Bug#1065476: RFS: omd/1.3.2-1 [ITP] -- Markdown frontend in pure OCaml

2024-03-05 Thread Bo YU
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "omd": * Package name : omd Version : 1.3.2-1 Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL

Re: FWD: Copyright in LGPL projects

2024-03-05 Thread Wookey
On 2024-03-04 11:19 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > Alan, > > These are good questions. > > 1. Yes, there must be a copyright statement. Only the person, people, > group, > or organization that holds the copyright can issue a license for other people > to use the work. So, you must have

Re: Rebuilding Debian packages

2024-03-05 Thread Wookey
On 2024-03-04 08:18 +0200, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote: > Hello > > If the dependency graph of a binary package in the unstable distribution is > changed (e.g. because of the 64-bit time_t transition) shall the binary > package be rebuilt in the distribution? Any package that has a direct dependency

Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-03-05 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Lucas, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:50:27PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: > * Package name : foolsm Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures the history of the package on tracker.d.o and it's not really necessary. Quick package review: - d/postinst: I

Bug#1065205: RFS: serioussam-vk/1.10.6d+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Linux port of Serious Sam Classic with Vulkan support

2024-03-05 Thread Alexander Pavlov
Dear mentors. I rewrote Debian patches to support the content of the demo version of the game. The engine now supports the content of the demo version of the game. When the game starts, the engine determines the installed game content, and if it finds content from the demo version, it turns on

Re: Bug#1065078: Question about the debian group on Salsa

2024-03-05 Thread Peter B
On 01/03/2024 04:12, Soren Stoutner wrote: I have created a repository named planner under debian and have granted you Developer access. :) F.Y.I.   'Developer' access on Salsa does not allow to Manage CI/CD settings. If required, 'Maintainer' or 'Owner' is needed to do that.

Bug#1065102: RFS: serioussam/1.10.6d+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- open source first person shooter developed by Croteam

2024-03-05 Thread Alexander Pavlov
Dear mentors. I rewrote Debian patches to support the content of the demo version of the game. The engine now supports the content of the demo version of the game. When the game starts, the engine determines the installed game content, and if it finds content from the demo version, it turns on

Bug#1065504: RFS: shotwell/0.32.6-1 -- digital photo organizer

2024-03-05 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shotwell":  * Package name : shotwell    Version  : 0.32.6-1    Upstream contact : Jim Nelson  * URL  : https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Shotwell  * License  :

Bug#1065507: RFS: netconsd/0.4-1 [ITP] -- Netconsole Daemon

2024-03-05 Thread Michel Lind
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "netconsd": * Package name : netconsd Version : 0.4-1 Upstream contact : https://github.com/facebook/netconsd/issues * URL :

Re: FWD: Copyright in LGPL projects

2024-03-05 Thread Soren Stoutner
Wookey, On Tuesday, March 5, 2024 2:51:10 AM MST Wookey wrote: > On 2024-03-04 11:19 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > Alan, > > > > These are good questions. > > > > 1. Yes, there must be a copyright statement. Only the person, people, > > group, or organization that holds the copyright can

Re: FWD: Copyright in LGPL projects

2024-03-05 Thread Alan M Varghese
Soren, ... but it is also perfectly fine to ship them in the same file. I think what Wookey is referring to is that GPL and LGPL licenses contain a line that says something like: 'Copyright (C) 1991, 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.' I believe this copyright refers to the text of the

Re: Bug#1065507: RFS: netconsd/0.4-1 [ITP] -- Netconsole Daemon

2024-03-05 Thread Fred
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM ALL LISTS! I tried to remove myself. It didn't work. I tried to contact the list admin. I did not get an answer. I'M GONNA SPAM YOUR LISTS UNTIL YOU REMOVE ME! On 05.03.24 19:15, Michel Lind wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-03-05 Thread Fred
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM ALL LISTS! I tried to remove myself. It didn't work. I tried to contact the list admin. I did not get an answer. I'M GONNA SPAM YOUR LISTS UNTIL YOU REMOVE ME! On 05.03.24 19:29, Lucas Castro wrote: Em 05/03/2024 08:09, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, On Mon, Feb

Re: FWD: Copyright in LGPL projects

2024-03-05 Thread Fred
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM ALL LISTS! I tried to remove myself. It didn't work. I tried to contact the list admin. I did not get an answer. I'M GONNA SPAM YOUR LISTS UNTIL YOU REMOVE ME! On 05.03.24 22:15, Alan M Varghese wrote: Soren,  ... but it is also perfectly fine to ship them in the

Re: Bug#1065078: Question about the debian group on Salsa

2024-03-05 Thread Fred
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM ALL LISTS! I tried to remove myself. It didn't work. I tried to contact the list admin. I did not get an answer. I'M GONNA SPAM YOUR LISTS UNTIL YOU REMOVE ME! On 05.03.24 21:34, Soren Stoutner wrote: Peter, That’s a good point. When I granted the access I actually

Re: Remove package from unstable?

2024-03-05 Thread Preuße , Hilmar
On 04.03.2024 02:09, Loren M. Lang wrote: Hi, Have you just tried passing through -S from gbp? As in "gbp buildpackage -S"? It might not work if you have set a different builder like schroot, but you can just pass --git-builder=debuild or similar in that case. Yes, I tried that option "-S",

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-03-05 Thread Lucas Castro
Em 05/03/2024 08:09, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:50:27PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: * Package name : foolsm Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures the history of the package on tracker.d.o and it's not really

Re: Bug#1065078: Question about the debian group on Salsa

2024-03-05 Thread Soren Stoutner
Peter, That’s a good point. When I granted the access I actually selected Maintainer, but for some reason I wrote Developer in the email. On Tuesday, March 5, 2024 5:44:51 AM MST Peter B wrote: > On 01/03/2024 04:12, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > I have created a repository named planner under

Re: Remove package from unstable?

2024-03-05 Thread Fred
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM ALL LISTS! I tried to remove myself. It didn't work. I tried to contact the list admin. I did not get an answer. I'M GONNA SPAM YOUR LISTS UNTIL YOU REMOVE ME! On 05.03.24 23:30, Preuße, Hilmar wrote: On 04.03.2024 02:09, Loren M. Lang wrote: Hi, Have you just

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-03-05 Thread Lucas Castro
Please mail to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject unsubscribe. Em 05/03/2024 19:50, Fred escreveu: PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM ALL LISTS! I tried to remove myself. It didn't work. I tried to contact the list admin. I did not get an answer. I'M GONNA SPAM YOUR LISTS UNTIL YOU