[Declude.JunkMail] Looking for more cool feature in Declude

2002-09-30 Thread Tom
I'm hoping the following features would be added to Declude: Message variable: - XNOTE: %WEIGHTCOUNT% = What value did the message fail with Junkmail action: WEIGHT10CFOLDER c:\WEIGHT10 (copy

[Declude.JunkMail] Latest Statistics on the Kill list- Image`fx

2002-09-30 Thread Tom
of all Identifiers: 1551 Total Percent of ID effectiveness: 59% List of spammers caught by the kill file: found: 17 ID-20020930-000139 .transcentives.net found: 16 ID-20020930-000170 @dealsindemand.com found: 15 ID-20020930-000434 .torpedomail.com found: 4

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILTO Filter Request

2002-09-30 Thread George Kulman
Scott, Thanks very much. George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILTO Filter Request There was a question last month

[Declude.JunkMail] Smarthost/Gateway...

2002-09-30 Thread Mark Smith
I mentioned a few weeks ago that our netblock has been listed on SPEWS because our ISP is Spam Friendly. Anyway... I was going to setup a Smarthost/SMTP gateway on a different network but wanted to know what impact Junkmail might have on that. With regard to Rev DNS records and MX Records, do I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Smarthost/Gateway...

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
I mentioned a few weeks ago that our netblock has been listed on SPEWS because our ISP is Spam Friendly. Anyway... I was going to setup a Smarthost/SMTP gateway on a different network but wanted to know what impact Junkmail might have on that. Assuming that Declude JunkMail is running on the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] STOP testing if Blacklist

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
It would also be great if you could consider adding a stop test consideration. This (and stopping when a certain weight is reached) are in the suggestion database. Given that performance is rarely an issue with Declude JunkMail, it isn't a high priority right now, but it is something that we

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Smarthost/Gateway...

2002-09-30 Thread Mark Smith
Assuming that Declude JunkMail is running on the existing IMail server (and not the Smarthost), there isn't anything special you would need to do. The way we're currently configured, we have Junkmail running on iMail just as an inbound filter. All inbound SMTP traffic hits iMail/Junkmail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile blacklist question.

2002-09-30 Thread Mark Smith
In this case, you would need to enter [EMAIL PROTECTED] or @bellsouth.net. Alternatively, you could use a filter that filters on the HELO/EHLO text, that filters for .inalarm.com.mx. Could you have both filters read from the same 'fromfile'? What's the syntax to setup the HELO/EHLO

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile blacklist question.

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
In this case, you would need to enter [EMAIL PROTECTED] or @bellsouth.net. Alternatively, you could use a filter that filters on the HELO/EHLO text, that filters for .inalarm.com.mx. Could you have both filters read from the same 'fromfile'? The fromfile test type just checks the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Smarthost/Gateway...

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
Assuming that Declude JunkMail is running on the existing IMail server (and not the Smarthost), there isn't anything special you would need to do. I'd like to forward all outbound SMTP traffic from Exchange back to iMail and then have iMail act as the SmartHost. In that case, you would

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Looking for more cool feature in Declude

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm hoping the following features would be added to Declude: Message variable: - XNOTE: %WEIGHTCOUNT% = What value did the message fail with There is a %WEIGHT% variable that will display the total weight for the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest Statistics on the Kill list- Image`fx

2002-09-30 Thread Darrell L.
% List of spammers caught by the kill file: found: 17 ID-20020930-000139 .transcentives.net found: 16 ID-20020930-000170 @dealsindemand.com found: 15 ID-20020930-000434 .torpedomail.com found: 4 ID-20020930-000373 @yourbigvote.com found: 23 ID-20020930

[Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail: Routing

2002-09-30 Thread Hirthe, Alexander
Hello, what must be wrong that make a mail fail the routing tests? I'm getting many of them, most from inside of Germany. And nothing really strange about them. Alex --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail: Routing

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
what must be wrong that make a mail fail the routing tests? I'm getting many of them, most from inside of Germany. And nothing really strange about them. Given the way that test works, it doesn't work well if your mailserver is located in a country that isn't among the countries that send

[Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer test...

2002-09-30 Thread Mark Smith
I have SNIFFER tests set to alert. I've found that the user will receive the alert even if they are in the whitelist? Is this normal or do I have something mis-configured? --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Proto Virus Scanner] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile blacklist question.

2002-09-30 Thread Mark Smith
In a filter, you could use a line such as: HELO 0 ENDSWITH .inalarm.com.mx as well as: MAILFROM 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED] I haven't used any of the filters yet I assume that these entries go in the Global.cfg file? Is there anyway to place all of them in an

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer test...

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have SNIFFER tests set to alert. I wouldn't recommend that -- the SNIFFER test catches mostly spam, and spammers typically use valid E-mail addresses less than 1% of the time. That means that for each pseudo-bounce message that gets back to the spammer, you're using resources to send 100

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile blacklist question.

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
I haven't used any of the filters yet I assume that these entries go in the Global.cfg file? It's best to read up about them before using them. :) The filtering section of the manual covers this. Is there anyway to place all of them in an external file and apply the same weight/rules to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile blacklist question.

2002-09-30 Thread Mark Smith
Thanks!... I'm off to RTFM. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 11:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile blacklist question. I haven't used

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Console (Update)

2002-09-30 Thread John Tolmachoff
Ok, I am now back in the office. There were two deccon.exe in task manager. There was one Declude Console window open as expected. There was a error window open that said the following: Couldn;t create file map2; already exist. That is the exact message, including punctuation marks, except

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question...

2002-09-30 Thread Mark Smith
One question about filters... You assign the rule in the Global.cfg file a weight. You also assign each filter a weight. Are these two weights added to get the final weight for the message? For example, if you have: MYFILTER filter c:\iMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x 5 0 And in

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question...

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
One question about filters... You assign the rule in the Global.cfg file a weight. You also assign each filter a weight. Are these two weights added to get the final weight for the message? For example, if you have: MYFILTER filter c:\iMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x 5 0 And in

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Console (Update)

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
There were two deccon.exe in task manager. There was one Declude Console window open as expected. There was a error window open that said the following: Couldn;t create file map2; already exist. That is the exact message, including punctuation marks, except the quotes. That's a message that

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Console (Update)

2002-09-30 Thread Douglas Hardison
How can I tell what version of deccon.exe I am running now? Is there an outstanding benefit to upgrading to the latest version? Other than the grammar upgrades ;-) I'm currently running Declude 1.61. Douglas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Console (Update)

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
How can I tell what version of deccon.exe I am running now? The Declude console does not have a version number. Is there an outstanding benefit to upgrading to the latest version? Other than the grammar upgrades ;-) I'm currently running Declude 1.61. If you do not see that Couldn;t create

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Console (Update)

2002-09-30 Thread John Tolmachoff
OK, that did it. Comments/questions: Could you include version information, both in the About box and in the file properties? This would make it easy to identify which version is being run, and can be compared to the latest version. You have a Help button on the menu, why not just remove it?

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Console (Update)

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
Unfortunately, we just don't have the resources right now to do that. Understood. Feature request? :)) Yes. :) -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Console (Update)

2002-09-30 Thread Dan Horne, CCNA
FWIW, I don't know if it will work, but there is an application called Firedaemon that will install almost any executable file as a Windows Service. It is extremely versatile and easy. Check it out at http://www.firedaemon.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] STOP testing if Blacklist

2002-09-30 Thread George Kulman
Scott, When you do get to consider this please think about something like STOP to stop testing further in the individual filter or test, and STOPALL to stop all further testing. Thanks, George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Kill list criteria- Image`fx

2002-09-30 Thread Tom
Is there any criteria to get listed on your list? I have noticed over the last couple of weeks that more and more sites that I would have thought would be legitimate are being listed? If they spam me and our users they will more than likely be blacklisted. However, if the site is an ISP or

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Looking for more cool feature in Declude

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
There already is a MAILFROM filter type... Sorry I meant to say MAILTO That will be available in the next release (ALLRECIPS, to match the %ALLRECIPS% variable name). -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

[Declude.JunkMail] spam gang e-mails

2002-09-30 Thread Marc Catuogno
Below is a second mailing that I received from these people, I posted the first one to the IMAIL forum. They claim someone is Joe-jobing them, but I do notice that on their explanation page they are still advertising their services. That makes me suspicious.I've included the header and the

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude log ?

2002-09-30 Thread John Tolmachoff
When Imail receives a message, it is set to copy all to a ruleprocess account. This account is only used for running a rules.ima, like for archiving some users and such. However, Declude is seeing this as a second to address and running all scans twice. Is there a way to tell Declude not to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude log ?

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
When Imail receives a message, it is set to copy all to a ruleprocess account. This account is only used for running a rules.ima, like for archiving some users and such. However, Declude is seeing this as a second to address ... That's because IMail has changed the E-mail so that there are now

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude log ?

2002-09-30 Thread John Tolmachoff
Standard version here. :( John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 4:57 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude log ?

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
Standard version here. Unfortunately, the Standard version treats all E-mail addresses the same, including copied ones. One idea would be to have the copied mail sent to an address on a separate domain, and set up a per-domain configuration for that domain. Another would be to have it

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No recipients in .eml

2002-09-30 Thread Hideki Onuma
Hi, I have From:, To:, Subject: in all of my .eml files and a blank line after subject then body follows. Somehow, sender's postmaster receives a warning and not the recipient nor the sender. I am using declude v 1.60. Do you have any other idea? Thank you Hideki -Original