[Declude.JunkMail] wrong hop?

2004-03-03 Thread Technical Support
Does this mean that I am running lookups on the wrong hop? My mail server is ync.net the sender's mail server is mail.webagency.net from the headers: Received: from SMTP32-FWD by ync.net (SMTP32) id A060810EB; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:04:18 -0600Received: from mail.webagency.net

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] wrong hop?

2004-03-03 Thread Technical Support
HOP 1 and I don't have any IPBYPASS, I have it commented out. I also have HOPHIGH commented out. Thank you for making YourNET Connection your connection to the world Jim O'Keefe Technical Support @YourNET Connection, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] wrong hop?

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
Does this mean that I am running lookups on the wrong hop? It sounds like it. My mail server is ync.net the sender's mail server is mail.webagency.net from the headers: Received: from SMTP32-FWD by ync.net (SMTP32) id A060810EB; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:04:18 -0600 Received: from mail.webagency.net

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] wrong hop?

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
HOP 1 and I don't have any IPBYPASS, I have it commented out. I also have HOPHIGH commented out. You should change that to HOP 0 (with HOP 1, you're telling Declude JunkMail that you will always have at least 1 mailserver in front of the IMail server -- but since you do not, you

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fwd: OT: JM/Virus modules

2004-03-03 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I have no idea why I forwarded that so sloppily. Sorry. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!

[Declude.JunkMail] Virus scan and Declude

2004-03-03 Thread Administration
Hello, Just wondering, I'm using Declude with F-prot anti virus. when F-prot and declude scan for viruses, does it clean the virus/message. Or does it just delete the whole message? thanks in advance for your time! --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus scan and Declude

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm using Declude with F-prot anti virus. when F-prot and declude scan for viruses, does it clean the virus/message. Or does it just delete the whole message? It will either quarantine or delete the E-mail. It does not clean them (since about 99% of all viruses are in virus-generated E-mails,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus scan and Declude

2004-03-03 Thread Kami Razvan
It depends on your setting in the cfg file. Look at the following entry: # # The DELETEVIRUSES option, when set to ON, will delete viruses, rather than quarantine them. # It is recommended to leave this at OFF. Works with v1.30 and higher. # DELETEVIRUSES ON We have ours set to on to delete

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus scan and Declude

2004-03-03 Thread Glenn \\\\ WCNet
I hold them in the Virus folder just so I can check how much activity is going on if I want to, and a scheduled batch file clears the folder every two hours. Glenn Z. - Original Message - From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 2:25 PM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude Junkmail] Antispam to block file extensions....

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there a way for AntiSpam to block e-mails by file attachments? A lot of viruses are going around with the .pif attachment I'd like to set the AntiSpam up to block these from even coming in. Until we find that spammers start using file attachments, we likely won't add that to Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude Junkmail] Antispam to block file extensions....

2004-03-03 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Brent- The easiest way to handle that is to block the attachment at the firewall. Then even Declude doesn't have to deal with it. We block SCR, PIF, COM, EXE, WSH, VBS, and maybe a few others. -Dave - Original Message - From: Brent Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude Junkmail] Antispam to block file extensions....

2004-03-03 Thread Darin Cox
Get Declude Virus. It allows banning of files by extension. Scott also recently added the ability to ban encrypted zips (Standard version) and extensions within zips (encrypted or otherwise - PRO version). An inexpensive virus scanner like F-Prot or AVG and you're all set. Darin. -

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude Junkmail] Antispam to block file extensions....

2004-03-03 Thread Rick Davidson
You can use the Imail message rules to do that, search the ipswitch knowledge base for how to Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Company - - Original Message - From: Brent Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 3:42 PM

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude version

2004-03-03 Thread Bud Durland
I downloaded and installed the interim version of Delcude, and added 'banext ezip' to the virus.cfg file, but an encryptedzip file still got through. 'banext zip' wroks OK, though. I want to confirm that I've got the right declude executable, but am having cranial flatulence trying to

[Declude.JunkMail] HOLD on domain

2004-03-03 Thread Jose Gosende
Is it possible to hold mail, with the lite version, based on the domain of the sender? TIA --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.610 / Virus Database: 390 - Release Date: 3/3/2004 --- [This E-mail was scanned for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
I downloaded and installed the interim version of Delcude, and added 'banext ezip' to the virus.cfg file, but an encryptedzip file still got through. 'banext zip' wroks OK, though. I want to confirm that I've got the right declude executable, but am having cranial flatulence trying to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOLD on domain

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is it possible to hold mail, with the lite version, based on the domain of the sender? That would be a Sender Blacklist, which requires Declude JunkMail Standard or Pro. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version

2004-03-03 Thread Nick Hayer
type declude at the \imail prompt more info is declude -diag -Nick Hayer Date sent: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 16:45:20 -0500 From: Bud Durland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HOLD on domain

2004-03-03 Thread Jose Gosende
The cost to upgrade is the difference in $$ between versions, right? ie: $246 to go from lite to std Thanks, Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 4:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HOLD on domain

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
The cost to upgrade is the difference in $$ between versions, right? ie: $246 to go from lite to std Correct. You can do so at http://www.declude.com/purchase.htm . -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail

[Declude.JunkMail] declude virus - additional info

2004-03-03 Thread Doug Anderson
We have mcafee at our location. I understand that I can use declude virus with it - but got some questions 1. which version of mcafee should I use? I have access to both the windows Virus Scan Enterprise 7.1.0 and the dos based Version 4.3.20. 2. If the suggestion is dos based 4.3.20, does anyone

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude virus - additional info

2004-03-03 Thread Nick Hayer
Doug, Should post these to the declude virus list... virus with it - but got some questions 1. which version of mcafee should I use? scan.exe I think it comes with all of them but not sure. based 4.3.20, does anyone have a good automated update routine for it? If you say 7.1.0 then updating

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude virus - additional info

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
We have mcafee at our location. I understand that I can use declude virus with it - but got some questions 1. which version of mcafee should I use? I have access to both the windows Virus Scan Enterprise 7.1.0 and the dos based Version 4.3.20. You can use any version of VirusScan (or NetShield)

[Declude.JunkMail] Email Address Error

2004-03-03 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Does anyone know why we would get this error from our exchange server after delude processed the email and forwarded it. xxx replaced the real email address. All I think of it has a .@ 03:03 03:59 SMTP-(04989AD1) MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03:03 03:59 SMTP-(04989AD1) 501 Invalid Address 03:03

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version

2004-03-03 Thread Bud Durland
R. Scott Perry wrote: I downloaded and installed the interim version of Delcude, and added 'banext ezip' to the virus.cfg file, but an encryptedzip file still got through. 'banext zip' wroks OK, though. I want to confirm that I've got the right declude executable, but am having cranial

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Email Address Error

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
Does anyone know why we would get this error from our exchange server after delude processed the email and forwarded it. xxx replaced the real email address. All I think of it has a .@ 03:03 03:59 SMTP-(04989AD1) MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03:03 03:59 SMTP-(04989AD1) 501 Invalid Address 03:03

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
If you type \IMail\Declude from a command prompt, it should show 1.78i9. If not, you aren't running the latest interim release, and will need to copy the new Declude.exe file to the \IMail\ directory. C:\\imail\declude Declude 1.78i9 (C) Copyright 2000-2004 Computerized Horizons. That's good.

[Declude.JunkMail] Non-beta release

2004-03-03 Thread Agid, Corby
Title: Non-beta release I'm wondering when the next full (non-beta) release will be available. It seems that a bunch of very nice features have been added since 1.75 (July 2003), but I'm always hesitant to run beta software. Will there be a full release sometime soon, so we can get all the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-beta release

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm wondering when the next full (non-beta) release will be available. It seems that a bunch of very nice features have been added since 1.75 (July 2003), but I'm always hesitant to run beta software. Will there be a full release sometime soon, so we can get all the newest features without