On 10/26/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is 1.1 trunk at a point that I can put it to use . erm . in
production?
Well, I *was* going to say I'm running it straight from a svn
checkout, but now it won't build.
I thought it was CONTINUUM-970, but that's closed.
On 10/26/06, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and its been fixed up now :)
Thanks, Jesse. :) I think Rahul is already convinced, but I'll just
offer that I'm running it from a svn checkout, and since the
occasional 'mvn clean' wipes out the configuration, I've recorded
Selenium tests
On 12/20/06, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest to not use mvn jetty:run on continuum-webapp for the moment, you can
run the plexus runtime instead.
I added some notes on building and the various ways to deploy the
Continuum webapp:
If I remove all the roles from the guest user [1] and log out, I can
still see everything from project groups down to build results.
Is this being worked on already?
[1] including the mysterious 'Guest' role, which, once removed, is not
in the list of Available Roles
--
Wendy
In 1.1-SNAPSHOT, on 'Create New User', I can create an account with no
password, even though the two password fields have asterisks displayed
next to them.
If I then edit the user and uncheck the 'Change Password Next Login'
box, the user can log in without a password.
Should this be possible?
I'm having trouble with new user registration. (The
creation-verification-change password flow works, but so do some
things that shouldn't.)
1. Register for an account
2. Ignore the confirmation email
3. Attempt to log in with the new userid. Leave the password blank
4. You are prompted to
On 12/26/06, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
imo, yes :)
only the administrator has the ability to make those decisions and
they ought to be allowed to do it...
Works for me, but let's fix the UI so the password fields are not
marked with an asterisk if they're not actually
On 11/28/06, Christian Edward Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey. Just FYI, in the trunk the unauthenticated user (and other
logged-in, unempowered users) can create new project groups.
Thanks, this appears to be fixed in the latest code. (The 'Add
project group' button no longer appears.)
On 12/22/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I remove all the roles from the guest user [1] and log out, I can
still see everything from project groups down to build results.
Is this being worked on already?
[1] including the mysterious 'Guest' role, which, once removed
On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a clean checkout of the trunk, running on XP with JDK 1.5.0_06 and maven
2.0.4
It also builds fine here on WinXP, JDK 1.5.0_10 and Maven 2.0.4 or
2.0.5-SNAPSHOT.
(However, I've seen odd intermittent problems before, especially on
On 1/5/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw it yesterday too. I actually had the problem before svn kicked
in, as far as I could tell. ie, retrieving POMs might be the problem.
Yes, it happens as soon as I add an ASF project with a lot of modules,
such as
A couple of problems with Continuum 1.1-SNAPSHOT on the MyFaces zone:
1. Missing author/date/revision of the scm change
2. Foreign key contraint violation SQL Exception
--
Wendy
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] commits@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Feb 5, 0007 8:23
I need more info on running the tests in the continuum-webapp-test
module. After starting the selenium server and servlet container,
what do I need to do in IDEA to execute one of the test cases?
(I'll settle for Eclipse instructions, depending on who answers. :) )
On 2/15/07, Dan Tran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
change packaging type to jar, run eclipse:eclipse to generate project file,
and change the packaging type back.
... and then what? I need more details. :)
--
Wendy
On 2/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: oching
Date: Mon Feb 19 18:41:37 2007
New Revision: 509415
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=509415
Log:
Added isAuthorized* methods in ContinuumActionSupport for checking
authorization in action classes with different
On 3/1/07, Thierry Lach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using current sources patched for JBoss, I can't access the configuration
page. As the administrator, when I try to go there, I get the message
Authorization Error You are not authorized to access this page. Please
contact your administrator to
On 3/7/07, Erik Drolshammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I get write access to your wiki?
This space is open to the public:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Home
--
Wendy
I just noticed this
$ svn up
Fetching external item into 'continuum-rpc-client\src\main\mdo'
External at revision 515905.
At revision 515905.
It comes from
Author: evenisse
Date: Mon Feb 26 06:11:01 2007
New Revision: 511810
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=511810
Log:
Generate
On 4/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jmcconnell
Date: Tue Apr 17 14:24:19 2007
New Revision: 529769
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=529769
Log:
uping the version of the gpg plugin being used on the continuum-webapp to one
that supports the war artifact
On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its that time, to start releasing continuum in alpha to get some users
and feedback on it.
The fixes are far too numerous to specify a concise list of, hundred's
of jira's fixed and many new additions in functionality.
I have it staged at:
On 4/23/07, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, I got it fixed up..
http://people.apache.org/~jmcconnell/continuum/org/apache/maven/continuum/continuum-plexus-runtime/1.1-alpha-1/
that is the tar.gz and it has the license and notice in it so I think
we are good to go for this.
On 5/2/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to find the official release, and I can only find the file
in Jesse's home directory, and no announcement. Bit lost.
Can we do these?
- put in the main repo
- put in /dist/
- put on the website
- announce to lists / blogs
It's under
On 5/2/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As we've discussed, it's an official release and could be mirrored,
but for an early alpha, this seems appropriate to me.
Ack, that's what happens when half the conversation is taking place on
IRC -- I'm definitely in favor of linking it from
On 5/8/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I have more time on my hands (pretty much swamped atm with Jakarta and
work related things), I
will start having a look at continuum 1.1 and see if we can start using a more
standard version and
not have too much customized.
So in
In the FAQ [1] we say to uncomment an allowedScheme element in
apps/continuum/conf/application.xml to allow use of the file://
protocol.
However, the element doesn't exist there, and instead can only be
found down in
apps/continuum/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/plexus/application.xml
.
What
On 5/20/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it's possible to put it anywhere other than the webapp
META-INF location at this point, without changing the way it's
configured.
On the Deploying page on the wiki [1] there's a comment that You can
also copy and edit this file
The Jetty port for Continuum can now be pre-configured in conf/plexus.xml:
component
roleorg.codehaus.plexus.contextualizer.Contextualizer/role
role-hintjettyConfiguration/role-hint
implementationorg.codehaus.plexus.contextualizer.DefaultContextualizer/implementation
Is the Jetty Configuration section on this page up to date?
http://maven.apache.org/continuum/guides/mini/guide-configuration.html
I don't have access at the moment, but I'm pretty sure I'm using
Apache httpd and mod_proxy with ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse without
configuring anything at
On 7/1/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since all apache committers can commit in the sandbox area, is it a problem if
I do my things there,
instead of at my personal svn ?
I am not at the point yet to start coding though, but in case I am starting I
like to know the best
On 7/2/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
I can (sort of) get it to work if I visit
http://otherserver/apps/continuum/index.action. The complaint is that
Continuum is sending Location headers/redirects with hostnames in
them. That's apparently why
On 7/19/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, is anyone interested?
Me too... both Shale and MyFaces can move over. And Tiles, probably.
--
Wendy
On 7/19/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to do a release of the 1.1-beta-1
Can you please check the NOTICE files in both the Plexus app and the
standalone webapp?
They only say 'software developed at the ASF' when WEB-INF/lib at
least has things from Codehaus and
On 7/24/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know for know how to resolve it, so I think I can do the release
tomorrow morning and resolve it for beta-2. What do you think?
But if you know how to resolve it, you're welcome to fix it.
You have the votes for the release.
I'll
?
Thanks,
Wendy Smoak
On 7/24/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems I have the same conf for the resources plugin in Continuum and in
Archiva
The config was the same, but it was in pluginManagement rather than
plugins. It's fixed in r559411.
--
Wendy
On 7/25/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The vote has passed with
4 binding +1's from PMC members: Jesse, Wendy, Trygve, me
2 non-binding +1's from committers: Deng, Stephane
Correction: 4 binding +1's from PMC members: Jesse, Stephane, Trygve, Emmanuel
Stephane is on the
FYI, I moved this issue to PLXREDBACK and promptly lost the ability to
edit it. :(
See: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXREDBACK-95
(BTW, the reply-to on this was [EMAIL PROTECTED], not continuum-dev.)
--
Wendy
On 8/16/07, Brett Porter (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
On 8/17/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The maven/Continuum team is pleased to announce the Continuum 1.1-beta-2
release
...
http://maven.apache.org/continuum/download.html
I noticed this last time and didn't bring it up... we need to rename
the files to apache-continuum-1.1* .
On 8/17/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/17/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The maven/Continuum team is pleased to announce the Continuum 1.1-beta-2
release
...
http://maven.apache.org/continuum/download.html
I noticed this last time and didn't bring it up
I think the form for adding a new Installation should be split up into
one form for environment variables, and another for the Ant/Maven/JDK
installations.
The current web UI is confusing, we have a field marked as required
when it usually isn't, necessitating a long field label to try to
explain
On 9/4/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Wendy, can you file an issue?
Olivier, do you want to work on it?
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1430
I'm not really a fan of the two-step process, but it's already being
used for notifiers so we might as well be consistent.
I'm in need of an SCM Matrix for a Continuum talk... can someone
familiar with maven-scm take a look at the one on the wiki and let me
know if it's up to date?
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SCM/SCM+Matrix
Also, what columns are relevant for Continuum?
Thanks,
--
Wendy
I'm looking at the UI for the new things in Group Actions, and there's
some inconsistency.
The drop down needs a space, Choose a Build Definition (not BuildDefinition).
Everything else is capitalized, so the next one should be Build All Projects.
We have Edit, Delete Group, and Release. Either
When I add a multi-module project, the project group summary shows the
'cancel build' icon for the first project, and 'queued build' icons
for the rest.
This is incorrect, nothing is building or queued at that time.
If I navigate away and come back, it correctly shows the 'build
project' icon
On 9/10/07, LAMY Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, I think Choose a Build Definition is not very clear.
The best should be something like : You can choose a Build Definition but if
you don't the default one will be used.
But it's a little bit huge for a list box ;-) .
I wondered if
On 9/10/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
When I add a multi-module project, the project group summary shows the
'cancel build' icon for the first project, and 'queued build' icons
for the rest.
This is incorrect, nothing is building or queued
On 9/18/07, olivier lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to add some wink captures to the site (as adding a project for
newbies etc...)
Great idea. :)
As this files can be huge, I don't really want to add this in sources trunk
(It can be long to checkout the sources)
But in order to
On 9/20/07, fherrerav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to try this version using the database from beta-2 but I can't migrate
using the data tool I need a dependency. Where can i find it?
/usr/java/jdk1.6.0/bin/java -Xmx512m -jar
~/install/continuum/data-management-cli-1.1-beta-3-app.jar
On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level Project at
ASF and the continuum community will have more chance to grow.
My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from different
companies, To be
On 9/25/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below are the results of this vote:
3 Binding Votes (Wendy, Jesse, and Myself)
1 Non-binding vote (Olivier)
Should be 3 non-binding, Damien and Vivek also voted. (Thanks!)
--
Wendy
On 10/1/07, Tomislav Stojcevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does everybody think about adding a step to the continuum-webapp
project that extracts the templates from the continuum-core.jar and
puts a copy of them in the WEB-INF/classes directory. When the mail
notifier loads the templates
On 10/2/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can't move all in the db because schema updates can be a pain.
In 1.2 all the conf, actually written in application.xml, will be move to an
external file. This file will can be stored in ${user.home} so each installs
will can use it
On 10/3/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are near the end of 1.1, it's time to discuss of 1.2 roadmap :)
For this new version, my vision is:
Sounds good in general.
I'm not thrilled with GWT-- I'm suspicious of code generation-- but
since I'm not doing the work I'm not going
On 10/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Fri Oct 5 06:02:30 2007
New Revision: 582242
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=582242view=rev
Log:
Add monitoring page written by wendy on the wiki
We were talking about this one on IRC. Technically I don't
I'm going to work on publishing reference docs (Javadoc, reports) for
Continuum under the maven.a.o/continuum/ref/$version url.
This weekend I configured UMLGraph to generate diagrams as part of
Javadoc for Archiva [1] and plan to do that also for Continuum.
[1] example:
On 10/15/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to work on publishing reference docs (Javadoc, reports) for
Continuum under the maven.a.o/continuum/ref/$version url.
Or not. Any idea what this is about?
$ mvn site
...
[INFO] Building Maven Continuum Plugin
[INFO
On 10/16/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I modified redback-legacy pom to fix it.
The problem was that we patch generated modello files in process-sources
phase due to a bug in modellobut the javadoc reporting is executed in
generate-sources phase so our patch wasn't applied.
On 10/29/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If possible, I'd like to see more votes for this release from committers/PMC
Sorry, I missed this until Sunday evening. I'll take a look at it tonight.
(Continuum releases tend to come as a surprise to me. A message a few
days before,
On Dec 14, 2007 5:41 AM, Tomislav Stojcevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree it is confusing. Renaming to Build Profile would help, but
how about Build Environment instead?
I think Build Environment is better, thanks.
The word Profile just sends anyone who already knows Maven down a
On Dec 28, 2007 7:51 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/12/2007, at 1:35 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I was just going to leave it under continuum/trunk as continuum-docs
and continuum-site.
Cool, thanks for that. Should be pretty straightforward to move the
site up at a later date
On Dec 29, 2007 8:55 AM, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I moved the 1.1 docs to http://maven.apache.org/continuum/docs/1.1 and
added a redirect (from /continuum/documentation/1_1) to the .htaccess
file.
... and it synced the 1.1 directory, but not the contents that I moved
on the server
On Dec 29, 2007 5:08 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/12/2007, at 2:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:
maven/site/trunk/src/site/resources/.htaccess
Should this go in Continuum's site .htaccess?
It could, but there isn't one at the moment. No objection to adding
The 'Project Groups' page automatically refreshes itself every so
often. Unfortunately, this now causes errors when existing actions
forward to that page rather than redirect to it.
One such problem (after performing a release) was reported and fixed
in CONTINUUM-1560 [1]. But it also happens
I've been rearranging and publishing things for the website. Here's a
summary of how things stand now:
The continuum-site module publishes the top-level site to
http://maven.apache.org/continuum .
A new module, continuum-docs, publishes versioned documentation to
On Feb 5, 2008 4:06 PM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven
PMC to apply for graduation.
...
+1
--
Wendy
I'm having trouble building the trunk of Continuum. It's complaining about:
Missing:
--
1) bcel:bcel:jar:5.2
...
Path to dependency:
1) org.apache.maven.continuum:continuum-test:jar:2.0-SNAPSHOT
2) jpox:jpox-enhancer:jar:1.1.9
3) bcel:bcel:jar:5.2
Looks like
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Emmanuel Venisse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created the svn group with all pmc members. The next step will be the svn
move to the new location.
I'd like to see the move done for the end of the week, so if you have some
changes to commit, you must do it
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 7:51 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/12/2007, at 1:35 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I was just going to leave it under continuum/trunk as continuum-docs
and continuum-site.
Cool, thanks for that. Should be pretty straightforward to move the
site up
On the Maven zone, I changed the schedule for the Continuum Parent
group to 'On Demand' so that it won't run.
AFAIK there's no way to tell it where the source code moved, so we'll
have to delete and re-add the projects.
(Talking about using Continuuum to build Continuum is confusing...)
--
We have a Continuum instance available for ASF projects to use:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/groupSummary.action
This is our (internal) public face, and it would be great to have more
volunteers keeping an eye on it!
It was down this morning, so I re-started it (at 11AM MST.) I didn't
I added maven/plugins/trunk/pom.xml to Continuum 1.1 and forced a
build of the maven-plugins parent pom. (This is my own instance, not
vmbuild or the maven zone.)
It's using the default --non-recursive build definition, so I don't
understand this error:
INFO | jvm 1| 2008/03/09 09:55:55 |
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even though it uses --non-recursive to build, the checkout does not
exclude any subdirectories. This would occur in the checkout/update
and building changesets.
Is a build error and Please correct your data! the right
72 matches
Mail list logo