Hi,
Concerned about the high number of rejected ballots, I want
and manually checked them out. Here are the annotated notes I took,
sorted fiurst by gpg error message, then by the type of MIME
encoding, and finally, by the sending MUA.
I must confess I am impressed by mutt.
[ 4 ] Choice 1: Moshe Zadka
[ 3 ] Choice 2: Bdale Garbee
[ 2 ] Choice 3: Branden Robinson
[ 1 ] Choice 4: Martin Michlmayr
[ 5 ] Choice 5: None Of The Above
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
the results. I am attaching both the list of good mailers, as well
as the reasons for rejection of the ballot, with the MUA and count.
I note
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
the results. I am attaching both the list of good mailers, as well
as the reasons for rejection of
Manoj Srivastava:
gpg: verify signatures failed: unexpected data
Encrypted Ballot 1
Uh, I thank that's me. Does this mean that one cannot cast the votes
secretly, but must send them unencrypted? Or did I use the wrong key (I
used your personal key as the
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:30:01 +0100 (CET),
Peter Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava:
gpg: verify signatures failed: unexpected data Encrypted Ballot 1
Uh, I thank that's me. Does this mean that one cannot cast the
votes secretly, but must send them unencrypted? Or did I
Hi Folks,
Since the LDAP server at db.debian.org is misbehaving, the
vote engine is not fully operational. The ballots are being received
and stored (and gpg processing is still happening), but the ballots
are not parsed and tallied, and hance acks are not being generated.
Hi,
Concerned about the high number of rejected ballots, I want
and manually checked them out. Here are the annotated notes I took,
sorted fiurst by gpg error message, then by the type of MIME
encoding, and finally, by the sending MUA.
I must confess I am impressed by mutt.
[ 4 ] Choice 1: Moshe Zadka
[ 3 ] Choice 2: Bdale Garbee
[ 2 ] Choice 3: Branden Robinson
[ 1 ] Choice 4: Martin Michlmayr
[ 5 ] Choice 5: None Of The Above
pgplRc3IqL5NC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
the results. I am attaching both the list of good mailers, as well
as the reasons for rejection of the ballot, with the MUA and count.
I note
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
the results. I am attaching both the list of good mailers, as well
as the reasons for rejection of
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 07:41:04PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
the results. I am attaching both
Manoj Srivastava:
gpg: verify signatures failed: unexpected data
Encrypted Ballot 1
Uh, I thank that's me. Does this mean that one cannot cast the votes
secretly, but must send them unencrypted? Or did I use the wrong key (I
used your personal key as the
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:30:01 +0100 (CET),
Peter Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava:
gpg: verify signatures failed: unexpected data Encrypted Ballot 1
Uh, I thank that's me. Does this mean that one cannot cast the
votes secretly, but must send them unencrypted? Or did I
14 matches
Mail list logo
