Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-11 Thread Luca Olivetti
Buchan Milne wrote: 486/16MB or 586/16MB system, whereas with LTSP, devfs is not used it seems it is: $ head -n 12 /opt/ltsp/i386/etc/rc.local #!/bin/sh # # rc.local # # This script will setup the environment for a diskless workstation, as # part of the Linux Terminal Server Project

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-11 Thread Henri
Stew Benedict a écrit: On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Henri wrote: What i would really like is drakTerm to be a complete remote X solution : for the moment, it only provide one kind of the two ways to use remote thin stations. Unfortunately this whole thread is a little late for the party.

[Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Henri
Hi, Why is DraTermServ exporting the root dir of the server ? couldn't it be a /var/drakTermServRoot or something like that, as it is done with ltsp ? That would be even greater if that was a chrooted service... I don't really like the idea to export everything, and that does not seem really

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Henri wrote: Hi, Why is DraTermServ exporting the root dir of the server ? So that you can run every single binary installed on the server on any of the clients, so you can use it for thick-clients also, without having to have multiple copies of

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Stew Benedict
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Henri wrote: Hi, Why is DraTermServ exporting the root dir of the server ? couldn't it be a /var/drakTermServRoot or something like that, as it is done with ltsp ? That would be even greater if that was a chrooted service... I don't really like the idea to export

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Stew Benedict
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: Well, there is already LTSP, which works fine on Mandrake also. So, you have a choice. Use LTSP if you have really thin clients (Pentium or slower), or Mandrake's terminal-server if you have thicker (ie Pentium MMX or better) clients. Buchan,

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Henri
But LTSP is not very esay to use...don't you think that there could be the choice ? LTSP is not as simple to install as DrakTermServ, and concerning remote drives it is even worse...DrakTermServ is a really good tool, but that would be great to have such an option. And do you really think that

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Henri wrote: But LTSP is not very esay to use...don't you think that there could be the choice ? That's not Mandrake's problem. LTSP is not as simple to install as DrakTermServ, Show us the souce to the entire LTSP distro (one that can be built

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stew Benedict wrote: On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: Thin-client support was added when it was first brought up as an issue. I am aware of that, but AFAIK (ie I haven't tested this) thin-clients still start up devfs locally, which runs

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Henri
Buchan Milne a écrit: Henri wrote: But LTSP is not very esay to use...don't you think that there could be the choice ? That's not Mandrake's problem. What i mean is that drakTerm should give the choice : export all the root dir so that you are able to run everything locally n your TX OR using

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Henri wrote: Buchan Milne a écrit: What i mean is that drakTerm should give the choice : export all the root dir so that you are able to run everything locally n your TX OR using a small directory containing only the necessary to use a remote X

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Henri
Buchan Milne a écrit: Henri wrote: Buchan Milne a écrit: What i mean is that drakTerm should give the choice : export all the root dir so that you are able to run everything locally n your TX OR using a small directory containing only the necessary to use a remote X session. In your mind it

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Henri wrote: Buchan Milne a écrit: Why, you're just duplicating everything. What motivation is there to have to maintain two sets of software (including security updates etc)? That is simple : - the risk to have something compromised on the

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Henri
Buchan Milne a écrit: Henri wrote: Buchan Milne a écrit: Why, you're just duplicating everything. What motivation is there to have to maintain two sets of software (including security updates etc)? That is simple : - the risk to have something compromised on the NFS exported dir is decreased

Re: [Cooker] DrakTermServ, root directory export and chroot

2003-03-10 Thread Stew Benedict
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Henri wrote: What i would really like is drakTerm to be a complete remote X solution : for the moment, it only provide one kind of the two ways to use remote thin stations. Unfortunately this whole thread is a little late for the party. Same thing happened last