Hello,
Just downloaded the demo version of Junkmail Pro, and I was curious about
the basic setup. For the last two days I've monitored and tweaked and held
and redirected and spent hours upon hours looking over the junkmail setup
and rules and whatnot. I'm wondering if I'm reinventing the
On 3-3-05, Andy Wrote
Query THOSE DNS servers to see if they have MX/A records. Sometimes people
have an internal DNS server for the AD domain that doesn't have the
public
records.
That was it.
Thanks Andy!
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
Joey,
Declude is very effective when tweaked. Not to mention the default
global.cfg ships without all of the RBL's that most of us use (XBL, UCE,
MAIL-POLICE, SENDERDB). Also, there are other 3rd patry utilties which are
very effective at catching spam like like invURIBL and Message
Thank you for the response. Here is my global.cfg file:
#=ADVANCED
OPTIONS =
CONSOLE ON
#IPBYPASS 192.0.2.25
HOP 0
#HOPHIGH1
#DNS127.0.0.1
HIDETESTS CATCHALLMAILS IPNOTINMX
Some stats on how rate their test performances:
Marcus: http://www.zcom.it/decludeupdater/spam_stats.htm
Sort Monster: http://www.sortmonster.com/MDLP/
Mine: http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/declude.htm
Andrew posted a filter that removes quite a few false positives for
CMDSPACE:
Joey,
If you go here http://declude.mydomain.com/ (where mydomain.com is the
domain I use in my from address) you can see the part of our Declude
JunkMail Config which we make public.
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Joey Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Joey,
A couple of thoughts.
1.) Look at adding a content test like invURIBL or Message Sniffer. Both
have trials.
2.) I would not give a negative weight for BONDEDSENDER or SPFPASS. Spammers
can easily setup SPF records.
3.) Add a few of the other RBL style tests. make sure you adjust the
Right, so they have to make it so that we can account for this which is what
they didn't do when they made the change in 2.0 as we do know what the account
name is, however, if you don't have pro version that is even a bigger issue.
Not a problem for me, but perhaps others.
---
Network
I expect to re-route email that fails WEIGHT10 but to simply delete
email when it fails the higher weight because the probability of spam
there is much higher and I do not want to waste my time checking it.
The problem is that the WEIGHT10 ROUTETO action removes me as a
recipient and
Thanks Dan,
Is it generally frowned upon to use another company's spam setup, like
yours? My feelings are that I'm not very experienced with this and you
seem to have a very nice setup. I know I'd have to change a few things to
reflect our system, but it would take me years to learn enough
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
I have not been following the thread in detail, but if some one that is
having the problem would change to WEIGHTRANGE instead of WEIGHT and ensure
there are no overlappings, I have a feeling the at least part of the
"problem" might be resolved.
No, this
Chipping in my two cents, I'd say you've received excellent advice for
tuning Declude so far.
As a busy sysadmin myself, I'll add some less specific advice from the
field. Hopefully others will see fit to add their observations.
Go with the weighted system.
You're busy, but resist the urge to
We use
weightrange and do not use per user configurations. Also the messages that were
over our delete weight and not deleted did not contain a routto
action??
Kevin
Bilbee
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
MattSent:
Title: Message
Hi Nick, John, Eric, Fritz, Kevin, Dan,
NCL Admin, et al:
This
change removes our ability to override ROUTETO in special
circumstances.
I recommendyou sit tight just a little longer.
The "new" behavior apparently was not intended and I'm certain, Declude will be
made
Kevin,
A per-domain config can also have an effect. This very well might not
be the case with your issue, but in this context I believe that I
should explain further just in case.
If you have a message sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that fails tests that
result in both a ROUTETO and DELETE action
Title: Message
And
also:
If you
have the COPY ALL EMAIL active in Imail.. the DELETE action does does not
work. In our setup, we do not use any ROUTETO in any of our config
files. And you can not setup a per domain/user for that copy all email
account.
-Original
On 4 Mar 2005 at 12:51, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi Nick, John, Eric, Fritz, Kevin, Dan, NCL Admin, et al:
I recommendyou sit tight just a little longer.
Done!. I'm chilled. No problem. Really. Honest!
:)
The only thing that slightly ticked me off was lack of communication
about this bug. Now
You mention that he should adjust for the weight of his system, but you do
not let him know what weighting system you are using. Can you expand on
that? I.e. Hold at 10, Delete at 20 Thanks.
John Olden
Systems Administrator
Champaign Park District
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I found yesterday that MAILPOLICE Bulk and Porn have been combined into
Block (although there may be legitimate reasons to do separate lookups.)
http://rhs.mailpolice.com/usage.php One page says fraud is in there too,
but they are not consistent with that.
John
-Original Message-
From:
Sorry about that.
Subject Tag 12
Hold 20
Delete 30+
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Thanks for your help...I will figure it out...
Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247. Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 3:23 PM
Is just my browser, or is Declude's clock on:
https://www.declude.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=5
Off? In CET (Central European Time) of 2:15AM, their clock shows 4:15AM EST
when it should be showing 9:15PM EST.
.hope this doesn't reflect in their 2.0 programming code. ;-)
---
[This E-mail
Actually, it shows -4 hours.
GMTas I write thisis 01:46
The code they use on the pagesubtracts five hours, which results in a
value of -4 for the hours. They need to add a line to add 24 if the result is
negative. I'm sure it looks fine 19
hours a day, though...
And no, it does not
Hm,
What am I missing - it's stating Via Ticket System (and I've seen others
refer to ticket numbers) but WHERE on that page does it let me open a
ticket.
The only thing that I see is email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - but that doesn't
respond
with a ticket (at least not when I had used it earlier
Title: Message
Hey Scott,
This is really a question for you about JM.
The JM log file lists "passed" messages as "L1 Message OK", so it's only the
failed messages that list the actual tests failed. However, isn't
catchallmails supposed to fail for all messages? So it must be the JM
ignores
Does LOOSENSPAMHEADERS ON have to go in the global.cfg? What if I want to
do this for one domain but not for others? Is there any way to accomplish
this?
Thanks,
Evans Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thank you for your feedback. Ihave fixed
it.Friday night 10:30 pm. What we do too please our customers ;) As for
the website it is my responsibility and not that of our programmers, so you can
be confident that this does not reflect our programmers skills.
David B
www.declude.com
-
Hi David-
Problem solved. Now that's what I call
service!
(Thanks for the credit...)
-d
- Original Message -
From:
David Barker
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 10:33
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clock
Time on
Evan.
It is my understanding that is a global command and is only supported in the
global.cfg file.
Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration,
FYI...your clock script flickers
needlessly... Instead of refreshing every 1/10 of a second, you might want
to change the following line in your clock script
window.setTimeout("tick();", 100);
Torefresh every second...
window.setTimeout("tick();", 1000);
or even strip off the seconds and
Darin,
Check now - is that better? I noticed the flicker
seemed to only occur in FireFox not IE.
David B
www.declude.com
- Original Message -
From:
Darin Cox
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 12:20
AM
Subject: Re:
Ok, you got it.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clock Time on Declude
Support
You're up late g. Looks good.
You may want to remove the trailing colon, though.
You're up late g. Looks good.
You may want to remove the trailing colon, though.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: David Barker
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 12:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clock Time on Declude
Support
Darin,
33 matches
Mail list logo
