As the Subject-line says, I am using Icewm and Mozilla as my Browser.
In the _old_ days while I was still using Netscape I could change the
fonts for Netscape in .Xdefault ( or .Xresources) with a entry like
this:
I've answered a few questions and got the text visible. Details at
the bottom.
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:09:08PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
I'm using mozilla 1.6-5 in testing, including mozilla-xft which
activates the xft support.
Considerable chunks of the subversion.tigris.org are
I'm using mozilla 1.6-5 in testing, including mozilla-xft which
activates the xft support.
Considerable chunks of the subversion.tigris.org are invisible in this
browser. These are pieces formatted with pre.
E.g.,
http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=usersmsgNo=73raw=true
the text of
On 28.Mar 2004 - 04:33:07, Gerhard Gaussling wrote:
Hi Liste,
Nach einem dist-upgrade meines sid/sarge system spinnt hier mozilla 1.6.
Manchmal ist der Font des GUI klitzeklein dargestellt (auf menem Desktop
nicht zu entziffern) mal ist die Schrift normal dargestellt (wie vor
dem update
Am Sonntag, 28. März 2004 12:16 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Also wenn du das letztere nicht selbst herausfinden kannst, bist du
bei sid/sarge falsch. Sorry, aber wenn du schon auf die Idee mit dem
BTS kommst, wieso guckst du nicht selbst bei Mozilla nach?
Ich war mir nicht ganz sicher, aber es
On 28.Mar 2004 - 13:27:10, Gerhard Gaussling wrote:
Am Sonntag, 28. März 2004 12:16 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Also wenn du das letztere nicht selbst herausfinden kannst, bist du
bei sid/sarge falsch. Sorry, aber wenn du schon auf die Idee mit dem
BTS kommst, wieso guckst du nicht selbst bei
Am Sonntag 28 März 2004 20:47 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Daher ist mir nicht ganz klar wo nach ich im BTS suchen sollte.
mozilla
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=185378
scheint allerdings längst geschlossen zu sein.
ciao
Gerhard
Hi Liste,
Nach einem dist-upgrade meines sid/sarge system spinnt hier mozilla 1.6.
Manchmal ist der Font des GUI klitzeklein dargestellt (auf menem Desktop
nicht zu entziffern) mal ist die Schrift normal dargestellt (wie vor
dem update auf kde 3.2).
Weiß jemand Rat (gibt es schon eine bug
I think my fonts are screwed up in Mozilla 1.0.0...
Under Preferences Appearance Fonts, everything is set to Agfa
Monotype-andale mono-iso8859-1 and Slashdot renders in full monospace.
What does everyone else's fonts section have by default? I'm using
Mozilla 1.0.0 from a .mozilla generated
Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
I think my fonts are screwed up in Mozilla 1.0.0...
Under Preferences Appearance Fonts, everything is set to Agfa
Monotype-andale mono-iso8859-1 and Slashdot renders in full monospace.
What does everyone else's fonts section have by default? I'm using
Mozilla 1.0.0
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:41:02PM -0600, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
Under Preferences Appearance Fonts, everything is set to Agfa
Monotype-andale mono-iso8859-1 and Slashdot renders in full monospace.
Uhhh... Andale Mono *is* a monospace font. Exactly what do you expect to
be happening
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:41:02PM -0600, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
Under Preferences Appearance Fonts, everything is set to Agfa
Monotype-andale mono-iso8859-1 and Slashdot renders in full monospace.
Uhhh... Andale Mono *is* a monospace font. Exactly what do you expect
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:20, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
The newer mozillas, e.g. Sid's mozilla-snapshot, have 'default'
fonts which I rather like (of course, 'there is no accounting for
tastes'). In the Preferences menu, the serif font is just called
'serif', the monospace font is called
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 13:29, Ashish Ariga wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:20, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
The newer mozillas, e.g. Sid's mozilla-snapshot, have 'default'
fonts which I rather like (of course, 'there is no accounting for
tastes'). In the Preferences menu, the serif font is just
Ashish Ariga wrote:
Turns out that Mozilla and a bunch of other GNOME/GTK2 apps use
fonts that are configured via some fontconfig. (I don't know
much about it.)
fc-list reports fonts that are available through fontconfig.
Ensure that the path where you installed the fonts are listed in
The newer mozillas, e.g. Sid's mozilla-snapshot, have 'default'
fonts which I rather like (of course, 'there is no accounting for
tastes'). In the Preferences menu, the serif font is just called
'serif', the monospace font is called 'monospace'.
I found that (at least on my system) these are in
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 10:42:46AM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
Ross Boylan wrote:
I was playing around with fonts on Mozilla today, and noticed a number
of odd things. I'd be curious if anyone can explain a bit more about
what is going on.
1. I can't find anything that controls the
I was playing around with fonts on Mozilla today, and noticed a number
of odd things. I'd be curious if anyone can explain a bit more about
what is going on.
1. I can't find anything that controls the fonts used in the browser
menu bar and menus. It looks as if the same font may be used on
Ross Boylan wrote:
I was playing around with fonts on Mozilla today, and noticed a number
of odd things. I'd be curious if anyone can explain a bit more about
what is going on.
1. I can't find anything that controls the fonts used in the browser
menu bar and menus. It looks as if the same
And I heard Miquel van Smoorenburg exclaim:
snip
Daniel When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm running at
Daniel 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes up the majority of
Daniel the screen (nice scaling, by the way--not a bit blocky : ).
snip
If you have TrueType fonts
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote:
And I heard Miquel van Smoorenburg exclaim:
snip
Daniel When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm running at
Daniel 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes up the majority of
Daniel the screen (nice scaling, by the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joseph Dane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel == Daniel Farnsworth Teichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm running at
Daniel 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes up the majority of
Daniel the screen (nice
I hope this isn't a repeat of a problem that's been
mentioned long ago--I searched a bit in the archives
and have been watching the lists, and haven't seen
anything that looked related.
When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm
running at 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes
up the
Daniel == Daniel Farnsworth Teichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm running at
Daniel 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes up the majority of
Daniel the screen (nice scaling, by the way--not a bit blocky : ).
no help here, but I'm
Hello everybody,
I know this is an old topic, but can anyone remind me of the *subject*
for upgrading to XFree 4.1 and GTK/Mozilla fonts going haywire?
Actually it is only Gnumeric and Mozilla that have freaked out - AbiWord
is still fine.
I've searched under different combinations of GTk fonts
remind me of the *subject*
for upgrading to XFree 4.1 and GTK/Mozilla fonts going haywire?
Actually it is only Gnumeric and Mozilla that have freaked out - AbiWord
is still fine.
I've searched under different combinations of GTk fonts upgrade but to
no avail. Please guide me...
Thanks
Despite my having done nothing, appearance is back to normal.
(I did lots of things yesterday, but none of them had any effect.
I've since shut down and restarted the computer. I also forgot to
mention that immediately before the unpleasantness I installed
realplayer.)
Weird.
On Mon, Aug 13,
27 matches
Mail list logo
