PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Robertson
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
Keith wrote:
I plugged pink contracts into Google and here's the first link that
came up...
Well, doesn't that just suck? Hopefully
If someone demands they not get listed then they deserve to get
blacklisted because OBVIOUSLY they have something to hide.
.6 is List of hosts that have been noted as sending
spam/UCE/UBE to the admins of SORBS. This
zone also contains netblocks of spam supporting
service
Cox cable I'll bet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Harvy
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
Who's Cox?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Would you post your configuration that works for you? and anyone else
that's willing to do so? I'd like to see some examples of successful
configurations to learn from.
Thanks
Either way with declude there is not reason to directly block anything
just use a weighted system where each test
.8 is one of those F-U blacklists that punishes every user on a system
because a network administrator saw fit to complain. I would think that
most of these organizations are bandwidth providers with some sort of
firewall that got tripped by the testing. Spammers don't rely on open
relays in
Keith wrote:
Would you post your configuration that works for you? and anyone else
that's willing to do so? I'd like to see some examples of successful
configurations to learn from.
Here's mine. Weights 0-12 are OK, weights 13-19 get bounced and 20+
gets deleted. Neither bounces nor deletes
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthew Bramble
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 6:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
.8 is one of those F-U blacklists that punishes every user on
a system
because a network administrator saw fit to complain. I would
://www.mediares.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1-888-395-4678 |Ext. 101
972-889-0201 |Ext. 101
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthew Bramble
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 6:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS
Absolutely agreed.
pbh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthew Bramble
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
Don't get me wrong, I will use .6
and since SBC is obviously not an ethical
alternative,
Whets using SBC as a provider got to do with ethics?
Todd
- Original Message -
From: Phillip B. Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 8:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
Two words: pink contracts
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
- Smart Mail
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 7:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
and since SBC is obviously not an ethical
Phillip wrote:
Two words: pink contracts
9 syllables: what the heck are you talking about?
I've had nightmares setting up PacBell/SBC DSL that would fill a book,
but that was incompetent tech installation and support. Once the
service is up its always been just great; for years running.
And
and destroy all copies of the original message.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt Robertson
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
Phillip wrote:
Two words: pink
Keith wrote:
I plugged pink contracts into Google and here's the first link that
came up...
Well, doesn't that just suck? Hopefully the 2001 date on that post is
indicative of a changed landscape, otherwise they're pretty much *all*
in league with the devil.
-888-395-4678 |Ext. 101
972-889-0201 |Ext. 101
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Robertson
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
Keith wrote:
I plugged
Yes..do not block on 127.0.0.6 and .8
pbh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Smart Business Lists
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
Careful on SORBS-SPAM -
Who's Cox?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Smart Business
Lists
Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2003 07:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
Careful on SORBS-SPAM - blocking some large providers - Cox for
http://www.cox.com/
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Glen Harvy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 3:12 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
Who's Cox?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
18 matches
Mail list logo
