In Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:19:19 +0100 Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
I've seen one in lyx-cjk bugs. It's cosmetically annoying.
I really would love to remove it but there would be quite a lot of
trouble (and fear that legitimate info could be lost).
Tell me the bug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Wirzenius) wrote on 24.12.00 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Robert van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ignoring spam has made the internet the spam-ridden place it is right now.
Spam hasn't been ignored for the past six years, thank you very much.
It thrives regardless of the
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:05:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
Did you ever wonder (assuming you even noticed) why so much spam gets sent
to completely invalid addresss (for example, to message ids)? Because
spamware sellers don't care if the finely targetted addresses they sell
In Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:06:08 +0100 Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
On related note, it's fun to watch all the spams sent to
oldclosedbug@bugs.debian.org or even oldclosedbug[EMAIL PROTECTED]
addresses. OTOH it's not fun to discover that someone spammed
In Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:06:08 +0100 Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
On related note, it's fun to watch all the spams sent to
oldclosedbug@bugs.debian.org or even oldclosedbug[EMAIL PROTECTED]
addresses. OTOH it's not fun to discover that someone spammed
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:30:47AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
For the record, right now I'm the primary reason why the spam in the BTS
`magically' disappears, once it's reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
I've seen one in lyx-cjk bugs. It's cosmetically annoying.
I really would love to
Quoting John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
You going to send them the bill then? At the bottom off the mailinglist
subscription page:
snip
I think that you have some volunteers to send dunning notices within this
thread (myself included). If you already are, could you post a summary of
your
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 01:06:53AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
Quoting Bas Zoetekouw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Now you can boost the reliability of ordinary Windows 3.x, 95 and 98 to
nearly the level of Windows NT or 2000, Microsoft's
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 01:06:53AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
Quoting Bas Zoetekouw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Now you can boost the reliability of ordinary Windows 3.x, 95 and 98
to
nearly the level of Windows NT or 2000, Microsoft's professional and
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 01:39:45AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 12:43:03AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hmm, the debian lists get quite a lot of spam lately. Is there anything
that can be done about this?
Pardon my French, but this is a fucking stupid idea. Did
from the secret journal of esoR ocsirF ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
A possability might be to have a signature key. This is not
significantly different than the extra header idea but it would allow
*any* MUA to work with it. Could be something like a GPG fingerprint or
whatever. Just a thought.
from the secret journal of Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Solution: just deal with the few spam we get so as not to hinder real
discussions.
Ben
amen.
OK, if you can do that, I'm absolutely thrilled to do it, PLEASE make
debian-devel spam-free. But the problem is that you CAN'T.
Daniel Stone wrote:
from the secret journal of Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Solution: just deal with the few spam we get so as not to hinder real
discussions.
Ben
amen.
OK, if you can do that, I'm absolutely thrilled to do it, PLEASE make
debian-devel spam-free. But the
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:00:26PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
from the secret journal of Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Solution: just deal with the few spam we get so as not to hinder real
discussions.
Ben
amen.
OK, if you can do that, I'm absolutely thrilled to do it,
Quoting Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
BTW, I'm on a 28.8, and I get over 1000 emails a day from all the lists I
am sub'd to. So I do see a lot of spam, even beyond Debian's lists. If I
can ignore it, so can everyone else, IMNHO.
Ignoring spam has made the internet the spam-ridden place it is
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
Quoting Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
BTW, I'm on a 28.8, and I get over 1000 emails a day from all the lists I
am sub'd to. So I do see a lot of spam, even beyond Debian's lists. If I
can ignore it, so can everyone
You going to send them the bill then? At the bottom off the mailinglist
subscription page:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/subscribe
is the mailinglist policy. Basically, the policy says either pay us
$1,000 up front or $1,999 after. Martin (Joey, whatever you prefer...),
Remco,
I was kind of feeling sorry about including you as a CC in the last
post--partial oversight, partial personal policy (I never quite know how
to deal with tertiary CCs: I generally detest people who adulterate a
message they're replying to, but I also think that responsibility for
replies stops
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
Quoting Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
BTW, I'm on a 28.8, and I get over 1000 emails a day from all the lists I
am sub'd to. So I do see a lot of spam, even beyond Debian's lists. If I
can ignore it, so can
19 matches
Mail list logo
