[COOT] Coot 0.5 and colours

2008-09-25 Thread Björn Kauppi
! *** Title: Coot 0.5 and colours Why is coot 0.5 relying on the element card at the right end of a pdb file for proper atom colouring? Can one turn back the 0.4.1 behaviour? --Björn

Re: [COOT] Coot 0.5 and colours

2008-09-25 Thread Steven Sheriff
Bjorn: First I presume you mean element field (or column) rather than card. Second, at least since COOT 0.3, which is when I started using COOT, it has used the element field to colo[u]r atoms, so this is not new behavio[u]r. Steven Björn Kauppi wrote: Why is coot 0.5 relying on the

Re: [COOT] Coot 0.5 and colours

2008-09-25 Thread Debreczeni, Judit
To answer your question then, there is no way in 0.5 to turn back to the old behaviour. It might be possible in new versions to enable this, but currently I am against the idea. Running the file through pdbset solves the missing element identifier problem -- not elegant, but quick

Re: [COOT] Coot 0.5 and colours

2008-09-25 Thread Johan P. Turkenburg
FWIW: If you have an 'old' pdb file, just run it through pdbset with no keywords (other than 'END'), and the 'element column' will be added for you. Johan Paul Emsley wrote: I think Björn means that previous versions of Coot could read archaic (version 2.3) pdb files and infer the element