I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to run all the other
tests along side it.
I am trying to reduce my daily workload of analyzing the spamtrap and hope
that sniffer and surbl will do this.
Do I even need surbl?
Any advice in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in
I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to run
all the other tests along side it.
I am trying to reduce my daily workload of analyzing the
spamtrap and hope that sniffer and surbl will do this.
Do I even need surbl?
Do you have so much workload on your mailserver that you
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer
I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to run
all the other tests along side
Sniffer is very good. It detected 47600 out of 49250 spam messages for me through Sept
1-5.
The SURBL filter contains a lot of body filters and can be CPU intensive.
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/08/04 10:13AM
I am testing sniffer right now and
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 11:13:18 AM, Harry wrote:
HV I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to run all the other
HV tests along side it.
Well, you can probably get by without the other tests, but since
you have Declude it would be MUCH better if you keep the other tests
in
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer
I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to run
all the other tests along side it.
I am trying
Harry,
We have a utility to let you know how well a specific test does in our log
parser (DLAnalyzer). The test is called the Test Breakdown Summary
Report. Essentially you can pick a certain test(s) and see which other
tests fail along with them. This report has helped us eliminate tests
developers
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of MattSent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:56
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with
snifferHarry,Sniffer is a great addition to any
] Test needed along with sniffer
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 11:13:18 AM, Harry wrote:
HV I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to
run all the
HV other tests along side it.
Well, you can probably get by without the other tests, but
since you have Declude it would
Thank you, I will try the report out.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of support
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer
Harry,
We have
, September 08, 2004 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer
Harry,
Sniffer is a great addition to any Declude setup, however your issues are
not due to just simply the size of your processors. We run a dual 1 GHz
PIII system with RAID 5
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with
sniffer
Harry,
Sniffer is a great addition to any Declude setup, however your
12 matches
Mail list logo