Hi,
Uwe reported that with a newest release of xserver-xorg-core, the
bug disappeared. [1]
There has been new uploads recently in Stretch and Sid, which now have
2:1.19.2-1 and 2:1.19.3-1 respectively.
Is one of this versions the one supposed to have "fixed" the bug?
Could be helpfull if
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 07:50:38PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
>
> Do you see the same bug with the Python 2 version?
Nop, with the python2 version it works well, both test and update
commands.
> I guess you can't easily try and reproduce on testing/sid, but if you
> can, please do so.
Hi again,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > ii python3-six1.8.0-1
>
> After some researched, this problem seems to come from this dependency.
> Pulling python3-six from unstable makes the update command works again.
> This version dependency wasn't obvious from the package description.
Well,
Package: jenkins-job-builder
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
After an upgrade to the 1.3.0 version of the package on a Jessie system, it's
now impossible to update the jobs in Jenkins.
Whenever we issue the `jenkins-job-builder update
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 04:55:46PM +0200, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
Hi,
On 15:31 Tue 17 Mar , bertagaz wrote:
Hi,
When enabling storeconfig in puppetmaster, the database connection pool gets
filled up by inactive connections opened by previous puppet agents
runs.
It's
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:26:59PM +0100, bertagaz wrote:
Are you using the stomserver queue handling feature? We're not, and I'm
tempted to give it a try.
It does not fix this issue.
I'll try to test in another environment, to be sure this bug is not
related to any specifics bits
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 04:46:46PM +0200, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
On 15:42 Wed 18 Mar , bertagaz wrote:
Hi,
Just tried in another Jessie environment, which is an almost fresh one,
installed not so long ago and that didn't had a lot of changes. Sadly, I
hit the same bug
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 06:52:59PM +0200, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
On 17:44 Tue 17 Mar , bertagaz wrote:
ii puppetmaster 3.7.2-3
ii puppetmaster-common 3.7.2-3
ii puppetmaster 3.7.2-3
Do you use a WEBrick
Package: puppetmaster
Version: 3.7.2-3
Severity: important
User: tails-...@boum.org
Usertags: infra
Hi,
When enabling storeconfig in puppetmaster, the database connection pool gets
filled up by inactive connections opened by previous puppet agents runs. After
the maximum size of the pool have
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 04:55:46PM +0200, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
On 15:31 Tue 17 Mar , bertagaz wrote:
Hi,
When enabling storeconfig in puppetmaster, the database connection pool gets
filled up by inactive connections opened by previous puppet agents
runs.
It's
Hi,
= the best way to help get this fixed is probably to test the
proposed patches and to report back here :)
By the way, we're running a production puppetmaster with the patches and
everything (db creation, stored configs and exported resource
collection) works fine. I'll commit the
Package: di-netboot-assistant
Severity: normal
User: tails-...@boum.org
Usertags: infra
Dear Maintainer,
Given most of the files downloaded by di-netboot-installer are done so
over insecure connections, it makes sense to have it verifying this files
or at least provide a way for sysadmins to do
Package: puppetmaster
Version: 3.7.2-1
Severity: important
Usertags: tails-...@boum.org
Dear Maintainers,
When upgrading a puppet master from Wheezy to Jessie, it's not possible
anymore to use the `storeconfigs` option, which is required for manifests to
use exported resources. This lead to have
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 03:36:55AM +, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
Dear bertagaz:
What is this problem in Tahoe-LAFS FHS compliance?
Sorry to lag on answering this question, I sometimes have hard time to
follow my mail flow and have other task on my plate.
I've just answered
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 05:57:07PM +, Daira Hopwood wrote:
Hmm, apparently tahoe-lafs has been removed from testing due to this bug
(see https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals).
Some warning would have been nice.
There has been some on the debian-devel-announce list
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 03:53:25AM +, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
Dear bertagaz:
• Re: line 50 ² this reminds me of Tahoe-LAFS ticket #725 (“We should
whine if we're running as root.”) ³. I don't suggest any change to the
tahoe-lafs.init script, but it makes me wonder if #725 should
Hi,
I've been quite busy on another project lately, but managed to import the
last patches intrigeri sent me for this initscript.
I also tested it, fixed the last remaining bugs. It seems to work nicely.
On the packaging level, I believe it is also ready to be uploaded in the
Debian archive.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:30:33PM +, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
This issue might be blocking a project to include Tahoe-LAFS as a tool
in the Tails system:
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6227
It isn't clear to me if this is really a blocker — maybe the Tails
people can use
Hi,
I've finally had some time to go on this review process.
Thanks for your close look at this script. Your inputs were meaningful and
sounded relevant. In the end, I implemented them, as you can read in:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:53:21PM +, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
Okay, now that I've reviewed
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=tahoe/tahoe.git;a=blob;f=debian/README.Debian;h=14ea2a7c1b38d41df36dd052c44cdf22603fd775;hb=87f7666c2c3a5059dc28ea95c336b9de7f08ae47
and
Hi again,
Forgot to add that I've also updated the README.Debian file so that the
node $UID is different from its nickname when creating it.
Last update is available at:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:09 PM, James Healy ji...@deefa.com wrote:
JRuby 1.6.3 is available upstream and includes official support for ruby
1.9 syntax. Are there any plans to package 1.6.x?
yes, but every helping hand is welcome!
Is there a place where this plans are documented? What are
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:25:04PM +0100, Alex Young wrote:
On 25/09/12 13:31, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:09 PM, James Healyji...@deefa.com wrote:
JRuby 1.6.3 is available upstream and includes official support for ruby
1.9 syntax. Are there any plans to
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 06:24:41PM +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
Hi,
Without too much reading, it seems tomb and cryptmount somewhat similar.
The latter is already in the archives and stable. What's the most
important differences (if any)?
I'd say that one of the most important
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:00:59PM +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
Hi Bert,
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 13:03 +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
I'd say that one of the most important difference is the use of the
steghide tool to hide access keys in an image. Also Tomb has some Gtk
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:43:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, 05 Aug 2012, Robert Luberda wrote:
Processing triggers for doc-base ...
/usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/perl5/auto/UUID/UUID.so:
undefined symbol: Perl_xs_apiversion_bootcheck
dpkg: error
Hi,
Any news on this? I see there is a debian/ directory in the upstream repo
(btw, a dedicated branch for Debian packaging is a better option). Is
peer-review needed?
bert.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:22:22AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 14:19:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 18:26:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
W/o having looked yet at the details I'd say this *seems* like #671711,
which I'm not planning on
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 08:37:05PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 20:32:01 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:29:44 +0200, bertagaz wrote:
unblock tahoe-lafs/1.9.2-1
Please unblock package tahoe-lafs
145 files changed, 5152
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:18:33PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 23:01:00 +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
Dunno what to say, appart that 1.9.1 *is* broken, and it shouldn't be
shipped into wheezy, as it *has been reported* to be so to upstream by
many
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:30:30PM -0600, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
But then please don't spend your night on that particular package. While I
was replying to you, someone raised a bug (#683331) that should probably
be fixed before tahoe-lafs would be included in wheezy. So I'll probably
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:04:05PM +0100, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
I reviewed the commits since
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=tahoe/tahoe.git;a=commit;h=70b0e555ef5f880c08f09331946c83744ca310a5
Thanks a lot!
and saw no problems, apart from the following minor nits:
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: normal
Hi,
In an attempt to test upgrading Squeeze to Wheezy now that the Big Wheezy
Freeze has come, it failed at the dist-upgrade step.
I installed a fresh Debian Squeeze and tested from it.
I wanted first to see if it would be possible to upgrade with a
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:38:17PM +0100, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
Some reminders of things specific to the 1.9.2 release that might affect
debian
packaging:
Tahoe-LAFS 1.9.2 depends on foolscap 0.6.3, which is a change from Tahoe-LAFS
1.9.1.
(It looks like squeeze only had
Package: tahoe-lafs
Version: 1.9.1-1
Severity: important
1.9.0/1 did introduce several regressions on 1.8.3 regarding mutable
files support which makes them impossible to be retrieved. [1][2][3]
Upstream is actually preparing a 1.9.2 release, which will only be a
bugfix one and will hopefully
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:32:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 05:36 +0200, intrigeri wrote:
And, even if it was, as far as I understand it, moving a bunch of
bare-metal USB sticks from some an always-on server in a datacenter to
another one, and sharing the stick over
Source: adabrowse
Version: 4.0.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: adacgi
Version: 1.6-14
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: adasockets
Version: 1.8.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: ahven
Version: 1.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: bluetile
Version: 0.5.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: ghc-mod
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: git-annex
Version: 3.20110915
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gitit
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gnat-gps
Version: 4.3-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gnustep-dl2
Version: 0.12.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-criterion
Version: 0.5.0.10-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-authenticate
Version: 0.10.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-hakyll
Version: 3.2.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-hledger-web
Version: 0.14-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-hs3
Version: 0.5.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-http-enumerator
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-hxt-xslt
Version: 9.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-smtpclient
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-statistics
Version: 0.9.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-uuid
Version: 1.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-wai-app-static
Version: 0.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-warp
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-xss-sanitize
Version: 0.3.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-yesod-auth
Version: 0.7.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-yesod-form
Version: 0.3.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-yesod-json
Version: 0.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-yesod-persistent
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: haskell-yesod
Version: 0.9.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libalog
Version: 0.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libaws
Version: 2.7-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libflorist
Version: 2009-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libgmpada
Version: 0.0.20100805-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libgtkada2
Version: 2.14.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: liblog4ada
Version: 1.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libncursesada
Version: 5.9.20110404-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libtemplates-parser
Version: 11.5-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libtexttools
Version: 2.0.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libwww-mechanize-shell-perl
Version: 0.52-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: narval
Version: 1.10.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: pyzmq
Version: 2.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: steptalk
Version: 0.10.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: sweethome3d
Version: 3.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: elki
Version: 0.4.0~beta2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
ant
Source: fgfs-atlas
Version: 0.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: fgrun
Version: 1.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
Source: foo-yc20
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++
Source: gai
Version: 0.5.10-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -g -fPIC -Wall -O2 -I..
Source: ghemical
Version: 2.99.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
Source: gnome-mplayer
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering
Source: gtkpod
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool
Source: lastfm
Version: 1:1.5.4.27091+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -c -m64
Source: libghemical
Version: 2.99.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: liblouisutdml
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool
Source: nas
Version: 1.9.2-9
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering directory
Source: oss-libsalsa
Version: 4.1-build1052b-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]:
Source: vdr-plugin-dvd
Version: 0.3.6~b03+cvs20090426.0013-7
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: witty
Version: 3.1.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: qsapecng
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: dvorak7min
Version: 1.6.1-13
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: abraca
Version: 0.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: access-modifier-checker
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
[INFO]
Source: cyrus-sasl2
Version: 2.1.24~rc1.dfsg1+cvs2011-05-23-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: dbus-java
Version: 2.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Source: dracut
Version: 013-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
dh build
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
