Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation

2006-02-09 Thread Rich Walker
be listed as # compatible at # http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html. Alternatively you can # use the GNU Free Documentation License for technical # documentation. You can also use the Affero GPL. cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical

Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation

2006-02-09 Thread Rich Walker
if it is not compatible with the GNU GPL. Interesting. cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical director 251 Liverpool Road | need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487 www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml

Re: GPL, yet again. (The kernel is a lot like a shared library)

2005-09-16 Thread Rich Walker
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 9/14/05, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] As an anarchist I You're brainwashed GNUtian. Wow. I think that's the *least relevant* rejoinder I've ever seen. cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company

Re: GPL, yet again. (The kernel is a lot like a shared library)

2005-09-16 Thread Rich Walker
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 9/16/05, Rich Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 9/14/05, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] As an anarchist I You're brainwashed GNUtian. Wow. Anarchists are anti-copyright

Re: EUPL draft

2005-07-22 Thread Rich Walker
2005 page 6 of 6 -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical director 251 Liverpool Road | need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487 www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: On the definition of source

2005-07-21 Thread Rich Walker
. -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical director 251 Liverpool Road | need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487 www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: MP3 decoder packaged with XMMS

2005-07-15 Thread Rich Walker
is what kind of useful advice cannot be propagated, and why?... cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical director 251 Liverpool Road | need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487 www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml

Re: Bug#317359: kde: ..3'rd Help-About $KDE-app tab calls the GPL License Agreement, ie; a contract.

2005-07-13 Thread Rich Walker
(1) rights' on Google, and it appears to be a US legal concept. As far as the other 6.1 billion of us go, what is our position? cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical director 251 Liverpool Road | need a Hand? London N1 1LX

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-08 Thread Rich Walker
the judgement is it can't be legally distributed as part of a package of Debian CD's, it isn't on a package of Debian CD's. cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical director 251 Liverpool Road | need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK

Re: Copyright Question

2004-12-10 Thread Rich Walker
? cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical director 251 Liverpool Road | need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487 www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml

Hardware license (status)

2002-12-05 Thread Rich Walker
anyone *disagree* that this is DFGS-compliant? cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | technical person | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] front-of-tshirt space to let 251 Liverpool Road | London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487

Re: Hardware license

2002-12-05 Thread Rich Walker
Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 02 December 2002 21:04, Walter Landry wrote: Rich Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.opencores.org/OIPC/OHGPL.shtml. The OpenIPCore license is a more of a copyleft, so you'll

Re: Hardware license

2002-11-28 Thread Rich Walker
gschem to work on it. So it's equivalent to, say, a gimp save-file. The .pcb file is similar. Could you distribute that? In that case, you could use a slightly modified GPL, where you replace object code with non-source derivative works. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- rich

Re: Hardware license

2002-11-27 Thread Rich Walker
Rich Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We've been putting together some robot-related software and hardware. We want to release this with a DFSG-compliant license set. For the software, GPL, no problems. For the hardware we propose to include .pcb files for pcb, .sch files for gschem

Hardware license

2002-11-26 Thread Rich Walker
licenses are appropriate for hardware releases? cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | technical person | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] front-of-tshirt space to let 251 Liverpool Road | London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487