RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread Markus Gufler
I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to run all the other tests along side it. I am trying to reduce my daily workload of analyzing the spamtrap and hope that sniffer and surbl will do this. Do I even need surbl? Do you have so much workload on your mailserver that you

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread Harry Vanderzand
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 11:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to run all the other tests along side

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread Scott Fisher
Sniffer is very good. It detected 47600 out of 49250 spam messages for me through Sept 1-5. The SURBL filter contains a lot of body filters and can be CPU intensive. Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress Companies [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/08/04 10:13AM I am testing sniffer right now and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 11:13:18 AM, Harry wrote: HV I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to run all the other HV tests along side it. Well, you can probably get by without the other tests, but since you have Declude it would be MUCH better if you keep the other tests in

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread Matt
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 11:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to run all the other tests along side it. I am trying

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread support
Harry, We have a utility to let you know how well a specific test does in our log parser (DLAnalyzer). The test is called the Test Breakdown Summary Report. Essentially you can pick a certain test(s) and see which other tests fail along with them. This report has helped us eliminate tests

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread Harry Vanderzand
developers -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:56 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with snifferHarry,Sniffer is a great addition to any

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread Harry Vanderzand
] Test needed along with sniffer On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 11:13:18 AM, Harry wrote: HV I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to run all the HV other tests along side it. Well, you can probably get by without the other tests, but since you have Declude it would

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Thank you, I will try the report out. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of support Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer Harry, We have

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread Scott Fisher
, September 08, 2004 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer Harry, Sniffer is a great addition to any Declude setup, however your issues are not due to just simply the size of your processors. We run a dual 1 GHz PIII system with RAID 5

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread Matt
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer Harry, Sniffer is a great addition to any Declude setup, however your