Hello Sanford,
Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 2:05:17 AM, you wrote:
I think you're missing the whole point here. I never claimed (at least
I don't think I did) that XML was a better/faster way of storing large
amounts of relational data with high I/O demands.
Of course there are better methods of
On 8 Nov 2004 at 14:31, Scott Fisher wrote:
Scott,
If you have the horsepower to spare...
Use ClamAv and Turn PreScan off with Declude Virus Pro.
131 Phish detections this month through yesterday (33271 total
e-mails).
Neat. I was unaware that the virus programs also did some content
Hello Markus,
Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 10:31:27 AM, you wrote:
MG I've to set up Imail/Declude on a Dell Poweredge 1750 with Dual 3 GHz Xeon
MG CPUs and 4 Ethernet Ports.
MG 2 x Intel NICs
MG 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme Gbit NICs
MG Now I have two questions:
MG 1.) Anyone has had the known
Absolutely put your spool on it's own partition and have Declude and any
other related application log to that partition. Both the IMail and
Declude logs cause an unbelievable amount of fragmentation, and if you
put these on your system partition, you will quickly diminish your
system's
I implemented Scott Fishers spamdomains filters yesterday afternoon and
caught all the paypal mydoom variants with the SD-PHISH filter
Thanks Scott!
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
I use the same systems for my two Imail/Declude mail gateways
Don't use the Broadcomm Nics! They will intermittently quit working!
Like Dan said, install Imail on the D drive, there is more than enough disk
space and horse power to deal with the other things you want to do.
Each of mine get
MG 1.) Anyone has had the known Imail-NIC problems with this
Ethernet ports?
Yep.
And your solution? Installing another NIC card (3Com) beside the other four
existing ethernet ports?
Don't do that. Create 2 more partitions with the rest of your
69G. One for Imail program files and one
Hello Markus,
Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 11:20:16 AM, you wrote:
MG And your solution? Installing another NIC card (3Com) beside the other four
MG existing ethernet ports?
Yea, that's what we reluctantly did. This is our most annoying Imail
issue. We restart SMTP and Queue service as well.
Hello Markus,
Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 10:20:16 AM, you wrote:
MG 1.) Anyone has had the known Imail-NIC problems with this
Ethernet ports?
Yep.
MG And your solution? Installing another NIC card (3Com) beside the other four
MG existing ethernet ports?
Don't do that. Create 2 more
Hello Charles,
Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 11:42:56 AM, you wrote:
CF Just as a note, you can use Kiwi Syslog as your syslog server (it's free if
CF you don't want to use the more advanced features), then write the log
CF files from Kiwi to anywhere on the system you want, you can even run
CF it
1.) Anyone has had the known Imail-NIC problems with this
Ethernet ports?
We have 4 1750's using adapter teaming without any problem.
Although I've never heard of an application level issue with a NIC (in
WinNT+)
2.) The system is preconfigured with Win2003 Server on 2 x 80
GB RAID 1 SCSI
On 8 Nov 2004 at 13:08, Bill Landry wrote:
Bill,
A little SpamAssassin help please -
It does, but it can also be used with Declude as an RHSBL now:
MAILPOLICE-FRAUDfraud.rhs.mailpolice.com 127.0.0.230
to see if I have this correct for SA 3x
In my local.cf
urirhsbl URIBL_MP
- Original Message -
From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A little SpamAssassin help please -
It does, but it can also be used with Declude as an RHSBL now:
MAILPOLICE-FRAUDfraud.rhs.mailpolice.com 127.0.0.230
to see if I have this correct for SA 3x
In my local.cf
I should have clarified, the example I give below is for SA 3.0.1, since
they changed the action from header to the more appropriate body setting
between SA 3.0.0 3.0.1. So, you have it correct if you are using anything
before 3.0.1.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL
On 9 Nov 2004 at 11:27, Bill Landry wrote:
Thanks!! Bill [I do have 3.0.1]
-Nick
I should have clarified, the example I give below is for SA 3.0.1,
since they changed the action from header to the more appropriate
body setting between SA 3.0.0 3.0.1. So, you have it correct if
you are
Hello sbsi,
Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 5:00:39 PM, you wrote:
sl How do you handle larger mail boxes/webmail/imap if you are
sl keeping your /imail/ main directory/program files down to a lower
sl disk space?
sl I understand keeping the disk space down to a minimum but
Disks generally maintain throughput in 20 GB chunks these days, which
leaves you with plenty of wiggle room. When creating partitions, the
system obviously goes first, then followed by your IMail Users and then
your Spool. The other partitions on your system shouldn't be accessed
with any
On 9 Nov 2004 at 11:12, Bill Landry wrote:
Bill,
How do you handle if a particular rhsbl returns multiple return codes
like 127.0.0 2; 127.0.0 4, etc and you want to pick which one to use -
is it:
urirhsbl URIBL_EX multiple.example.com. A 127.0.0.4
or
urirhssub URIBL_EX multiple.example.com.
Hi,
Thanks for this excellent input - much appreciated.
_
Glen Harvy
Aquarius Communications
for all your Internet Needs.
Phone 9977 3788 Fax 9977 3844
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Hi, all -
Heads up!
There is a new variant of the MyDoom virus that does not work in the usual
way.
Previous MyDoom virii have attached the virus payload to an email message.
The new variants (AH and AI, so far) simply include links to infected
machines. The links exploit the Internet Explorer
- Original Message -
From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do you handle if a particular rhsbl returns multiple return codes
like 127.0.0 2; 127.0.0 4, etc and you want to pick which one to use -
is it:
urirhsbl URIBL_EX multiple.example.com. A 127.0.0.4
or
urirhssub URIBL_EX
21 matches
Mail list logo
