Hi David
On 21/09/2007, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please check the following menu in IE6 and 7? I am told the
menu is not behaving correctly.
http://theriverchurch.info/
http://theriverchurch.info/wp-content/themes/RiverChurch/style.css
The Lord works in mysterious
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Georg wrote:
Have a look at this page across browser-land...
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/moa_17.html ...especially in Moz/Fx,
and do some font-resizing.
What do you consider 'wrong' in Gecko's behaviour ? (Safari/WebKit
and Konqueror have exactly the same
The following does of course *not* make sense...
As it stands now I wouldn't consider 'ex' to be a practical alternative
to 'ex' for element-sizing - in any browser under any circumstances.
Corrected to...
As it stands now I wouldn't consider 'ex' to be a practical
alternative to 'em' for
Richard Brown wrote:
Hi David
On 21/09/2007, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please check the following menu in IE6 and 7? I am told the
menu is not behaving correctly.
http://theriverchurch.info/
http://theriverchurch.info/wp-content/themes/RiverChurch/style.css
If there's any chance of the list items wrapping, as one does in your
example, then you're asking the impossible. Even if you could calculate
which items were going to wrap server-side, it'd fall apart on text resize.
Maybe with CSS 3 multi-column support, but not with the current crop of
Hello,
I have a problem here: http://www.linkhomes2000.co.uk/index.php
At present there is a lot of JS in the header, this is surrounded by:
//![CDATA[ //]]. It validates and works fine.
My problem is when I try to includes it like so:
script src=filename.js type=text/javascript
On Sep 22, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I'm observing, amongst other things, that 20ex Georgia can be either
the same, slightly larger, or slightly smaller than 10em Georgia,
depending on degree of resizing.
To me this indicates that 'ex' isn't calculated reliably in that
Hi List,
Could I please have help with this website!!
Seems to functions ok in Firefox
But the dreaded IE is giving me trouble with the horizontal menu.
I would appreciate some help in overcoming the following problems:
second level menu alignment and font size.
second level hidden
Wow - I guess I'm the only one on the planet who doesn't have issues
with this menu - I love it and use it all the time.
The sticky issue can be read up on here, with a solution:
http://www.builtfromsource.com/2006/10/23/a-fix-for-suckerfish-dropdowns-in-ie-7/
~Shelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Test-site is: url: http://www.sun-safe.com.au/
css: http://www.sun-safe.com.au/default-stylesheet.css
css: http://www.sun-safe.com.au/IE-stylesheet22.css
Check your host/server-- connection reset (unable to
Richard Brown wrote:
Hi David
On 21/09/2007, David Laakso wrote:
Could you please check the following menu in IE6 and 7? I am told the
menu is not behaving correctly.
http://theriverchurch.info/
The drop-down /drops down/ in 6 and 7.
In 7 they stick, that is to say, when
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem here: http://www.linkhomes2000.co.uk/index.php
At present there is a lot of JS in the header, this is surrounded by:
//![CDATA[ //]]. It validates and works fine.
My problem is when I try to includes it like so:
script src=filename.js
Jennifer Gardner wrote in reply to Georg Sorten
Thank you so much!! Other than a slight positioning problem it seems to all
be working now.
Is
there a specific place (or book) that will explain how you knew what to
do? I did it and it worked but I don't know why it worked or more
I'm working on a site for my wife's burgeoning business, and while I'm
running into a bunch of snags, this one has me puzzled. The following works:
#top-nav {
background: #28629E;
color: #FFF;
width: 100%;
font-style: italic;
font-weight: bold;
On 2007/09/22 19:20 (GMT-0400) Erik Harris apparently typed:
However, the following does NOT work:
#top-nav {
background: #28629E;
color: #FFF;
width: 100%;
font: italic bold 0.9em;
text-align: center;
}
Why does the font shorthand not work? I suppose one
* Erik Harris wrote:
font: italic bold 0.9em;
Why does the font shorthand not work? I suppose one is as good as the
other (i.e. the one that works), but it seems that, according to the spec,
both should be equivalent. Given that it fails to work in both Firefox and
IE7, I'm sure _I'm_
Hi there,
My questions begin here:
http://dime77.dizinc.com/~somedom/geothermex/about-us.html
CSS here: http://dime77.dizinc.com/~somedom/geothermex/geothermex_styles.css
The navigation in the header of the page is png images, yet when I
increase the type size in the browser, the spacing
In IE6 the footer is located on the bottom- right and runs off the page
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:13:25 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED] CC: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: Re: [css-d] Website
check please!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Test-site is: url:
At 07:35 PM 9/22/2007, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
both should be equivalent. Given that it fails to work in both Firefox and
IE7, I'm sure _I'm_ doing something wrong; I just don't know what.
The specification http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#font-shorthand
actually says that you have to
Keno wrote:
Hi List,
Could I please have help with this website!!
Seems to functions ok in Firefox
But the dreaded IE is giving me trouble with the horizontal menu.
I would appreciate some help in overcoming the following problems:
second level menu alignment and font size.
On Sep 23, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Don Hinshaw wrote:
http://dime77.dizinc.com/~somedom/geothermex/about-us.html
CSS here: http://dime77.dizinc.com/~somedom/geothermex/
geothermex_styles.css
The navigation in the header of the page is png images, yet when I
increase the type size in the
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
ps - don't ask me to read the text of your navigation, it is sooo small.
Yep, it's tiny AND it gets red over blue (I really suggest you to
change colors, maybe yellowish over blue) --assuming you're using a
bigger text, otherwise, it wouldn't matter much
Don Hinshaw wrote:
http://dime77.dizinc.com/~somedom/geothermex/about-us.html
Question 2: I would actually prefer to use html type instead of images
there, but I could not think of a clever way to keep the words from
disappearing when they got larger and pushed down over the white page
Rafael wrote:
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
ps - don't ask me to read the text of your navigation, it is sooo small.
Yep, it's tiny AND it gets red over blue (I really suggest you to
change colors, maybe yellowish over blue) --assuming you're using a
bigger text, otherwise, it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: second level menu alignment and font size.
second level hidden behind images
second level disappears with cursor to run over
also bottom navigation alignment.I'm sure you have a reason for it, but I
don't see the absolute necessity of giving Z-indexes to the top
On 21/09/2007, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please check the following menu in IE6 and 7? I am told
the menu is not behaving correctly.
http://theriverchurch.info/
http://theriverchurch.info/wp-content/themes/RiverChurch/style.css
The Lord works in mysterious ways:
Hi Don,
Try the following:
Get rid of the images and the javascript rollover for the navigation on the
header.
Mark up that navigation as HTML type as you want.
Set the height for the #header in ems instead px.
As you define the base font 62.5% you get 10px = 1em.
So the header height must be
On Behalf Of Richard Brown
Many thanks for the reply. I have changed the subject to reflect the
next question. What do folks do if they don't use the suckerfish
option please? Any suggestions?
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/keyboard_friendly_dropdown_menu/EK.asp
HTH
--
Regards,
Thierry
28 matches
Mail list logo
