2010/12/5 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
To save you some seconds locating the appropriate statement:
| The release team can remove source packages - and *all* binaries built
| from them - from testing. Per-architecture removals from testing are
| not handled by the Release Managers
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (06/12/2010):
It was removed from unstable on my last upload.
No. That doesn't remove it *from the archive*.
| $ rmadison partman-zfs -s unstable|grep kfreebsd
| partman-zfs | 3 | sid/main/debian-installer | kfreebsd-i386
| partman-zfs | 4 | sid/main/debian
2010/12/6 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
No. That doesn't remove it *from the archive*.
| $ rmadison partman-zfs -s unstable|grep kfreebsd
| partman-zfs | 3 | sid/main/debian-installer | kfreebsd-i386
| partman-zfs | 4 | sid/main/debian-installer | kfreebsd-amd64
Old binaries stay around
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (05/12/2010):
Ok, I disabled partman-zfs on kfreebsd-i386.
Need to get rid of it in the archive too, I guess? I don't see any bug
against ftp.debian.org to that effect.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
2010/12/5 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (05/12/2010):
Ok, I disabled partman-zfs on kfreebsd-i386.
Need to get rid of it in the archive too, I guess? I don't see any bug
against ftp.debian.org to that effect.
Actually the request should be sent to -release
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (05/12/2010):
Actually the request should be sent to -release […]
No. I wrote ftp.debian.org and I meant it.
To save you some seconds locating the appropriate statement:
| The release team can remove source packages - and *all* binaries built
| from them - from
Quoting Robert Millan (r...@alioth.debian.org):
Author: rmh
Date: Tue Nov 30 18:34:05 2010
New Revision: 65817
Log:
Add partman-zfs/i386 template to warn users who want to use ZFS on i386.
Added:
trunk/packages/partman/partman-zfs/check.d/zfs_i386 (contents, props
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (04/12/2010):
I unmarked this for translation.
My opinion, indeed, is that if ZFS is unsafe on kfreebsd-i386,
then partman-zfs should no tbe kfreebsd-any but only
kfreebsd-amd64
As suggested by Robert, I bring this to -bsd as well.
My main
on kfreebsd-i386, but do not make
use/propose it from d-i (for a while)?
Well, if partman-zfs is Arch: kfreebsd-amd64, this is exactly what
will happen. It doesn't prevent using ZFS on kfreebsd-i386 but the
filesystem won't be offered *in D-I* as an option for i386 installs.
signature.asc
Description
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 03:21:03PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
True, but running out of memory is, in traditional Unix, an irrecove-
rable error condition, and if it occurs in the kernel, its only option
IS, in fact, to panic.
It can also return ENOMEM. Userland doesn't always cope with
Rogério Brito dixit:
Personally, I find the following comment from the FreeBSD ZFS tuning
guide most scary:
Oh please. You don’t have to use it if you don’t want it. But this
doesn’t prevent it from being offered to these who do: “We sell rope
to hang yourself.”
(Someone here mentioned that
* Jerome Warnier:
While the current status of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is interesting, I was
quite disappointed there is no ZFS support in it (at least any related
tools).
Any plans to enable this support?
Is ZFS producton-ready? On Solaris, Sun recommends to reformat and
restore from backup
* Florian Weimer:
* Jerome Warnier:
While the current status of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is interesting, I was
quite disappointed there is no ZFS support in it (at least any related
tools).
Any plans to enable this support?
Is ZFS producton-ready? On Solaris, Sun recommends to reformat and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Weimer wrote:
[...]
Is ZFS producton-ready? On Solaris, Sun recommends to reformat and
restore from backup should your system panic on boot:
Personally, I find the following comment from the FreeBSD ZFS tuning
guide most scary:
To use
Hi, David.
On Sep 24 2009, David Given wrote:
Personally, I find the following comment from the FreeBSD ZFS tuning
guide most scary:
To use ZFS, at least 1GB of memory is recommended (for all architectures)
but more is helpful as ZFS needs *lots* of memory. Depending on your
workload,
While the current status of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is interesting, I was
quite disappointed there is no ZFS support in it (at least any related
tools).
Any plans to enable this support?
End of http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2009/08/msg00130.html:
If we still have more time I think we should
Hello,
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz writes:
Fou our specifics, take a look at our SVN repository
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/glibc-bsd/trunk/, namely
freebsd-libs, freebsd-util. Start with target get-orig-source
in debian/rules.
Out of curiosity, is there any plan to get the
Am Montag, 21. September 2009 09:15:04 schrieb Petr Salinger:
While the current status of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is interesting, I
was quite disappointed there is no ZFS support in it (at least any
related tools).
Any plans to enable this support?
End of
know pretty well the packaging in
Debian, but not the specifics of GNU/kFreeBSD (ports, etc...).
In general, it should be possible to create package zfsutils
similarly as is already ufsutils.
ZFS on GNU/kFreeBSD works when using the userland tools from plain
FreeBSD. Unfortunately zfsutils
Hannes a écrit :
Am Montag, 21. September 2009 09:15:04 schrieb Petr Salinger:
While the current status of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is interesting, I
was quite disappointed there is no ZFS support in it (at least any
related tools).
Any plans to enable this support?
End of
20 matches
Mail list logo
