Sam Hocevar sam at zoy.org writes:
FWIW, there are no plans to change the official logo licensing as far
as I know. Unless someone comes up with a suggestion that complies with
trademark law, it will have to remain non-free if we want it to serve
the purpose it was created for.
Does it
Hi,
Yaroslav Halchenko debian at onerussian.com writes:
My questions to the list now:
1. Do we have to list all copyright holders + licenses per each piece of
software distributed within a package?
The opinion of the ftp-masters ist that we do have to:
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilbert at gmail.com writes:
Stephen Gran wrote:
That being said, packages that exist solely to download external
non-free content have traditionally been considered contrib material.
If this is just a helper script that nothing else in the package uses,
it
.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
german selling or service contracts, not only but in
particular if you buy online.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
. But it's a pity that there's no way to get the ftpmasters'
opinion except by trying, and no regular way at all, it seems, to get
the reasons for their decisions.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX
?) statements by so many people, without trying to sum up on
a web page or similar.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
that, whether in the
particular cases there's in fact any doubt, etc.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
conflictual feelings, but do you
really feel this is *right*?
Even if it is not, it's off-topic on -legal. Please continue this on
-project; note that I'm not subscribed there.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
that installed the file, and finally to
its copyright file.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
/convince upstream. Except
dropping the file, of course, if the restriction is *not* ineffective.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
what's relevant depending on the
individual case.
Can you help me out? Is there any consensus in debian-legal? I'd
rather get some general guidelines, otherwise I expect myself boring
-legal with similar questions all the time...
TIA, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein
to happen. Finally there's the GFDL, which
is a *bad* license, but DFSG-free by GR if the document does not include
any of the GFDL's invariant section options (for the details, read the
GR).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ
Andrew Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/10/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you fail, well, I fear there is currently no license for
documentation that has been approved by -legal.
Actually, the MIT license[1] covers documentation:
---
Permission is hereby granted, free
than a bug.
Yes, it's as simple as
mv ukhyphen.tex britpat.tex
$EDITOR britpat.tex
echo britpat.tex ukhypen.tex /usr/share/texmf-tetex/aliases
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
, and originally the data were in the public domain...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
.
The xml files in the glade subdirectory, as well as the images don't
have a license statement (at least not in their svn repository).
Shipping a copy of the GPL in the distribution does not mean that every
file is licensed under it.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
alone. And it would also be much less interesting to do the
work in a company with traditional organization. Therefore, the fact
that Debian is a social entity, too, with a particular culture,
contributes to my motivation to work for it.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
statement for the Documentation is the
problem.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
to dance or theatre works.)
I've seen partition used in a cover text of a music CD, it seems to
refer to the score of music for the orchestra. It might be a
false-friend like translation, in german a music score for many
instruments is called partitur.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule
.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To summarize, I think that, if those documents are actually modified in
MS Word Doc format by their actual maintainers, then their source code
is really in MS Word Doc format.
I agree.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
* material which is well-separated and not
required for the operation of the package can go into main?
That one is true, I'm sure, although I can't give you a reference,
either.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
? Or are they newly exported every release?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
just remove it, it's obsolete cruft anyway, useful
only for some hypothetical centuries-old documents.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Hi debian-legal,
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 15:14 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
,
| %%% Copyright (C) 1994 Aloysius G. Helminck. All rights reserved.
| %%% Permission is granted to to customize the declarations in this
| %%% file to serve the needs
expected anything else :)
GPL-compatible as in openssh and openssl?
The modified BSD license is GPL compatible, isn't it? (I know the
original BSD license isn't)
That doesn't matter. GPL-compatibility or copyleft ist *not* a
requirement of the DFSG, not at all.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
don't *archive* the source
code after there's been a new upload with new source code. That's no
problem with the GPL, but it appears to be with the MPL.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
- a table of contents at the start
We already have some of this, the visual separators could be more
visible...
Incidentally, is the Artistic License the same as the one in
/usr/share/common-licenses?
No, it's a different version.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
it is okay to violate the
words of the Policy and go for a separate licenses.texts file?
If you think that this is not acceptable, what else would you suggest to
actually make the copyright file useful?
TIA, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ
.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
things as they are?
The fact is that there's at least one file like this in tetex-base. And
I'm not sure whether the copyright holder can still be reached.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
to distribute it in main, or non-free, or not at all.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
for the real licensing problems first - there are plenty of
them.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
, it seems. If I had, I'd asked
differently.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
is nice, but not
necessary at all. The other issue is a question of rpm/Fedora packaging
policy which I can't comment on.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried contacting Janusz Nowacki on 28 Apr 2005 and 14 Sep 2005
but received no answer. He's obviously alive, so this could be caused
either by his lack of time
in the computer world, even on Windows systems, that stuff is
not-world readable. Or in other words because this restriction would
make the whole license void, and that can't be what the licensor
intended.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie
team).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
the first upload) about the
license status of the individual files.
There's nothing special about packages that contain differently licensed
parts, as long as they are compatible -you just need to clearly indicate
this in the copyright file.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
of modification for the author,
and I see no reason not to accept this as source in the sense of the
DFSG, since there doesn't seem to be anything better. Consequently, the
fonts would be free.
What do you think?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f
the back
cover text. be helpful?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05 Mar 2006 12:03:00 +0100 Claus Färber wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote:
The reason for this is that building (La)TeX documentation
* depends on the right number and order of commands to be
executed,
which one
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05 Mar 2006 12:03:00 +0100 Claus Färber wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote:
The reason for this is that building (La)TeX documentation
* depends on the right number and order
you be in touch with the author (explaining the
problem)?
With some, yes.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
if the sources could go to contrib.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
if it
is subsetted, you just have to collect enough documents to get all
glyphs). So if it is technically possible to extract and reuse the
font, but forbidden by the license, this is non-free.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ
on the non-free fonts.
Are you sure? Isn't it the same as a program that contains in its
sources a binary blob that's copied as-is to the executable, and the
binary blob is non-free? Just that here the binary blob, i.e. the
embedded fonts, is not even in the sources?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank
that are a PDF
presentation.
/mode
Fixing source in order to make it actually rebuildable with the declared
Build-Depends should not be left to the users...
mode=repeat
tetex-base does not rebuild documentation and does not Build-Depend on
tetex-bin.
/mode
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripsit Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do you fix errors in the document?
By waiting for upstream to release a new version.
Even though _you_ may not want to take the time to fix errors, it is
essential for freedom that _the user_ has
to the question I wanted answered, thank you
for that. I didn't ask because I expected a is suitable for main, but
just because I don't feel comfortable with legal stuff, and because I
had a faint recollection that fonts are handled specially because of
some special reason.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, everything in orig.tar.gz must be DFSG free.
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Err, of course. That's why I ask. Does debian-legal think that a
document with a DFSG-free license and with sources
magically without having worrying about LaTeX rerun, makeindex, etc...)
For a texinfo file, it's of course easy. For many LaTeX package
documentation files, often created from dtx files, it is *that*
difficult, as I already explained in this thread.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule
) in the binary package, and the sources in the source
package?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
care much.
But the important question is whether we can distribute that *existing*
document in main.
Regards, Frank
Footnotes:
[1] Read: are about to ensure, see http://bugs.debian.org/345604
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
.
And it still doesn't answer my question whether we can distribute
documents prepared with a non-free, distributable font.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
to rework all the spacing and page breaking, and probably
rather put it into contrib (or non-free if that's the only example,
since we already have a package with non-free stuff but none with
contrib).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot to answer one question - please follow up to devel if you want
to discuss this, since it isn't a legal issue.
If the usual dtx mantra:
pdflatex package.dtx
makeindex -s gind.ist
makeindex -s gglo.ist -o package.gls package.glo
pdflatex
not intentional.
I hope that, too. #353833.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
.
Has nobody volunteered to package one of the three autotools doc
packages in non-free?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Huerlimann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I'm bitten by the removal of the autoconf documentation. I wanted to do some
bugfixing in a configure.in script. But as I'm currently offline, I don't
have access to the needed documentation. Well
.
And when you violate the license by distributing modified versions with
misleading information, you loose your right to copy and use the
software. But that's not a freeness problem, I guess.
I think this is clearly DFSG-compliant.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
?
Germany (which part of the EU) has declared the GPL legal. See
http://lwn.net/Articles/73848/
Germany hasn't done anything, at least nothing is described in this
article. A particular german court has spoken.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding
* if I am stuck with
an ASCII-only medium.
I guess you've never heard of UUENCODE.
That won't help: If the device is not capable of uudecoding and
displaying the resulting Japanese, the license requirement cannot be
fulfilled.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:44:33AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:07:21AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
By contrast, if there is an invariant section written in Japanese, I
cannot
Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This discussion seems to have gone into the weeds about WHY someone
would want to make a change and whether Debian is able to make such
changes reasonably.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Well, only in part
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In practice, this means that the version string displayed in the file
log of a LaTeX run will be different, and that the user, or a developer
of a package that uses the work, has the possibility to check for the
version and act accordingly; it does
not a question of freeness, it's a technical
problem.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
of documents ;-)
Yes.
Well, let's say preserve rendering. A no-longer incorrect letter
kerning might, via changes in line wrapping, lead to a completely
incorrect page breaking, or figure placement, etc., and in consequence
to a much less correct rendering.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single
be acceptable to change
either the version or, as long as there's no technical solution yet that
includes this version in the API, the font name?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Hi Evan, hi all,
is there any public information about the progress in the talks with CC
about clarification/amelioration/whatever of their licenses?
TIA, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
as for
the program is not applicable
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
additional
restrictions.
... and for packages with non-free docs. Any help is appreciated.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
), but wants to
restrict commercial trade of the printed version, and therefore assumes
the second interpretation, would such a document qualify for Debian
(main, of course)?
TIA, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
are referred to it in an online-shop.
The german original text is at
http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_muenchen_gpl.pdf, an english translation at
http://www.jbb.de/judgment_dc_munich_gpl.pdf
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
on
the outcome of the discussion...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
in gsfonts-other-nonfree because of the
license statement on CTAN, the origin of which is now unclear.
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Hi,
it just occurred to me that the X strike force might be a better place
to ask this:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear debian-legal people,
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is quite odd that on the one hand Adobe says that all the rights are
with the X consortion
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:50:32PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Do you know which person we could contact among the X.org people?
More context, please. Which fonts?
In this special case, it's about the Utopia fonts
gsfonts-other-6.0/putbi.pfa gsfonts
two. It seems they are not free enough (or rather, their
copyright and license status is unclear). So you could just have
answered:
Yes, you're right. But they aren't free enough, and therefore I deleted
them.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
reserved usually.
Thanks, that also made things clearer to me. It sounds so obvious once
someone said it...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
that it is a meaningful phrase. We do not want
such statements to act as a restriction.
Yes, it was in this sense that I suggested this addition.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
the executable-specific cruft rippeed off (or replaced)?
With such a license I would hope that we could convince individual
authors to switch from GFDL to this GPL-doc (of course not the FSF...).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:09:18PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Would it be possible to create something like a reduced form of the GPL,
...
This isn't really the right forum for that.
Well, hm, yes, no. Indeed the case that made me post this question
compatibility of GPL'ed
code with BSD or artistic licensed code.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
that would not hold for a text published without a
license, simply in printed form?
TIA, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
4. Writing to debian-legal and asking for advice.
Now that's a good idea. Why did you do that on debian-devel instead?
s/instead/, too/
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f
have so productively worked with to make the LPPL better, and
free.
I would be willing to raise this issue on -release, but not without some
further input from the -legal people.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
a or later
clause?
I hope not - I have other things to do this summer, Debian related and
mostly not.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
old code with
unknown or unreachable authors in the package if it is marked a such,
but require a rewrite if substantial changes have to be made anyway.
Regards, Frank
[1] at least if the code is complex enough to warrant a copyright at all.
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt
in the kernel before.
Is this relevant? He contributed code to a GPL'ed project, assuming that
all of the project meets the license requirements. Do you expect every
contributor to check the copyright status of every file in the project?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) schrieb:
Debian NotBSD ;-)
Plus Debian FearBSD and Debian OvenBSD (or UponBSD?)
Bye, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 04:09:37PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
does anybody know what is going to happen with regard to LPPL-1.3, and
in which timeline? The latest mails I found were
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200306
there is no need to list them manually in
| package.conffiles.
`
If there's no way to override this, one can instead copy them there in
postinst.
Bye, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
derivation.
a) What is the simplification in the derivation on p. 66?
b) How can it be formulated correctly?
Bye, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
