Hi all,
I configured courier esmtpd for blocking spam,
using a MAPS subscription. So far so good.
I also configured a secondary MX for each domain
I host, using such service by an ISP connected
via a different carrier. This also proved quite
useful.
However, the two things don't match. Some
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Hi all,
I configured courier esmtpd for blocking spam,
using a MAPS subscription. So far so good.
I also configured a secondary MX for each domain
I host, using such service by an ISP connected
via a different carrier. This also proved quite
useful.
Hello all!
I' m running Debian GNU/Linux woody (3.0 unofficial).
Probably most of the questions I'm going to ask here have already been
answered here but it often comes that I don't even know exactly what people
are talking about here because the topics are quite specific and some words
are
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
iii) Get rid of the second MX.
A second MX doesn't get you anything unless your primary has been down
for at least 24 hours, and if that happens you'll have other things to
worry about.
You sure ? I have a courier box doing secondary MX for our main
sendmail based
On Thursday 11 July 2002 06:52 pm, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Yeah, so the secondary's going to try to immediately contact the primary,
which is temporarily unavailable (obviously), so the secondary is going to
defer the mail, and try again later. The mail that you see off the
secondary is from
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
...
As I said, you'll only receive tangible benefits from secondary MXes if
you routinely go down for 24 hours, since at that time some senders will
begin to bounce mail, instead of deferring it.
Granted but still some minor browny points for taking part of the
load
I had to recently reinstall courier, I already have all users entered and they
already have home directories and Maildir directory from previous machine
(machine went down so it is more like a transfer). It is a RH 7.3 with only
red hat updates and nothing else installed. I had to copy the
Sam Varshavchik writes:
As I said, you'll only receive tangible benefits from secondary MXes if
you routinely go down for 24 hours, since at that time some senders will
begin to bounce mail, instead of deferring it.
There are different ways one goes down. Last winter
it happened that I
I been looking at docs, and cannot seem to get a clear answer on this,
so, heres a shot in the dark...
Does the web administration portions of the web part of courier, properly
handle adding/editing/removing virtual domains/virtual users under those
domains/aliases, AND do all this with the
OK, I got to the point where ps shows:
/usr/lib/courier-imap/libexec/authlib/authdaemond.mysql start
and
/usr/lib/courier-imap/libexec/couriertcpd -address=0 \
-stderrlogger=/usr/lib/courier-imap/libexec/logger \
-stderrloggername=imapd -maxprocs=50 -maxperip=50 \
-pid=/var/run/imapd.pid
I'm going coo-coo for coco puffs! this is driving me crazy the server is ready
roll I just can't get courier to auth anyone , any ideas? , places to look?
Here is what my authdaemond looks like:
root 7274 0.0 0.1 1660 528 ?S00:43 0:00
Mark Constable wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
iii) Get rid of the second MX.
A second MX doesn't get you anything unless your primary has been down
for at least 24 hours, and if that happens you'll have other things to
worry about.
You sure ? I have a courier box doing secondary MX
David Mir writes:
I had to recently reinstall courier, I already have all users entered and they
already have home directories and Maildir directory from previous machine
(machine went down so it is more like a transfer). It is a RH 7.3 with only
red hat updates and nothing else
update: I also cannot login using authdaemond.plain
I looked around the docs, but cannot find some debugging options - is
there a switch or something for verbose logging?
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Razvan Cosma wrote:
OK, I got to the point where ps shows:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Roland Schneider wrote:
Wont work that way. You bad-edited authmodules in etc/imapd,
or vice versa.
double and triple checked :(
mysql is up and running, postfix uses the db and correctly delivers
mails, but courier makes no connections to mysql, so login fails.
Thanks, I thought I had an option...RPMS or no. But you the man so I will
re-install via RPM. Can I just remove the /usr/lib/courier dir and it should
work??
Thanks for your time.
On Thursday 11 July 2002 12:41 pm, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
David Mir writes:
I had to recently reinstall
No go. The more more I think about it, the more I wonder how this even
works. I have a feeling the courier imapd binary in /usr/bin/ that does
the preauth stuff was made for doing stuff similar to this ( the uw
passwdless way in the previous post).
Perhaps it's more of a pine question, but
Hello all, I seem to be having a rather large problem with courier. It configured,
made and installed without any detectable flaws (although i did have to install gcc
2.95 because of issues with 3.1). When i start the master courier process it correctly
spawns the childs as shown:
root
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 05:16, Sangohn Christian wrote:
What I want is get my mails from my various mail accounts out there in the
internet. I now this can be done with fetchmail and I've already successfully
tested it.
...
Now I want courier to sort these mail depending on the recepient
From the docs:
maildirmake {-q} {1000S} {./Maildir}
For setting a quota enforcement (also you can set the quota in the
authmysql as well).
However all the docs that talk about set a quota using a quota
following quotas... they seem to leave out what the quota actual
_IS_... is it in
Hi Sam,
in maildir/maildirpurgetmp.c, function dopurge, the ctime of the files
is used.
Is there a reason not to use mtime?
Our backup software resets the atime after backup, so everytime the
backup runs, the ctime changes and things in .Trash/cur never get deleted.
BTW: Not resetting the
I have now successfully gotten sendmail to bind to port 25 by adding it to xinetd and
using the sendmail wrapper /usr/lib/courier/bin/sendmail. I can now make connections
to port 25, unfortunatly, I am not greeted with any response. It does not close the
connection, it just stays open and
It explains clearly what the problem is...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No such domain.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases more
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
David Mir writes:
Thanks, I thought I had an option...RPMS or no.
You do, as long as you know how to set it up.
But you the man so I will
re-install via RPM. Can I just remove the /usr/lib/courier dir and it should
work??
Thanks for your time.
Just blow it away before building
Hello,
I'm trying to get off of this mailing list. The unsubscribe address
listed does not work and returns an error and I do not remember my
username and password for the web-based interface nor is there an
obvious way to retrieve it. In addition, my mailings to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] E-Mail
If you note in the original message :
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(uid 48)
who is uid 48?
- Original Message -
From: Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 4:18 PM
Subject: [courier-users] Hack attempt?
This
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 10:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all, I seem to be having a rather large problem with courier.
It configured, made and installed without any detectable flaws
(although i did have to install gcc 2.95 because of issues with 3.1).
When i start the master courier
Jesse Keating writes:
[message/delivery-status (337 bytes)]
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.j2solutions.net
Arrival-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:00:32 -0700
Received-From-MTA: dns; localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Mark T. Valites writes:
No go. The more more I think about it, the more I wonder how this even
works. I have a feeling the courier imapd binary in /usr/bin/ that does
the preauth stuff was made for doing stuff similar to this ( the uw
passwdless way in the previous post).
The default
Georg Lutz writes:
Hi Sam,
in maildir/maildirpurgetmp.c, function dopurge, the ctime of the files
is used.
Is there a reason not to use mtime?
Yes.
Our backup software resets the atime after backup, so everytime the
backup runs, the ctime changes and things in .Trash/cur never
I have virtual hosting inbound working in a manner similar to sendmails virtual file.
Is there equivalent to the generics file?
I also tried the virtual hosting using userdb as in the FAQ and this did not work.
I'm scanning the Docs right now but any help from someone who has done this would
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:41:43 -0400
Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#The original message was sent by whoever logs in as uid 48.
#
#Anybody can put anything they want in the From: header, or use any return
#address.
UID 48 belongs to apache... Do messages sent via sqwebmail get that
Problem:
NetBSD 1.x - 1.5.3's /bin/sh has a subtle bug (1.6, which is in prerelease
fixes this). The bug is that the '-a' flag (and 'set -a') are not
implemented.
A couple of the Courier start up scripts (esmtpd, esmtpd-ssl, imapd, ...)
[grep for 'set -a' in courier/shared] take advantage of
Eric Gustafson writes:
Problem:
NetBSD 1.x - 1.5.3's /bin/sh has a subtle bug (1.6, which is in prerelease
fixes this). The bug is that the '-a' flag (and 'set -a') are not
implemented.
A couple of the Courier start up scripts (esmtpd, esmtpd-ssl, imapd, ...)
[grep for 'set -a' in
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:54:52 -0400
Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#No. Mail from sqwebmail originates under whatever uid the mail account
#uses.
Yeah, so, any other idea on how this could be happening? Perhaps there is an
exploit in apache that lets them send mail? I'm somewhat
Kevin Barnard writes:
I have virtual hosting inbound working in a manner similar to sendmails virtual
file. Is there equivalent to the generics file?
I also tried the virtual hosting using userdb as in the FAQ and this did not work.
I'm scanning the Docs right now but any help from
Well, what i did temporary, is for users that need .mailfilter to make
..courier:
|/usr/local/bin/maildrop
Also I noticed that in /etc/courier/maildirfilterconfig it's
MAILDIRFILTER=../.mailfilter
I'm not sure what it means, may be there's a problem...
But didn't play with it yet.
if have
Ive been exploring shared folders. What I want to do is create an
account, make that accounts Maildir a shared folder, and give selected
userids access to the mail messages that come into it.
I also want it to be accessible from a standard IMAP client such as
Outlook or Outlook Express.
Is
Jesse Keating writes:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:54:52 -0400
Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#No. Mail from sqwebmail originates under whatever uid the mail account
#uses.
Yeah, so, any other idea on how this could be happening? Perhaps there is an
exploit in apache that
Jesse Keating writes:
UID 48 belongs to apache... Do messages sent via sqwebmail get that UID
attached to them? The reason I ask, the contents of the original email don't
match anything that would have been sent via apache.
YOU ARE COMPROMISED
from http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:01:28 -0500
Bill Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
#YOU ARE COMPROMISED
#
#from http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/ scan of your server
# -
#The site www.j2solutions.net is running Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux)
# -
#
#from
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:37:38 -0400
From: Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [courier-users] Re: passwordless key-based ssh authentication to
courier imapd
Mark T. Valites writes:
No go. The more more I
42 matches
Mail list logo
