apt-get problem installing qemu-kvm
Hi All, I'm having problem installing qemu-kvm from apt-get. When I run the command: apt-get install qemu-kvm using root user I got this error message: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package qemu-kvm is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package 'qemu-kvm' has no installation candidate I tried: apt-get update or apt-get clean without any luck. This is my source.list file: deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib Any clue about this problem? Thanks in advance!
Re: apt-get problem installing qemu-kvm
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0600, Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote: Hi All, I'm having problem installing qemu-kvm from apt-get. When I run the command: apt-get install qemu-kvm using root user I got this error message: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package qemu-kvm is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package 'qemu-kvm' has no installation candidate I tried: apt-get update or apt-get clean without any luck. This is my source.list file: deb [1]http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib deb-src [2]http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib deb [3]http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib deb [4]http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib deb-src [5]http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib Any clue about this problem? http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=qemu-kvm shows that qemu-kvm SHOULD be available in wheezy main on the amd64 and i386 architectures (if you're running something else, then no, you won't be able to get it). Try apt-cache policy qemu-kvm, to see if that sheds any light. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: apt-get problem installing qemu-kvm
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0600, Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote: Hi All, I'm having problem installing qemu-kvm from apt-get. When I run the command: apt-get install qemu-kvm using root user I got this error message: ...snip.. Strange. I'm running wheezy. I assume you are to from your sources. My sources list is substantially like yours. Qemu-kvm shows up in my synaptic. Try another mirror. -- Bob Holtzman Your mail is being read by tight lipped NSA agents who fail to see humor in Doctor Strangelove Key ID 8D549279 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: apt-get problem installing qemu-kvm
Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package qemu-kvm is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
This is usually do to not having run apt-get update and having an out
of date package list. But...
I tried: apt-get update or apt-get clean without any luck.
I see that you tried update already.
This is my source.list file:
deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib
Any clue about this problem?
Do you have any other files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/* that would be
causing trouble?
Check to see if you are using a proxy. It is possible that your apt
proxy is causing trouble.
find /etc/apt/apt.conf* -type f -exec grep -i proxy {} +
In any case try apt-cache policy qemu-kvm to see what it shows. Here
is what I see on my Wheezy 7 system.
root@joseki:~# apt-cache policy qemu-kvm
qemu-kvm:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.1.2+dfsg-6
Version table:
1.1.2+dfsg-6 0
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main i386 Packages
It should be available. Check everything over again. Make double and
tripple sure that you have no errors running apt-get update.
Now some other unrelated comments...
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib
This should be okay. The http.us.debian.org is the same as
ftp.us.debian.org and there should not be any difference. But if all
else fails then I would
Lastly and unrelated I see that you have the contrib section but not
the non-free section. That is a valid combination but unusual. This
won't be related to your problem since qemu-kvm is in main. But
usually contrib and non-free go together since both are for non-free
things. Usually contrib is for free things that load non-free things.
It is a two-step process for most things in contrib. Like the Adobe
Flash installer and so forth. Usually you would either have simply
main or you would have all three main contrib non-free. Also you
are missing the deb-src entry for the main archive.
You have the deb-src entries for the volatile wheezy-updates and
security wheezy/updates but are missing the one from main. No big
deal if you never download source but I thought it less than tidy.
Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...[solved]
Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit : On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote: Bonsoir, trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmjpegutils-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmjpegutils-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 ^^^ Unpacking liblavjpeg-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblavjpeg-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package liblavjpeg-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 Unpacking libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpeg2encpp-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmpeg2encpp-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 ^^ I savagely killed these packages, and everything went fine... I don't know why apt-get is unable to do the job by itself (ie. upgrade a package) though. Regards -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...[solved]
Hi. On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:02:38 +0200 François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr wrote: Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit : Unpacking libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpeg2encpp-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmpeg2encpp-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 ^^ I savagely killed these packages, and everything went fine... I don't know why apt-get is unable to do the job by itself (ie. upgrade a package) though. Judging from the packages' names, libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0 and libmpeg2encpp-2.0-0 - those are different packages to apt. And apparently person who built them didn't include 'Replaces' and 'Conflicts' stanzas to the packages' metadata. So, apt tried to do what it's told to do - i.e. install second package, keep first. Reco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131026132658.05cdf62504e960984757a...@gmail.com
Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...[solved]
Le 26.10.2013 11:02, François Patte a écrit : Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit : On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote: Bonsoir, trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmjpegutils-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmjpegutils-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 ^^^ Unpacking liblavjpeg-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblavjpeg-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package liblavjpeg-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 Unpacking libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpeg2encpp-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmpeg2encpp-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 ^^ I savagely killed these packages, and everything went fine... I don't know why apt-get is unable to do the job by itself (ie. upgrade a package) though. apt... or I should say dpkg, does not do black magic. In deb packages, there are at least 3 types of contents: _ files to install themselves _ scripts to run before/after the installation _ informations about which package will broke the package, which packages it will need, which virtual packages it provides, etc When some of those informations lacks, then apt-*, aptitude, dselect, etc can not do their job correctly. It is a bug, and if you can report about it, do it ( I have no idea if you can submit bugs to people who are maintaining multimedia, though. Of course, reporting bug to Debian will not help, here we can only try to help you find a workaround.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/03f6474dbc3b94ce1c8294a034580...@neutralite.org
Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...
Le 25/10/2013 00:28, Scott Ferguson a écrit : On 25/10/13 09:12, François Patte wrote: Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit : On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote: Bonsoir, It looks like you 'might' have mixed conflicting repositories perhaps deb-multimedia? alien requires debhelper, you can force the solution but before dpkg/apt can deal with it you need to fix an outstanding dependancy problem with multimedia packages. I'd suggest you ignore the alien package for the time being - *if* you've mixed Debian official with unofficial (i.e. deb-multimedia):- 1. remove the unofficial packages and comment out the entry in /etc/apt/source.list - preferably a non-standard repo would be a *.list entry in /etc/apt/source.list.d (but it's not essential) in which case # mv /etc/apt/sources.list.d/whatever.list ../ 2. apt-get update;apt-get -f install[;apt-get upgrade] I still get these messages: Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libmjpegutils-2.1-0_1%3a2.1.0+debian-2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/liblavjpeg-2.1-0_1%3a2.1.0+debian-2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_1%3a2.1.0+debian-2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmplex2-2.1-0_1%3a2.1.0+debian-2_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) # apt-get -sf install | more if it looks like nothing will explode and spray the room with toxic waste proceed with:- # apt-get -f install I do not understand what you mean by remove the unofficial packages remove *all packages* installed from deb-multimedia? Best regards Yes. I presume that means you did have deb-multimedia enabled. There are several ways to do that (remove all from a certain repository) - the method I use to remove all those packages from that repository (until I find a more efficient way) is:- 1. remove entry for given repository (e.g. deb-multimedia) in sources lists 2. # apt-get update 3. # for i in `apt-show-versions | grep 'No available' | cut -d' ' -f 1` ;do apt-get remove -y $i ; done apt-show-versions is not installed on my system and apt-get refuses to install it because some dependencies for mjpegtools and transcode are broken I do not understand that: apt-get refuses do anything because of these missing(?) dependencies, the whole system seems to need dependencies for two unnecessary packages? Thanks for your answer. What can I do else? Best regards -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...
François Patte wrote: Scott Ferguson a écrit : I do not understand what you mean by remove the unofficial packages remove *all packages* installed from deb-multimedia? That would be my understanding of the suggestion. I recommend that course of action too. Because step 1) Fix your broken system. Step 2) Do whatever you were trying to do when you got your system into this broken state. You can always break your system again after fixing it. :-) 1. remove entry for given repository (e.g. deb-multimedia) in sources lists 2. # apt-get update 3. # for i in `apt-show-versions | grep 'No available' | cut -d' ' -f 1` ;do apt-get remove -y $i ; done The problem I see there is that apt is not happy. Therefore I suggest using dpkg to remove the packages instead of apt. But first apt-show-packages needs to be installed. Because you are mixing reposities I assume you now have an unstable Sid Unstable system? What system were you trying to track? apt-show-versions is not installed on my system and apt-get refuses to install it because some dependencies for mjpegtools and transcode are broken You can install it using 'dpkg -i' after downloading the .deb file. The apt-show-versions depends upon libapt-pkg-perl and libstorable-perl which may also need to be installed if they aren't already. Start by going to the packages page: http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages Enter the package you wish to locate. Search for it. Specify your desired track of stable, testing, unstable, or any. I always select any. Then download the correct architecture for your system. http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=apt-show-versionssearchon=namessuite=allsection=all Then install it using dpkg. # dpkg -i apt-show-versions_0.22.3_all.deb Using dpkg directly will bypass the problem with apt. I do not understand that: apt-get refuses do anything because of these missing(?) dependencies, the whole system seems to need dependencies for two unnecessary packages? APT tries hard to tidy up anything broken. Because there are broken dependencies on your system apt is going to do nothing else until those broken items are fixed. If a car has a flat tire then you can't drive anywhere until the tire is fixed. Even if you only want to take it to the car wash. Since you have broken apt then you must fix apt before doing anything else to your system. Thanks for your answer. What can I do else? I am concerned by the original question. You are trying to install alien. That indicates that you probably are wanting to install an rpm package upon your Debian system. And you have also broken your system by mixing repositories. These are both expert level actions. Can they be done? Yes. (But only by an expert.) Should they be done? No. (Not even by an expert in my opinion.) Therefore your question is disconcerting. It indicates that even after you fix up your current system problems that another set of problems are soon to happen. It feels to me like there are these paintings by Monet, Van Gogh, Klimt, Renoir, and then someone thinks they appear a little drab and dirty and they are just going to clean them up with a little turpentine and a rag and then touch up parts with some new paint. That just isn't going to go very well. Can paintings be cleaned? Yes. But a master's paintings should be preserved by an expert curator. Best to leave alien alone and work within the Debian system natively. What problem did you originally start out having that caused you to go down this dark and scary path? Perhaps the list can help with those. Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:55:19PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: APT tries hard to tidy up anything broken. Because there are broken dependencies on your system apt is going to do nothing else until those broken items are fixed. If a car has a flat tire then you can't drive anywhere until the tire is fixed. Well, you can ... but I don't think the wheel will be much use after a while. :) What problem did you originally start out having that caused you to go down this dark and scary path? Perhaps the list can help with those. It seems he installed the ffmpeg package from deb multimedia, *now* he has problems. -- If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131026043513.GH358@tal
out to get out of an apt-get problem...
Bonsoir, I try to install alien, but I get these messages: apt-get install alien Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: alien : Depends: debhelper (= 7) but it is not going to be installed liblavfile-2.1-0 : Depends: libmjpegutils-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed liblavplay-2.1-0 : Depends: liblavjpeg-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmjpegutils-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed mjpegtools : Depends: liblavjpeg-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmjpegutils-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmplex2-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed transcode : Depends: libmjpegutils-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). So I run apt-get -f install and: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: liblavjpeg-2.0-0 libmjpegutils-2.0-0 libmpeg2encpp-2.0-0 libmplex2-2.0-0 Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: liblavjpeg-2.1-0 libmjpegutils-2.1-0 libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0 libmplex2-2.1-0 The following NEW packages will be installed: liblavjpeg-2.1-0 libmjpegutils-2.1-0 libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0 libmplex2-2.1-0 0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 182 not upgraded. 6 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/177 kB of archives. After this operation, 574 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done (Reading database ... 195959 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libmjpegutils-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../libmjpegutils-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmjpegutils-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmjpegutils-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmjpegutils-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 Unpacking liblavjpeg-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblavjpeg-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package liblavjpeg-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 Unpacking libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpeg2encpp-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmpeg2encpp-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 Unpacking libmplex2-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../libmplex2-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmplex2-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmplex2-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmplex2-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libmjpegutils-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmplex2-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) How to recover? Thanks -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...
On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote: Bonsoir, I try to install alien, but I get these messages: apt-get install alien Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: alien : Depends: debhelper (= 7) but it is not going to be installed liblavfile-2.1-0 : Depends: libmjpegutils-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed liblavplay-2.1-0 : Depends: liblavjpeg-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmjpegutils-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed mjpegtools : Depends: liblavjpeg-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmjpegutils-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmplex2-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed transcode : Depends: libmjpegutils-2.1-0 but it is not going to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). So I run apt-get -f install and: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: liblavjpeg-2.0-0 libmjpegutils-2.0-0 libmpeg2encpp-2.0-0 libmplex2-2.0-0 Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: liblavjpeg-2.1-0 libmjpegutils-2.1-0 libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0 libmplex2-2.1-0 The following NEW packages will be installed: liblavjpeg-2.1-0 libmjpegutils-2.1-0 libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0 libmplex2-2.1-0 0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 182 not upgraded. 6 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/177 kB of archives. After this operation, 574 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done (Reading database ... 195959 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libmjpegutils-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../libmjpegutils-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmjpegutils-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmjpegutils-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmjpegutils-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 Unpacking liblavjpeg-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblavjpeg-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package liblavjpeg-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 Unpacking libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpeg2encpp-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmpeg2encpp-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 Unpacking libmplex2-2.1-0:amd64 (from .../libmplex2-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmplex2-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmplex2-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmplex2-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libmjpegutils-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmplex2-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) How to recover? Thanks It looks like you 'might' have mixed conflicting repositories perhaps deb-multimedia? alien requires debhelper, you can force the solution but before dpkg/apt can deal with it you need to fix an outstanding dependancy problem with multimedia packages. I'd suggest you ignore the alien package for the time being - *if* you've mixed Debian official with unofficial (i.e. deb-multimedia):- 1. remove the unofficial packages and comment out the entry in /etc/apt/source.list - preferably a non-standard repo would be a *.list entry in /etc/apt/source.list.d (but it's not essential) in which case # mv /etc/apt/sources.list.d/whatever.list ../ 2. apt-get update;apt-get -f install[;apt-get upgrade] 3. install alien (and it's dependancies) 4. re-enable the non-standard repo *and* pin it (you can -t choose the repo, but pinning is safer in the long term). 5. install the packages you need from the non-standard repo NOTE: that's the proper way - I've sometimes solved similar (non-production) problems by rm the file that the installer balks at overwriting (first mv
Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...
On 25/10/13 09:12, François Patte wrote: Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit : On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote: Bonsoir, It looks like you 'might' have mixed conflicting repositories perhaps deb-multimedia? alien requires debhelper, you can force the solution but before dpkg/apt can deal with it you need to fix an outstanding dependancy problem with multimedia packages. I'd suggest you ignore the alien package for the time being - *if* you've mixed Debian official with unofficial (i.e. deb-multimedia):- 1. remove the unofficial packages and comment out the entry in /etc/apt/source.list - preferably a non-standard repo would be a *.list entry in /etc/apt/source.list.d (but it's not essential) in which case # mv /etc/apt/sources.list.d/whatever.list ../ 2. apt-get update;apt-get -f install[;apt-get upgrade] I still get these messages: Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libmjpegutils-2.1-0_1%3a2.1.0+debian-2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/liblavjpeg-2.1-0_1%3a2.1.0+debian-2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_1%3a2.1.0+debian-2_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmplex2-2.1-0_1%3a2.1.0+debian-2_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) # apt-get -sf install | more if it looks like nothing will explode and spray the room with toxic waste proceed with:- # apt-get -f install I do not understand what you mean by remove the unofficial packages remove *all packages* installed from deb-multimedia? Best regards Yes. I presume that means you did have deb-multimedia enabled. There are several ways to do that (remove all from a certain repository) - the method I use to remove all those packages from that repository (until I find a more efficient way) is:- 1. remove entry for given repository (e.g. deb-multimedia) in sources lists 2. # apt-get update 3. # for i in `apt-show-versions | grep 'No available' | cut -d' ' -f 1` ;do apt-get remove -y $i ; done You can re-install them later taking care not to break the main system, but first remove them. When you remove them you'll get lots of run apt-get autoremove type messages. You can ignore those messages. Kind regards NOTE for search engines - when removing packages like this it's best to use apt instead of aptitude to avoid problems with multiarch dependencies. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52699f22.1090...@gmail.com
apt-get problem
This is a partial output of apt-get update command, performed on my brand new Debian 5.0 installation: Ign http://ftp.egr.msu.edu lenny/main Packages Ign http://ftp.egr.msu.edu lenny/main Sources Err http://ftp.egr.msu.edu lenny/main Packages Connection failed Err http://ftp.egr.msu.edu lenny/main Sources Connection failed Fetched 93.1kB in 10s (9041B/s) W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.egr.msu.edu/debian/dists/lenny/Release.gpg Connection failed W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.egr.msu.edu/debian/dists/lenny/main/i18n/Translation-en_US.bz2 Connection failed W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.egr.msu.edu/debian/dists/lenny/main/binary-i386/Packages Connection failed W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.egr.msu.edu/debian/dists/lenny/main/source/Sources Connection failed E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Is that an indication that the mirror is not ok, or I am doing something wrong. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: apt-get problem
Angelin Lalev schreef: This is a partial output of apt-get update command, performed on my brand new Debian 5.0 installation: [snip] Is that an indication that the mirror is not ok, or I am doing something wrong. You are using the ftp.egr.msu.edu mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list. It seems the mirror has gone offline and you may want to switch to another one. To do that, open your /etc/apt/sources.list in an editor as root, and replace all instances of ftp.egr.msu.edu with another mirror, such as ftp.debian.org. Sjors -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: apt-get problem
Use apt-get spy but read this about apt-get for the future... http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#pkgmgmt Sjors Gielen wrote: Angelin Lalev schreef: This is a partial output of apt-get update command, performed on my brand new Debian 5.0 installation: [snip] Is that an indication that the mirror is not ok, or I am doing something wrong. You are using the ftp.egr.msu.edu mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list. It seems the mirror has gone offline and you may want to switch to another one. To do that, open your /etc/apt/sources.list in an editor as root, and replace all instances of ftp.egr.msu.edu with another mirror, such as ftp.debian.org. Sjors -- -- You don't know where your shadow will fall, Somebody.- -- Ing. Olaf Reitmaier Veracierta ola...@gmail.com -- http://olafrv.googlepages.com (Personal Webpage) http://olafrv.blogspot.com (Technical Blog) -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: apt-get - problem configuring /etc/apt/sources.list
Vwaju wrote: With a little help from my friends, I'm teaching myself networking by building an internet server. I am running Debian Linux 3.1 I would upgrade to Debian 4 (Etch) via Internet by doing these steps: 1.) apt-get clean 2.) replace your /etc/apt/sources.list with this: deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib non-free 3.) apt-get update 4.) apt-get upgrade 5.) reboot (required because kernel gets replaced) 6.) apt-get dist-upgrade 7.) reboot (optional) Now your system is up-to-date. TIP: You should have a second terminal open and save a copy of your important config files (the upgrader will tell you which user-modified cfg files should be upgraded). But before doing the above steps consult the official release notes, for example here: http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html (If you want, you can even continue upgrading to Debian 5 (lenny) by replacing etch with lenny above and repeating the steps... But Debian 5 is not yet released, it is in testing state.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get – problem configuring /etc/apt/sources.lis t
With a little help from my friends, I'm teaching myself networking by building an internet server. I am running Debian Linux 3.1 on a Dell Dimension 4100 desktop. I have installed ISPConfig, and I now I'm trying to install monit: # apt-get install monit Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... The following NEW packages will be installed: monit 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 228kB of archives. After unpacking 643kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org oldstable/main monit 1:4.5-1 [228kB] Err ftp://ftp.us.debian.org oldstable/main monit 1:4.5-1 Unable to fetch file, server said 'Failed to open file. ' [IP: 35.9.37.225 21] Failed to fetch ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/monit/monit_4.5-1_i386.deb Unable to fetch file, server said 'Failed to open file. ' [IP: 35.9.37.225 21] E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing? I tried the update and –-fix-missing options, which don't help. Here is /etc/apt/sources.list: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - #deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ oldstable main deb-src ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ oldstable main #added by me 11/19/08 #doesn't work! #deb http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ oldstable main deb http://security.debian.org/ oldstable/updates main - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The man pages for apt-get and for sources.list are kind of hard to understand. I googled monit_4.5-1_i386.deb, and found it at: http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/monit / I tried to insert a line in sources.list, but it doesn't work (see line added 11/19/08, then commented out). What does the entry in sources.list needs to look like in order to download monit_4.5-1_i386.deb? Best Regards, Vwaju New York City -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get – problem configuring /etc/ apt/sources.list
Vwaju wrote: [snip] Get:1 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org oldstable/main monit 1:4.5-1 [228kB] Err ftp://ftp.us.debian.org oldstable/main monit 1:4.5-1 Unable to fetch file, server said 'Failed to open file. ' [IP: 35.9.37.225 21] Failed to fetch ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/monit/monit_4.5-1_i386.deb Unable to fetch file, server said 'Failed to open file. ' [IP: 35.9.37.225 21] E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing? Firstly, try use another mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list, for example ftp.cz.debian.org or ftp.de.debian.org. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com Ukrainian C++ Developer, Debian APT contributor signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: apt-get -- problem configuring /etc/apt /sources.list
Bob Cox wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 16:26:08 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Firstly, try use another mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list, for example ftp.cz.debian.org or ftp.de.debian.org. No. There is no sarge repository on these servers either. The OP will have to use http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive. ftp://ftp.cz.debian.org/debian/README confirms this. Yes, you are right. I've missed the fact that he are using sarge. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com Ukrainian C++ Developer, Debian APT contributor signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: apt-get – problem configuring /etc/apt/sources .list
Thank you Bob and Eugene. Bob -- Yes, inserting: deb http://archive.debian.org/debian sarge main into /etc/apt/sources.list and then running #apt-get update does the trick. Might there be a guide to using apt that is conceptually clearer than the man page? Best Regards, Vwaju -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apt-get problem
[ Please don't top post. ] On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:23:58 +0100, Josep M. wrote: Hello Eugene. Thanks, I will change in next msgs, about apt-get upgrade nothing is upgraded: The problem is that apt-get want remove a lot of packages without needed, and I would like change this. deb:# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. I have two packages for upgrade and would like what are, dpkg returns nothing:: 140:/home/system/debian/install# dpkg --get-selections | grep hold 140:/home/system/debian/install# Run aptitude search '~U' or start aptitude in interactive mode and look at the section Upgradable Packages. -- Regards,| http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apt-get problem
Josep M. wrote: Hello. With aptitude dist-upgrade all is ok but apt-get dist-upgrade want delete a lot of packages...how can I fix it? [snip] Firstly, please not post locale-specific output of commands, use LANG=C command instead. Secondly, yes, aptitude now has better dependency-resolution algorithm. You can also try 'apt-get upgrade', however. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Apt-get problem
Hello Eugene. Thanks, I will change in next msgs, about apt-get upgrade nothing is upgraded: The problem is that apt-get want remove a lot of packages without needed, and I would like change this. deb:# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. I have two packages for upgrade and would like what are, dpkg returns nothing:: 140:/home/system/debian/install# dpkg --get-selections | grep hold 140:/home/system/debian/install# Greetings Josep Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Josep M. wrote: Hello. With aptitude dist-upgrade all is ok but apt-get dist-upgrade want delete a lot of packages...how can I fix it? [snip] Firstly, please not post locale-specific output of commands, use LANG=C command instead. Secondly, yes, aptitude now has better dependency-resolution algorithm. You can also try 'apt-get upgrade', however. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get problem removing kdebluetooth and rserve
I'm trying to install some packages but seem to have gotten the package manager thoroughly confused: When trying to install anything I get the unmet dependencies error with the suggestion to run apt-get -f install. Doing that I get the following two errors: Removing kdebluetooth ... dpkg-divert: mismatch on divert-to when removing `diversion of /usr/bin/kdesktop_lock to /usr/bin/kdesktop_lock_nobt by kdebluetooth' found `diversion of /usr/bin/kdesktop_lock to /usr/bin/kdesktop_lock.orig by kdelock-knoppix' dpkg: error processing kdebluetooth (--remove): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2 Removing rserve ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/rserve.postrm: line 15: R: command not found dpkg: error processing rserve (--remove): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127 Can someone please suggest the next thing to try? Thanks for your time! Paul
Re: apt-get Problem
Stopping apache 2.0 web server...Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php4.load: API module structure `php4_module' in file Da ist ein Fehler in der php4.load. Das php4 Modul temporaer disablen (a2dismod) hilft das Upgrade durchzufuehren. okay, habe ich gemacht. Nun läuft das apt-get upgrade wieder ordentlich durch, wenn es dabei auch ein paar failed-Meldungen rauswirft: Entferne apache2-common ... Stopping apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.conf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden ... no pidfile found! not running?. (Lese Datenbank ... 201286 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von apache2-mpm-prefork 2.0.55-4.1 (durch .../apache2- mpm-prefork_2.2.3-2_i386.deb) ... Stopping apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.con f: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/actions.load: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so into server: /usr/li b/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory failed! invoke-rc.d: initscript apache2, action stop failed. Stopping apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.conf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/actions.load: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so into server: /usr/li b/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory failed! invoke-rc.d: initscript apache2, action stop failed. Entpacke Ersatz für apache2-mpm-prefork ... Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket apache2.2-common. Entpacke apache2.2-common (aus .../apache2.2-common_2.2.3-2_i386.deb) ... Stopping apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.con f: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden apache2: Syntax error on line 116 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Syntaxerror on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/actions.load: Canno t load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so into server: /usr/li b/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory failed! invoke-rc.d: initscript apache2, action stop failed. Danach lief dann alles sauber durch. Das Wer testing/unstable nutzt, sollte sowas selbst hinkriegen verkneife ich mir mal ;) Tja, wie soll man lernen soetwas hinzukriegen ohne es zu versuchen? Ich habe gewiß noch einige Wissenlücken zu füllen in Sachen Aufbau von Debian. ZB ist mir nicht ganz klar, was ich mit den beiden Meldungen machen soll, die beim Update noch aufgetaucht sind: ** * Please purge the hotplug package! * (/etc/init.d/hotplug has been found on this system) ** und * Linux = 2.6.13-rc1 and udev is enabled; use pcmciautils instead Hat da noch jemand Tipps? Oder wo ich mich dazu schlau lesen kann? Danke. -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem
On 31.10.06 22:20:48, Tom Schmitt wrote: Stopping apache 2.0 web server...Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php4.load: API module structure `php4_module' in file Da ist ein Fehler in der php4.load. Das php4 Modul temporaer disablen (a2dismod) hilft das Upgrade durchzufuehren. okay, habe ich gemacht. Nun läuft das apt-get upgrade wieder ordentlich durch, wenn es dabei auch ein paar failed-Meldungen rauswirft: IIRC kann man dem GMX-Webmail Frontend sagen er soll bei 72 Zeichen den Text umbrechen. Tu das doch bitte. Entferne apache2-common ... Stopping apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.conf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden ... no pidfile found! not running?. Hast du alle Module deaktiviert? Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/actions.load: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so into server: /usr/li b/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Hmm, wohl doch nicht, oder du hast das actions Modul nicht korrekt deaktiviert. Das Modul (.so) ist im Paket apache2.2-common, das sollte im folgenden wohl wieder installiert werden... Das Wer testing/unstable nutzt, sollte sowas selbst hinkriegen verkneife ich mir mal ;) Tja, wie soll man lernen soetwas hinzukriegen ohne es zu versuchen? Man muss ja nicht unbedingt gleich ins Arktische Eiswasser springen, nur um sich abzuhaerten ;) Man koennte z.B. mit einem Stable-Server anfangen, um die Funktionsweise von Debian zu verstehen... Ich habe gewiß noch einige Wissenlücken zu füllen in Sachen Aufbau von Debian. ZB ist mir nicht ganz klar, was ich mit den beiden Meldungen machen soll, die beim Update noch aufgetaucht sind: ** * Please purge the hotplug package! * (/etc/init.d/hotplug has been found on this system) ** Weil du das hotplug Paket purgen sollst, udev hat dieses ersetzt und alte Konfigurationen sollten entfernt werden. und * Linux = 2.6.13-rc1 and udev is enabled; use pcmciautils instead Hat da noch jemand Tipps? Oder wo ich mich dazu schlau lesen kann? Ich vermute du hast ein pcmcia-Paket, das ebenfalls ersetzt wurde durch pcmciautils... Andreas -- Learn to pause -- or nothing worthwhile can catch up to you. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem
Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 22:20 schrieb Tom Schmitt: Ich habe gewiß noch einige Wissenlücken zu füllen in Sachen Aufbau von Debian. ZB ist mir nicht ganz klar, was ich mit den beiden Meldungen machen soll, die beim Update noch aufgetaucht sind: ** * Please purge the hotplug package! * (/etc/init.d/hotplug has been found on this system) ** Einfach machen, was die Meldung sagt. Ich nehme an, Udev wurde installiert, jetzt mußt du den Rest von hotplug entfernen. cu Werner -- Bei genauem Hinsehen zeigt sich, daß Arbeit weniger geisttötend ist als Amusement. -- Charles Baudelaire
apt-get Problem
Hi, ich benutze Etch und wollte das System mal wieder mit apt-get auf den aktuellen Stand bringen. Leider habe ich damit nun ein Problem. Folgendes erhalte ich beim Versuch das Problem mit -f install zu lösen: # apt-get -f install Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig Abhängigkeit werden korrigiert... Fertig Die folgenden zusätzlichen Pakete werden installiert: apache2-mpm-prefork apache2.2-common Die folgenden Pakete werden ENTFERNT: apache2-common Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden installiert: apache2.2-common Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert: apache2-mpm-prefork 1 aktualisiert, 1 neu installiert, 1 zu entfernen und 51 nicht aktualisiert. 9 nicht vollständig installiert oder entfernt. Es müssen noch 0B von 1333kB Archiven geholt werden. Nach dem Auspacken werden 532kB Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt. Möchten Sie fortfahren [J/n]? J dpkg: apache2-common: Abhängigkeitsproblem, aber lösche es auf Anfrage dennoch: apache2-mpm-prefork hängt ab von apache2-common (= 2.0.55-4.1). (Lese Datenbank ... 201657 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Entferne apache2-common ... Stopping apache 2.0 web server...Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php4.load: API module structure `php4_module' in file /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp4.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO? failed! invoke-rc.d: initscript apache2, action stop failed. dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von apache2-common (--remove): Unterprozess pre-removal script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: apache2-common E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Das angemeckerte File ist vorhanden: # ls -la /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp4.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3105288 2006-10-09 12:23 /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp4.so und sieht auf den allerersten Blick auch ok aus: # file /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp4.so /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp4.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), stripped Kann mir jemand einen Tipp geben, was ich nun machen muß um mit apt-get wieder ins Reine zu kommen? Danke, Tom. -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem
On 28.10.06 10:30:26, Tom Schmitt wrote: ich benutze Etch und wollte das System mal wieder mit apt-get auf den aktuellen Stand bringen. Leider habe ich damit nun ein Problem. Folgendes erhalte ich beim Versuch das Problem mit -f install zu lösen: Hier sind Zeilen mit einer Laenge von 72 Zeichen erwuenscht. Stopping apache 2.0 web server...Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php4.load: API module structure `php4_module' in file /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp4.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO? failed! Da ist ein Fehler in der php4.load. Das php4 Modul temporaer disablen (a2dismod) hilft das Upgrade durchzufuehren. Eventuell solltest du aber auch warten bis libapache2-mod-php4 in testing eintrudelt, moeglich das die 4.4.2 nicht mit apache2.2 funktioniert. Das Wer testing/unstable nutzt, sollte sowas selbst hinkriegen verkneife ich mir mal ;) Andreas -- You will be honored for contributing your time and skill to a worthy cause. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Apt-get problem
mattias jonsson skrev: Har råkat ut för ett något irriterande problem Otillfredsställda beroenden. Försök med apt-get -f install Har du provat apt-get -f install? Danne -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SV: Apt-get problem
Ja funkar inte. mattias jonsson mobil: 0708174516 hemsida www.mattiasweb.tk email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq 21188 -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Daniel Nylander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 7 oktober 2006 08:45 Till: debian-user-swedish@lists.debian.org Ämne: Re: Apt-get problem mattias jonsson skrev: Har råkat ut för ett något irriterande problem Otillfredsställda beroenden. Försök med apt-get -f install Har du provat apt-get -f install? Danne -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apt-get problem
Har råkat ut för ett något irriterande problem Ska ta väck postgresql Får följande fel Följande paket har beroenden som inte kan tillfredsställas: kcontrol: Beror: kdebase-data men det kommer inte att installeras kde: Beror: kdepim men det kommer inte att installeras Beror: kdeutils men det kommer inte att installeras Beror: kdewebdev men det kommer inte att installeras kdebase: Beror: kdebase-data (= 4:3.3.2-1sarge3) men det kommer inte att inst alleras kformula: Beror: latex-xft-fonts men det kommer inte att installeras kicker: Beror: kdebase-data men det kommer inte att installeras kivio: Beror: kivio-data (= 1:1.3.5-4.sarge.3) men det kommer inte att install eras kmail: Beror: libmimelib1a men det kommer inte att installeras koffice: Beror: karbon men det kommer inte att installeras korn: Beror: libmimelib1a men det kommer inte att installeras kpat: Beror: kdebase-data men det kommer inte att installeras kword: Beror: libwv2-1 (= 0.1.9-0) men det kommer inte att installeras E: Otillfredsställda beroenden. Försök med apt-get -f install utan paket (elle r ange en lösning). Vad gör man?! mattias jonsson mobil: 0708174516 hemsida www.mattiasweb.tk email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq 21188
Re: apt-get problem
Gruesse! * Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [29.08.06 21:46]: Hallo, das habe ich soweit gemacht uind dann lief es auch ganz gut bis dass dann kam: dpkg: Ernste Warnung: Dateilisten-Datei des Paketes »slapd« fehlt, nehme an, dass das Paket derzeit keine Dateien installiert hat. 36339 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von slapd 2.2.23-8 (durch .../slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb) ... start-stop-daemon: stat /usr/sbin/slapd: No such file or directory dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb (--unpack): Du hast ja noch einen anderen Thread aufgemacht mit ähnlichen Problemen. Ich würde slapd (und auch die anderen Pakete des anderen Threads, die zwar runtergeladen aber nicht ausgepackt/konfiguriert werden können) komplett weghauen mit: apt-get --purge remove paket evtl. erstmal mit der Option -s (simulate) antesten siehe man apt-get und auch das runtergeladene Paket in /var/cache/apt/archives löschen. Dann nochmal versuchen. Du mußt also (wieder) einen Zustand erreichen, in dem alle gewünschten Pakete downgeloadet, entpackt und konfiguriert sind. Mit: dpkg -l kannst du das kontrollieren, es sollte für jedes Paket in der ersten Spalte ii auftauchen. Unkonfigurierte Pakete (wie jetzt bei dir) haben da AFAIK ic oder ci, ich kann grad nicht nachschauen. Erst dann kannst du wieder sauber neue Pakete installieren. Außerdem als Hinweis für die Zukunft: ab Sarge ist aptitude das vorgeschlagene Installations-Werkzeug. Es macht die Paketverwaltung noch einfacher und konsistenter (obwohl es bei deinem Problem keinen Unterschied momentan machern würde). Ach ja: und wenn du in deinem Mail/Web-Frontend normalerweise schon drauf achtest nur an die Liste und nicht an den Absender zu antworten, wäre es ganz nett das auch bei mir zu tun ;-) marcus Gruß Gerhard -- It's nice to be important... but it's more important to be nice. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
apt-get problem
Hallo, habe versucht folgende pakete zu installieren. apt-get install slapd ldap-utils phpldapadmin xml-core php4-ldap allerdings hab ich dass dummerweise in webmin zuerst gemacht und konnte somit keinen weiteren angaben machen und das programm lief und lief. den prozess habe ic schon gekillt. und das kommt dann leider traurig debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process (Lese Datenbank ... dpkg: Ernste Warnung: Dateilisten-Datei des Paketes »slapd« fehlt, nehme an, dass das Paket derzeit keine Dateien installiert hat. 35878 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von slapd 2.2.23-8 (durch .../slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb) ... debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb (--unpack): Unterprozess pre-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process dpkg: Fehler beim Aufräumen: Unterprozess post-removal script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von phpmyadmin 4:2.6.2-3sarge1 (durch .../phpmyadmin_4%3a2.6.2-3sarge1_all.deb) ... Entpacke Ersatz für phpmyadmin ... debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process dpkg: Warnung - altes post-removal-Skript wurde beendet mit Fehler-Status 1 dpkg - probiere stattdessen Skript aus dem neuen Paket ... debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/phpmyadmin_4%3a2.6.2-3sarge1_all.deb (--unpack): Unterprozess neues post-removal Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process dpkg: Fehler beim Aufräumen: Unterprozess post-removal script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket ldap-utils. Entpacke ldap-utils (aus .../ldap-utils_2.2.23-8_i386.deb) ... Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket php4-ldap. Entpacke php4-ldap (aus .../php4-ldap_4%3a4.3.10-16_i386.deb) ... Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket sgml-base. Entpacke sgml-base (aus .../sgml-base_1.26_all.deb) ... Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket xml-core. Entpacke xml-core (aus .../archives/xml-core_0.09_all.deb) ... Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket phpldapadmin. Entpacke phpldapadmin (aus .../phpldapadmin_0.9.5-3sarge3_all.deb) ... Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: /var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/phpmyadmin_4%3a2.6.2-3sarge1_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) WIe kann ich das jetzt beheben das problem? traurig marcus _ Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche. Suchen Sie gleichzeitig im Web, Ihren E-Mails und auf Ihrem PC! Jetzt neu! http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden! -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get problem
Gruesse! * Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [29.08.06 09:02]: Hallo, habe versucht folgende pakete zu installieren. apt-get install slapd ldap-utils phpldapadmin xml-core php4-ldap und das kommt dann leider traurig debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process (Lese Datenbank ... dpkg: Ernste Warnung: Dateilisten-Datei des Paketes »slapd« fehlt, nehme an, dass das Paket derzeit keine Dateien installiert hat. Schau doch mal (als root) mit ps ax ob noch ein debconf Prozess oder ein anderer Prozeß, der etwas mit apt/dpkg/... zu tun hat, läuft. Wenn ja kille diese Prozesse. Auch kann es sein, daß durch dein vorhergehendes Killen einfach ein Lockfile übriggeblieben ist. Diese Lockfiles verhindern normalerweise, das z.B. zwei debconfs gleichzeitig laufen bzw. auf die Datenbank zugreifen. Dieses Lockfile (ich kann dir nicht den genauen Ort und Namen sagen) kannst du per Hand löschen. Es sollte sich unter /var finden und z.B. eine Endung wie .lck oder .lock haben. Ich würde bei der Suche in /var/cache beginnen. Wenn du dir unsicher bist schreibe einfach den Namen der datei hier an die Liste. Danach dann nochmal die Installation versuchen. marcus Gruß Gerhard -- MSCI = M$cro Soft Certificated Installer -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get problem
Schau doch mal (als root) mit ps ax ob noch ein debconf Prozess oder ein anderer Prozeß, der etwas mit apt/dpkg/... zu tun hat, läuft. Wenn ja kille diese Prozesse. Auch kann es sein, daß durch dein vorhergehendes Killen einfach ein Lockfile übriggeblieben ist. Diese Lockfiles verhindern normalerweise, das z.B. zwei debconfs gleichzeitig laufen bzw. auf die Datenbank zugreifen. Dieses Lockfile (ich kann dir nicht den genauen Ort und Namen sagen) kannst du per Hand löschen. Es sollte sich unter /var finden und z.B. eine Endung wie .lck oder .lock haben. Ich würde bei der Suche in /var/cache beginnen. Hallo, das habe ich soweit gemacht uind dann lief es auch ganz gut bis dass dann kam: apt-get install slapd ldap-utils phpldapadmin xml-core php4-ldap Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig ldap-utils ist schon die neueste Version. phpldapadmin ist schon die neueste Version. xml-core ist schon die neueste Version. php4-ldap ist schon die neueste Version. Empfohlene Pakete: db4.2-util libsasl2-modules Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert: slapd 1 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert. 11 nicht vollständig installiert oder entfernt. Es müssen noch 0B von 3585kB Archiven geholt werden. Nach dem Auspacken werden 2281kB Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt. Vorkonfigurieren der Pakete ... (Lese Datenbank ... dpkg: Ernste Warnung: Dateilisten-Datei des Paketes »slapd« fehlt, nehme an, dass das Paket derzeit keine Dateien installiert hat. 36339 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von slapd 2.2.23-8 (durch .../slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb) ... start-stop-daemon: stat /usr/sbin/slapd: No such file or directory dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb (--unpack): Unterprozess pre-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 2 zurück Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von phpmyadmin 4:2.6.2-3sarge1 (durch .../phpmyadmin_4%3a2.6.2-3sarge1_all.deb) ... Entpacke Ersatz für phpmyadmin ... Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: /var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Also irgendwie ist ein Teil installiert udn der andere teil geht ned :( marcus _ Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche. Suchen Sie gleichzeitig im Web, Ihren E-Mails und auf Ihrem PC! Jetzt neu! http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden! -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
SquiVi2 and apt-get problem
Hello, I can't retrieve packages from remote http repository through apt-get since my internet provider decided to filter http traffic with SquiVi2 software: # apt-get install bc Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: bc 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 64.8kB of archives. After unpacking 188kB of additional disk space will be used. Err http://ftp.debian.org stable/main bc 1.06-15 302 Moved Temporarily Failed to fetch http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/bc/bc_1.06-15_i386.deb 302 Moved Temporarily E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing? Is there any known workaround? Thanks in advance. George -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SquiVi2 and apt-get problem
George Chelidze wrote: Err http://ftp.debian.org stable/main bc 1.06-15 302 Moved Temporarily Failed to fetch http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/bc/bc_1.06-15_i386.deb 302 Moved Temporarily E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing? Is there any known workaround? Edit the apt.source file to use FTP instead? (e.g. ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org ...) Hope this helps, -- George Borisov DXSolutions Ltd signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
APT-GET problem: does not have a corresponding .info file
Hi, I just installed mod_evasive apache module and it is working fine. But after that I cannot install or remove anything with apt-get. ex. when i try to install libapache-mod-perl, got error below; Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done libapache-mod-perl is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 19 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libapache-mod-perl (1.29.0.3-6sarge1) ... Error: mod_evasive.so does not have a corresponding .info file. The above errors might cause apache to not work properly or start Please refer to the documentation on how to fix it or report it to Debian Apache Mailing List debian-apache@lists.debian.org if in doubt on how to proceed dpkg: error processing libapache-mod-perl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 20 Errors were encountered while processing: libapache-mod-perl E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Any ideas? Cem
Re: APT-GET problem: does not have a corresponding .info file
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:29:49PM +0300, Cem Kamil Kulekci wrote: Hi, I just installed mod_evasive apache module and it is working fine. But after that I cannot install or remove anything with apt-get. ex. when i try to install libapache-mod-perl, got error below; Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done libapache-mod-perl is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 19 not upgraded. ** 1 not fully installed or removed. ** this is your problem. until you clear out that 1 package you will not be able to install anything. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libapache-mod-perl (1.29.0.3-6sarge1) ... Error: mod_evasive.so does not have a corresponding .info file. The above errors might cause apache to not work properly or start Please refer to the documentation on how to fix it or report it to Debian Apache Mailing List debian-apache@lists.debian.org if in doubt on how to proceed dpkg: error processing libapache-mod-perl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 20 Errors were encountered while processing: libapache-mod-perl E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I'm curious why it refers you to debian-apache unless there is some apache specific stuff going on here in the install. I would guess this is definitely a packaging bug. Can you unpack the .deb and locate the .info file anywhere? maybe the install scripts are looking in the wrong place. A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: APT-GET problem: does not have a corresponding .info file
Hi, 2006/5/20, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:29:49PM +0300, Cem Kamil Kulekci wrote: ** 1 not fully installed or removed. ** this is your problem. until you clear out that 1 package you will not be able to install anything. It refers to libapache-mod-perl. I've tried more than one but nothing happened. Shows earlier tries. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libapache-mod-perl (1.29.0.3-6sarge1) ... Error: mod_evasive.so does not have a corresponding .info file. The above errors might cause apache to not work properly or start Please refer to the documentation on how to fix it or report it to Debian Apache Mailing List debian-apache@lists.debian.org if in doubt on how to proceed dpkg: error processing libapache-mod-perl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 20 Errors were encountered while processing: libapache-mod-perl E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I'm curious why it refers you to debian-apache unless there is some apache specific stuff going on here in the install. I would guess this is definitely a packaging bug. Can you unpack the .deb and locate the .info file anywhere? maybe the install scripts are looking in the wrong place. I've installed it from source code, there is no deb packages for mod_evasive. http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/mod_evasive/mod_evasive_1.10.1.tar.gz and installation howto: http://www.hostgeekz.com/guides/Security/59/Install_mod_evasive.htm Cem
Re: APT-GET problem: does not have a corresponding .info file
Problem solved. I've just written the info file manually and it worked. Cem Here is the info I wrote: --- Loadmodule: evasive_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_evasive.so Directives: DOSHashTableSize DOSPageCount DOSSiteCount DOSPageInterval DOSSiteInterval DOSBlockingPeriod Description: Apache module to stop DOS attacks --- 2006/5/20, Cem Kamil Kulekci [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, 2006/5/20, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:29:49PM +0300, Cem Kamil Kulekci wrote: ** 1 not fully installed or removed. ** this is your problem. until you clear out that 1 package you will not be able to install anything. It refers to libapache-mod-perl. I've tried more than one but nothing happened. Shows earlier tries. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libapache-mod-perl (1.29.0.3-6sarge1) ... Error: mod_evasive.so does not have a corresponding .info file. The above errors might cause apache to not work properly or start Please refer to the documentation on how to fix it or report it to Debian Apache Mailing List debian-apache@lists.debian.org if in doubt on how to proceed dpkg: error processing libapache-mod-perl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 20 Errors were encountered while processing: libapache-mod-perl E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I'm curious why it refers you to debian-apache unless there is some apache specific stuff going on here in the install. I would guess this is definitely a packaging bug. Can you unpack the .deb and locate the .info file anywhere? maybe the install scripts are looking in the wrong place. I've installed it from source code, there is no deb packages for mod_evasive. http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/mod_evasive/mod_evasive_1.10.1.tar.gz and installation howto: http://www.hostgeekz.com/guides/Security/59/Install_mod_evasive.htm Cem
Re: apt-get problem
Aqui nem isso resolve! :( ta ruim! Harlei - Original Message - From: Marcos Vinicius Lazarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Harlei [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: grupo do debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:20 PM Subject: Re: apt-get problem Harlei wrote: Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns numa porcentagem maior e outros em menor, mas sempre para... oque pode estar acontecendo? Preciso instalar uns pacotes mas assim fica dificil... Cara, já tive problemas assim muito misterioso mesmo. Lembro que troquei de mirror, e só resolveu quado passei de http p/ ftp (ou foi ao contrário? nao me lembro). -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
Pelo relato do pessoal da lista e a observação do que ocorre nas minhas máquinas isto deve ser causado pelo repositório ftp.br.debian.org que não estava respondendo mas aparentemente parece ter voltado a vida. Tente agora Boa sorte Sucesso Flávio Alberto Lopes Soares Harlei escreveu: Aqui nem isso resolve! :( ta ruim! Harlei - Original Message - From: Marcos Vinicius Lazarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Harlei [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: grupo do debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:20 PM Subject: Re: apt-get problem Harlei wrote: Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns numa porcentagem maior e outros em menor, mas sempre para... oque pode estar acontecendo? Preciso instalar uns pacotes mas assim fica dificil... Cara, já tive problemas assim muito misterioso mesmo. Lembro que troquei de mirror, e só resolveu quado passei de http p/ ftp (ou foi ao contrário? nao me lembro). -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get problem
Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns numa porcentagem maior e outros em menor, mas sempre para... oque pode estar acontecendo? Preciso instalar uns pacotes mas assim fica dificil... aguardo retorno Harlei
Re: apt-get problem
Harlei wrote: Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns numa porcentagem maior e outros em menor, mas sempre para... oque pode estar acontecendo? Preciso instalar uns pacotes mas assim fica dificil... Cara, já tive problemas assim muito misterioso mesmo. Lembro que troquei de mirror, e só resolveu quado passei de http p/ ftp (ou foi ao contrário? nao me lembro). -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
Particularmente eu prefiro mirrors http. Acho que tinha estes problemas quando utilizava ftp. Ei, não tem um mirror aí na unicamp? Fabiano. Em 18/01/06, Marcos Vinicius Lazarini[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Harlei wrote: Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns numa porcentagem maior e outros em menor, mas sempre para... oque pode estar acontecendo? Preciso instalar uns pacotes mas assim fica dificil... Cara, já tive problemas assim muito misterioso mesmo. Lembro que troquei de mirror, e só resolveu quado passei de http p/ ftp (ou foi ao contrário? nao me lembro). -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Abraços, Fabiano
Re: apt-get problem
Tem sim, é o que eu uso: http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/debian.d/ Entre lá e veja os disponiveis... Se nao me engano, no sources.list vai assim: http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/debian.d/debian/ Tem mirror do marillat inclusive, beeem mais rápido :-) As vezes eles estão mexendo no Lab (cabeamento, etc) e site fica down - uso mais pela proximidade, é bem rapido por aqui, tem banda sobrando lá: http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/ -- Marcos Fabiano Pires wrote: Particularmente eu prefiro mirrors http. Acho que tinha estes problemas quando utilizava ftp. Ei, não tem um mirror aí na unicamp? Fabiano. Em 18/01/06, Marcos Vinicius Lazarini[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Harlei wrote: Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns numa porcentagem maior e outros em menor, mas sempre para... oque pode estar acontecendo? Preciso instalar uns pacotes mas assim fica dificil... Cara, já tive problemas assim muito misterioso mesmo. Lembro que troquei de mirror, e só resolveu quado passei de http p/ ftp (ou foi ao contrário? nao me lembro). -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Abraços, Fabiano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get problem
Nie wiem co zrobic ani skasowac ani upgrade apt-get -f install nie poamaga E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential package e2fsprogs due to a Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop. This is often bad, but if you really want to do it, activate the APT::Force-LoopBreak option. E: Internal Error, Could not early remove e2fsprogs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get problem
Hello list, I've installed debian unstable on my IMAC. My problem is with apt-get. I used a sniffer and verified a http file is transmitted properly but the problem seems to be that apt-get searches for base-installer_1.13_powerpc.udeb which does not exist, what does exist in all the mirrors I've tested is base-installer_1.13.4_powerpc.udeb so of course I get 404 error. Has any of you run across this before and can provide insights? Thanks in advance, -- Use Linux - live longer Best regards, Jess Portnoy Lingnu open source consulting -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: apt-get problem
Have you tried other mirrors? -Original Message- From: Jess Portnoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:17 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: apt-get problem Hello list, I've installed debian unstable on my IMAC. My problem is with apt-get. I used a sniffer and verified a http file is transmitted properly but the problem seems to be that apt-get searches for base-installer_1.13_powerpc.udeb which does not exist, what does exist in all the mirrors I've tested is base-installer_1.13.4_powerpc.udeb so of course I get 404 error. Has any of you run across this before and can provide insights? Thanks in advance, -- Use Linux - live longer Best regards, Jess Portnoy Lingnu open source consulting -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
Yes, I have: /base-installer_1.13_powerpc.udeb which does not exist, what does exist *in all the mirrors I've tested* is base-installer_1.13.4_powerpc.udeb/ I've tested 3 different mirrors. Use Linux - live longer Best regards, Jess Portnoy Rob Brenart (TT) wrote: Have you tried other mirrors? -Original Message- From: Jess Portnoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:17 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: apt-get problem Hello list, I've installed debian unstable on my IMAC. My problem is with apt-get. I used a sniffer and verified a http file is transmitted properly but the problem seems to be that apt-get searches for base-installer_1.13_powerpc.udeb which does not exist, what does exist in all the mirrors I've tested is base-installer_1.13.4_powerpc.udeb so of course I get 404 error. Has any of you run across this before and can provide insights? Thanks in advance, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange apt-get problem
I am building the a third new mail server at the moment. They are similar machines with one network connection on the same segment as the ftp-servers (archive and archive2). I have copied /etc/apt/sources.list from one of the productions machines (say machine 1) to the new one. The md5sum of the file on machine 2 is the same as the on on the machine 1, but while it works machine 1 it fails on 2. I have tried the same sources.list on another machine in the network and it works without a problem. The file is too large to include everything but here are the first few lines and the error message that I get on machine 2. deb ftp://archive2.sun.ac.za/debian stable main contrib non-free deb ftp://archive.sun.ac.za/debian/non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free deb ftp://archive.sun.ac.za/debian stable main contrib non-free deb ftp://archive.sun.ac.za/debian stable-proposed-updates main contrib non-free deb ftp://archive.sun.ac.za/debian/non-US stable-proposed-updates/non-US main contrib non-free deb ftp://archive.sun.ac.za/mirrorsites/security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free deb-src ftp://archive.sun.ac.za/debian stable main contrib non-free deb-src ftp://archive.sun.ac.za/debian/non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree Reading extended state information... Done ... snip ... Lots of errors like this: W: Couldn't stat source package list ftp://archive.sun.ac.za stable-proposed-updates/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.sun.ac.za_debian_dists_stable-proposed-updates_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) But: lftpget ftp://archive.sun.ac.za/debian/dists/stable-proposed-updates/main/binary-i386/Packages downloads Packages without a problem from the same machine. Al three mail server have the same version of apt. This sources list was also tested on a sid machine without a problem. Any idea what can be causing this? Regards Johann -- Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036 Informasietegnologie, Universiteit van Stellenbosch Fear not, for I am with thee; be not dismayed, for I am thy God. I will strengthen thee and I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness. Isaiah 41:10 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Strange apt-get problem
Johann Spies wrote: I am building the a third new mail server at the moment. They are similar machines with one network connection on the same segment as the ftp-servers (archive and archive2). W: Couldn't stat source package list ftp://archive.sun.ac.za stable-proposed-updates/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.sun.ac.za_debian_dists_stable-proposed-updates_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) Does this directory really exist? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange apt-get problem
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote: Al three mail server have the same version of apt. This sources list was also tested on a sid machine without a problem. Any idea what can be causing this? I found a solution: after installing wget there was no problem. What did apt use then to download the files because some lines in the sources.list was working? Regards Johann -- Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036 Informasietegnologie, Universiteit van Stellenbosch Fear not, for I am with thee; be not dismayed, for I am thy God. I will strengthen thee and I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness. Isaiah 41:10 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Strange apt-get problem
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:53:57 +0200 Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote: Al three mail server have the same version of apt. This sources list was also tested on a sid machine without a problem. Any idea what can be causing this? I found a solution: after installing wget there was no problem. What did apt use then to download the files because some lines in the sources.list was working? Ah, I ran into this (or a very similar) problem when I was installing apt-proxy. If you look at the dependencies for apt-proxy, it says it depends on rsync *or* wget. However, I found there were some source lines that depend on rsync, while others depend on wget. I'm afraid I don't know enough to understand why the difference. IMHO though, the depends line should be changed to say that it depends on both rsync and wget. Jacob -- GnuPG Key: 1024D/16377135 Random .signature #55: Given enough time and money, eventually Microsoft will re-invent UNIX. pgpcKK9DsHxi4.pgp Description: PGP signature
apt-get problem
Hi, I'm receiving the following error messages while I'm trying to upgrade postfix package. It happened during apt-get dist-upgrade. Anyone can help me to understand what is wrong with my system? I'm using testing version of debian. server:/home/mike# apt-get install postfix Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 102 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/611kB of archives. After unpacking 540kB will be used. Preconfiguring packages ... --output-fd: unknown option debconf: whiptail output to the above errors, giving up! Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /tmp/config.221581 line 279, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. (Reading database ... 24646 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace postfix 1.1.11.0-3 (using .../postfix_2.0.16-4_i386.deb) ... Stopping mail transport agent: Postfix. --output-fd: unknown option debconf: whiptail output to the above errors, giving up! Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 279, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 301, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 305, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 318, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 325, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 329, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 342, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 125, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 126, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 346, STDIN line 17. Use of uninitialized value in scalar
Re: apt-get problem
server:/home/mike# apt-get install postfix Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 102 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/611kB of archives. After unpacking 540kB will be used. Preconfiguring packages ... --output-fd: unknown option debconf: whiptail output to the above errors, giving up! I don't think there's anything wrong with your system. I think there's an error in the postfix install scripts. You should file a bug report against postfix. Good luck, Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get problem
Hallo, Ich hatte zu Testzwecken versucht evolution zu installieren, was aber nicht funktionierte. apt-get remove evolution bringt u.a. Fehlermeldung. Dummerweise kann ich jetzt auch nichts installieren, da er erst evolution entfernen will. bei apt-get -f install bekomme ich folgende Meldungen: . Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: evolution 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 49 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 51.2MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y (Reading database ... 32108 files and directories currently installed.) Removing evolution ... dpkg: error processing evolution (--remove): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: evolution E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Wie kann ich hier weiter vorgehen? Vielen Dank. Gruss Peter -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get problem
Moin, On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:21:43AM +0100, Peter Mathis wrote: Hallo, Ich hatte zu Testzwecken versucht evolution zu installieren, was aber aus unstable? nicht funktionierte. apt-get remove evolution bringt u.a. Fehlermeldung. Dummerweise kann ich jetzt auch nichts installieren, da er erst evolution entfernen will. er ist IMHO uebrigens sie; starte mal apt-get moo um zu wissen warum ;-) [...] Wie kann ich hier weiter vorgehen? Wahrscheinlich nur ueber die brutale Methode: dpkg --force-remove-reinstreq remove evolution Tu Dir selbst bitte den Gefallen, die manpage zu dpkg zu lesen, um eine Idee zu bekommen, was bei solchen Befehlen schief gehen kann. Gruss -- hgb -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get problem
Hans-Georg Bork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moin, On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:21:43AM +0100, Peter Mathis wrote: Hallo, Ich hatte zu Testzwecken versucht evolution zu installieren, was aber aus unstable? nicht funktionierte. apt-get remove evolution bringt u.a. Fehlermeldung. Dummerweise kann ich jetzt auch nichts installieren, da er erst evolution entfernen will. er ist IMHO uebrigens sie; starte mal apt-get moo um zu wissen warum ;-) Und daraus erkennst du ein weibchen: ridcully:~# apt-get moo (__) (oo) /--\/ / ||| * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ Have you mooed today?... Heino -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Version bei apt-get install (war: apt-get Problem (?) ...)
Hallo, Am Montag, 22. Dez 2003, 18:33:08 +0100 schrieb Heino Tiedemann: Du hättest auch apt-get --reinstall install mozilla/stable machen können, dann hättest du dir das deinstallieren gespart. Es sollte auch das hier funktionieren: apt-get --reinstall install mozilla=2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 ^^ damit bestimmst die die Version des Paketes, nicht die Distribution, aus der es kommen soll. Verständnisfrage: wo kommt das `2:' her, bzw. wo sind diese Versionsangaben am besten dokumentiert? Danke im voraus, Gruß Bertram -- Bertram Scharpf Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Version bei apt-get install (war: apt-get Problem (?) ...)
* Bertram Scharpf wrote: Am Montag, 22. Dez 2003, 18:33:08 +0100 schrieb Heino Tiedemann: Du hättest auch apt-get --reinstall install mozilla/stable machen können, dann hättest du dir das deinstallieren gespart. Es sollte auch das hier funktionieren: apt-get --reinstall install mozilla=2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 ^^ damit bestimmst die die Version des Paketes, nicht die Distribution, aus der es kommen soll. Verständnisfrage: wo kommt das `2:' her, bzw. wo sind diese Versionsangaben am besten dokumentiert? Das ist die Epoche, ist im New Maintainers Guide dokumentiert. Norbert -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Version bei apt-get install (war: apt-get Problem (?) ...)
Hallo, Am Samstag, 27. Dez 2003, 19:35:22 +0100 schrieb Norbert Tretkowski: * Bertram Scharpf wrote: Am Montag, 22. Dez 2003, 18:33:08 +0100 schrieb Heino Tiedemann: Es sollte auch das hier funktionieren: apt-get --reinstall install mozilla=2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 ^^ damit bestimmst die die Version des Paketes, nicht die Distribution, aus der es kommen soll. Verständnisfrage: wo kommt das `2:' her, bzw. wo sind diese Versionsangaben am besten dokumentiert? Das ist die Epoche, ist im New Maintainers Guide dokumentiert. Scheint nicht so: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wget -O - \ http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/maint-guide.de.txt \ 2/dev/null | grep -i epoch | wc -l 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Werde ich trotzdem lesen; danke erstmal. Gruß Bertram -- Bertram Scharpf Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Am 2003-12-22 18:33:08, schrieb Heino Tiedemann: Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Danach zeigte mir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser mozilla-browser: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 Version Table: 2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org woody/main Packages 500 http://security.debian.org woody/updates/main Packages 2:0.9.9-6 0 500 cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 beta _Woody_ - fsn.hu unofficial i386 Binary-1 (20020515)] unstable/main Packages Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Das weiss ich ehlrich gesagt nicht. Bist Du sicher das Du apt-get update richtig ausgeführt hast ? Ich würde gerne die Version 1.0.0 installieren. wirst Du auch, die ist nämlich jetzt candidate. Aber warum willst Du das ? Die Version ist Doch krank ! Die Version 1.5 von backports.org funktioniert doch einwandfrei. Außerdem haben jetzt die meisten Dialoge Window-Dekorationen, damit Du sie verschieben kannst ! (Im Save-Dialog von 1.0 ein ärgerlicher BUG) Grüße Michelle -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 2003-12-22 18:33:08, schrieb Heino Tiedemann: Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Danach zeigte mir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser mozilla-browser: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 Version Table: 2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org woody/main Packages 500 http://security.debian.org woody/updates/main Packages 2:0.9.9-6 0 500 cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 beta _Woody_ - fsn.hu unofficial i386 Binary-1 (20020515)] unstable/main Packages Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Das weiss ich ehlrich gesagt nicht. Bist Du sicher das Du apt-get update richtig ausgeführt hast ? Ich? ich war nicht der OP. du bist in der falschen Antwortebene. Ich würde gerne die Version 1.0.0 installieren. wirst Du auch, die ist nämlich jetzt candidate. Aber warum willst Du das ? Ich? Ich will das nicht ;-) Die Version ist Doch krank ! Ack Die Version 1.5 von backports.org funktioniert doch einwandfrei. Ack! Außerdem haben jetzt die meisten Dialoge Window-Dekorationen, damit Du sie verschieben kannst ! (Im Save-Dialog von 1.0 ein ärgerlicher BUG) Grüße Michelle Michelle, ich stimmer Dir in allen Ounkten zu, und deswegen: antworte lieber dem OP ;-)) Heino -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Um einen weiteren Fast-GAU zu verhindern, bitte ich jetzt doch mal um Hilfe! Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody hatte, (zunächst Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1 von bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von woody selber nehmen. Also hab ich die Quellen der o.g. Installationen in der apt-sources.list auskommentiert und apt-get update ausgeführt. Nachdem das nix half hab ich einfach mal den (sowieso nicht funktionierenden) Mozilla-Browser deinsalliert (apt-get remove mozilla-browser). Wobei er noch 3 weitere mitdeinstalliert hat. The following packages will be REMOVED: mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm Danach zeigte mir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser mozilla-browser: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 Version Table: 2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org woody/main Packages 500 http://security.debian.org woody/updates/main Packages 2:0.9.9-6 0 500 cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 beta _Woody_ - fsn.hu unofficial i386 Binary-1 (20020515)] unstable/main Packages Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Ich würde gerne die Version 1.0.0 installieren. Danke im vorraus Ulrich __ UNICEF bringt Kriegskinder in die Schule - helfen Sie mit! https://www.unicef.de/spe/spe_03.php -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote: Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody hatte, (zunächst Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1 von bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von woody selber nehmen. Wenn du Probleme hast, solltest du das den zustaendigen Personen auch mitteilen, damit die diese Probleme u.U. aus der Welt schaffen koennen. [...] Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Vermutlich weil diese noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt ist. Norbert -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:04:53PM +0100, =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote: Um einen weiteren Fast-GAU zu verhindern, bitte ich jetzt doch mal um Hilfe! Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody hatte, (zunächst Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1 von bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von woody selber nehmen. Also hab ich die Quellen der o.g. Installationen in der apt-sources.list auskommentiert und apt-get update ausgeführt. Nachdem das nix half hab ich einfach mal den (sowieso nicht funktionierenden) Mozilla-Browser deinsalliert (apt-get remove mozilla-browser). Wobei er noch 3 weitere mitdeinstalliert hat. The following packages will be REMOVED: mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm Danach zeigte mir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser mozilla-browser: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 Version Table: 2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0 Du scheinst Du bunk-1 sourcen immer noch in der sources.list zu haben und da dort ein Mozille mit der Version 1.2.1 liegt wird dieser der Version 1.0.0 aus woody vorgezogen. Ich wuerde Dir aber empfehlen bei der 1.5.x version von backports.org zu bleiben. Alles andere versetzt Dich um Jahre zurueck in die Vergangenheit. Sven -- Das Weihnachtskonzert COMBO GUANO 23.12.2003, Saal Norhausen Lev. Rheindorf http://www.comboguano.de -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:17:15: Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Vermutlich weil diese noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt ist. Norbert O.k., laut apt-get ist sie das aber! debian:/home/ulrich# apt-get remove mozilla Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Package mozilla is not installed, so not removed 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. debian:/home/ulrich# apt-get remove mozilla-browser Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Package mozilla-browser is not installed, so not removed 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. d Soll ich die verbleibenden Verzeichnisse per Hand löschen? /var/local/cache/mozilla/ not empty, so not removed? bzw. verschieben, weil da alle Mails etc. gespeichert sind. Gruß Ulrich Fürst -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl) __ UNICEF bringt Kriegskinder in die Schule - helfen Sie mit! https://www.unicef.de/spe/spe_03.php -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:21:07: Danach zeigte mir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser mozilla-browser: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 Version Table: 2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0 Du scheinst Du bunk-1 sourcen immer noch in der sources.list zu haben und da dort ein Mozille mit der Version 1.2.1 liegt wird dieser der Version 1.0.0 aus woody vorgezogen. Ja, aber die ist auskommentiert: #deb http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/debian woody/bunk-1 contrib non-free #deb-src http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/debian woody/bunk-1 contrib non-free # stable main Ich wuerde Dir aber empfehlen bei der 1.5.x version von backports.org zu bleiben. Alles andere versetzt Dich um Jahre zurueck in die Vergangenheit. Da war, soweit ich mich erinnere, das Problem das mozilla-psm wg. einer Abhängigkeit nicht vollständig installiert werden konnte (und auch die Rechtschreibprüfung fehlte, was weniger tragisch ist, aber das ist das was ich noch weiß). Gruß Ulrich Fürst -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl) __ Nachrichten, Musik und Spiele schnell und einfach per Quickstart im WEB.DE Screensaver - Gratis downloaden: http://screensaver.web.de/?mc=021110 -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:17:15: Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Vermutlich weil diese noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt ist. Norbert O.k., laut apt-get ist sie das aber! dpkg -l | grep mozilla sagt was? Soll ich die verbleibenden Verzeichnisse per Hand löschen? Das sollte dpkg --purge erledigen. Du moechtest uebrigends noch einen Blick auf den Abschnitt Code of conduct aus http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ werfen. Norbert -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31: Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ? dpkg -l | grep mozilla rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser rc mozilla-mailne 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - mail and news support rc mozilla-psm1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - Personal Security Mana Das sollte dpkg --purge erledigen. für (mozilla-browser, -psm, -mailnews) Es tut zumindes etwas. ABer: bei danach ausgeführtem apt-get -s install mozilla Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: mozilla: Depends: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-mailnews (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-psm (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed und selbiges, weil: mozilla-browser: Depends: libnspr4 (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but 2:1.2.1-2.bunk is to be installed Du moechtest uebrigends noch einen Blick auf den Abschnitt Code of conduct aus http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ werfen. Entschuldigung aber ich finde da nix, es sei den auch Dir wurde eine Vervollständigungsmail von WEB.de gesendet. Ich möchte mich in diesem Fall dafür bei Dir und allen anderen Betroffenen entschuldigen. Ich hab da wohl beim Filter konfigurieren einen Falschen Button erwischt! Und da ich das gleich bei einigen Adressen gleichzeitig angewendet habe, die Adressen zu merken und ab da nicht mehr als 'unbekann' zu markieren, betrifft das wie ich befürchte ca. 10 Teilnehmer dieser Liste. Wird nicht wieder vorkommen! Vielen Dank, das Du mir trotzdem hilfst! Ulrich Fürst -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl) __ UNICEF bringt Kriegskinder in die Schule - helfen Sie mit! https://www.unicef.de/spe/spe_03.php -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31: Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ? dpkg -l | grep mozilla rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser rc mozilla-mailne 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - mail and news support rc mozilla-psm1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - Personal Security Mana Ist also noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt. dpkg --purge mozilla-psm mozilla-mailnews mozilla-browser Das sollte dpkg --purge erledigen. für (mozilla-browser, -psm, -mailnews) Es tut zumindes etwas. ABer: bei danach ausgeführtem apt-get -s install mozilla Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: mozilla: Depends: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-mailnews (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-psm (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed und selbiges, weil: mozilla-browser: Depends: libnspr4 (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but 2:1.2.1-2.bunk is to be installed dpkg -l | grep libnspr4 sagt was? Du moechtest uebrigends noch einen Blick auf den Abschnitt Code of conduct aus http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ werfen. Entschuldigung aber ich finde da nix, es sei den auch Dir wurde eine Vervollständigungsmail von WEB.de gesendet. Keine Ahnung was du unter Vervollstaendigungsmail verstehst, es ging mir aber um das zusaetzliche und ueberfluessige CC. Norbert -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote: Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:21:07: Ich wuerde Dir aber empfehlen bei der 1.5.x version von backports.org zu bleiben. Alles andere versetzt Dich um Jahre zurueck in die Vergangenheit. Da war, soweit ich mich erinnere, das Problem das mozilla-psm wg. einer Abhängigkeit nicht vollständig installiert werden konnte Kann ich hier nicht nachvollziehen. Norbert -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Um einen weiteren Fast-GAU zu verhindern, bitte ich jetzt doch mal um Hilfe! Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody hatte, (zunächst Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1 von bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von woody selber nehmen. Also hab ich die Quellen der o.g. Installationen in der apt-sources.list auskommentiert und apt-get update ausgeführt. Nachdem das nix half hab ich einfach mal den (sowieso nicht funktionierenden) Mozilla-Browser deinsalliert (apt-get remove mozilla-browser). Wobei er noch 3 weitere mitdeinstalliert hat. The following packages will be REMOVED: mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm logisch. Du hast die vollen Vorteile des APT-Systems kennengelernt. Danach zeigte mir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser mozilla-browser: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 Version Table: 2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org woody/main Packages 500 http://security.debian.org woody/updates/main Packages 2:0.9.9-6 0 500 cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 beta _Woody_ - fsn.hu unofficial i386 Binary-1 (20020515)] unstable/main Packages Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Das weiss ich ehlrich gesagt nicht. Ich würde gerne die Version 1.0.0 installieren. wirst Du auch, die ist nämlich jetzt candidate. Du hättest auch apt-get --reinstall install mozilla/stable machen können, dann hättest du dir das deinstallieren gespart. Es sollte auch das hier funktionieren: apt-get --reinstall install mozilla=2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 damit bestimmst die die Version des Paketes, nicht die Distribution, aus der es kommen soll. Heino -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: mozilla: Depends: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-mailnews (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-psm (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed und selbiges, weil: mozilla-browser: Depends: libnspr4 (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but 2:1.2.1-2.bunk is to be installed Was sagt apt-cache policy libnspr4 Heino -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31: Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ? dpkg -l | grep mozilla rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser rc mozilla-mailne 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - mail and news support rc mozilla-psm1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - Personal Security Mana Wenn du mal den Kopf der Ausgabe anschaust, also ohne grep, dann siehst du die Erklärung für die Buchstaben am Zeilenanfang: Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-=-=-== ii wine 0.0.20031118-0.bunk Windows Emulator (Binary Emulator) Der Großbuchstabe entscheidet, wine ist bei mir (erste Spalte, Desired) auf install, mozilla-* sind bei dir auf remove. Remove bedeutet aber, dass zwar das Programm entfernt wird, aber die config-Dateien erhalten bleiben. Das ist meistens ziemlich gut, weil man sich Arbeit spart, wenn man das Programm doch mal wieder installiert. Dass die Config-Dateien noch da sind sieht man an der zweiten Spalte, Status, wo das c steht. Das sollte dpkg --purge erledigen. für (mozilla-browser, -psm, -mailnews) Wenn man es vorher weiß, geht es auch mit apt-get --purge remove $paketname Aber wenn der Status schon r ist, macht das (blöderweise, finde ich), nichts mehr. Gruß, Frank -- Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
apt-get problem (on debian sid)
Since some days I don't get any upgradable packages when doing an apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade (0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded). First I thought it had something to do with an old Packages file being cached in the proxy server. I then did a grep on the Packages file for gaim (which I knew was at version 0.72) and it showed up correctly. I have this idea that my local package database might be broken (?) since it's impossible that there haven't been any package updates to sid last week. Anyone has any ideas on fixing this? Kind regards Tim Broddin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: apt-get problem (on debian sid)
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:32:56 +0100 Tim Broddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... I have this idea that my local package database might be broken (?) since it's impossible that there haven't been any package updates to sid last week. Anyone has any ideas on fixing this? ... Hi It is possible and is tue the compromise of some debian project servers (this was also discussed on this listif you take a look at incoming.debian.org you will see that there are packages hanging there...so be patient and wait until all problems are fixed... (for more information have a look at the maillinglist) yours Albert -- Albert Dengg [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get problem (on debian sid)
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 07:32, Tim Broddin wrote: Since some days I don't get any upgradable packages when doing an apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade (0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded). First I thought it had something to do with an old Packages file being cached in the proxy server. I then did a grep on the Packages file for gaim (which I knew was at version 0.72) and it showed up correctly. I have this idea that my local package database might be broken (?) since it's impossible that there haven't been any package updates to sid last week. Anyone has any ideas on fixing this? Oh it is possible that nothing has been processed since the widely reported Debian machine compromises happened. The Debian Archive Pool has not been compromised. Things will get cranking sometime soon... just wait. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: apt-get problem (on debian sid)
Thanx for the reply both. Stupid me, thought I nuked my system :) On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 16:22, Greg Folkert wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 07:32, Tim Broddin wrote: Since some days I don't get any upgradable packages when doing an apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade (0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded). First I thought it had something to do with an old Packages file being cached in the proxy server. I then did a grep on the Packages file for gaim (which I knew was at version 0.72) and it showed up correctly. I have this idea that my local package database might be broken (?) since it's impossible that there haven't been any package updates to sid last week. Anyone has any ideas on fixing this? Oh it is possible that nothing has been processed since the widely reported Debian machine compromises happened. The Debian Archive Pool has not been compromised. Things will get cranking sometime soon... just wait. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
begin Dany Joly quote from Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:14:50PM + Here are my errors message : remove an other package : dpkp : serious warning files list file for package 'xfonts-base' missing, assuming package has no files currently installed. 12118 files currently installed.) Preparing to replace xfonts-base 4.1.0-16 (using ../xfonts-base_4.1.0-16.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xfonts-base ... here it freezes Something has gone horribly wrong, and now dpkg doesn't know what files xfonts-base is supposed to contain. You may be able to hack around it by running touch /var/lib/dpkg/info/xfonts-base.list and then dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-base_4.1.0-16.deb. -- Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Do I look like I want a CC? Words of the day: SSL corporate security credit card ISEC global Manfurov Hi, VeriSign! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
apt-get problem
I recently have installed Woody recently and it does a great job so far! I had a problem while installing xfonts-base package : the operation froze and would not complete even after a period of a few hours. I did ctrl-c to stop the process and I now have 1 package not fully installe or removed message. The problem is that it cannot be removed and it is impossible to install / remove any package as apt-get will try to reinstall xfonts-base each time any install / remove is done with apt-get (which still freeze the process). How can I bypass this problem of even better, clean the problem manually. Note that I have made a apt-get update and apt-get upgrate to get the most current package. Here are my errors message : remove an other package : dpkp : serious warning files list file for package 'xfonts-base' missing, assuming package has no files currently installed. 12118 files currently installed.) Preparing to replace xfonts-base 4.1.0-16 (using ../xfonts-base_4.1.0-16.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xfonts-base ... here it freezes _ MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous ! http://fr.ca.search.msn.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem (bug in apt-get?)
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:37:25PM -0500, Terry Hancock wrote: On Monday 22 September 2003 08:32 pm, Darryl Barlow wrote: Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time ago but it has not yet been fixed. This is one of the joys of running unstable and the price to be paid for running a more cutting edge distribution. Personally I find it remarkably stable but these things do happen from time to time. Well, I'm actually running a mixed system with stable preferred (but libc6 and other development packages are from unstable). So it's not a flat single distribution system -- and that may indeed be why I'm running into this kind of grief. Quite possibly. I'd *strongly* recommend not doing that. There's basically no point running stable if you're just going to upgrade its libc6 to unstable ... apt-get is known to react badly to slightly inconsistent systems, and those are very easy to set up when trying to mix stable and unstable. But apt-get is refusing to *recognize* that it is installed at some times (when it's a dependency), but insisting that it is at other times (when you try to install it or when it conflicts). 'apt-get -f install' might help; but I think I'd use a more sophisticated package manager to try to figure this out, not apt-get which was originally written as a test utility for the apt library and which doesn't have much facility for interacting with the user. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:37:26PM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error message: Failed to fetch http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found Kindly help ... potato is old enough that it's been moved to the archive. It's now: deb http://archive.debian.org potato main Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem (bug in apt-get?)
Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time ago but it has not yet been fixed. This is one of the joys of running unstable and the price to be paid for running a more cutting edge distribution. Personally I find it remarkably stable but these things do happen from time to time. I'd say your problem is with the version of the package rather than the package itself not being installed. I think you will find all will install fine when the bug is resolved. If you are really desperate you can force the install of whatever package has the unresolved dependency and hope it works or that you can make it work by symlinking libraries etc,. or perhaps install from source. The better option is probably to wait. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get problem
Hi , I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error message: Failed to fetch http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found Kindly help ... Thanks -- Vivek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Vivek Kumar wrote: Hi , I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error message: Failed to fetch http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found Likely wouldn't be any updates anyways, as potato support was discontinued in June 2003. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:37:26PM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: | Hi , | I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error | message: | | Failed to fetch | http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages | 404 Not Found Upgrade to Woody. Potato is no longer supported, and thus mirrors are likely to no longer provide potato. -D -- If Microsoft would build a car... ... Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the car windows, shut it off, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this. http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get problem (bug in apt-get?)
On Monday 22 September 2003 08:32 pm, Darryl Barlow wrote: Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time ago but it has not yet been fixed. This is one of the joys of running unstable and the price to be paid for running a more cutting edge distribution. Personally I find it remarkably stable but these things do happen from time to time. Well, I'm actually running a mixed system with stable preferred (but libc6 and other development packages are from unstable). So it's not a flat single distribution system -- and that may indeed be why I'm running into this kind of grief. The version of kdebase-audiolibs I have is from testing. But the point is, I'm not having ANY technical problems with kdebase-audiolibs (my KDE environment has sound effects which I can hear as I use it, and games etc all have sound as expected). But apt-get is refusing to *recognize* that it is installed at some times (when it's a dependency), but insisting that it is at other times (when you try to install it or when it conflicts). I'd say your problem is with the version of the package rather than the package itself not being installed. I think you will find all will install fine when the bug is resolved. If you are really desperate you can force the install of whatever package has the unresolved dependency and hope it works or that you can make it work by symlinking libraries etc,. or perhaps install from source. Like I said -- it IS installed. Dpkg thinks so, and even apt-get thinks so when you ask it to install it again. And it works -- I use it everyday. But apt-get still complains that that it's not installed whenever I try to install something that depends on it. And it's NOT a version issue, because non of the packages in question ask for a specific version of the package, they just depend on kdebase-audiolibs OR kdebase3-audiolibs. I can work around it by using --reinstall and including kdebase-audiolibs on *every*single*usage* of apt-get. But that's just really stupid. Especially since that actually does cause it to reinstall needlessly. So you see, apt-get is making logically contradictory claims. So what we're talking about is a package database that contains a logical contradiction. And furthermore, the claim that the package is not installed is refuted by the simple fact that the program it installs is working just fine. So I'm still inclined to suspect that there is something wrong in the database, and therefore in the programs that manage it, rather than a problem in the package (of course, maybe the package has some irregularity that triggers this mismanagement, but that still should be under apt-get's control). Hopefully apt-get is not designed to assume that packages will cooperatively manage the database?! (Remember how successful cooperative multi-tasking was?). Unfortunately, even if this is all true, I don't have any way to know when or on what stimulus the problem occured, so it'd be nearly impossible to identify a specific bug to report. I was more wondering if anybody knew how to verify the contents of the Debian package database. I pretty much treat it as a black box, and never touch it. :-) The better option is probably to wait. Ah, but for what? ;-) Well, it's not crippling at the moment -- it's only blocking installation of a few games my kids want, and there are other ways around that. It's just a matter of maintenance. Cheers, Terry -- Terry Hancock ( hancock at anansispaceworks.com ) Anansi Spaceworks http://www.anansispaceworks.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get problem (bug in apt-get?)
Hi, I suspect this is an actual bug in apt-get, but I'm not sure where the problem would be, or when it occured. Anyway, it looks like it must be some kind of database inconsistency, and I'm really more interested in fixing my package database. Lately, I've started to get this message when trying to install a package: kde: Depends: kdebase-audiolibs but it is not going to be installed or kdebase3-audiolibs but it is not installable Well, for starters, my sound works fine in KDE, so it seems quite improbable that kdebase-audiolibs isn't installed. And indeed, dpkg says I'm right: % dpkg --status kdebase-audiolibs [...] Status: install ok installed [...] So what if I try to install kdebase-audiolibs? % apt-get install kdebase-audiolibs [...] Sorry, kdebase-audiolibs is already the newest version. [...] So, here, even apt-get agrees that kdebase-audiolibs is installed. So what if I force it to install? % apt-get --reinstall install kdebase-audiolibs [...] Unpacking replacement kdebase-audiolibs ... Setting up kdebase-audiolibs (2.2.2-14.4) ... Well, that *seems* to work (it downloads the package and installs it). But unfortunately, the behavior is exactly the same as before -- when trying to install packages which depend on kde, apt-get continues to claim: kde: Depends: kdebase-audiolibs but it is not going to be installed or kdebase3-audiolibs but it is not installable So I'm right back where I started! How can I fix this, then? And how can apt-get simultaneously think that a package is installed so that it can't re-install it, but then think that *isn't* installed when I need it? Clearly the two opinions contradict, so apt-get's database (the package database) must now be inconsistent in some way. That's why I think it has to be a bug in apt-get and not something wrong with kdebase-audiolibs that gets us to this point. Right now, though, it's probably a corruption of my package database. Anybody know how to check it or correct it? TIA, Terry -- Terry Hancock ( hancock at anansispaceworks.com ) Anansi Spaceworks http://www.anansispaceworks.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
on Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:39:57PM +0100, Mark Ayliffe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I had a problem updating my two unstable machines this morning. I got the message Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Resource temporarily unavailable). Looking through the archive of this illustrious list I found several suggestions that another copy of dselect (or presumably apt-get) must be running. This was not so, the first instance happened part way through the installation phase, after the download was complete. It also recurred after an init 1. Are you running as root? If not, do. I found that deleting /var/lib/dpkg/lock did not solve the problem and a new instance was created on each attempt. However deleting that file and /var/lib/dpkg/methlock allowed the installtion to complete successfully. Hrm. So your problem's solved? Try also: strace foo ...where foo is some command and arguments. Usually the error will be evident in output (note ther emay be lots of it). Peace. -- Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of Gestalt don't you understand? By failing to protect the public interest in free access to the products of the inventive and artistic genius -- indeed, by virtually ignoring the central purpose of the Copyright/Patent Clause [in the Constitution] -- the Court has quitclaimed to Congress its principal responsibility in this area of the law. -- Justice Stevens, J., dissenting, Eldred v. Ashcroft pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
apt-get problem
I had a problem updating my two unstable machines this morning. I got the message Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Resource temporarily unavailable). Looking through the archive of this illustrious list I found several suggestions that another copy of dselect (or presumably apt-get) must be running. This was not so, the first instance happened part way through the installation phase, after the download was complete. It also recurred after an init 1. I found that deleting /var/lib/dpkg/lock did not solve the problem and a new instance was created on each attempt. However deleting that file and /var/lib/dpkg/methlock allowed the installtion to complete successfully. HTH Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get Problem
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 13.13 schrieb Werner Gast: Hallo Johannes, Hallo Werner, diese Meldungen hatte ich gestern auch. Ich bin dann auf Adrian Bunk's Download-Seite gegangen und habe die angemeckerten Pakete mit der Vorgabe 'ohne Versionscheck' einzeln installiert. Manchmal braucht man halt -f oder --force. Evolution laueft bei mir trotz der Fehlermeldung. Cu Evolution lief bei mir auch problemlos. Der Haken war da, dass ich keine weitere Software mehr installieren konnte. BTW, habe grade festgesellt dass einige Programme die sich mit den Backports installieren anscheinend noch auf GTK 1.X basieren. Ist etwas ärgerlich, wei man für die die tollen neuen Themes nicht benutzen kann. Hat jemand einen Tip wie ich das Aussehen dieser Anwendungen beeinflussen kann? Johannes -- Powerd by Debian Linux - http://www.debian.org -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem
Johannes Bedenbender schrieb: Hallo Liste, ich habe jetzt damit begonnen, auf Gnome 2.2 umzusteigen. Alles was ich brauche läuft soweit, ich würde jetzt nur noch gerne Galeon intallieren. Ein apt-get install galeon bringt: --- You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: evolution: Depends: libpisync0 but it is not going to be installed galeon: Depends: libgconf11 (= 1.0.7) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnome-vfs0 (= 1.0.3-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: galeon-common (= 1.2.7-6woody2) but it is not going to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). Sieht mir ganz nach einem Release-Problem aus. Was steht in /etc/apt/sources.list und /etc/apt/preferences? --- Also hab' ich ein apt-get -f install probiert. Da versucht apt-get nur libpisync0 zu installieren, klappt aber leider nicht: --- Entpacke libpisync0 (aus .../libpisync0_0.11.7-2woody2_i386.deb) ... dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/libpisync0_0.11.7-2woody2_i386.deb (--unpack): versuche »/usr/lib/libpisync.so.0.0.0« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket libpisock8 ist Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: /var/cache/apt/archives/libpisync0_0.11.7-2woody2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) --- Hatte ich auch schonmal, sowas. Was sagt dpkg -r libpisock8 bzw. apt-get remove libpisock8 ? Für eine genauere Diagnose müsste ich allerdings wirklich wissen, was in besagten Konfigurationsdateien steht. Sören -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 12.43 schrieb Soeren D. Schulze: Hatte ich auch schonmal, sowas. Was sagt dpkg -r libpisock8 Das hat da Problem gelöst. Danke. apt-get remove libpisock8 Das hat das Problem nicht gelöst. Für eine genauere Diagnose müsste ich allerdings wirklich wissen, was in besagten Konfigurationsdateien steht. Hm, die sources.list habe ich, aber die prefernces gibt es bei mir nicht. Wofür wird die gebraucht? Vielen Dank auf jeden Fall schonmal, Johanes -- Powerd by Debian Linux - http://www.debian.org -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 12.26 schrieb Johannes Bedenbender: Ein apt-get install galeon bringt: evolution: Depends: libpisync0 but it is not going to be installed galeon: Depends: libgconf11 (= 1.0.7) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnome-vfs0 (= 1.0.3-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: galeon-common (= 1.2.7-6woody2) but it is not going to be installed Hallo Johannes, diese Meldungen hatte ich gestern auch. Ich bin dann auf Adrian Bunk's Download-Seite gegangen und habe die angemeckerten Pakete mit der Vorgabe 'ohne Versionscheck' einzeln installiert. Manchmal braucht man halt -f oder --force. Evolution laueft bei mir trotz der Fehlermeldung. Cu -- Schoene Gruesse aus der Lüneburger Heide Werner Gast http://www.heidefewo.de Gaeste aus Baden-Wuerttemberg reisen ungern ab. Sie muessen schliesslich wieder zum Teufel fahren. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
Jag kommer tyvärr inteihåg vart jag hittatde apt källan men den är inte officiell har jag för mig, tror att jag hittade den på apt-get.org, så ev bug rapport borde nog inte gå till debian bug listan, hur som helst trode jag att det bara var jag som hade problem. Och för ögonblicket så kan jag inte installera något på mitt sys alls... :-( men jag ska försöka hitta rätt i pre/post-skriptet så jag kan få bort det. sedan lät det bra att använda freenet:s egna så jag kommer nog att använda det, även om jag hels vill apt-get:a :-) tack för hjälpen /joakim On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 21:46, Adam Huuva wrote: Fredrik Jonson wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Adam Huuva wrote: Att installera [freenet-unstable] gick inte för mig. Om man alldeles bortser från Rätt Sätt[tm] och buggrapporteringar mot debianpaketet som borde göras och så: Point taken. Fast det blir ju att man slingrar sig på såna punkter eller att man tänker att det säkert är nåt annat konstigt med just mitt system osv... eller att man när man ser att andra har löst problemet tänker att dom kanske har rapporterat det... det är ju en alldelens egen halvevig loop i sig... :) Och så är det ju extra jobb också, fast det kanske man skulle förväntas göra för att andra ideellt sliter med ett system som man själv använder gratis... jaja. Nu när jag fick inspiration (ahem..) att sätta mig in i hela bugrapporterings-tjosan så ser jag att buggen redan är rapporterad, och det för 208 dagar sedan. Det var bara någon vecka sedan jag provade att installera paketet... http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=177011 -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
