On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 2:24 AM gene heskett wrote:
> Well, since I'm alone, my wife passed 3.5 years back, and was not
> computer literate, its my show. And sshfs Just Works. I use this machine
> as the src for my output for some 3d printers, although the 4 linuxcnc
> machines are largely
On 6/1/24 06:07, Michael Grant wrote:
I use sshfs, works great to let me drop files on my server from my
desktop. But I wouldn't call that "file sharing". I probably would call
that a "network disk" or "remote mount".
There's probably some formal definition out there, but when I think of
On Sat, 01 Jun 2024 10:06:43 +
"Michael Grant" wrote:
>
> To this day, I have yet ever to see an easy way to share a file
> between 2 devices without full internet connectivity, except by say
> getting one to run an ftp or ssh server and ftp or ssh'ing over the
> file between local ip
Michael Grant wrote:
> I have long been plagued by the problem if sitting in a room or on a boat
> with someone, 2 devices right next to one another, and no trivially easy way
> to send a file from one device to the other without say first uploading it
> to some mutual third party (e.g.
On 5/31/24 22:37, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 31 May 2024 at 17:30:19 (+0100), mick.crane wrote:
On 2024-05-31 13:58, gene heskett wrote:
On 5/30/24 20:09, mick.crane wrote:
On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN?
On Fri 31 May 2024 at 17:30:19 (+0100), mick.crane wrote:
> On 2024-05-31 13:58, gene heskett wrote:
> > On 5/30/24 20:09, mick.crane wrote:
> > > On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
> > > > Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
> > > > LAN? There have already
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 01:16:28PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:30:19PM +0100, mick.crane wrote:
> > I only drag stuff in and out of the directory in Thunar. Dragging from the
> > directory takes a copy. I wondered what would happen if somebody deleted a
> > file while
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:30:19PM +0100, mick.crane wrote:
> I only drag stuff in and out of the directory in Thunar. Dragging from the
> directory takes a copy. I wondered what would happen if somebody deleted a
> file while you were half way through fetching it.
If you're copying a file, that
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:30:19PM +0100, mick.crane wrote:
[...]
> I only drag stuff in and out of the directory in Thunar. Dragging from the
> directory takes a copy. I wondered what would happen if somebody deleted a
> file while you were half way through fetching it.
This will depend on the
On 2024-05-31 13:58, gene heskett wrote:
On 5/30/24 20:09, mick.crane wrote:
On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot,
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:58:34AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 5/30/24 20:09, mick.crane wrote:
> > On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
> > > Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
> > > LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
> > >
On 5/30/24 20:09, mick.crane wrote:
On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
problems.
I
Dear Richard,
But I never use pre-complied packages since by doing this I won't know whether
I will install proprietary binaries.
Yours,
Carter
On May 31, 2024 2:38:26 PM GMT+08:00, Richard wrote:
>LocalSend and LanXchange are available as precompiled archives. Also,
>LocalSend is available
On 5/30/24 22:46, Carter Zhang wrote:
Dear Dan,
Thanks a lot for your reply but I am not clear how to use SFTP, SCP or
NFS on Android. Could you please show me how? Any help will be
appreciated.
(lines wrapped)
SFTP / SCP:
Dear Richard,
Thank you for your reply. LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop, NitroShare, Sharik,
Warpinator, TrebleShot have their respective problems.
LocalSend is not available in Debian's and Trisquel's official repositories,
and it is not so convenient to complie it from source using a machine
Dear Dan,
Sorry I forgot an CC.
Thanks a lot for your reply but I am not clear how to use SFTP, SCP or NFS on
Android. Could you please show me how? Any help will be appreciated.
On May 29, 2024 11:37:55 PM GMT+08:00, Dan Ritter wrote:
>Carter Zhang wrote:
>> Dear Dan,
>>
>> Thanks a lot
On 5/30/24 20:08, mick.crane wrote:
On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
problems.
I
On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
problems.
I don't know if sshfs would have issues
A client that by your own words barely works, while fully functional
alternatives have been available for many years already. So what's your
point?
Am Do., 30. Mai 2024 um 14:23 Uhr schrieb Anssi Saari <
anssi.sa...@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi>:
>
> Wow. I already mentioned an open source client?
Richard writes:
> There have already been many answers. And since it's highly unlikely any
> third party will include support for such a
> closed down system, you might want to look at them. At least I don't think
> Google will suddenly open source Nearby Share
> for everyone to write clients
There have already been many answers. And since it's highly unlikely any
third party will include support for such a closed down system, you might
want to look at them. At least I don't think Google will suddenly open
source Nearby Share for everyone to write clients for it.
Am Do., 30. Mai 2024
Carter Zhang writes:
> Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over LAN?
> There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange,
> LANDrop, NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
> problems.
I'd like to know too, assuming you're asking for
On 5/29/24 13:34, Monte Milanuk wrote:
SyncThing
On 5/29/24 07:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
Hi,
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:07:17PM +0800, Carter Zhang wrote:
> Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files
> over LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
> NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have
> respective problems.
Your post
On 5/29/24 07:58, Curt wrote:
I travel to https://pairdrop.net/ on both devices on the LAN for
the occasional file transfer. There is an Android app, although you
don't need one (merely a browser).
Thanks for that... I may have to set that up with my wife's iPhone.
Getting her to use
SyncThing
On 5/29/24 07:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
problems.
On Wed, 29 May 2024 22:07:17 +0800
Carter Zhang wrote:
> but they have respective problems.
We can't advise you very well if we don't know what you think their
respective problems are.
A more important question: What problem would you like to solve?
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
pairdrop.net/ on the both devices on the land for
the occasional file transfer.
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.user
From: Curt
Subject: Re: Question About Free File Transfering Apps
References: <8d2a6e13-9f36-47ed-a2e4-7543b1701...@autistici.org>
Organization: Unorganized
Followup-To:
On 2024-0
KDE connect? That has clients for many systems.
But the question is, what's the issue with the existing solutions? It's
quite a useless task to recommend file transfer apps when they all have the
same issue you try to avoid.
Richard
rsync - which is biderectional and uses checksums for correct transfer.
Best
Hans
On 5/29/24 10:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over LAN?
There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop, NitroShare, Sharik,
Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective problems.
scp / sshd
nc, but you don't get
Carter Zhang wrote:
> Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over LAN?
> There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop, NitroShare, Sharik,
> Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective problems.
On the Debian side, options include:
- SFTP and SCP via
Le 06/03/2024 à 18:19, ke6jti a écrit :
Hi,
I have a possible kernel regression for a usb-dvb tuner card. I know
the error in dmesg points to kernel : au0828 but I am not sure what
package this belongs to. I think it belongs to v4l(video for linux)
but I am still not sure what specific v4l
Bonjour à tous,
didier gaumet a écrit :
> Donc globalement pas de dysfonctionnement avec Wayland si on emploie
> un bureau vraiment prévu pour (Gnome, peut-être KDE de nos jours (je
> connais mal)).
L'expérience m'a malheureusement montré le contraire. J'ai acheté en
juin 2023 un mini PC mis sur
hello,
> > tout compte fait comparable à la compression protocolaire de type
> > freeNX (comme X2go quoi). j'ai fais qq tentatives à l'époque et
> > ce que j'ai vu était assez loin de pouvoir valider l'affirmation.
>
> C'est possible en utilisant Waypipe [1], disponible dans Debian 12.
>
Salut,
> > * Il y a enfin un compositor qui m'attire:
> > https://github.com/riverwm/river
>
> Merci pour le lien. Est-ce que tu as évalué dwl qui est le remplaçant de
> dwm ?
>
> https://codeberg.org/dwl/dwl
Nope: j'attend maintenant qu'un utilisateur me dise que wayland est
isofonctionnel
Bonjour,
Le 2023-12-26 10:43, Marc Chantreux a écrit :
* adieu remote display. visiblement c'est un WONTFIX de la communauté
wayland qui dit en gros: utilise un truc qui render et compresse
des images sur le réseau (VNC) en m'expliquant que c'est
tout compte fait comparable à la
Le 26 décembre 2023 Marc Chantreux a écrit :
> * à l'époque, rien dans le monde wayland ne ressemblait à dwm.
>
> Ce Noël-ci:
>
> * Il y a enfin un compositor qui m'attire:
> https://github.com/riverwm/river
Merci pour le lien. Est-ce que tu as évalué dwl qui est le remplaçant de
dwm ?
Bonjour
Tout dépend de ton environnement de bureau :
gnome -> oui
kde -> oui
xfce -> non
Informatique BILLARD
writes:
Bonjour à toutes et tous,
en ce jour de Noêl je lis quelques pages sur Wayland le
remplaçant de X11.
Et la une question émerge, peut-on sans trop de risque de
Le 25/12/2023 à 10:52, Informatique BILLARD a écrit :
Bonjour à toutes et tous,
en ce jour de Noêl je lis quelques pages sur Wayland le remplaçant de X11.
Et la une question émerge, peut-on sans trop de risque de
dysfonctionnement installer wayland sous debian 12 .
Bonjour,
Quand tu
On 11/26/23 17:52, John Hasler wrote:
https://webkitgtk.org/
Thanks John.
Take care & stay well.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for
https://webkitgtk.org/
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Bonjour,
Le mardi 04 juillet 2023 à 13:45 +, Kevin ROBERT a écrit :
> Bonjour, excusez-moi de vous déranger mais j’ai vraiment du mal à
> faire la différence sur votre site.
>
> Pouvez-vous s’il vous plaît me donner le lien pour télécharger debian
> 12 pour serveur.
>
> En vous remerciant
Le 04/07/2023 à 15:45, Kevin ROBERT a écrit :
Bonjour, excusez-moi de vous déranger mais j’ai vraiment du mal à faire la
différence sur votre site.
Pouvez-vous s’il vous plaît me donner le lien pour télécharger debian 12 pour
serveur.
En vous remerciant
Bonjour,
il n'y a pas
- Mail original -
De: "Kevin ROBERT"
À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Mardi 4 Juillet 2023 15:45:29
Objet: Question téléchargement debian 12
Bonjour, excusez-moi de vous déranger mais j’ai vraiment du mal à faire la
différence sur votre site.
Pouvez-vous s’il vous
"i c'est 4" ? Ça ressemble à une émulation de pavé numérique activée sur un
clavier de portable. Dans ce cas ça doit pouvoir se désactiver avec un
combinaison 'fn'+'ver num' ou 'fn'+'num lock'. Après il faut voir ce qui active
ce verrouillage au démarrage.
@+
Hugues
--- Original Message
Le 13/06/2023 à 15:08, Simeone Dominique a écrit :
Chers amis,
en installant bullseye debian, j'ai le clavier du fujitsu qui ne répond
plus correctement (touche manquante ou autre signe que la touche en
question...) avec bookworm debian mon clavier est perturbé et celui que
j'ai branché pour
Le 13/06/2023 à 15:08, Simeone Dominique a écrit :
Chers amis,
en installant bullseye debian, j'ai le clavier du fujitsu qui ne répond
plus correctement (touche manquante ou autre signe que la touche en
question...) avec bookworm debian mon clavier est perturbé et celui que
j'ai branché pour
f...@dnsbed.com wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> as you see this PTR,
>
> $ dig -x 1.1.1.1 +short
> one.one.one.one.
>
> so 2.2.2.2 can have the PTR two.two.two.two? and 3.3.3.3 can have
> three.three.three.three?
A simple counter example is
$ dig -x 8.8.8.8 +short
dns.google.
> Sorry I am not good
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 20:32:31 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 08:28:03AM +0800, f...@dnsbed.com wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > as you see this PTR,
> >
> > $ dig -x 1.1.1.1 +short
> > one.one.one.one.
> >
> > so 2.2.2.2 can have the PTR two.two.two.two? and 3.3.3.3 can have
On 2023-03-25 08:32, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 08:28:03AM +0800, f...@dnsbed.com wrote:
Greetings,
as you see this PTR,
$ dig -x 1.1.1.1 +short
one.one.one.one.
so 2.2.2.2 can have the PTR two.two.two.two? and 3.3.3.3 can have
three.three.three.three?
Any IP address can
On 25/3/23 08:32, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I didn't know .one was a valid TLD. It looks like .two is not, so if
someone were to assign "two.two.two.two" as the PTR value of an IP
address, that PTR would not resolve back to any IP address. (An IP
address block owner might reject such a petition.)
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 08:28:03AM +0800, f...@dnsbed.com wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> as you see this PTR,
>
> $ dig -x 1.1.1.1 +short
> one.one.one.one.
>
> so 2.2.2.2 can have the PTR two.two.two.two? and 3.3.3.3 can have
> three.three.three.three?
Any IP address can have any PTR value. You
On Tue 21 Mar 2023 at 18:27:42 (-0400), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > me second. 192.168.1.1/24 just makes me confused with 192.168.1.1/32
> > which is a real host address.
>
> Interesting.
> I can't remember ever seeing 192.168.1.1/32 used. In my my part of the
> world, it's only meaningful as a
On Mon 20 Mar 2023 at 07:36:41 (+0800), Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> On 20/3/23 02:48, David Wright wrote:
> > > Checking the RFC. To my reading the final stanza is not checked
> > > " The is compared to the given network. If CIDR prefix length
> > >
> > > high-order bits match, the mechanism
On 22/3/23 06:27, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Interesting.
I can't remember ever seeing 192.168.1.1/32 used. In my my part of the
world, it's only meaningful as a degenerate form: all the syntaxes I've
seen which accept the IP/NN notation also accept just IP to mean IP/32,
so writing IP/32 is just
> me second. 192.168.1.1/24 just makes me confused with 192.168.1.1/32
> which is a real host address.
Interesting.
I can't remember ever seeing 192.168.1.1/32 used. In my my part of the
world, it's only meaningful as a degenerate form: all the syntaxes I've
seen which accept the IP/NN notation
Le 3/19/23 à 18:51, DdB a écrit :
Wow!
Great hint there!
I just tested it in a couple of areas and found it to be quite useful,
by far more up-to-date and i did enjoy the experience.
Thank you for sharing it.
Am 19.03.2023 um 12:01 schrieb Yassine Chaouche:
In contrast,
a tool like
On 2023-03-20 07:36, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
As for the RFC? It's precise and definitive. My only concern is that
some mail system implementer may 'improve' the RFC and restrict the
acceptable address range to a /32 when they see a non zero final qnum
in a /24
me second. 192.168.1.1/24 just
On 20/3/23 02:48, David Wright wrote:
O
Checking the RFC. To my reading the final stanza is not checked
" The is compared to the given network. If CIDR prefix length
high-order bits match, the mechanism matches."
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7208#section-5.6
So in this
On 3/19/23 03:28, cor...@free.fr wrote:
On 19/03/2023 18:00, David Christensen wrote:
On 3/18/23 16:31, cor...@free.fr wrote:
On 19/03/2023 06:17, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18 2023 at 07:28:23 PM, cor...@free.fr wrote:
Hello
I know 192.168.1.0/24 is a valid C range for network
On Sun 19 Mar 2023 at 17:16:47 (-), Curt wrote:
> On 2023-03-19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 06:38:41PM +0800, cor...@free.fr wrote:
> >> So,
> >>
> >> * 188.66.63.1/24 is a range, not a single host in SPF
> >> * why it's not written as 188.66.63.0/24 which is more
On Sun 19 Mar 2023 at 19:36:47 (+0800), Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> On 19/3/23 19:29, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> >
> > In this case of the /24 it gave an answer I expected. I imagine it
> > will take a trawl of the RFC and then of actual implementations to
> > find out for sure.
> >
> > The best
Wow!
Great hint there!
I just tested it in a couple of areas and found it to be quite useful,
by far more up-to-date and i did enjoy the experience.
Thank you for sharing it.
Am 19.03.2023 um 12:01 schrieb Yassine Chaouche:
> In contrast,
> a tool like perplexity.ai is an answer-questionning
On Sun 19 Mar 2023 at 08:25:28 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 12:45:06PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> > #!/bin/sh
> > eval "$(recode b64..data < > H4sIACv1FmQAAzXMPQrCQBAG0H5O8TFEMII/BA3BVF7AXoLFsI5kCdl1d5JC8PCSIuVrnro+gm82
> >
On 2023-03-19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 06:38:41PM +0800, cor...@free.fr wrote:
>> So,
>>
>> * 188.66.63.1/24 is a range, not a single host in SPF
>> * why it's not written as 188.66.63.0/24 which is more clear?
>
> Because it was written by a human being who made a tiny
On 2023-03-19, wrote:
>
> Yes, it is just a simulation of knowledge (it can be pretty
> convincing at that,though).
>
> In other words: if you want an answer from it, you have to
> know the answer beforehand.
So the specific answer it gave cited above is wrong? Or did you already know
the
Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> Le 3/18/23 à 12:28, cor...@free.fr a écrit :
> > Hello
> >
> > I know 192.168.1.0/24 is a valid C range for network address.
> >
> > but what does 192.168.1.1/24 mean?
> >
> > I ask this just for a setting in the SPF:
> >
> > spf.pinoad.se. 300 IN TXT
> * 188.66.63.1/24 is a range, not a single host in SPF
> * why it's not written as 188.66.63.0/24 which is more clear?
Which is more likely:
- someone erroneously added `/24` when they really meant to specify just
one host.
- someone wrote `1` instead of the more conventional `0` at the spot
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 12:45:06PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
> eval "$(recode b64..data < H4sIACv1FmQAAzXMPQrCQBAG0H5O8TFEMII/BA3BVF7AXoLFsI5kCdl1d5JC8PCSIuVrnro+gm82
> QPBVO4aINKtNPoYrU1Z5YZ+RyIkpuNh+sg/TG7wxRpHwg/VSXWqbx5LhA6E7Vee6EafPXQld9ofa
> oW0Jq+9xoZo4+gNQ3NCSfg==
> EOF
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 06:38:41PM +0800, cor...@free.fr wrote:
> So,
>
> * 188.66.63.1/24 is a range, not a single host in SPF
> * why it's not written as 188.66.63.0/24 which is more clear?
Because it was written by a human being who made a tiny error. One that
makes no difference in
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 07:07:06PM +0800, f...@dnsbed.com wrote:
[...]
> For this kind of definition with clear rules (SPF), I think chatGPT is more
> precise than person.
Sometimes. But you won't know which times beforehand. Of course,
you could order ChatGPT to give you the right answer ;-D
Jeremy Ardley (12023-03-19):
> So in this case AI got it right.
Try the following AI:
#!/bin/sh
eval "$(recode b64..data <
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 19/3/23 19:29, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
In this case of the /24 it gave an answer I expected. I imagine it
will take a trawl of the RFC and then of actual implementations to
find out for sure.
The best description of the AI is it is informative but not authorative.
Checking the RFC. To
On 2023-03-19 19:01, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
It only knows about saying things that sound plausible,
not necessarily true.
It doesn't fetch info from the internet,
process it,
then give it you.
It rather generates text,
using statisics.
Don't get mislead by it.
It often gives wrong answers.
On 19/3/23 19:10, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
Yes, it is just a simulation of knowledge (it can be pretty
convincing at that,though).
In other words: if you want an answer from it, you have to
know the answer beforehand.
I have actually paid for a subscription and have used it for a month
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 12:12:15PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de (12023-03-19):
> > Yes, it is just a simulation of knowledge (it can be pretty
> > convincing at that,though).
> >
> > In other words: if you want an answer from it, you have to
> > know the answer beforehand.
>
>
to...@tuxteam.de (12023-03-19):
> Yes, it is just a simulation of knowledge (it can be pretty
> convincing at that,though).
>
> In other words: if you want an answer from it, you have to
> know the answer beforehand.
Ted Chiang described it very accurately as a blurry JPEG of the web:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 12:01:19PM +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> Le 3/19/23 à 11:32, Jeremy Ardley a écrit :
> >
> > On 19/3/23 18:28, cor...@free.fr wrote:
> > > "v=spf1 ip4:188.66.63.1/24 -all"
> >
> > According to an AI version 4 that cannot be named:
> >
>
> I'm new to the list,
> thus,
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 06:38:41PM +0800, cor...@free.fr wrote:
[...]
> * 188.66.63.1/24 is a range, not a single host in SPF
> * why it's not written as 188.66.63.0/24 which is more clear?
My hunch is that they are meant to be equivalent, as, for
example 192.168.63.42/24, or actually any
Le 3/19/23 à 11:32, Jeremy Ardley a écrit :
On 19/3/23 18:28, cor...@free.fr wrote:
"v=spf1 ip4:188.66.63.1/24 -all"
According to an AI version 4 that cannot be named:
I'm new to the list,
thus,
I don't know how many people have told you this before
(or not)
but that AI is a speech
On 19/3/23 18:38, cor...@free.fr wrote:
So,
* 188.66.63.1/24 is a range, not a single host in SPF
* why it's not written as 188.66.63.0/24 which is more clear?
In the very specific case of an SPF there will be a rule. I assume given
the AI response that the rule is to use the net
On 19/03/2023 18:32, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 19/3/23 18:28, cor...@free.fr wrote:
"v=spf1 ip4:188.66.63.1/24 -all"
According to an AI version 4 that cannot be named:
This is an SPF (Sender Policy Framework) record, which is a TXT record
in a domain's DNS settings. SPF records are used to
On 19/3/23 18:28, cor...@free.fr wrote:
"v=spf1 ip4:188.66.63.1/24 -all"
According to an AI version 4 that cannot be named:
This is an SPF (Sender Policy Framework) record, which is a TXT record
in a domain's DNS settings. SPF records are used to help prevent email
spoofing by specifying
On 19/03/2023 18:00, David Christensen wrote:
On 3/18/23 16:31, cor...@free.fr wrote:
On 19/03/2023 06:17, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18 2023 at 07:28:23 PM, cor...@free.fr wrote:
Hello
I know 192.168.1.0/24 is a valid C range for network address.
but what does 192.168.1.1/24 mean?
On 3/18/23 16:31, cor...@free.fr wrote:
On 19/03/2023 06:17, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18 2023 at 07:28:23 PM, cor...@free.fr wrote:
Hello
I know 192.168.1.0/24 is a valid C range for network address.
but what does 192.168.1.1/24 mean?
I ask this just for a setting in the SPF:
Le 3/19/23 à 09:53, Yassine Chaouche a écrit :
The A.B.C.D/24 notation can be used to either :
- specify an IP address along with its netmask
See for example this snippet from the output of the ip command:
10:02:21 /usr/share/man -1- $ ip -4 address show eth4 | grep inet
inet
Le 3/18/23 à 12:28, cor...@free.fr a écrit :
Hello
I know 192.168.1.0/24 is a valid C range for network address.
but what does 192.168.1.1/24 mean?
I ask this just for a setting in the SPF:
spf.pinoad.se. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:188.66.63.1/24 -all"
Thanks.
The A.B.C.D/24
On 19/03/2023 06:17, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18 2023 at 07:28:23 PM, cor...@free.fr wrote:
Hello
I know 192.168.1.0/24 is a valid C range for network address.
but what does 192.168.1.1/24 mean?
I ask this just for a setting in the SPF:
spf.pinoad.se. 300 IN TXT
On Sat, Mar 18 2023 at 07:28:23 PM, cor...@free.fr wrote:
> Hello
>
> I know 192.168.1.0/24 is a valid C range for network address.
>
> but what does 192.168.1.1/24 mean?
>
> I ask this just for a setting in the SPF:
>
> spf.pinoad.se.300 IN TXT "v=spf1
>
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 7:28 AM wrote:
> Hello
>
> I know 192.168.1.0/24 is a valid C range for network address.
>
> but what does 192.168.1.1/24 mean?
>
192.168.1.1 is a host address usually assigned to the router. The network
subnet mask is /24 or 255.255.255.0. 192.168.1.0 is the network and
18.03.23, 12:28 +0100, cor...@free.fr:
I know 192.168.1.0/24 is a valid C range for network address.
but what does 192.168.1.1/24 mean?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing
--
Regards
mks
Bonjour,
--- Original Message ---
Le lundi 13 mars 2023 à 10:28, aucourto a écrit :
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> J'ai mis en place un petit réseau avec debian 11, constitués de 17
> postes (client) et d'un poste principal (serveur) tous reliés par un
> switch. J'ai plusieurs questions :
>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 09:32:40PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 02:20:39AM +0800, cor...@free.fr wrote:
> > I have put these statement in @reboot crontab for auto startup.
> >
> > @reboot mkdir -p /var/run/xxx && chown -R www-data:www-data /var/run/xxx
>
> I'd use
Hi.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 02:20:39AM +0800, cor...@free.fr wrote:
> On 16/03/2023 02:08, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 02:02:35AM +0800, cor...@free.fr wrote:
> > > I am having the question that why the dir I created in /var/run disappears
> > > after rebooting the
Greg Wooledge (12023-03-15):
> If you want something to appear there the next time the computer is
> booted, you need to set up an event to occur at boot time to create
> it. This could be a systemd unit, an entry in rc.local, a crontab job
> with @reboot, etc.
To create a directory, something
On 16/03/2023 02:08, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 02:02:35AM +0800, cor...@free.fr wrote:
I am having the question that why the dir I created in /var/run
disappears
after rebooting the system? how to prevent that?
unicorn:~$ ls -ld /var/run
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Jan 11
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 02:02:35AM +0800, cor...@free.fr wrote:
> I am having the question that why the dir I created in /var/run disappears
> after rebooting the system? how to prevent that?
unicorn:~$ ls -ld /var/run
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Jan 11 2018 /var/run -> /run/
unicorn:~$ df /run
- Mail original -
De: "Sébastien NOBILI"
À: "Liste Debian"
Envoyé: Mardi 14 Mars 2023 10:22:46
Objet: Re: Question sur Debian 11
Bonjour,
Le 2023-03-13 10:28, aucourto a écrit :
> Question 1) J'arrive à me connecter avec mon poste serveur à un poste
> c
Bonjour,
Le 2023-03-13 10:28, aucourto a écrit :
Question 1) J'arrive à me connecter avec mon poste serveur à un poste
client par SSH, je voudrais envoyer un message à l'écran de chaque
poste client et j'utilise Zenity,
Pourquoi ne pas utiliser le système de notification (via la commande
1 - 100 of 3288 matches
Mail list logo
