64.119.192.0/19 = iwayhosting.com covers all those
Been in my banned ip list for a while now.
Rick Rountree
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/6/2003 at 3:04 PM George Kulman wrote:
Marc
Don't forget 64.119.208.0/24
George
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I figure that each individual E-mail on my system has about a 0.6%
chance of being stolen and delivered by the queue.
Matt:
I have spent a lot of my years in the field of mathematics. A study done a
while back and it is related to data-mining stated.. men buy baby diapers
and orange juice
Apologies if this has already been mentioned, but this may be a quick easy way to find
out exactly what messages(and quantity of messages) never got scanned by Declude on a
per server basis: If you have Declude configured to add anything consistent to the
headers, like an x-note: or whatever
Scott, you have probably seen requests like this before, however, I think
this would be a great way to support most corporate and some ISP e-mail
domains with a negative weight based test:
HELO RDNS domain match -5
HELO RDNS MAILFROM domain match -10
HELO RDNS domain match IPINMX -10 (yes,
Bill..
This goes well along the line of the subject that was discussed a while back
and one that could help a great deal.
Right now we are concentrating on negative aspects of the email - to
minimize FP and even further reduce CPU we should give some attention to
some positive aspects as well.
Not related to your problem but do yourself a favor block @mcsi.net
only thing I ever seen from there is spam.
Best regards,
Eje Aya Gustafsson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Family Entertainment Network http://www.fament.com
Phone : 620-231- Fax :
Now this one is an
interesting concept... Reverse psychology at its best..
Let us check see
if your card is stolen..
IP Listed:
203.126.160.62
Regards,
Kami
Subject:
[55~]ALERT: YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN STOLENDate: Thu, 04 Dec 03
05:33:41
Would it be possible to have the TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS variable to not show the score
for WEIGHT type test such as WEIGHT10 or WEIGHT20? It appears that the WEIGHT10 test
has added 10 points to the score by the way the variable appears.
-Daniel
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
Kami Razvan wrote:
I have spent a lot of my years in the field of mathematics. A study done a
while back and it is related to data-mining stated.. men buy baby diapers
and orange juice on Tuesdays more than any other day of the week.
Sure it's useful, what it says is that there is something
Dave,
It appears that the E-mail getting delivered improperly is the result of
IMail stealing a copy and processing it apart from Declude. In the
example that I provided, Declude deleted the copy that it got because it
scored too high, but IMail delivered a copy before it was scanned by
Use the HIDETESTS option to remove the weight-based tests from your
output. I believe it is used in the Global.cfg as follows:
HIDETESTS WEIGHT10
HIDETESTS WEIGHT20
Of course Scott might also want to change the way that weight-based
tests are reported, but this will remove some of
Scott,
what we need is %TESTWITHWEIGHT% intead of %TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS%
so it will list test like ipnotinmx when they pass, and contribute to the
total weight, instead of when they fail.
you said i was coming in the next release, did you mean
%TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS% ?
- Original Message
Gotcha. But do the headers of the copy that Imail delivered\stole have any Declude
markings in the header?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Bramble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude not
OK, I have an idea. Scott, can we disable HOLD1, and if so would that
affect HOLD2 operation?
99.5% of messages held by HOLD1 end up passing.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL
There is only one Q file per message. If Declude locks it, Imail can do
nothing with it. In the cases I have seen, there is a line in the log
stating could not lock file.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That should be as follows per Scott:
HIDETESTS WEIGHT10 WEIGHT20 (andsoforth)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Sunday, December 07,
Matthew, I have confirmed that this occurred on my server 4 times on
Thursday. That works out to 1/10 of 1%. A lot more than your figure. Like I
stated before, this is a concern as it let a virus through.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
I have tried this and it did not work. I already have IPNOTINMX and NOLEGITCONTENT
set up for this and they are not appearing in the TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS variable. I
added my weight test to it and they still appear. It is formatted as follows in my
global.cfg
HIDETESTS IPNOTINMX
18 matches
Mail list logo
