I upgraded to Imail 8.2 (hf1)2 weeks ago, running declude (Declude
v1.81). I have had SMTP crash twice with these errors before going into
overflow directory. SMTP would not start and had to be rebooted.
Any suggestions?
05:24 09:48 SMTPD (30850906b185) (CP) error 1455 executing
I know there is a HF2 for 8.20 now. Also, looking up error 1455 it seems to
indicate that you may have not had enough virtual memory. Could this be the
case? I know there is some oddity with smtpd memory usage where it will
balloon until the service is restarted - are you experiencing that?
I have 2 gigs RAM with 4 gigs Virtual, dual Zeon 3.06 on a Compaq DL380
with 6 SCSI's.
Has been running rock solid on 8.05 until I upgraded to 8.2 2 weeks ago.
What is the newest version of Declude that is stable with 8.2, anyone?
Thanks,
Chris Patterson, CCNA
Network Engineer/Support
Chris,
The following was Declude's response to 8.2 compatability.
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg24366.html
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Hi all,
I have a need to use Declude to filter mail to a user's spambox based on
X-IMAIL-SPAM in the headers (we're still using an imail filter that we don't
want to give up).
I created a custom filter file with the following:
HEADERS 10 CONTAINSX-IMAIL-SPAM
(separated by tabs)
I do not think this will work. The imail headers are added after declude
sees the email
-Nick
Spaminator wrote:
Hi all,
I have a need to use Declude to filter mail to a user's spambox based on
X-IMAIL-SPAM in the headers (we're still using an imail filter that we don't
want to give up).
- Original Message -
From: NIck Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do not think this will work. The imail headers are added after declude
sees the email
Actually, some IMail spam tests run before being passed to Declude and some
after. The JunkMail archives will contain the gory details.
Bill Landry wrote:
Actually, some IMail spam tests run before being passed to Declude and
some after. The JunkMail archives will contain the gory details.
Bill
correct William - but the headers are after. I already tried to do this
awhile ago without success.. Key here is though - awhile
- Original Message -
From: NIck Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Landry wrote:
Actually, some IMail spam tests run before being passed to Declude and
some after. The JunkMail archives will contain the gory details.
Bill
correct William - but the headers are after. I already tried to
Bill, thanks-- this helps a lot.
The imail statistics test was one I wanted to capture with declude, but mostly
I'm looking for the phrase and URL tests (which we've spent years tweaking
extensively). So, this is good news (although I still can't get it working--
maybe imail writes headers
- Original Message -
From: Spaminator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill, thanks-- this helps a lot.
The imail statistics test was one I wanted to capture with declude,
but mostly I'm looking for the phrase and URL tests (which we've
spent years tweaking extensively). So, this is good news
Ipswitch IMail Server Multiple Unspecified Vulnerabilities
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13727?ref=rss
Just a FYI...
--Mike
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The
- Original Message -
From: Michael L. Hardrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ipswitch IMail Server Multiple Unspecified Vulnerabilities
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13727?ref=rss
Though they don't report it, I'm assuming that 8.15 with HF2 is not
vulnerable either, since the HF2 patches
Thanks for the FYI, Mike.
So, question is... will Ipswitch create hotfixes or workarounds for versions
before 8.2? Or is everyone forced to upgrade to 8.2?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Michael L. Hardrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 24,
Bill, another excellent suggestion-- thanks!
I enabled a HOLD action and took a look at the headers, and sure enough-- no
imail headers.
Strangely, my rule did catch one. It was an imail phrase test that got caught
by Declude, but strangely the other 4000 messages filtered by the phrase
Or turn off IMAP and web calendaring
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 12:58 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail Server Vulnerabilities...
So, question is... will Ipswitch create hotfixes or workarounds for versions
before 8.2? Or is everyone forced to upgrade to 8.2?
Wanna make a bet on which? :-)
--
--mattRobertson--
Janitor, MSB Web Systems
mysecretbase.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
Well, I was _trying_ to take the high road...grin
Hopefully, as Kevin is suggesting, the webmail vulnerability is only with
calendaring.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 5:26 PM
Subject: Re:
Was the webmail vulnerability only with web calendaring? We might be able
to get away with turning it off. It hasn't been a very useful product for
our customers, so I doubt many of them are using it.
I was concerned that there might be vulnerabilities in the main webmail
product...
Darin.
It looks like it will be 4 IMAP Vulnerabilties and 1 Web Calendering
vulnerability.
Darrell
---
invURIBL - Intelligent URI Filtering. Stops 85%+ SPAM with the default
configuration. Download a copy today - http://www.invariantsystems.com
- Original
Huh? What? Not useful? IPSwitch is charging thousands of dollars for
that very feature on steroids .. G
Jonathan
Darin Cox wrote:
Was the webmail vulnerability only with web calendaring? We might be able
to get away with turning it off. It hasn't been a very useful product for
our
8.1x has the patch out - I would suggest posting to the Imail list for
info on earlier versions?
Regards,
-Nick
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It looks like it will be 4 IMAP Vulnerabilties and 1 Web Calendering
vulnerability.
Darrell
---
One other thing to mention it looks like HF2 for 8.20 fixes all of the
vulnerabilities - the smtpd32 issue looks like that was a bug fix and not
part of the vulnerabilities.
a.. IMAP4d32: Fixed crash when malicious LSUB encountered.
b.. IMAP4D32: Fixed crash when SELECTing mailbox name with
Oh, right...I didn't read it closely enough to realize it was just web
calendaring and not webmail as well. Thanks.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 6:37 PM
Subject: Re:
Most of our customers that use a calendaring solution use Exchange as an
internal server.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail Server Vulnerabilities...
25 matches
Mail list logo
