SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE Chemical Weapons Defense Subcommittee
hearing on Chemical Demilitarization. Witnesses: Joseph Westphal, acting
secretary of the Army; James Bacon, program manager, Chemical
Demilitarization; Michael Parker, program manager, Assembled Chemical
Weapons
Experts Highlight Shortcomings Of National Terrorism Preparedness
Response Capabilities
7 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 18:01:41 -0400
7 Subject: 4/24/01 Experts Highlight Shortcomings Of National
Terrorism Preparedness Response Capabilities
7 From: Hansen, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday, April 25, 2001, at 06:41 AM, Steve Mynott wrote:
Is John Young actually a Nym for Robert Hettinga?
Or is there meaning hidden via some advanced steganographical
technique?
John Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That'd plonk the whole discoursing shebang, I mean lockbox all
Is John Young actually a Nym for Robert Hettinga?
Or is there meaning hidden via some advanced steganographical
technique?
John Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That'd plonk the whole discoursing shebang, I mean lockbox all
golden tongues everywhere.
Then journalisming kaput, and
Hey Tim.
I've got a great idea. Let's ignore each other.
Bear
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Trei, Peter wrote:
Just how dangerous an extra 25+% dioxin is I don't know.
Only it's a lot more harm than you'd think, if that 25% is concentrated
somewhere along the human food chain. Which it seems to be.
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], gsm:
Peter wrote:
My understanding is this:
1. It is not a regulatory requirement for an airline
passenger in the US to produce identification.
2. In fact, it's a violation of the airline's common carrier
status for them to do so - they must admit anyone who
shows up with a valid
At 8:13 PM +0300 4/25/01, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
I think this may be one idea for which you don't want credit.
Actually it's one that's been implemented. The problem is, those perverters
made their Net such a fun place *everybody* wanted part of it.
interesting to me that out of my four years working for the IMF, I've never
once seen any of these textbooks on an economist's bookshelf. perhaps
post-PhDs working in the real world have a vastly different view of academic
economics.
phillip
btw everyone does, however, read the latest papers
Tim May wrote:
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001, at 09:21 AM, Bill Stewart wrote:
Perhaps the field has changed since I was in college, but back then,
academic econometrics had the reputation of being dominated by Marxists -
. . .
I'll provide a data point about what corporations want: they
hire a
At Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:29:29 -0400, Trei, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sandy Sandfort[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote
Peter wrote:
My understanding is this:
1. It is not a regulatory requirement for an airline
passenger in the US to produce identification.
2. In fact,
At 09:59 AM 4/25/01 -0400, Trei, Peter wrote:
The figure I heard was that up to this date, the amount of dioxin released
in the cow-pyres was equal to 25% of the total annual British industrial
output. Presumably more will be released as the cull goes on (they really
should be using napalm).
--
At 04:50 PM 4/24/2001 -0400, Faustine wrote:
http://www.best.com/~ddfr/Academic/Anarchy_and_Eff_Law/Anarchy_and_Eff_Law.
html.
I read these essays: is this really representative of his best work? It
seemed
awfully rudimentary. In fact, I did a search on the NBER website for any real
Ralph Wallis[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Tuesday, 24 Apr 2001 at 16:13, Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, it used to be SOP to buy train tickets at the ticket
window--for cash and with no I.D. or phone numbers or SS numbers or
forehead marks.
It looks like the temporary
Sandy Sandfort[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote
Peter wrote:
My understanding is this:
1. It is not a regulatory requirement for an airline
passenger in the US to produce identification.
2. In fact, it's a violation of the airline's common carrier
status for them to do so -
[Got a bounce first time due to list management software command]
What would be sensible is third party ratings.
If a given country wants to censor things (Germans and French certain
writings, other governments other writings), just let them create their
rating service and allow their citizens
At 6:33 PM -0500 4/25/01, Jim Choate wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:43:20PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
From our perspective, it will show the foolishness of government
overreaction (ordering a million animals to be slaughtered and burned
I wrote, and to curb offlist replies, flames and comparisons to John Young,
I write again:
BTW, I need a gray travel consultant. Lemme know if anybody knows of one.
Will accept salt-and-pepper gray.
= low-key/anonymous travel, increasingly critical to execs in certain parts
of the world, as
18 matches
Mail list logo
