FYI In light of the implementation work, I've made some updates to the
design doc (changes highlighted in red.)
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfbnm49n_0dpc7pxpx
In particular, we discovered 4.1 events have over taken us and there's now a
HostContentSettings component to integrate the
Yaar, Digging through my inbox I just realized I entirely missed this email,
sorry! Belated comments inline
On 2 December 2009 19:50, Yaar Schnitman y...@chromium.org wrote:
Jonathan, this is a great design and the mocks are beautiful!
Two comments:
1. I think there should be a way for the
2009/12/2 Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org
I'd expect the icons in the mocks to be BSD licensed, which means
you'd be free to use them in Firefox if you liked them. Does Firefox
already have Geolocation iconography that we should consider?
Firefox does not currently have any iconography for
Does Firefox already have Geolocation iconography that we should
consider?
Not yet, geolocation landed late in our ship cycle so I just grabbed a
very generic set of globe icons we already had sitting around designed
for every platform's aesthetic.
We are working on some ideas now, and
Jonathan, this is a great design and the mocks are beautiful!
Two comments:
1. I think there should be a way for the user to say hey, the location
provider is wrong, I'm not in Kansas. I'm in mountain view CA!. Desktop
users would want to manually set it to some address. Cnn.com currently
thinks
Should the various browser vendors try to use common iconography for
geolocation, similar to how a standard symbol for Web Feeds emerged?
The external consistency would likely help users as they moved between
multiple apps and sites that support geolocation.
-Alex
On Nov 28, 2009, at 5:07
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Alex Faaborg faab...@mozilla.com wrote:
Should the various browser vendors try to use common iconography for
geolocation, similar to how a standard symbol for Web Feeds emerged?
The external consistency would likely help users as they moved between
multiple
1) Why green? The other infobars in the product are yellow.
Historically, green in browsers has signaled extended validation.
We had intended to use a few differently-colored infobars for a while,
but a more recent discussion (which got out of sync with the geo team;
my fault) has trimmed it
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Glen Murphy g...@chromium.org wrote:
1) Why green? The other infobars in the product are yellow.
Historically, green in browsers has signaled extended validation.
We had intended to use a few differently-colored infobars for a while,
but a more recent
I'd expect the icons in the mocks to be BSD licensed, which means
you'd be free to use them in Firefox if you liked them. Does Firefox
already have Geolocation iconography that we should consider? The
right folks to get on board are the members of the UI team. Glen's
probably the right person
I am implementung the geolocation API (http://www.w3.org/TR/geolocation-API/)
in Chromium using the WebKit native bindings. Here is a short design doc for
the changes:
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfbnm49n_0dpc7pxpx
If you have any comments or questions please feel free to direct them to me.
Nice mocks. A few questions:
1) Why green? The other infobars in the product are yellow.
Historically, green in browsers has signaled extended validation.
2) Is there any difference in presentation for SSL versus non-SSL
sites? From the mocks, it looks like we're showing the host name but
not
12 matches
Mail list logo
