Nat Sakimura writes:
Hi.
While I am awaiting the HOW-TOs on Sophos + Courier ...
Ok, I wrote a couple of pages describing that solution
and the pieces of code used
http://www.tana.it/sw/avfilter/
Meaningful comments will be appreciated
Has anyone tested RAV Ani-virus on Courier?
Hi,
excuse me for jumping late into this thread,
I'm running my own little filter and I am very
interested in the filtering protocol (not using
perlfilter, I skipped the thread.)
Sam wrote:
I think that probably the best thing to do is to append the control filename
to the message queue id,
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
However, reformime is not smaller:
it is 157Kb while the whole avfilter takes 88Kb.
Not over here it isn't:
Ooops, I'm using not stripped versions.
size /usr/local/bin/reformime avfilter
textdata bss dec hex filename
Hi all,
I'm puzzled about unusual mime types that sometimes loom
around throwing established mail criteria up in the air.
Is a filter a kind of user agent (MUA)?
And, what should a filter do with message/partial stuff?
BTW, does anyone know about clients that do automatically
reassemble or at
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Bryan Ross writes:
/usr/lib/courier/sbin/makehosteddomains is owned by courier.admin and has
been chmod'd u+s.
makehosteddomains is a script, not a binary executable. setuserid bit has
no effect on scripts.
Hmmm... sometimes if a script starts with
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Bill Williamson writes:
Question I have is, can a filter change the text of an email, or just
block/pass?
Just block/pass.
That is not enough. E.g. for sanitizing html
messages against swf or js viruses that can
really act in the preview window.
The
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Let me just note that putting some antivirus or
sanitizer filter *before* courier, one could not
use black list filtering based on relay address.
So put one after Courier.
But then, if a message goes to N recipients, it
will have
Sorry answering with much delay, but I've been out
and I'm surprised nobody answered correctly to this.
Bill Williamson wrote on Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:19:14 -0600:
[...]
When you connect to imap/pop3/smtp, you connect via IP address. That is
all. If you look at the session, you never see am
Hi all,
I configured courier esmtpd for blocking spam,
using a MAPS subscription. So far so good.
I also configured a secondary MX for each domain
I host, using such service by an ISP connected
via a different carrier. This also proved quite
useful.
However, the two things don't match. Some
Sam Varshavchik writes:
As I said, you'll only receive tangible benefits from secondary MXes if
you routinely go down for 24 hours, since at that time some senders will
begin to bounce mail, instead of deferring it.
There are different ways one goes down. Last winter
it happened that I
Bowie Bailey writes:
[...]
cp -f /export/B/userdb /courier/etc/userdb
makeuserdb
cp -f /courier/etc/userdb.dat /export/B/userdb.dat
Since we're at it, would Samone confirm or deny that
it is correct to use cp on userdb files? (I heard that
some implementation may result in
about to install a new server, I recall Courier was not
alone having problems with newer releases of GCC. Debian
'stable' Woody still has 2.95.4.
I know that Courier installation instructions still say that
2.NOTE: At this time, Courier cannot be compiled by gcc 3.0
but I keep forgetting why.
Wouldn'it be cool to have a preference to
open a new window for each message?
(I'm getting my right finger tired)
It amounts to adding a ' target=_blank'
3 times for each row of a folder page,
which wouldn't bloat the html code very much
and could save the time to rebuild folder's
content after
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Patrick O'Reilly writes:
...how-to mark recipients as delivered...
http://www.courier-mta.org/queue.html
Control File Format section. I suggest examining a couple of
records in a live queue, until you're familiar with it.
That's great, but it in turn raises a
I get bounces saying
useralias@domain:
System error - unable to forward message.
Probably, it is just a documentation failure (whazzat?)
In courier.html I read, about bofh file,
spamtrap user@domain
[...]
this check is made after any alias processing
trout writes:
[...]
is there a way to make [EMAIL PROTECTED] go into one
mailbox?
one way is to resort to aliasdir. I use it as follows:
mail-542# cd aliasdir
mail-543# ls -lab
total 20
drwxr-xr-x2 courier courier 4096 Sep 26 09:24 .
drwxr-xr-x 12 courier courier 4096 Sep 13
Sam Varshavchik writes:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Some POP3 MTAs apparently don't retrieve messages
that are not new, e.g. Lotus Notes (?)
There is no such thing as a new message in the POP3 protocol. All
messages are alike, as far as the server is concerned.
That's
What is the following (re)interpretation of boundaries
for a mime compliant utility (reformime, in this case)?
[ ] legal: both structures are legal and equivalent
[ ] required: must be able to interpret such quirks
[ ] tolerant: should accept not properly coded messages
[ ] safe: no entity is
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
--B57772158E.1035822756/svpegasus1.flur.zuerich.ubs.ch
--B57772158E.1035822756/svpegasus1.flur.zuerich.ubs.ch
--B57772158E.1035822756/svpegasus1.flur.zuerich.ubs.ch
--0__=jbWsAZXFFywhcPE7ZWjoR0lMsv0mxbsnaYbTYfU3d3D7h4Ch2ESN3wfy
--0__
Sam wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
My filter complains it cannot understand such MIME structure,
it dumps a copy of the message and blocks it. So I have to
manually look at it, run reformime -r and send it over again.
Reformime returns a valid MIME structure.
I doubt that the output from
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Is it correct?
Yes. The From: header has absolutely nothing to do with the return
address. Look at the Return-Path: header.
Ooops!
Thanx, I'll try and be more careful...
Ale
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Tomas Ericsson writes:
For example when using Apache one get asked about the PEM-password when
you are starting the server...
That makes the difference between a server that can boot
unattended (e.g. when UPS restores power) and one that
needs the guy to get there.
Karl Kuehn writes:
[...]
Is there some step I am missing to turn on filtering?
On my setup, I have to specify the mail filtering engine
as a | command on a .courier file (same directory,
ownership and permissions as .mailfilter). If you don't
have it on as DEFAULTDELIVERY, you need to specify
Jeff Slutzky writes:
where or how do you add users to the mail server
and passwd table in Mysql?
I live just well with 3 scripts:
showmailuser,
newmailuser,
newmaildomain.
The first script can show one or many users.
The second one calls the third script. For
special needs I do it by hands
Ale
-Original Message-
From: Alessandro Vesely [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 1:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:[courier-users] Re: Adding users
File: ATT5.txt; charset = utf-8
Sam Varshavchik writes:
If you want to get anal: this is your browser's bug.
I18n is completely broken in HTML forms, because the
browser has no means to specify what charset/encoding
it is using for sending stuff. It just says
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
(note: that
Peter Andersson writes:
The mail log says that the mail gets delivered but i can´t find it
anywhere.
Courier stores mail in a clever queue mechanism and may
hold it there for a while. Just run `mailq` to check.
If it's not there nor in user's box, chances are it was
forwarded (depending on
Hi all,
sometimes I get errors 523 Message length exceeds administrative limit.
otherwise I just get 534 SIZE=Message too big.
I guess the latter only happens when the sender politely says
MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=10485761 to inform the server of the size.
I have no sizelimit file and no
Hi,
is Courier-MTA going to host any program, similar to couriermlm but
for newsletters rather than mailing lists?
On a newsletter, we want the recipient to be able to unsubscribe
with one click and we don't want replies to go to the list. But
handling subscriptions and bounces just the way
??
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:
Is it possible or recommendable to have positive DSNs only be emitted
for certain users, e.g. internal users, and disable them for others?
TIA
Ale
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Is it possible or recommendable to have positive DSNs only be emitted
for certain users, e.g. internal users, and disable them for others?
The sending mail client is fully capable of specifying which DSNs are to
be generated for a particular
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
if such [DSNs] specifications can/should
be overridden, so as to avoid helping spammers confirm addresses.
Spammers do not need DSNs to confirm addresses.
Did you actually ever log a succesful dictionary attack against a Courier
server
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Spammers just use typical addresses (e.g. sales@yourdomain).
Also, many people give away what they believe to be a fancy address,
but may actually match some aliasing criteria at the domain.
In addition, some spammers, after giving a wrong
Hi Roland,
--Sam Varshavchik wrote on 24.02.03 19:53 -0500:
I suppose I'll look at what needs to be changed to allow filter to
safely
modify the message. That's a long term project, though.
[...]
No. I am not working on this area at the moment.
I am currently inserting X-Spam: at the top of
James A Baker writes:
[...] because I store useful messages in much more well organized
folder categories (from 10 to 500 messages per folder typically) so I can
find what I'm looking for quickly when I need it, rather than searching a
10,000 or 100,000 message folder for 1 message.
Average
Sam Varshavchik writes:
You'll just have to tune the parameters in accordance to your
mail traffic levels.
How do I know what are my mail traffic levels?
(Personally, I have small traffic and seldom run mailq.)
And, how do I learn what would happen if non-average
conditions will occur?
TIA
Ale
This is the Courier Mail Server 0.39 on wmail.tana.it.
Please notify the original sender that their message was not properly
formatted by their mail software. The specific mail protocol error in the
original message is as follows:
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
The MIME boundary delimiter strings in the following message are
ambiguous, and cannot be parsed.
The bad delimiters were boundary=wrefhhxwrefhhx inside wrefhhx, I
suppose.
The software that produced them is W32/Yaha-E.
Curiously, Courier
Hi,
once again someone choose my e-mail as the sender
for tons of spam. What I've never seen before is
that the original messages contained in failure
reports show the following
1. every message comes from a different IP. Often
those IPs are in MAPS dul list. I didn't find any
of them with an
Sam,
is it possible that Courier behaves differently
depending on the return code of the filter?
I don't know what should be the preferred return
code when a virus is found in a message. I currently
use 554, can't remember why. The idea is to reserve
one of the 5xx codes to bear the additional
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Sam,
is it possible that Courier behaves differently
depending on the return code of the filter?
I don't know what should be the preferred return
code when a virus is found in a message. I currently
use 554, can't remember why. The idea
Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
There IS a way to do this, it's just a bit ugly (IMHO at least).
Sam says the way is to run your filter and read the message file - do any
rewriting you want to, and inject a new message. The control file can be
modified to indicate successful delivery of the first
Anand Buddhdev wrote:
[...]
It would be so nice if courier allowed adding,removing or modifying
message headers at filter-time.
What about environment variables?
They are not saved in the control file, are they?
---
The SF.Net email is
Nice one, thank you
$TCPREMOTEHOST (and/or maybe $TCPLOCALPORT) is all you need.
Courier currently lacks some mechanism to exclude hosts from filtering.
One easy to implement solution could be to skip the filtering-stage
alltogether when RELAYCLIENT (and maybe BLOCK=) ist set.
But if you
I think Roland answered most of this already - except to say that the way to
exclude messages from refiltering was to set an X-Already-Seen-By-My-Filter
header so that you could skip re-running if you saw that header. Suggested
injection method was I belive by sendmail call.
The
Despite much talking about dropping and resubmitting a message,
there is no way a global filter can _cleanly_ mark all recipients
as delivered.
Looking at the code in submit2.C reveals that, before calling a
global filter, ctlfile is flushed so that the filter can read it,
but it's not closed, so
Avfilter is a global filter using Sophos antivirus
New in version 2:
- upgraded to CSAVI3 interface
- by default drop infected messages
- e-mail driven download of new virus identities (ide)
- reload configuration and virus database on SIGHUP
- GNU configure script
- GPL except sophos
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
It looks to me like your patch reinvents the wheel.
I'm not sure why wheels have to be reinvented every now and then, but
on the ChangeLog I found the following:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/courier/courier/courier/ChangeLog?rev=1.600view=markup
: 2002-08-01 Mr.
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
[...]
Now, one change that can be made is to disable all filtering completely if
RELAYCLIENT is set. This is going to disable all content filtering for all
senders with relaying privileges. I'm just not sure if we want to do that.
Pardon my intrusion, but this option
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
I've been semi-succesfull in setting up Courier and Amavisd-new. Everything
works, except that amavisd-new (running as a courierfilter) cannot seem to
add any headers to the message. I don't have a clue where to look for a
solution, besides the config-file
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Sam, may I ask if filters are going to be redesigned one day? In this
case it would seem more polite to sprout two control files, similarly
to what is being done with 200 recipients...
I don't follow you. Splitting the message
Lindsay Haisley wrote:
Thus spake Alessandro Vesely on Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:42:12AM CDT
Pardon my intrusion, but this option looks like requiring two servers:
one to accept incoming mail from any stupid client and the other for
filtering e-mail according to varying recipients
Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
OK, now I know it is /usr/sbin/courierfilter which produce the error
Unable to reserve file descriptor 3.
I'd be curious as to why that happens. As fd's 0, 1, and 2 are in use,
the sequence
close(3);
if (open(/dev/null, O_RDONLY) != 3
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2004-05-25 10:04:38, schrieb Alessandro Vesely:
cannot fail. Can you reproduce the failure running the program by itself?
yes
If that's possible, truss can reveal what's going on.
Sorry, I said truss but I meant strace. If you run a line like
strace -f
That's an interesting idea!
Jason L. Buberel wrote:
After reading through the on-line man pages of courierfilter,
localfilter, and maildrop, I'm left wondering how I would go about
implementing a mail filter that processes all outbound messages.
AFAIK maildrop is only used for messages
Isn't this the same as
Problem (and patch for) 534 Message header size, or ... error
22 Jan 2004 05:51:42 +0100
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=7102594
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I would like to know why the real maximal length of To: header is
only 5000
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
[...]
Overview of the planned courier-authlib package:
1. Uses the existing configure options.
2. Uses standard FHS install paths.
3. Installs:
A) Various authdaemond builds, and the authdaemond startup script
B) Configuration files
C) Test
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
I think authtest might also be good as a generic configuration tool
as it delivers name, home directory, uid and gid of a given user.
(Suppose a configure script takes an option like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for installing some data
Lloyd Zusman wrote:
% deliveryloc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/home/uname/Maildir
What about
# authtest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Authenticated: module authdaemon
Home directory: /home/uname
UID/GID: 12345/12345
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AUTHFULLNAME=User Full Name
Not (always) installed, no
The maxlongsize.h header used to define the max size of
a decimal representation of the largest long int
using the size of its string representation as given in
limits.h, i.e. (simplified slightly)
#define MAXLONGSIZE MAXLONGSIZE1(ULONG_MAX)
#define MAXLONGSIZE1(x) MAXLONGSIZE2(x)
#define
Julian Mehnle wrote:
In the old times of the Internet where a.com (everybody) could send a
message and claim it to come from x.com, forwarders would have to take no
responsibility for what domains are used as the sender addresses of the
mail they forward. As a result, everybody could simply
Hi Sam,
I hope that requiring GNU ld is a temporary feature of courier-authlib.
The GNU loader has traditionally been buggy on solaris-sparc
and requiring it may jeopardize the portability of Courier.
It is only the line that builds libcourierauthcommon.la that fails.
I rewrote that command line
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
replacing
-Wl,--whole-archive with -Wl,-z -Wl,allextract, and
-Wl,--no-whole-archive with -Wl,-z -Wl,defaultextract.
That's a job for libtool, as (not much extensively) exemplified in
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual
Toby Heywood wrote:
[...]
MySQL Log
- --
050101 12:52:23 5 Query SELECT id, crypt, , uid, gid,
home, , , name, FROM passwd WHERE id = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is mandc the correct domain name? I get a strage MX record for it.
Sure the MySQL log lines originated from incoming
Hi Sam,
I was browsing the docs when I found
auth_sasl initializes *authtype_ret and *authdata_ret.
They will be set to a malloc(3)-ed buffers that can be
directly passed as arguments to auth_generic(3). It is
the application's responsibility to free(3) these
buffers when it's done with
chester c young wrote:
does anyone have any idea on how to have ssl with multiple domains?
Must use different ip addresses. That's rooted in the ssl handshake:
the client does not send the name of the (virtual) host before it
receives the server's certificate.
alekosr wrote:
2) Is it possible to forward a copy of all emails to a single email account ?
There is an ARCHIVEDIR variable you can set in courierd (the big-brother
option).
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday
David K. wrote:
[...]
pstack core
core 'core' of 17227: /usr/local/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond
d26cf539 strcmp () + 115
d2793d3d authcheckpassword (804d234, d254bba6, d277bb7b, d253e724) + 101
d253e73d ()
Possibly that is a strcmp in do_authcheckpassword, comparing
', `print' and `quit' as needed. See e.g.
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb_9.html
- David
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
David K. wrote:
[...]
pstack core
core 'core' of 17227: /usr/local/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond
d26cf539 strcmp () + 115
d2793d3d
this mean you are missing the crypt function?
Would you mind compiling the attached test program to check that?
(As usual, you may compile it with/without, say, -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=400
see man standards -shouldn't really change much in this case.)
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
David K. wrote:
I have
Hi David,
David wrote:
Hi Alessandro,
I just realized that my email client was translating some of the test
program source as smileys.
:-)
I have saved the code as an attachment and it
compiles fine as you sent it.
gcc crypttest.c
crypttest.c: In function `main':
crypttest.c:8:
and try rebuilding
with that. To reconfigure you should amend the top level configure so that
it reads
case `$LD -V 21` in
instead of
case `$LD -V` in
at line 25767.
Good luck!
Ale
- David
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Hi David,
David wrote:
Hi Alessandro,
I just
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Jay Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Mehnle said:
If it's a cost issue, run just one (i.e. drop the differently
configured secondary MX). That's what I actually do.
Have you ever had issues with downtime or lost mail?
Nothing where a secondary MX would
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
It's always safe to append more stuff to the control file. Whether
it's safe to rewrite it from scratch is something I need to think about.
I thought it was, too. However, when I started actually testing that
theory, I found that it's
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I think that ctlfile should be opened for append mode.
...capital idea. Am I wrong to assume that all of the calls to open()
in the openctl() function should have the same flags?
I'm not sure what you mean. And I wonder what sense may have
Lucio wrote:
[...]
Rejects all outgoing messages if they do not specify
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in one of the headers.
Courier already has a big-brother option. Check it out in etc/courierd
before you proceed. If you are going to test a filter, setting an
ARCHIVEDIR is a convenient way to debug
Lucio wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Courier already has a big-brother option.
Yes, I know. But I need the users to be aware of the fact that their messages
are being sniffed, so I have to force them to send CCs of thier messages to
the big-brother address.
If you want users to type
/
http://www.catb.org/~esr/fetchmail/
Good Luck!
Original Message
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:55:29 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Migrating to courier IMAP (Re: [courier-users] Filtering messages)
From: Martijn Lievaart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alessandro Vesely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alessandro
Bowie Bailey wrote:
[...] Since there are no DNS records for the
domain, it is impossible to deliver directly to this address from
anywhere else.
H... except for purposely built malaware?
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product
Ben Kennedy wrote:
Hey all,
I've been having a slightly annoying issue with mail filters.
Specifically, doing 'courierfilter stop' or otherwise having courier stop
or restart leaves sockets kicking around, leading to socket already
exists log messages and/or 432 Mail filters temporarily
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Ben Kennedy wrote:
In this example, pureperlfilter is cleaning up its socket (though
sometimes for whatever reason the socket stays around causing it to
refuse to launch subsequently); perlfilter is not removing its.
IMHO, the latter
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
pureperlfilter is the bootstrapping executable for Courier::Filter.
C:F cleans up its socket when shutting down (e.g. when told to by
courierfilter), but refuses to start if the socket it wants to create
already
uchu wrote:
If someone wants to run a mailing list they should use a mailing list
management software that's designed for that purpose, instead of
trying to shoehorn something out of an ordinary E-mail client.
Totally agreed on that.
The lack of functionality that had been objected
Malcolm Weir wrote:
[...]
The second MX is _strictly_ a fallback system. It will store and forward
messages for the primary, but it doesn't do the SMTP-level message
rejection. So it will accept pretty much anything sent to it, and then
shovel that on to my primary when the primary
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
A real DNS server returns records in random order. That's a fundamental
function of DNS: load balancing.
Is it random or round robin?
For multihoming, load balancing should imply that querying from net A
results in (at least averagely) different addresses than
Rodrigo Severo wrote:
[...]
I'm wondering if it might be better to:
a) not to deal with it at all because there might be so few cases
Appealing as this option can be, to make an informed decision we still
need a sharp view of what we don't want to deal with. Your clear analysis
of the
Vlad,
a similar question was discussed last year, you may
want to check the thread
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=7110106
Vlad Dinulescu wrote:
Thanks for the quick answer!
How can I modify a message from the filter? Like
adding a header, or modifying the body?
Sam
Bernhard Lukas wrote:
[...]
BLACKLISTS=-block=blackholes.mail-abuse.org,BLOCK
-block=relays.mail-abuse.org,BLOCK
[...]
Nevertheless I am still getting much SPAM and often from the same
address - does the blacklist really work?
No. To check that, you should try the query by hands, e.g.
dig
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
PCRE will be able to support all of maildrop's functionality except for
the w pattern option. With PCRE, the w option would require the
entire message to be loaded into memory. Maildrop does not load large
messages into memory, and this would not be desirable.
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
PCRE will be able to support all of maildrop's functionality except
for the w pattern option. With PCRE, the w option would require
the entire message to be loaded into memory. Maildrop does not load
large messages
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
This release of SqWebMail filters out certain MSIE-only scripting
constructs that could be used for malicious purposes. As an
alternative: a cumulative patch [...]
Apparently, that patch is not related with the downloading of viral
attachments that has been recently
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Although in the rest of the world, any !-- comment -- in HTML gets
ignored, with MSIE a specially formatted HTML comment can get processed
as regular HTML code, with scripting, et al:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
E.g. checking xxx entities terminate with `;'?
But there's no _hot_ security concern, is there?
Just being proactive here -- in case MSIE, or something else --
misparses it in a way that could be exploited:
fooscript...
Thank you so
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Ricardo Kleemann writes:
However, isn't the mail server supposed to accept for DSNs ?
Correct.
Is
there a
way to get around this?
No, there's no way to get around an idiot who is placed in charge
Chris Petersen wrote:
[...]
Our goal is to set up one server at our colo for fast handling of
incoming mail. This server would do spam/virus scanning/blocking to
reduce the download load on our in-office DSL connection. A second
on-site server would be set up to receive mail from the first
Chris Petersen wrote:
Yeah. VPN and just host the imap server on our dsl line.
It's fast enough for the few times that people will be
checking their mail from home.
Fine. That appears to be the best practice (with minor worryings about security)
See also thread Best practices for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,all
does Courier MTA has a big picture like as qmail? http://www.nrg4u.com/.
If you mean A4-sized approx. 50K gifs, then no, not really. Courier doc
is cool readable html. In http://www.courier-mta.org/queue.html there is
an ascii crude diagram, though.
Michael Mattess wrote:
[...]
First we looked at a plane installation, we limited our selves to mail
retrieval so we only used courier-pop and mounted the maildirs via NFS
[...] i modified Courier-pop to use a PostgeSQL DB instead of the
maildirs and the results were quite surprising.
It
Dirk Kulmsee wrote:
E.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] fills out the mailform and the mailform generates a mail
to
the company's responsible recipient who has her/his mail account on some
other mail server on this planet. The mailform uses [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
sender
address to give the recipient a
1 - 100 of 648 matches
Mail list logo
