Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 19:33:12 -0500 David Wright wrote: > [Big Snip] > > > None of which ever worked 100% because the web pages all seemed > > > to be using a different version. The "it works here" syndrome, > > > essentially the same as the N.I.H. beliefs. :( > > > >

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On Sun 23 Apr 2017 at 15:42:35 (-0700), Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 15:41:30 -0400 Gene Heskett > wrote: > > > On Sunday 23 April 2017 15:15:05 Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:21:28 -0400 Gene Heskett > > > > >

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 15:41:30 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 23 April 2017 15:15:05 Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:21:28 -0400 Gene Heskett > > > > > > wrote: > > > On Saturday 22 April 2017 23:22:45 Patrick Bartek wrote: >

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On Sunday 23 April 2017 15:15:05 Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:21:28 -0400 Gene Heskett > > wrote: > > On Saturday 22 April 2017 23:22:45 Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:24:32 -0400 Gene Heskett > > > > > > > > >

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:21:28 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 22 April 2017 23:22:45 Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:24:32 -0400 Gene Heskett > > > > > > wrote: > > > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On Sunday 23 April 2017 07:35:36 Frank de Bruijn wrote: > Op 23-04-17 om 12:37 schreef Gene Heskett: > > On Sunday 23 April 2017 01:54:21 Frank wrote: > >> Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett: > >>> And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site > >>> doesn't show me anything

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On 2017-04-23, Frank de Bruijn wrote: > I usually look in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, but the plugin file there > may actually be a symlink pointing to something in /etc/alternatives, > which in turn will probably point to some other item somewhere in > /usr/lib... To

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

Op 23-04-17 om 12:37 schreef Gene Heskett: On Sunday 23 April 2017 01:54:21 Frank wrote: Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett: And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site doesn't show me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff. Really? Both

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On Sunday 23 April 2017 01:54:21 Frank wrote: > Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett: > > And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site doesn't > > show me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff. > > Really? Both https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ and >

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On 2017-04-23, Gene Heskett wrote: What I do is check periodically for updates and when there is one, I open the tar.gz archive from Adobe in Firefox, extract the libflashplayer.so file into my home directory, and copy it over the obsolete libflashplayer.so files on my

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On 23/04/17 16:21, Gene Heskett wrote: And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site doesn't show me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff. flashplugin-nonfree is often broken. Here is my workaround: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/03/msg00491.html See also:

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett: And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site doesn't show me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff. Really? Both https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ and https://get.adobe.com/nl/flashplayer/ definitely show 25.0.0.148 for

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On Saturday 22 April 2017 23:22:45 Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:24:32 -0400 Gene Heskett > > wrote: > > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front > > page, while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on > > any product

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:24:32 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote: > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front page, > while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on any > product link. I hope its not contagious. > > Many news sites are saying

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

On Saturday 22 April 2017 17:20:00 songbird wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front > > page, while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on > > any product link. I hope its not contagious. > > > > Many news sites are saying

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

Gene Heskett wrote: > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front page, > while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on any product > link. I hope its not contagious. > > Many news sites are saying "request entity too large" also. i've not seen any problems

new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front page, while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on any product link. I hope its not contagious. Many news sites are saying "request entity too large" also. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used