strong recommendation on the direct cable for failover; you may risk a
split-brain scenario otherwise.
--
robbie
Ryan West
rw...@zyedge.com
m guys, i really appreciate your recommendation, but we are
talking here about 2 distinct data centers, where the 2 ASA chassis
will be separated by a L2 dwdm link. so i can't use a cable for
failover, but only a vlan carrying traffic destined to a subinterface
into the default context.
in any
NSP'ers,
For unfortunate reasons I am asking the collective if there is a way to do
VRF-lite style segragation for layer-2 interfaces. Situation is that I have
a 6509, and I need to make a single blade on the chassis have a completely
separate VLAN database from the rest of the chassis,
On 06.04.2011, at 18:23, randal k cisco...@data102.com
Situation is that I have
a 6509, and I need to make a single blade on the chassis have a completely
separate VLAN database from the rest of the chassis, effectively letting me
use a VLAN twice on the chassis without allowing them to talk
On 04/06/2011 05:16 PM, randal k wrote:
NSP'ers,
For unfortunate reasons I am asking the collective if there is a way to do
VRF-lite style segragation for layer-2 interfaces. Situation is that I have
a 6509, and I need to make a single blade on the chassis have a completely
separate VLAN
On 06.04.2011 18:16, randal k wrote:
NSP'ers,
For unfortunate reasons I am asking the collective if there is a way to do
VRF-lite style segragation for layer-2 interfaces. Situation is that I have
a 6509, and I need to make a single blade on the chassis have a completely
separate VLAN
Nexus 7k configured with two VDCs... Have a spare $150,000 to solve the
problem? :-)
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of randal k
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:16 AM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp]
Den 05/04/2011 kl. 12.32 skrev Daniel Holme:
On 5 April 2011 10:49, Reuben Farrelly reuben-cisco-...@reub.net wrote:
Approximately 200kbit/s throughput.
Sounds somewhat like the translation is being punted to software/CPU rather
than done in hardware. I was seeing similar figures when I
We are in need of a Cisco NSE-150 Board or complete Cisco7304-NSE-150 unit
U.S.Computer Exchange, Inc.
Robert M. Campbell
Account Manager
32106 Woodward Ave.
Royal Oak, Michigan 48073
Tollfree: (800) 711-9000
Phone: (248) 583-9000
Fax: (248) 583-9009
Email:rob...@usce.org
There are virtual-switches on Juniper MXs which do precisely what you are
asking
for. Each virtual-switch has the entire VLAN space and their own spanning-tree
configuration.
From: Garry g...@gmx.de
To: randal k cisco...@data102.com
Cc: cisco-nsp
EVC with split horizon can also achieve something similar but I am not
sure if 6500 supports it.
-Waris
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Garry
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:34 PM
To: randal k
Cc:
Hi all,
A bit of background...
We are preparing to deploy our first pair of 6509s with a SUP720-3B supervisors
and WS-X6548-GE-TX line cards (we may also have a few WS-X6748-GE-TX cards as
well). These will be used for core/customer distribution primarily, with a pair
of Juniper M7i routers
On Apr 6, 2011, at 6:22 PM, TCIS List Acct lista...@tulsaconnect.com wrote:
Hi all,
A bit of background...
We are preparing to deploy our first pair of 6509s with a SUP720-3B
supervisors and WS-X6548-GE-TX line cards (we may also have a few
WS-X6748-GE-TX cards as well). These will be
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Wil Schultz wrote:
Not netflow, but I use cacti to graph all switchports and aggregate
ports as needed into 95th percentile. Works well and there aren't any
load concerns on the switchside.
That's the easiest way...but the trouble is, cacti can't ignore local
traffic (so
On Apr 7, 2011, at 8:44 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
I suspect there will be switch processor load issues if you do more than some
form of sampled netflow,
6500 with current hardware doesn't support sampled NetFlow. It supports NDE
export sampling, which isn't the same thing, at all.
;
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 6, 2011, at 9:44 PM, Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org wrote:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Wil Schultz wrote:
Not netflow, but I use cacti to graph all switchports and aggregate ports as
needed into 95th percentile. Works well and there aren't any load concerns
on the
On 4/6/11 22:42 , Keegan Holley wrote:
Is there really any local traffic on an Internet feed? Also is there really any
local traffic that shouldn't be billed?
Local is a matter of perspective... if you assume it to just meant
router-to-customer control traffic, there's probably not much.
17 matches
Mail list logo
