Thank you all for the great answers.
I would like to throw a (potential) monkey wrench into the situation by saying,
that we develop on a common set of files.
How does that play into things?
Once again thanks for your time.
On 6/10/2010 6:59 PM, Michael Christensen wrote:
Thank you all for the great answers.
I would like to throw a (potential) monkey wrench into the situation by
saying, that we develop on a common set of files.
How does that play into things?
If that is the case then the distributed
It's a really good question, and one that I have no real good answer for.
I think if you are used to working on a common set of files, you do things a
little bit differently than when you have your own copy.
We rarely have the issue of people leaving broken files, not in the least
because
[mailto:mich...@strib.dk]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 October 2010 8:29 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?
It's a really good question, and one that I have no real good answer for.
I think if you are used to working on a common set of files, you do
,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Michael Christensen [mailto:mich...@strib.dk]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 October 2010 8:29 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?
It's a really good question, and one that I have
remember that you get what you pay for :-)
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Childress [mailto:camer...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 2:27 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: What version-/source control are you
We're using SVN and it's great. Throws a fit sometimes if you don't follow
the procedures exactly but it's solid.
andy
-Original Message-
From: Michael Christensen [mailto:mich...@strib.dk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:35 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: What version-/source control
September 2010 11:35 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?
We're thinking about setting up version-/source control for our CF code.
What are people out there using? What works, what doesn't
On 28/09/2010 23:34, Michael Christensen wrote:
We're thinking about setting up version-/source control for our CF code.
What are people out there using? What works, what doesn't?
We use both SVN and Mercurial (Hg).
The outside world has SVN to download from but internaly we have
staggered
Actually I disagree with what is best to go with based on your OS.
It is all going to boil down to your requirements, for us we needed to know
what changes had been made at the ticket level. And as we already had Jira
installed it was a no brainer to use Subversion to do this.
What this means
http://www.visualsvn.com
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Michael Christensen mich...@strib.dkwrote:
We're thinking about setting up version-/source control for our CF code.
What are people out there using? What works, what doesn't?
...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 September 2010 12:12
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?
http://www.visualsvn.com
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Michael Christensen
mich...@strib.dkwrote:
We're thinking about setting up version-/source control for our CF
On 29/09/2010 9:28 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
I have used this and it works great. Be careful not to listen to the
Linux-fanboys they slag this off purely because it is a windows solution,
however it does exactly what it says on the tin, I have never had any issues
with it.
I might add to my
: Michael Christensen [mailto:mich...@strib.dk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:35 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?
We're thinking about setting up version-/source control for our CF code.
What are people out there using? What works, what doesn't
Not to mention it's is free, and great support.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Kym Kovan [mailto:dev-li...@mbcomms.net.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 September 2010 9:50 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: What version-/source control are you using
-talk
Subject: Re: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?
On 29/09/2010 9:28 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
I have used this and it works great. Be careful not to listen to the
Linux-fanboys they slag this off purely because it is a windows solution,
however it does exactly what
The Big 3 out there right now are Subversion, Mercurial, and Git. I
personally use Subversion and Git, and they're both good.
Whatever you do, stay away from Vault/Fortress from Sourcegear. That's
what we're forced to use at work. It's labeled as a VSS replacement,
and while it is a little
, but I'm
interested in Mercurial.
Thanks
Will
-Original Message-
From: Kym Kovan [mailto:dev-li...@mbcomms.net.au]
Sent: 29 September 2010 12:50
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?
On 29/09/2010 9:28 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
I have
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Bobby Hartsfield bo...@acoderslife.com wrote:
I was always a fan of SVN... until I used perforce. Now I am a bigger fan of
perforce :-)
Perforce! Changelists! Workspaces! Labels! Very cool stuff that I
haven't seen in alot of other tools.
Perforce ain't
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Michael Christensen mich...@strib.dk wrote:
We're thinking about setting up version-/source control for our CF code.
What are people out there using? What works, what doesn't?
These days I'm using git for everything possible. Previously I was
using SVN. Most
What I like about git is the ability to work offline and still commit
changes, the lightweight branches and generally easier merging.
I also like that you have a copy of the entire repository, if you use hosting
it makes it very easy to change hosts.
Currently though I am using the hosted
We're thinking about setting up version-/source control for our CF code.
What are people out there using? What works, what doesn't?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
22 matches
Mail list logo
