On 12/01/2013 01:13 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
On Dec 1, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
On 12/1/13 10:29 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to the
JIRA instance:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016742
On Dec 2, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
On 12/01/2013 01:13 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
On Dec 1, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
On 12/1/13 10:29 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated
to the JIRA instance:
On 2 December 2013 19:47, Xueming Shen xueming.s...@oracle.com wrote:
That said, it might be desired to add the support of the JSR310 date/time
for the DateFormat, but it will not make jdk8.
FWIW, I think this should have been fixed in jdk 8.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016743
On 12/02/2013 12:46 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
On 2 December 2013 19:47, Xueming Shenxueming.s...@oracle.com wrote:
That said, it might be desired to add the support of the JSR310 date/time
for the DateFormat, but it will not make jdk8.
FWIW, I think this should have been fixed in jdk 8.
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to the
JIRA instance:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016742
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016743
I filed the bugs, though they say someone else did. It's frustrating that
suddenly I can't even
On 12/1/13 10:29 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to the
JIRA instance:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016742
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016743
I filed the bugs, though they say someone else did. It's
On 01/12/2013 18:29, Nick Williams wrote:
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to the
JIRA instance:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016742
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016743
I filed the bugs, though they say someone else did.
Webbug
On Dec 1, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
On 12/1/13 10:29 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to
the JIRA instance:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016742
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016743
I
On Dec 1, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
On Dec 1, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
On 12/1/13 10:29 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to
the JIRA instance:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016742
On Jun 15, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
Currently, MessageFormat /only/ supports SimpleDateFormat and instances of
java.util.Date or java.util.Calendar for date/time values. Because of this,
it's impossible to use Java 8 date/time types with any of the i18n and
localization
The standard JDK bug tracker should be used to keep track of these.
For info, Oracle is in control of integration of JSR-310 into other
APIs, not JSR-310.
Stephen
On 17 June 2013 09:40, Nick Williams
nicholas+open...@nicholaswilliams.net wrote:
On Jun 15, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Nick Williams
Thanks. I have filed two different bugs for these two different problems.
On Jun 17, 2013, at 4:20 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
The standard JDK bug tracker should be used to keep track of these.
For info, Oracle is in control of integration of JSR-310 into other
APIs, not JSR-310.
On 17 June 2013 12:40, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On 17/06/2013 11:05, Nick Williams wrote:
Thanks. I have filed two different bugs for these two different problems.
Here they are:
8016743: java.text.MessageFormat does not support java.time.* types
8016742: JAXB does not
On Jun 17, 2013, at 6:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
On 17 June 2013 12:40, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On 17/06/2013 11:05, Nick Williams wrote:
Thanks. I have filed two different bugs for these two different problems.
Here they are:
8016743: java.text.MessageFormat
14 matches
Mail list logo
