Hi All,
I'm having problem installing qemu-kvm from apt-get. When I run the command:
apt-get install qemu-kvm using root user I got this error message:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package qemu-kvm is not available, but is referred to
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0600, Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote:
Hi All,
I'm having problem installing qemu-kvm from apt-get. When I run the
command:
apt-get install qemu-kvm using root user I got this error message:
Reading package lists... Done
Building
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0600, Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote:
Hi All,
I'm having problem installing qemu-kvm from apt-get. When I run the command:
apt-get install qemu-kvm using root user I got this error message:
...snip..
Strange. I'm running wheezy. I assume
Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package qemu-kvm is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another
Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote:
Bonsoir,
trying to overwrite
'/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmjpegutils-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in
package libmjpegutils-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1
^^^
Unpacking
Hi.
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:02:38 +0200
François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr wrote:
Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
Unpacking libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0:amd64 (from
.../libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
Le 26.10.2013 11:02, François Patte a écrit :
Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote:
Bonsoir,
trying to overwrite
'/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmjpegutils-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is
also in
package libmjpegutils-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1
Le 25/10/2013 00:28, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 25/10/13 09:12, François Patte wrote:
Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote:
Bonsoir,
It looks like you 'might' have mixed conflicting repositories
perhaps deb-multimedia?
alien requires
François Patte wrote:
Scott Ferguson a écrit :
I do not understand what you mean by remove the unofficial packages
remove *all packages* installed from deb-multimedia?
That would be my understanding of the suggestion. I recommend that
course of action too. Because step 1) Fix your broken
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:55:19PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
APT tries hard to tidy up anything broken. Because there are broken
dependencies on your system apt is going to do nothing else until
those broken items are fixed. If a car has a flat tire then you can't
drive anywhere until the
Bonsoir,
I try to install alien, but I get these messages:
apt-get install alien
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
alien : Depends:
On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote:
Bonsoir,
I try to install alien, but I get these messages:
apt-get install alien
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these:
The following
On 25/10/13 09:12, François Patte wrote:
Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote:
Bonsoir,
It looks like you 'might' have mixed conflicting repositories
perhaps deb-multimedia?
alien requires debhelper, you can force the solution but
This is a partial output of apt-get update command, performed on my brand new
Debian 5.0 installation:
Ign http://ftp.egr.msu.edu lenny/main Packages
Ign http://ftp.egr.msu.edu lenny/main Sources
Err http://ftp.egr.msu.edu lenny/main Packages
Connection failed
Err
Angelin Lalev schreef:
This is a partial output of apt-get update command, performed on my brand new
Debian 5.0 installation:
[snip]
Is that an indication that the mirror is not ok, or I am doing something wrong.
You are using the ftp.egr.msu.edu mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list.
It
Use apt-get spy but read this about apt-get for the future...
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#pkgmgmt
Sjors Gielen wrote:
Angelin Lalev schreef:
This is a partial output of apt-get update command, performed on my
brand new
Debian 5.0
Vwaju wrote:
With a little help from my friends, I'm teaching myself networking by
building an internet server. I am running Debian Linux 3.1
I would upgrade to Debian 4 (Etch) via Internet by doing these steps:
1.) apt-get clean
2.) replace your /etc/apt/sources.list with this:
deb
With a little help from my friends, I'm teaching myself networking by
building an internet server. I am running Debian Linux 3.1 on a Dell
Dimension 4100 desktop.
I have installed ISPConfig, and I now I'm trying to install monit:
# apt-get install monit
Reading Package Lists...
Building
Vwaju wrote:
[snip]
Get:1 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org oldstable/main monit 1:4.5-1 [228kB]
Err ftp://ftp.us.debian.org oldstable/main monit 1:4.5-1
Unable to fetch file, server said 'Failed to open file. ' [IP:
35.9.37.225 21]
Failed to fetch
Bob Cox wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 16:26:08 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
Firstly, try use another mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list, for example
ftp.cz.debian.org or ftp.de.debian.org.
No. There is no sarge repository on these servers either. The OP
Thank you Bob and Eugene.
Bob --
Yes, inserting:
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian sarge main
into
/etc/apt/sources.list
and then running
#apt-get update
does the trick.
Might there be a guide to using apt that is conceptually clearer than
the man page?
Best Regards,
Vwaju
--
To
[ Please don't top post. ]
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:23:58 +0100, Josep M. wrote:
Hello Eugene.
Thanks, I will change in next msgs, about apt-get upgrade nothing is
upgraded:
The problem is that apt-get want remove a lot of packages without
needed, and I would like change this.
Josep M. wrote:
Hello.
With aptitude dist-upgrade all is ok but apt-get dist-upgrade want
delete a lot of packages...how can I fix it?
[snip]
Firstly, please not post locale-specific output of commands, use LANG=C
command instead.
Secondly, yes, aptitude now has better dependency-resolution
Hello Eugene.
Thanks, I will change in next msgs, about apt-get upgrade nothing is
upgraded:
The problem is that apt-get want remove a lot of packages without
needed, and I would like change this.
deb:# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
I'm trying to install some packages but seem to have gotten the package
manager thoroughly confused:
When trying to install anything I get the unmet dependencies error with
the suggestion to run apt-get -f install. Doing that I get the following
two errors:
Removing kdebluetooth ...
Stopping apache 2.0 web server...Syntax error on line 1 of
/etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php4.load:
API module structure `php4_module' in file
Da ist ein Fehler in der php4.load. Das php4 Modul temporaer disablen
(a2dismod) hilft das Upgrade durchzufuehren.
okay, habe ich gemacht. Nun
On 31.10.06 22:20:48, Tom Schmitt wrote:
Stopping apache 2.0 web server...Syntax error on line 1 of
/etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php4.load:
API module structure `php4_module' in file
Da ist ein Fehler in der php4.load. Das php4 Modul temporaer disablen
(a2dismod) hilft das Upgrade
Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 22:20 schrieb Tom Schmitt:
Ich habe gewiß noch einige Wissenlücken zu füllen in Sachen Aufbau
von Debian. ZB ist mir nicht ganz klar, was ich mit den beiden
Meldungen machen soll, die beim Update noch aufgetaucht sind:
Hi,
ich benutze Etch und wollte das System mal wieder mit apt-get auf den aktuellen
Stand bringen. Leider habe ich damit nun ein Problem. Folgendes erhalte ich
beim Versuch das Problem mit -f install zu lösen:
# apt-get -f install
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird
On 28.10.06 10:30:26, Tom Schmitt wrote:
ich benutze Etch und wollte das System mal wieder mit apt-get auf den
aktuellen Stand bringen. Leider habe ich damit nun ein Problem. Folgendes
erhalte ich beim Versuch das Problem mit -f install zu lösen:
Hier sind Zeilen mit einer Laenge von 72
mattias jonsson skrev:
Har råkat ut för ett något irriterande problem
Otillfredsställda beroenden. Försök med apt-get -f install
Har du provat apt-get -f install?
Danne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@lists.debian.org
Ämne: Re: Apt-get problem
mattias jonsson skrev:
Har råkat ut för ett något irriterande problem
Otillfredsställda beroenden. Försök med apt-get -f install
Har du provat apt-get -f install?
Danne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Har råkat ut för ett något irriterande problem
Ska ta väck postgresql
Får följande fel
Följande paket har beroenden som inte kan tillfredsställas:
kcontrol: Beror: kdebase-data men det kommer inte att installeras
kde: Beror: kdepim men det kommer inte att installeras
Beror: kdeutils
Gruesse!
* Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [29.08.06 21:46]:
Hallo,
das habe ich soweit gemacht uind dann lief es auch ganz gut bis dass dann kam:
dpkg: Ernste Warnung: Dateilisten-Datei des Paketes »slapd« fehlt, nehme an,
dass das Paket
derzeit keine Dateien installiert hat.
Hallo,
habe versucht folgende pakete zu installieren.
apt-get install slapd ldap-utils phpldapadmin xml-core php4-ldap
allerdings hab ich dass dummerweise in webmin zuerst gemacht und konnte
somit keinen weiteren angaben machen und das programm lief und lief.
den prozess habe ic schon
Gruesse!
* Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [29.08.06 09:02]:
Hallo,
habe versucht folgende pakete zu installieren.
apt-get install slapd ldap-utils phpldapadmin xml-core php4-ldap
und das kommt dann leider traurig
debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is
Schau doch mal (als root) mit ps ax ob noch ein debconf Prozess oder ein
anderer Prozeß, der etwas mit apt/dpkg/... zu tun hat, läuft. Wenn ja
kille diese Prozesse.
Auch kann es sein, daß durch dein vorhergehendes Killen einfach ein
Lockfile übriggeblieben ist. Diese Lockfiles verhindern
Hello,
I can't retrieve packages from remote http repository through apt-get
since my internet provider decided to filter http traffic with SquiVi2
software:
# apt-get install bc
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
bc
George Chelidze wrote:
Err http://ftp.debian.org stable/main bc 1.06-15
302 Moved Temporarily
Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/bc/bc_1.06-15_i386.deb 302
Moved Temporarily
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with
--fix-missing?
Is
Hi,
I just installed mod_evasive apache module and it is working fine. But
after that I cannot install or remove anything with apt-get. ex. when
i try to install libapache-mod-perl, got error below;
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
libapache-mod-perl is already the
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:29:49PM +0300, Cem Kamil Kulekci wrote:
Hi,
I just installed mod_evasive apache module and it is working fine. But
after that I cannot install or remove anything with apt-get. ex. when
i try to install libapache-mod-perl, got error below;
Reading Package
Hi,
2006/5/20, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:29:49PM +0300, Cem Kamil Kulekci wrote:
**
1 not fully installed or removed.
**
this is your problem. until you clear out that 1 package you will not
be able to install anything.
It refers to
Problem solved. I've just written the info file manually and it worked.
Cem
Here is the info I wrote:
---
Loadmodule: evasive_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_evasive.so
Directives:
DOSHashTableSize
DOSPageCount
DOSSiteCount
DOSPageInterval
DOSSiteInterval
DOSBlockingPeriod
Aqui nem isso resolve! :(
ta ruim!
Harlei
- Original Message -
From: Marcos Vinicius Lazarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harlei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: grupo do debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: apt-get problem
Harlei
isso resolve! :(
ta ruim!
Harlei
- Original Message -
From: Marcos Vinicius Lazarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harlei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: grupo do debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: apt-get problem
Harlei wrote
Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu
tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma
porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei
apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns
numa
Harlei wrote:
Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get
update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem
tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup
e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns
Particularmente eu prefiro mirrors http. Acho que tinha estes
problemas quando utilizava ftp. Ei, não tem um mirror aí na unicamp?
Fabiano.
Em 18/01/06, Marcos Vinicius Lazarini[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Harlei wrote:
Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get
Tem sim, é o que eu uso:
http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/debian.d/
Entre lá e veja os disponiveis... Se nao me engano, no sources.list vai
assim: http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/debian.d/debian/
Tem mirror do marillat inclusive, beeem mais rápido :-)
As vezes eles estão mexendo no Lab
Nie wiem co zrobic ani skasowac ani upgrade
apt-get -f install nie poamaga
E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential
package e2fsprogs due to a Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop. This is often bad,
but if you really want to do it, activate the APT::Force-LoopBreak option.
Hello list,
I've installed debian unstable on my IMAC.
My problem is with apt-get.
I used a sniffer and verified a http file is transmitted properly but
the problem seems to be that apt-get searches for
base-installer_1.13_powerpc.udeb which does not exist, what does exist
in all the mirrors
Have you tried other mirrors?
-Original Message-
From: Jess Portnoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:17 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: apt-get problem
Hello list,
I've installed debian unstable on my IMAC.
My problem is with apt-get.
I used
mirrors?
-Original Message-
From: Jess Portnoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:17 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: apt-get problem
Hello list,
I've installed debian unstable on my IMAC.
My problem is with apt-get.
I used a sniffer and verified
I am building the a third new mail server at the moment. They are
similar machines with one network connection on the same segment as
the ftp-servers (archive and archive2).
I have copied /etc/apt/sources.list from one of the productions
machines (say machine 1) to the new one. The md5sum of
Johann Spies wrote:
I am building the a third new mail server at the moment. They are
similar machines with one network connection on the same segment as
the ftp-servers (archive and archive2).
W: Couldn't stat source package list ftp://archive.sun.ac.za
stable-proposed-updates/main Packages
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
Al three mail server have the same version of apt. This sources list
was also tested on a sid machine without a problem.
Any idea what can be causing this?
I found a solution: after installing wget there was no problem.
What did
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:53:57 +0200
Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
Al three mail server have the same version of apt. This sources
list was also tested on a sid machine without a problem.
Any idea what can be causing
Hi,
I'm receiving the following error messages while I'm trying to upgrade
postfix package. It happened during apt-get dist-upgrade.
Anyone can help me to understand what is wrong with my system?
I'm using testing version of debian.
server:/home/mike# apt-get install postfix
Reading Package
server:/home/mike# apt-get install postfix
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 102 not
upgraded.
Need to get 0B/611kB of archives. After unpacking 540kB will be used.
Preconfiguring packages ...
Hallo,
Ich hatte zu Testzwecken versucht evolution zu installieren, was aber
nicht funktionierte. apt-get remove evolution bringt u.a. Fehlermeldung.
Dummerweise kann ich jetzt auch nichts installieren, da er erst
evolution entfernen will.
bei apt-get -f install bekomme ich folgende Meldungen:
Moin,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:21:43AM +0100, Peter Mathis wrote:
Hallo,
Ich hatte zu Testzwecken versucht evolution zu installieren, was aber
aus unstable?
nicht funktionierte. apt-get remove evolution bringt u.a. Fehlermeldung.
Dummerweise kann ich jetzt auch nichts installieren, da
Hans-Georg Bork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moin,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:21:43AM +0100, Peter Mathis wrote:
Hallo,
Ich hatte zu Testzwecken versucht evolution zu installieren, was aber
aus unstable?
nicht funktionierte. apt-get remove evolution bringt u.a. Fehlermeldung.
Dummerweise
Hallo,
Am Montag, 22. Dez 2003, 18:33:08 +0100 schrieb Heino Tiedemann:
Du hättest auch
apt-get --reinstall install mozilla/stable
machen können, dann hättest du dir das deinstallieren gespart.
Es sollte auch das hier funktionieren:
apt-get --reinstall install
* Bertram Scharpf wrote:
Am Montag, 22. Dez 2003, 18:33:08 +0100 schrieb Heino Tiedemann:
Du hättest auch
apt-get --reinstall install mozilla/stable
machen können, dann hättest du dir das deinstallieren gespart.
Es sollte auch das hier funktionieren:
apt-get --reinstall install
Hallo,
Am Samstag, 27. Dez 2003, 19:35:22 +0100 schrieb Norbert Tretkowski:
* Bertram Scharpf wrote:
Am Montag, 22. Dez 2003, 18:33:08 +0100 schrieb Heino Tiedemann:
Es sollte auch das hier funktionieren:
apt-get --reinstall install mozilla=2:1.0.0-0.woody.1
Am 2003-12-22 18:33:08, schrieb Heino Tiedemann:
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danach zeigte mir
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser
mozilla-browser:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1
Version Table:
2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0
100
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2003-12-22 18:33:08, schrieb Heino Tiedemann:
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danach zeigte mir
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser
mozilla-browser:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1
Version
Um einen weiteren Fast-GAU zu verhindern, bitte ich jetzt doch mal um Hilfe!
Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody hatte, (zunächst
Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1 von bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von
woody
selber nehmen. Also hab ich die Quellen
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote:
Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody
hatte, (zunächst Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1 von
bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von woody selber nehmen.
Wenn du Probleme hast, solltest du das den zustaendigen
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:04:53PM +0100, =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote:
Um einen weiteren Fast-GAU zu verhindern, bitte ich jetzt doch mal um Hilfe!
Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody hatte,
(zunächst
Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:17:15:
Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin?
Vermutlich weil diese noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt ist.
Norbert
O.k., laut apt-get ist sie das aber!
debian:/home/ulrich# apt-get remove mozilla
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:21:07:
Danach zeigte mir
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser
mozilla-browser:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1
Version Table:
2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0
Du scheinst Du bunk-1
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote:
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:17:15:
Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin?
Vermutlich weil diese noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt ist.
Norbert
O.k., laut apt-get ist sie das aber!
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31:
Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ?
dpkg -l | grep mozilla
rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser
rc mozilla-mailne 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - mail and news support
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote:
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31:
Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ?
dpkg -l | grep mozilla
rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser
rc mozilla-mailne
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote:
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:21:07:
Ich wuerde Dir aber empfehlen bei der 1.5.x version von
backports.org zu bleiben. Alles andere versetzt Dich um Jahre
zurueck in die Vergangenheit.
Da war, soweit ich mich erinnere,
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um einen weiteren Fast-GAU zu verhindern, bitte ich jetzt doch mal
um Hilfe! Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter
Debian woody hatte, (zunächst Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt
1.2.1 von bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von woody
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
mozilla: Depends: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: mozilla-mailnews (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be
installed
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31:
Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ?
dpkg -l | grep mozilla
rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser
rc mozilla-mailne 1.2.1-2.bunk
Since some days I don't get any upgradable packages when doing an
apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade (0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0
to remove and 3 not upgraded).
First I thought it had something to do with an old Packages file being
cached in the proxy server.
I then did a grep on the
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:32:56 +0100
Tim Broddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I have this idea that my local package database might be broken (?)
since it's impossible that there haven't been any package updates to
sid last week.
Anyone has any ideas on fixing this?
...
Hi
It is possible and
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 07:32, Tim Broddin wrote:
Since some days I don't get any upgradable packages when doing an
apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade (0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0
to remove and 3 not upgraded).
First I thought it had something to do with an old Packages file being
Thanx for the reply both. Stupid me, thought I nuked my system :)
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 16:22, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 07:32, Tim Broddin wrote:
Since some days I don't get any upgradable packages when doing an
apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade (0 upgraded, 0 newly
begin Dany Joly quote from Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:14:50PM +
Here are my errors message :
remove an other package :
dpkp : serious warning files list file for package 'xfonts-base' missing,
assuming package has
no files currently installed.
12118 files currently installed.)
I recently have installed Woody recently and it does a great job so far!
I had a problem while installing xfonts-base package : the operation froze
and would not
complete even after a period of a few hours. I did ctrl-c to stop the
process and I now have
1 package not fully installe or removed
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:37:25PM -0500, Terry Hancock wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2003 08:32 pm, Darryl Barlow wrote:
Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the
kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time
ago but it has not yet been
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:37:26PM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote:
I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error
message:
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages
404 Not Found
Kindly help ...
potato is old enough that
Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the
kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time ago but it
has not yet been fixed. This is one of the joys of running unstable and the
price to be paid for running a more cutting edge distribution.
Hi ,
I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error
message:
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages
404 Not Found
Kindly help ...
Thanks
--
Vivek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Vivek Kumar wrote:
Hi ,
I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error
message:
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages
404 Not Found
Likely wouldn't be any updates anyways, as potato support was
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:37:26PM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote:
| Hi ,
| I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error
| message:
|
| Failed to fetch
| http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages
| 404 Not Found
Upgrade to Woody. Potato is no
On Monday 22 September 2003 08:32 pm, Darryl Barlow wrote:
Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the
kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time ago but it
has not yet been fixed. This is one of the joys of running unstable and the
price to
Hi,
I suspect this is an actual bug in apt-get, but I'm not sure
where the problem would be, or when it occured. Anyway,
it looks like it must be some kind of database inconsistency,
and I'm really more interested in fixing my package database.
Lately, I've started to get this message when
on Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:39:57PM +0100, Mark Ayliffe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I had a problem updating my two unstable machines this morning. I got the
message Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Resource
temporarily unavailable). Looking through the archive of this illustrious
I had a problem updating my two unstable machines this morning. I got the
message Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Resource
temporarily unavailable). Looking through the archive of this illustrious
list I found several suggestions that another copy of dselect (or presumably
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 13.13 schrieb Werner Gast:
Hallo Johannes,
Hallo Werner,
diese Meldungen hatte ich gestern auch. Ich bin dann auf Adrian Bunk's
Download-Seite gegangen und habe die angemeckerten Pakete mit der
Vorgabe 'ohne Versionscheck' einzeln installiert.
Manchmal braucht man halt
Johannes Bedenbender schrieb:
Hallo Liste,
ich habe jetzt damit begonnen, auf Gnome 2.2 umzusteigen. Alles was ich
brauche läuft soweit, ich würde jetzt nur noch gerne Galeon intallieren.
Ein apt-get install galeon bringt:
---
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 12.43 schrieb Soeren D. Schulze:
Hatte ich auch schonmal, sowas.
Was sagt
dpkg -r libpisock8
Das hat da Problem gelöst. Danke.
apt-get remove libpisock8
Das hat das Problem nicht gelöst.
Für eine genauere Diagnose müsste ich allerdings wirklich wissen, was in
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 12.26 schrieb Johannes Bedenbender:
Ein apt-get install galeon bringt:
evolution: Depends: libpisync0 but it is not going to be installed
galeon: Depends: libgconf11 (= 1.0.7) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: libgnome-vfs0 (= 1.0.3-2) but it is
Jag kommer tyvärr inteihåg vart jag hittatde apt källan men den är inte
officiell har jag för mig, tror att jag hittade den på apt-get.org, så
ev bug rapport borde nog inte gå till debian bug listan, hur som helst
trode jag att det bara var jag som hade problem. Och för ögonblicket så
kan jag inte
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
