stub objects for web service invocation. Name: http://: http://. WSDLException (at /definitions/binding/operation[1]/input): faultCode=INVALID_WSDL: Encountered illegal

Re: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-07-07 Thread Michael Givens
Hi Tom. Thanks for your reply. The WSDL is browse-able with IE and FireFox, so at least it's well-formed. Of note: it's the same WSDL that runs fine under CFMX 7.0.1 hotfix 2. In fact we rolled our affected server back to 7.0.1 yesterday and the web service's WSDL is working again. Here's the

RE: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-07-07 Thread Andrew Stevens
Subject: Re: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation? Hi Tom. Thanks for your reply. The WSDL is browse-able with IE and FireFox, so at least it's well-formed. Of note: it's the same WSDL that runs fine under CFMX 7.0.1 hotfix 2. In fact we rolled our affected server back to 7.0.1 yesterday

Re: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-07-06 Thread Michael Givens
I ran into the same issue with one of our web services after upgrading to the 7.0.2 Updater. Could not generate stub objects for web service invocation. Name: http://: http://. WSDLException (at /definitions/binding/operation[1]/input): faultCode=INVALID_WSDL: Encountered illegal

RE: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-07-04 Thread Kevin Aebig
] Sent: July 1, 2006 1:08 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation? Um, I was referring to the WSDL of a webservice... no CFC here :) The webservice wasn't built in CF either. I couldn't consume the webservice using CFMX7.0.2, so we saved the WSDL to file and changed some

RE: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-07-01 Thread Andrew Stevens
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 1 July 2006 5:46 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation? Andrew, I'm not familiar with INPUT tags being part of the CFC set of tags...can you enlighten me? TIA Cheers Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP Director of E-Commerce Development

RE: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-06-30 Thread Andrew Stevens
. -Original Message- From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 30 June 2006 1:59 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation? You could try saving the WSDL locally and editing it yourself to correct the problem. On 6/30/06, Andrew Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED

7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-06-29 Thread Andrew Stevens
Hi I've just upgraded some servers to 7.0.2. We have a web service that previously worked fine. Now the WSDL is no longer acceptable/valid; Name: http://*/. WSDL: http://. WSDLException (at /definitions/binding/operation[1]/input): faultCode=INVALID_WSDL: Encountered illegal extension

Re: 7.0.2 Updater - tighter WSDL validation?

2006-06-29 Thread James Holmes
You could try saving the WSDL locally and editing it yourself to correct the problem. On 6/30/06, Andrew Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I've just upgraded some servers to 7.0.2. We have a web service that previously worked fine. Now the WSDL is no longer acceptable/valid; Name: