I don't care how much you monitor, you are NOT going to get a 100%
capture rate with no false positives. If there was a way to do that,
Scott would be a millionaire by now, and have twenty or thirty death
threats from spammers. You can get close, like maybe a 90% or 95% if
you're super particular,
Running JunkMail since May 2002. I've done a
bit oftuning on test weights, am using Sniffer
andseveralfilters,contra-filter, and blacklistof my own
based on false-positives that I find on my own accounts, but I haven't done near
the amount of tuning that some have done. I delete on
simply
whitelist their REVDNS.
Regards,
Kami
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \
WCNetSent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 4:53 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How good
does it get?
Running JunkMail since May 2002. I've done a
bit
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How good does it get?
Glenn:
What we do is simply a negative weight for newsletters. We review the
weights of 20-60 and delete on 60
Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How good does it get?
Glenn:
What we do is simply a negative weight for newsletters. We review the
weights of 20-60 and delete on 60.
Newsletters typically fall between 20-40 range
