Hi all. We've been struggling a bit with this issue. We have a variety of
tests in place, and basically have just changed our settings to:
WEIGHT10WARN
WEIGHT20BOUNCEONLYIFYOUMUST
WEIGHT40DELETE
The hope is that it will bounce some of the false positives back to the
Hi,
Hi all. We've been struggling a bit with this issue. We have a variety
of
tests in place, and basically have just changed our settings to:
WEIGHT10 WARN
WEIGHT20 BOUNCEONLYIFYOUMUST
WEIGHT40 DELETE
The hope is that it will bounce some of the false positives back to the
senders so
For reviewing held mail I use a win2003 box and outlook express, outlook
express allows easy access to the header information unlike Outlook.
Win2003 allows you to connect to the console session so you can always leave
outlook express open and running so your hold mailboxes dont get over
We're working on an independent version of SpamReview that has more
information and adjustments capabilities built in, but there are two
existing freeware products on the Declude Utilities page: SpamReview being a
desktop app, and another one (sorry forgot the name) being web based.
We review the
Hello Darin,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 10:22:11 AM, you wrote:
DC We're working on an independent version of SpamReview that has more
DC information and adjustments capabilities built in, but there are two
DC existing freeware products on the Declude Utilities page: SpamReview being a
DC desktop
Is there a way to check data in the REPLYTO field?
I don't see it with the MAILTO, SUBJECT, etc
I'm trying to setup a filter that will trap for our domain in the REPLYTO
and MAILFROM fields IF our domain is specified.
In other words, rarely should you see and email address coming in from the
Hi Charles,
Yours was the one I couldn't remember the name of...my apologies...grin.
I've been meaning to take a look at it for some time...but haven't gotten to
it yet. I'll have to bump it up on the priority list.
Your math is correct, but we are small enough that we don't spend anywhere
near
Is there a way to check data in the REPLYTO field?
Not directly -- you would need to search the entire headers (but you could
do something like HEADERS 0 CONTAINS Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam
MES Also, Exchange 2003 doesn't run POP3/IMAP4 by default and in our org so
MES that's why I can't use Outlook Express.
The Bat! is a MAPI client and it allows viewing of headers inline with
the message=. I do not have an Exchange server to test the MAPI
functionality, but you can download a
I think I saw mention of this, but I could not find it.
Declude Queue is put all files that start with Q into the overflow in a
overflow condition, including webmail temp files, forwarded messages, mail1
messages and so forth.
Can this be fixed promptly?
John Tolmachoff
I think I saw mention of this, but I could not find it.
Declude Queue is put all files that start with Q into the overflow in a
overflow condition, including webmail temp files, forwarded messages, mail1
messages and so forth.
Can this be fixed promptly?
The only way for it to be fixed is to fix
Scott,
What other products are you preparing Declude to function with??? If you are
not I sugest you do!
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think I saw mention of this, but I could not find it.
Declude Queue is put all files that start with Q into the overflow in a
overflow condition, including webmail temp files, forwarded messages,
mail1
messages and so forth.
Can this be fixed promptly?
The only way for it to be fixed
So, the reason for the SMTP service not processing will be investigated once
the overflow is cleared, but in the mean time why are webmail temp files and
list messages and postmaster message also being placed there?
That's because those are E-mails that need to be scanned and delivered,
just
Does Hijack work with WHITELIST AUTH that Junkmail sees in allowing
email to passthru? For example, one of our customers AUTH to our server
via their account, it will then not be scanned by Junkmail nor Hijack?
Thanks for the time.
---
Keith Johnson
Senior Network Engineer
.LST message do not need to be scanned. I thought web mail attachments were
not scanned.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday,
Also,
I see where Hijack requires Deccon.exe. We run Win2000 SP4 and
terminal service into the server for remote admin. Does deccon.exe only
run on the console session? I read that when the threshhold2 value is
reached, deccon is opened and once it is closed the flag will be reset?
Does Hijack work with WHITELIST AUTH that Junkmail sees in allowing
email to passthru?
No. The Declude products do not share configuration files.
For example, one of our customers AUTH to our server
via their account, it will then not be scanned by Junkmail nor Hijack?
It will not be scanned by
.LST message do not need to be scanned.
Declude will not scan mailing list messages the second time (in the .LST
files). But, they still need to be delivered by IMail. So having them
bypass Declude Queue would just slow down delivery of other E-mails that
are in the overflow queue.
I
On 25 Oct 2004 at 11:22, Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Scott,
What other products are you preparing Declude to function with??? If
you are not I sugest you do!
Because your customer base of Imail will not be increasing or so it
seems - if it is Collaborate or not it seems most folks will NOT -
I am
OK, thanks.
I guess I am a little on edge today now.
Is it Friday yet?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004
I see where Hijack requires Deccon.exe. We run Win2000 SP4 and
terminal service into the server for remote admin. Does deccon.exe only
run on the console session?
Yes, it does -- otherwise, it would not be able to keep track of data
properly (since the user sessions normally only last
I think when the Deccon window reopens depends on when all the SMTP
processes have ended and started afresh. On my heavy-traffic server, Deccon
won't reopen until all the SMTP processes have ended. What I do is close
the Console, open Task Manager, pause SMTP, watch for all the declude.exe
Scott,
(I apologize for the questions, just learning product, since no
trial) With the below said, there is really no reason to login and
close the deccon.exe via the Desktop unless there is an issue with it or
something needs to be hard reset? Some of our customers have had DHA's
Nick Hayer wrote:
Because your customer base of Imail will not be increasing or so it
seems - if it is Collaborate or not it seems most folks will NOT -
Wow. I missed the beginning of this thread but it looks like IMail is no
more?? Just visited the IPSwitch site and read up on ICS. Not
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
So add me to the 'what other products will Declude support'
question.
As has been suggested before: Microsoft SMTP. That would be pretty universal, and
could make it easier to get into the
I strongly agree that being able to use Declude with MS SMTP would be a
great benefit, even aside from Ipswitch's announcement. That would allow off
loading of work from the main mail server.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
We could also use MSSMTP as our gateway and what ever backend we want.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 1:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Perhaps the time has arrived for the folks at Computerized Horizons to
release their own full blown MTA... grin
Respectfully Wishing,
~Patrick
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at HGBD by Declude/McAfee]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Bilbee
We could also use MSSMTP as our gateway and what ever backend we want.
That would be a great option!
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Add my vote, too!
WebMail, POP, IMAP and SMTP. No need for the rest of it, IMHO. I have
calendaring turned off, and I do not want to get involved with instant
messaging and the rest. I could probably live without IMAP, too.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Childers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The overflow is a temporary problem cause by for some reason the SMTP
service stopped processing at 6:00 PM yesterday even thought is was
running,
and I found out about it at 10:00 this morning, restarted and the flood
gates opened up. Until the backflow of inbound and lists are processed,
the
At the time of the problem, the spool was empty as was the overflow because
Imail SMTP was not processing/receiving/sending anything. The overflow
occurred once the service was restarted and all the backup incoming started
to poor in.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
33 matches
Mail list logo
