From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Occasionally one has some very limited sympathy for the criminals. I sat
listening a few years ago to a plea of guilty at Southwark CC for unlawful
possession; discharge with intent to endanger life; att. murder(acquitted of
the latter) well-known drug dealer in the
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not after the comment about Pistol AD. I was at the last one and
so was Lord Cullen and neither of us saw anything that you mention.
You say later on Pistol 94, so possibly you are getting confused
as to the dates, but Pistol 96 did not have
From: "Earl W", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was concerned too that at the last "Pistol AD" that there were a number
of
black people present also. One can most definitely "judge a book by its
cover"! Drug dealers and illegal "Yardies" seeking to buy "off-ticket guns"
with money made from
From: "Robert Dashwood", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was concerned too that at the last "Pistol AD" that there were a number of
black people present also. One can most definitely "judge a book by its
cover"! Drug dealers and illegal "Yardies" seeking to buy "off-ticket guns"
with money made
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was concerned too that at the last "Pistol AD" that there were a
number of
black people present also. One can most definitely "judge a book by its
cover"! Drug dealers and illegal "Yardies" seeking to buy "off-ticket
guns"
with money made from
From: "Richard Loweth", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was concerned too that at the last "Pistol AD" that there were a number of
black people present also. One can most definitely "judge a book by its
cover"! Drug dealers and illegal "Yardies" seeking to buy "off-ticket guns"
with money made from
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex, you seem to want to misconstrue nearly everything I write. I'll
have
one more go then give up...
If that's a firm promise, Kenneth, I will try to explain, but without
inserting yet again everything that was written before.
My reference
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex, you seem to want to misconstrue nearly everything I write. I'll have
one more go then give up...
For clarity's sake I will preface quotes from your posting between ~ ~ marks.
~Ferocious looking characters, unshaven, unwashed, wearing camouflage
From: "Richard Loweth", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ferocious looking characters, unshaven, unwashed, wearing camouflage
uniforms, pot bellied with knives sticking out of their boots ...
get the picture? If they were playing violins I would consider banning
music!
What? Do you mean like
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And your point is? If you seriously think that rapid fire
competitions
caused the demise of pistol shooting then you aren't on the same planet
as me.
No, Kenneth, I don't think that rapid fire had much to do with it!
Ferocious looking
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex Hamilton wrote:
Synchronised Swiming is not a sport. It a very small part of Swiming,
which is practiced by many thousands in UK alone - probably millions
worldwide.
Well if synchronised swimming is a very small part of swimming then .50 Rifle
is a
From: "niel fagan", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh how reasonable a reply. But I have seen very similar ones from those
defending their "self-actions" on the previous bans ie the NRA , and the
Deer Society, and the many other self-interest groups who junked someone
else's sport to help them keep
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex Hamilton's comment exhibits the kind of Luddite mentality that is in
danger of killing our sport. The same attitude applied to golf would have
everyone playing with one club. He should perhaps remember that many of us
were first taught to shoot in the army and
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To claim that something is a sport implies that a large
number of people are participating. The fact that something
is shot in Switzerland or USA does not constitute a sport
here - I wish it did, but we have to be realistic.
Ah! And just how
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you read my reply to Tom Charnock email, Paul, you would have known
that I do more for you that you do for me and that I am spending more
that anyone half a working week every week on trying to do what I can
for all shooting sports.
All that
From: "Tom Charnock", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh how reasonable a reply. But I have seen very similar ones from those
defending their "self-actions" on the previous bans ie the NRA , and the
Deer Society, and the many other self-interest groups who junked someone
else's sport to help them keep
From: "Richard Loweth", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I personally do not think that anybody should be allowed to own any gun of a
type that I personally do not shoot. And those should be strictly licensed.
Furthermore no-one has any use of military and police type weapons such as
pistols, carbines
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, Tom, I have never seen a 50 cal rifle and certainly never
heard or seen one being shot. I shoot regularly at Bisley and other MoD
ranges and although I shoot Target Rifle up to 1000 yds. Match Rifle is
shot up to 1200 and they do not
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex Hamilton said:
To claim thatsomething is a sport implies that a large
number of people are participating. The fact that something
is shot in Switzerland or USA does not constitute a sport
here - I wish it did, but we have to be realistic.
Ah! And just
From: "Tom Charnock", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CLIPPED,
From: "Alex Hamilton", INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, what is the attraction of .50 cal? Very good for long range
sniping? Is that a sport?
Hunting of game and vermin I understand. I also recognise and accept
target
From: "M-P", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can any body advise how this proposed ban will affect .50 Cal. BLACK
POWDER. Rifles and Muskets/Shotguns
For some time now I have been wanting to purchase a .50 Cal. Flint lock
rifle for Deer stalking.
Comments please,
Rgds, Clive Y2K
A Cynic is what a
21 matches
Mail list logo
