Given that you are a Web hosting company, I am surprised to see no URL
for further information.
Marc de Piolenc
Look at This wrote:
Are YOU looking for a new website, to develop an existing website, for
cheaper hosting or domain names?
We are a UK based company who would like to offer
Nomen Nescio wrote:
So what you are suggesting is that I might as well take out US
citizenship, since the IRS behaves just as piratically and
imperially to anyone who gets a job in the US?
Considering only taxes, I think that's correct. You do need to consider
other things, such as what
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Are you saying that if someone is legally resident in the US for a
while, the US IRS will attempt to get his assets all over the
world forever? I find this hard to believe.
Not necessarily get them, but tax them. Believe!
Marc de Piolenc
--
Remember September 11,
Basically, none. A US resident is taxed just like a citizen. In fact,
even if you are not a green card holder, but have a substantial
presence in the US, you are still taxed like a citizen.
Marc de Piolenc
An Metet wrote:
What are the tax implications of a US resident green card holder, with
Basically, none. A US resident is taxed just like a citizen. In fact,
even if you are not a green card holder, but have a substantial
presence in the US, you are still taxed like a citizen.
Marc de Piolenc
An Metet wrote:
What are the tax implications of a US resident green card holder, with
Ultra originated in Poland, not Britain. The wartime decryption work was
of course carried out in Britain, but without the prewar seed work of
the Poles it would probably have been futile.
Marc de Piolenc
matthew X wrote:
It's not the great movie yet to
be made on the subject, but I'm sure
Ultra originated in Poland, not Britain. The wartime decryption work was
of course carried out in Britain, but without the prewar seed work of
the Poles it would probably have been futile.
Marc de Piolenc
matthew X wrote:
It's not the great movie yet to
be made on the subject, but I'm sure
A. Melon wrote:
Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2002, at 06:59 AM, Mike Rosing wrote:
But the reason we have AC today is because Tesla requested no
royalties on his motor/generator. Something for Brands to think
about.
No, we have AC because AC works
Gil Hamilton wrote:
F. Marc de Piolenc forwards:
Among the Bourgeoisophobes
Why the Europeans and Arabs, each in their own way, hate America and
Israel.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/102gwtnf.asp
It may be true that they hate freedom in some
A. Melon wrote:
Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2002, at 06:59 AM, Mike Rosing wrote:
But the reason we have AC today is because Tesla requested no
royalties on his motor/generator. Something for Brands to think
about.
No, we have AC because AC works
Among the Bourgeoisophobes
Why the Europeans and Arabs, each in their own way, hate America and
Israel.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/102gwtnf.asp
--
Remember September 11, 2001 but don't forget July 4, 1776
They that can give up essential liberty to
/02 +0800, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
Nonsense. If you can't see any difference between terrorists and
risistants you are either wilfully ignorant or confused.
Terrorist is what the bigger side of an asymmetrical conflict
call the smaller side. Also crazy, and other intended-derogatory
labels.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've been listening to Shrub to much. What makes you think this is about
hating freedom? Might this not be about getting us to mind our own fucking
business???
I really don't give a fig about the opinions of the current resident of
the White House. I've been
Nonsense. If you can't see any difference between terrorists and
résistants you are either wilfully ignorant or confused.
A terrorist strikes symbolic targets, preferably undefended ones. A
résistant strikes at the occupying power.
Of course it is possible for one and the same person to be both
Ask a Booch accolade to define 'simple' and 'complex' sometime.
I think you mean acolyte, as in disciple or follower, not accolade
as in praise...
If you like using ten-dollar words (and I do), keep a dictionary handy.
Marc de Piolenc
A few details that make me doubt the authenticity of this news item, or
perhaps the accuracy with which it is reported.
Major Variola (ret) wrote:
General Worden envisions a broad mission ranging from
black
campaigns that use disinformation and other covert
Steve Schear wrote:
I was having trouble understanding the thought constructs that these judges
use to arrive at their application and interpretation of the constitutional
issues until I came across a copy of a 1995 treatise by Larry Lessig,
Translating Federalism: United States v Lopez.
Jim Choate wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
Jim Choate wrote:
Property rights don't exist as absolute human rights.
Nonsense. It is impossible to logically separate property rights from
the right to life.
I disagree. Life Property. One can have life
Jim Choate wrote:
Property rights don't exist as absolute human rights.
Nonsense. It is impossible to logically separate property rights from
the right to life. The right to life is absolute, therefore the right to
property is, too.
Marc de Piolenc
Jei wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:17:53 -0500
From: Matthew Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matthew Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: James Bovard On Fighting Terrorism, Saving Tyrants
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:21:08 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Michael,
Wow - two minds with but one set of thoughts.
Michael Motyka wrote:
Won't it be wonderful if the Court rules in favor of the 1st?
OTOH, why trust in a corruptible legal system?
Use cash and don't leave the ID information at the goddam bookstore in
the first place. If
Petro wrote:
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 04:27 AM, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
What's good for the goose should be good for the gander, ya?
Nonsense. No reasonable definition of criminal conduct would put the US
government and al-Quaeda in the same category.
How about
mattd wrote:
US violates the Geneva Convention
The US is a signatory to the Geneva Convention, which specifies the
conditions under which such prisoners are to be treated. The Convention
covers irregular forces such as al-Qaeda as well as regular armed forces,
Al-Quaeda is not a military
It will work - provided that you provide a trained anesthetist for every
four or so passengers. There's no such thing as a safe, stable
anesthetic.
Marc de Piolenc
Marcel Popescu wrote:
The following article is pretty unsettling, in that it makes the case that
- the technique is
I think they may be referring to a random string of _ASCII characters_.
That would be subject to compression because it is not random at the bit
level.
But 100:1? I have no idea how to achieve that.
Marc de Piolenc
Declan McCullagh wrote:
What exactly is random data? Does it have to appear
Hey folks - you need to keep in mind that the not ratified argument is
not what will be discussed, and for obvious reasons. The IRS is not
competent to comment on whether their marching orders were or were not
properly ratified by the People. It is the actual content of their
statutory authority
Jim Choate wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
It is clear that whatever ID procedures were in effect, they were not
effective. Many enlistees lied about their ages and got away with it.
I have zero problem with that assertion.
However, lying about ones age
You need to get away from Manila, Mattd. It just ain't the Philippines,
any more than Paris is France.
Also: give yourself some time for acclimation before writing. I'm glad I
didn't see this piece in '96 before I first came here, because I would
have had a completely false impression of the
It is clear that whatever ID procedures were in effect, they were not
effective. Many enlistees lied about their ages and got away with it.
Marc de Piolenc
Duncan Frissell wrote:
At 05:10 PM 12/13/01 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
Which is beside your point. Your statement was that the government
Jim Choate wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Sigh. Choate on court decisions is like Ashcroft on civil liberties.
Neither understands them.
Ad hominim, ad hominim, ad nausium.
Gee - don't you think that if you're going to use hifalutin terms like
ad hominem and
Tim May wrote:
Answer: they do! Go to any large copying center near a university and
look for professor packs or HistCon 101 Course Materials consisting
of copied material out of various textbooks, hard and soft. The deal is
that the student takes the professor pack over to a copy machine
And you might mention for the nuclearly impaired that the fuel used in
RTGs is not the same as the fissionables used in reactors and weapons.
Marc de Piolenc
Eric Cordian wrote:
Peter Trei wrote:
I have a vague memory of seeing a photo of a ?3 inch? ball of Pu (isotopic
composition
A couple of corrections from somebody who began studying this threat
fifteen years ago.
There is little danger to weapons builders from exposure to fissile
materials, because they have very little spontaneous radioactivity. The
radioactive emissions come when the device goes supercritical during
Tim May wrote:
I would like to read these papers. Are they available on-line?
If they are, search engines will very likely have indexed them.
I would do the search for you, but your retainer has expired.
Just thought you might know offhand. Search engines it is...
Marc de Piolenc
Tim May wrote:
Nomen Nescio and others should read Chaum's Credentials without
identity papers. A true name is just another credential, not
necessarily more important than any of several other credentials. People
should think deeply about this issue.
I would like to read these papers. Are
An even more basic point is punishment - for what? These people are
SUSPECTS, against whom no criminal act has yet been proven in open
court. They are not yet eligible for punishment in any form.
Marc de Piolenc
Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
You
O-kay - the learning process begins. In every war we've ever fought,
we've learned from our opponents - if the political leadership gave us
the opportunity to do it.
Now we know the Talibs have small, heavily armed forces staked out NEXT
TO obvious fixed objectives. Our next assaults will be in
I would be interested to see that formula. I thought I knew them all,
but all the thermite formulas I know require at least a two-stage
initiator or a direct blowtorch flame.
Also, the formulas I've seen prescribe much larger particle sizes than
the colloidal range used in pigments, to keep
You can find formulas for this spray in many formularies - it's been
used at least as far back as WWI for making an envelope transparent for
a few minutes. Actually, translucent would be a better term, as you can
only read text that is right up against the inside of the envelope. What
is more,
Jim Choate wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you cannot tell the difference between terrorists and
freedom fighters, you got shit for brains.
The revolutionaries killed british soldiers in America. They
did not go to england and kill english children.
Why
Jim Choate wrote:
Why? The Americans were most certainly terrorist/revolutionaries/freedom
fighters/etc.
Again, you make no distinction between freedom fighters and terrorists,
which is very sad because there is a rather important difference. Being
incapable of making the distinction, you
Jim Choate wrote:
Nations with imperial aspirations, invariably, throughout History
change their conscript based army in favor of an army of paid
soldiers. Today euphimisticaly called 'profesional' soldiers, but know
also as mercenaries and soldiers of fortune in the not-so-distant
past.
David Honig wrote:
At 12:42 PM 10/25/01 +0800, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
Jim Choate wrote:
We need to send a message that armed propaganda is not an acceptable
form of self-expression, no matter what the alleged cause.
Review the American revolution and the current news before
Peter Capelli wrote:
If you start at zero, 50% is only 50 cents, Ponemon said.
Where did he learn math, I wonder?
Marc de Piolenc
Jim Choate wrote:
We need to send a message that armed propaganda is not an acceptable
form of self-expression, no matter what the alleged cause.
Review the American revolution and the current news before you follow this
little meme very far.
..and your point is...?
Marc de Piolenc
Jim Choate wrote:
But Nato's escape clause won't work this time round. For as the Afghan
refugees turn up in their thousands at the border, it is palpably evident
that they are fleeing not the Taliban but our bombs and missiles. The
Taliban is not ethnically cleansing its own Pashtun
Jim Choate wrote:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
Elementary - fair is whatever the parties in interest agree to. Period.
'agree' is synonymous with 'free' in this case. All you're doing is
playing word games and hand waving.
What does it mean to 'agree'?
You
David Honig wrote:
Personally I'd prefer a non-colonial foreign policy that doesn't generate
such antipathy.
And if you believe that WTC had anything to do with US foreign policy,
or that we would cease being targets if we e.g. dropped suppport for
Israel, you are living in a dream world and
Sounds like we need to be dictating into cellphones, with remote
recording!
Marc de Piolenc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the Terry stop escalated, and I was ordered to follow the officer for
more questioning, I asked him, while holding out the recorder for the
answer, whether I was under
YOu need to understand that terrorism has its own ideology, which has
nothing to do with whatever the terrorist du jour espouses publicly. All
that the actions proposed below would do is infuriate REAL Muslims, who
are not yet our enemies and need not be.
Marc de Piolenc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
50 matches
Mail list logo
