Ring, Chris cr...@ti.com writes:
Just a quick can we talk through this patch a bit note...
I _think_ there are existing codecs on some DaVinci platforms
(e.g. DM365) that are already using this SRAM memory. The current
[easy] solution to their use case was to keep this memory out of the
Brownell; linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] davinci: add SRAM allocator
Ring, Chris cr...@ti.com writes:
Just a quick can we talk through this patch a bit note...
I _think_ there are existing codecs on some DaVinci platforms (e.g.
DM365) that are already
On Friday 22 May 2009, Tivy, Robert wrote:
I think the way codecs are going to request SRAM is by
asking for all of it,
Yeech. I hope that's on the list of bugs to fix!
which means that if the audio driver takes any of it
through sram_alloc(), codecs won't have any. And if
codecs take
-Original Message-
From: David Brownell [mailto:davi...@pacbell.net]
On Friday 22 May 2009, Tivy, Robert wrote:
I think the way codecs are going to request SRAM is by
asking for all of it,
Yeech. I hope that's on the list of bugs to fix!
AFAIK, it's not, nor is it a bug.
Ring, Chris cr...@ti.com writes:
-Original Message-
From: David Brownell [mailto:davi...@pacbell.net]
On Friday 22 May 2009, Tivy, Robert wrote:
I think the way codecs are going to request SRAM is by
asking for all of it,
Yeech. I hope that's on the list of bugs to fix!
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
All of this discussion isn't relevant to the need for an in-kernel
SRAM allocator upstream. What is being discussed here is various ways
of using or not using it. IMHO, this discussion isn't relevant to
[ removing linux-arm-kernel ]
Ring, Chris cr...@ti.com writes:
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
All of this discussion isn't relevant to the need for an in-kernel
SRAM allocator upstream. What is being discussed here is various ways
of
Just a quick can we talk through this patch a bit note...
I _think_ there are existing codecs on some DaVinci platforms (e.g. DM365) that
are already using this SRAM memory. The current [easy] solution to their use
case was to keep this memory out of the kernel, and simply give it to CMEM to
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Ring, Chris wrote:
I _think_ there are existing codecs on some DaVinci
platforms (e.g. DM365) that are already using this
SRAM memory. The current [easy] solution to their use
case was to keep this memory out of the kernel, and
simply give it to CMEM to manage (via
