The future is downloading. Can you hear the impact?
O[rphan] D[rift]
Cyber Positive
The Armadillo Group
-
Special update for My.MP3.com registered users.
-
** Create Personal Playlists! **
Did you know that you can build playlists from your
favorite MP3.com music, song recommendations
If you think that report was disturbing, check out my article that should
be at wired.com at 3 am pt. --Declan
David Molnar writes:
Note that cash payments can have a property which encrypted messages
usually do not : you can have the mix break up the payment into
random-sized chunks, or aggregate several payments into a single
transaction between servers.
For example, say I send a payment for
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: Jim Choate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using other definitions.
What a fucking putz. Invent your own language and you expect others to go
along with it? Fat chance.
EVERYONE uses his own definitions when he speaks / writes. A dictionary does
not "define" words, it just
Phill wrote:
I know enough people who were involved in the previous investigations
of Mitnick to corroborate the points I made, namely that Mitnick is a nasty
piece of work and a pathetic loser rather than the harmless chap his
defence attorney would have people believe.
Watching Mitnick
At 8:48 AM -0800 3/4/00, Steve Mynott wrote:
I would have thought the very name "cypherpunks" suggests list
sympathies lie more on the "hacker" side then on those of
self-professed security experts.
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 07:30:24PM -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
When cypherpunks was
To the contrary, there have been questions raised about the book by
journalists who are not in any way a "Mitnick supporter." Check out way
back issues of CuD. Mitnick may well be a loser but that does not mean
everything written about him was true.
-Declan
t 10:57 3/4/2000 -0500, Phillip
At 12:33 AM 3/4/00 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
Economics - the study of how people choose among alternative uses of their
(usualy scarce) resources.
But using your definition then micro-economics is the same as
micro-capitalism? Macro-economics is macro-capitalism?
ROTFL
The other
There is a way to find the meat address of
a web browser, *even if through an anonymizing
proxy*, if the user is connected via a modem
subject to Hayes command sequence attacks.
The attack uses a variant of the Hayes exploit that Eric Cordian
mentioned in a DDoS context. The idea is that
Hi,
Tomorrow's Soldier: The Warriors, Weapons, and Tactics That Will Win
America's Wars in the Twenty-first Century
D. Alexander
ISBN 0-380-79502-7
$6.50 US
The future is downloading. Can you hear the
At 9:19 PM -0800 3/3/00, Reese wrote:
At 01:22 PM 3/3/00 -0500, David Honig wrote:
At 01:26 AM 3/3/00 -0500, Bill Stewart wrote:
Must be a typo - isn't it
"HOW Should The United States Use Nuclear Threats To Deter
Chemical and Biological Attacks? A Debate." :-)
The only way this would be
Another design issue to take into account in building a payments mix system
is that, unlike a message mix system, there is (at least in the United
States) an obvious "legal" (as opposed to technical) attack against payment
mix machine operators. Whereas message remailer operators are not
Export of the dolls is, of course, banned for children without
arms dealer permits :-)
At 08:55 AM 03/04/2000 -0500, Jay Holovacs wrote:
I don't remember seeing this posted here:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/377312.asp
***
G.I. Joe honors WW II code talkers
Navajo action figure
On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, Marcel Popescu wrote:
EVERYONE uses his own definitions when he speaks / writes. A dictionary does
not "define" words, it just indicates the most common ones.
No, normaly people use words within a reasonable range of commen
expectations. It's one of the reasons people
- Original Message -
From: Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthew
Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2000 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: Vin McLellan Charles Mudd On Denial of Service Attacks
At 07:30
Markoff. Isn't that the guy who may have fabricated (artistic license)
portions of a less than adequately documented book for personal profit,
then collaborated on an even more ficticious movie?
"May have fabricated", you don't have any proof, but you don't like what
he wrote. As Cartman
At 3:57 PM -0800 3/4/00, John Young wrote:
It's worth pondering what demonization and criminalization
may evolve from close study of the early Cypherpunk archives
made availalble a few days ago by Ralph Seberry :
http://lanesbry.com/cypherpunks
After a fews days of reading those remarkable
In 003701bf84c2$d4fc4e50$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/02/00
at 09:44 PM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Wait a minute. If I remember correctly, *Thawte* does X.509 in PGP,
already, right?
Shure does, the problem with the analysis many have been making is that
it is 5 years
On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, Marcel Popescu wrote:
Hi! David Madore had an interesting idea - you can read about it at
http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/madore/misc/freespeech.html . Being a fan
of Delphi, I wrote a program that enables one to implement that idea.
Unfortunately, he doesn't have
On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, dmolnar wrote:
On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, Jim Choate wrote:
Anonymous mailer operaters can most definitely be considered to be 'doing
anything' if it is found they're in the loop of a criminal investigation.
Yes. This is why I think it is important that even the senders
At 08:02 PM 3/4/00 -0500, Petro wrote:
? wrote:
People on this list think they've proven communism wrong, but
they've always avoided any real confrontation with it. No ones
strives to understand if communism might have something
valuable to say-- that's what passes for an open mind here.
Obviously, assorted FedGoons(tm) dislike untraceable money. Nasty
terrorists, child pornographers, drug dealers, and other horsemen could
hide their "profits" then...
But is there a *legitimate* reason to have anti-money-laundering laws? I
can't think of any, but perhaps I'm being naive.
On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, reject wrote:
Obviously, assorted FedGoons(tm) dislike untraceable money. Nasty
terrorists, child pornographers, drug dealers, and other horsemen could
hide their "profits" then...
But is there a *legitimate* reason to have anti-money-laundering laws? I
can't think
I've written up a public key encryption algorithm I came up with and some
thoughts on it at
http://www.gawth.com/bram/essays/simple_public_key.html
I've also posted some very provocative conjectures at
http://www.gawth.com/bram/essays/wild_cryptographic_conjectures.html
You might find them
On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, reject wrote:
Obviously, assorted FedGoons(tm) dislike untraceable money. Nasty
terrorists, child pornographers, drug dealers, and other horsemen could
hide their "profits" then...
But is there a *legitimate* reason to have anti-money-laundering laws? I
can't
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1956.text.html
Daniel Boone writes:
Another design issue to take into account in building a payments mix system
is that, unlike a message mix system, there is (at least in the United
States) an obvious "legal" (as opposed to technical) attack against
It's worth pondering what demonization and criminalization
may evolve from close study of the early Cypherpunk archives
made availalble a few days ago by Ralph Seberry :
http://lanesbry.com/cypherpunks
After a fews days of reading those remarkable exchanges, it would
be a surprise if they
On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, Jim Choate wrote:
Anonymous mailer operaters can most definitely be considered to be 'doing
anything' if it is found they're in the loop of a criminal investigation.
Yes. This is why I think it is important that even the senders of
anonymous mail not be able to prove
On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, Jim Choate wrote:
Anonymous mailer operaters can most definitely be considered to
be 'doing
anything' if it is found they're in the loop of a criminal
investigation.
Yes. This is why I think it is important that even the senders of
anonymous mail not be able to
30 matches
Mail list logo
