[cmake-developers] [CMake 0011437]: Visual project generation for Intel Fortran targets: XML syntax error and missing source control variables

2010-11-10 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11437 == Reported By:Thomas Schuetzle Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0011440]: VS Plugin doesn't reload the solution in VS 2008

2010-11-10 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11440 == Reported By:James Bigler Assigned To:

Re: [CMake] cmake my_BouncyBall

2010-11-10 Thread luxInteg
On Tuesday 09 November 2010 17:35:08 Michael Hertling wrote: On 11/07/2010 03:37 PM, luxInteg wrote: On Sunday 07 November 2010 11:34:47 Richard Wackerbarth wrote: First let me suggest that you word your request in a more complete manner. What does not work? cant get an executable

Re: [CMake] help with learning add_library

2010-11-10 Thread luxInteg
On Monday 08 November 2010 18:10:01 Eric Noulard wrote: BUT suppose I decide to set file1.c and file2.c as some variable FILES and I want to use a preprocessor say DLONG could I do the following? set(FILES file1.c file2.c ) SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES(${FILES} PROPERTIES

Re: [CMake] Solution folder property does not work for external projects in cmake 2.8.3

2010-11-10 Thread David Cole
Filed and fixed this bug : http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11436 Should be fixed by this commit, just merged to 'next' : http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=b3cf739e2c784fbd6c8a93c1ac91bd4bcea5acbf Please confirm, if you can build from CMake 'next'... Thanks! By the

[CMake] Who needs daylight savings time, anyway?

2010-11-10 Thread David Cole
Blog post I pushed today that might help you with your Nightly Start Time around this time of year -- if you find yourself adjusting things every six months to account for daylight savings time, please stop the madness. :-) http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/77 Express your project's nightly

Re: [CMake] Include Directories Cleanup/Remove Prior Entries

2010-11-10 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Jeremy Torres wrote: I have a question regarding removing prior entries from include_directories. Specifically, in a CMakeLists.txt, I have several targets. For example: # target 1 include_directories(x y z) add_executable(my_exe ...) #target 2

Re: [CMake] Bug fix requests for the *next* release of CMake...

2010-11-10 Thread David Cole
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Adam J Richardson fat...@crackmonkey.us wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, Replies requested. CMake is already pretty awesome from my POV, but since you ask... Replies on this thread should just be a collector for bug numbers.

Re: [CMake] 2.8.3 fortran regression

2010-11-10 Thread Brad King
On 11/09/2010 08:03 AM, Brad King wrote: I think this regression was an existing bug that was exposed by the other fix. It was, and here is the fix to the exposed bug: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=3d79e7d5 I also added the runtime library selection flag mapping

Re: [CMake] Bug fix requests for the *next* release of CMake...

2010-11-10 Thread David Cole
Thanks to all of you who have participated in this thread so far... You have helped to create the initial roadmap for CMake 2.8.4: http://www.cmake.org/Bug/roadmap_page.php The roadmap currently lists 31 issues as targeted for CMake 2.8.4. What that means is: these are the 31 issues currently

Re: [CMake] 2.8.3 fortran regression

2010-11-10 Thread Allen D Byrne
I will try it tomorrow, when the machines are idle. Thanks, Allen On 11/09/2010 08:03 AM, Brad King wrote: I think this regression was an existing bug that was exposed by the other fix. It was, and here is the fix to the exposed bug:

Re: [CMake] Bug fix requests for the *next* release of CMake...

2010-11-10 Thread Sean McBride
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:30:46 -0500, David Cole said: If there are still others to consider for the 2.8.4 release, please reply here with just the bug numbers. Please do not hijack this thread to talk about specifics. Bug numbers only please. I really appreciate the vast majority here who have

Re: [CMake] Bug fix requests for the *next* release of CMake...

2010-11-10 Thread James Bigler
Since the VS Plugin broken in 2010 bug ( http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11258) was added to the roadmap, here's another bug that I noticed with the VS plugin. VS Plugin doesn't reload the solution in VS 2008 http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11440 Thanks, James

Re: [CMake] Bug fix requests for the *next* release of CMake...

2010-11-10 Thread David Cole
By the way, I have also targeted the 10 oldest still open bugs for this release. I am thinking most of those can simply be closed, (they're either fixed already or irrelevant after several years have passed) but will leave it up to the people assigned them to decide whether they should be kept

[CMake] Support for MacRuby?

2010-11-10 Thread Dave Abrahams
Macruby (http://macruby.org)'s installer is a bit unusual: It will install MacRuby in /Library/Frameworks and provide shortcuts to its executable utilities in /usr/local/bin, with a mac prefix. For example, ruby will be available as macruby, and irb as macirb. It would be nice if the

Re: [CMake] Support for MacRuby?

2010-11-10 Thread David Cole
Looks like FindRuby.cmake is unclaimed in terms of a CMake module maintainer (according to this page: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Module_Maintainers ) -- but it looks like Alex has done the majority of maintenance on it in the last 2 years or so. What do you think, Alex? Thx, David C. On

Re: [CMake] fun with Boost - swap absolute library path for -L and -l?

2010-11-10 Thread David M . Lee
Adam J Richardson fat...@... writes: (That is, if I manually separate C:\Compilers\Libs\libboost_thread-mgw44-mt-1_44.a into -LC:\Compilers\Libs -lboost_thread-mgw44-mt-1_44.) Is there a way to have CMake do this by itself and not use absolute paths? I've tried setting CMP0003 to OLD but it

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.3-588-g72fe00a

2010-11-10 Thread David Cole
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 72fe00a8ad204742de4ad5c9c5948df6851b0f6b (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.3-590-g0ba03a0

2010-11-10 Thread David Cole
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 0ba03a02a29bff03645ab14ff2140d277e5c6021 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.3-593-gb40ecb4

2010-11-10 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via b40ecb48751886e8f80d6014a0cec7a314770d99 (commit) via