RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.05

2005-09-28 Thread David Lewis-Waller
Darell, Yes I'm running a dual processor Xenon Dell server. All the best, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: 27 September 2005 17:43 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Ver 3.0.5 What is the Proc Directory and why is all the mail going to it.

2005-09-28 Thread David Lewis-Waller
Fred, It's documented in the in declude 3.05 link under myaccount.asp section of the web site . All the best, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarelli Sent: 28 September 2005 05:26 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject:

[Declude.JunkMail] VERY Bad Luck with 3.0.5

2005-09-28 Thread Mark Smith
We upgraded 4 of our inbound gateway server to 3.0.5 yesterday. This morning our HP Open View alarms on all 4 went off reporting the following similar errors: HELP! From the Event Log: Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7031 Date:

[Declude.JunkMail] What is the Reveiw folder for?

2005-09-28 Thread Mark Smith
There's a folder in the \proc folder called "review" I've got messages building up in it but not sure what they are.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.05

2005-09-28 Thread Mark Smith
FYI I'm seeing the same thing. Dell PE 2650's 1.4Ghz Dual Proc 2GB RAM. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Lewis-Waller Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 4:48 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] VERY Bad Luck with 3.0.5

2005-09-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark, We are looking at this right now and will get back to you. Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:01 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] VERY Bad Luck

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.05

2005-09-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
David, When you start to see messages accumulate in the proc directory and it increases you want to watch your decludeproc process. If it processes mail and than stops and sits for about 30 seconds even though there is mail in the proc folder than you are also seeing. If you also watch the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.05

2005-09-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Mark, I just posted about what to look for if you see the same issue. To recap with one addition: Make sure you bump your threads up to 25 or so. Watch the proc directory, decludeproc.exe in task manager, and the logs. Do you see the logs just stop and the decludeproc.exe at zero % cpu

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What is the Reveiw folder for?

2005-09-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
One of more of the messages in the review folder was the cause of the decludeproc service to stop running. You should submit those to Declude or try and isolate which one of them is causing the issue. Darrell Check out

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What is the Reveiw folder for?

2005-09-28 Thread Mark Smith
There are 120+ messages in the folder on each server. :) Should I put them back into the proc folder to try reprocessing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:05 AM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.05

2005-09-28 Thread Mark Smith
Exactly. Also, I see the \templogs folder grow a fair amount too. Last night it had 16,000 logs in it despite the fact my declude.cfg file had these settings: THREADS 25 CONCATENATELOGS ON KEEPINDIVIDUALLOGS OFF ADJUSTFORLOAD ON -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What is the Reveiw folder for?

2005-09-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I would put them in a couple at a time. This way you can isolate it down to which ones it is. First I would remove all of them out of the review folder to another location. Drop them into the proc dir a couple pairs at a time. If the decludeproc service stops the entire contents of proc I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PROCESSES VS THREADS settings

2005-09-28 Thread David Barker
PROCESSES is only relevant to Declude 2.0.6 ADJUSTFORLOAD is only relevant to Declude 2.0.6 THREADS is only relevant to Declude 3.0 David Barker www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith Sent: Wednesday, September 28,

[Declude.JunkMail] Country - Countries - Country-Chain does not work

2005-09-28 Thread Heinrich Richter
Since installing 3.0.5.3 i get no longer informations about the Sender Country. The variable country-chain is always empty and the filters for country and countries are processed but shows nothing. Log snippet in debug mode: 09/28/2005 16:07:09.458 qa380013a1e15.smd Filter COUNTRIES: Not

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What is the Reveiw folder for?

2005-09-28 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Please review the posts I made on 3.0.5.3 earlier this week. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 5:07 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Two Utilities (SpamSize ipHarvest)

2005-09-28 Thread Richard Farris
When I run this on the server all I get is  in the log text..any ideas what to do.. Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet - Original Message - From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Two Utilities (SpamSize ipHarvest)

2005-09-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Richard, When you run what? There are two utilities listed? Darrell Richard Farris writes: When I run this on the server all I get is  in the log text..any ideas what to do.. Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support Crossroads to a Cleaner

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Store and Forward Spam Filtering to Multiple IPs

2005-09-28 Thread Dan Geiser
Hello, All, I realize that this might be better asked in the IMail Forum but this group has a little better signal-to-noise ratio so I thought I'd try here first. We are doing Store and Forward mail filtering for a customer. We use the hosts file to define what IP to Forward mail to after we

[Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc did not install

2005-09-28 Thread Frederick Samarelli
It looks like Declude should have installed a Service called decludeproc service. It did not. What next. Fred --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Store and Forward Spam Filtering to Multiple IPs

2005-09-28 Thread Markus Gufler
... 66.148.217.251 domain.com 70.60.133.251 domain.com will this mechanism rotate through both IPs or will it also just use whichever it hits first when reading from the top of the list down? Or is it just a bad idea in general to do this and we will just have to change the IP

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc did not install

2005-09-28 Thread David Barker
Fred, Goto you're the command prompt and to your \Imail directory and type the following: decludeproc -i This should install the service. David Barker www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarelli Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc did not install

2005-09-28 Thread Goran Jovanovic
How would you de-install the service if you wanted to? Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 3:26 PM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Store and Forward Spam Filtering to Multiple IPs

2005-09-28 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Would this work? Instead of using the hosts file to define the IPs and DOMAINS could you not create a zone on your own DNS server for the domain in question and then define 2 MX records? In this case when the primary goes down it will flip to the secondary by itself? Then you would not need to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc did not install

2005-09-28 Thread David Barker
decludeproc -vversion decludeproc -i install decludeproc -uuninstall David Barker www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 3:55 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Store and Forward Spam Filtering to Multiple IPs

2005-09-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Instead of using the hosts file to define the IPs and DOMAINS could you not create a zone on your own DNS server for the domain in question and then define 2 MX records? In this case when the primary goes down it will flip to the secondary by itself? Then you would not need to put

[Declude.JunkMail] OT Imail Logs filter

2005-09-28 Thread Frederick Samarelli
I need a log filter program that will tell me what address sent and received emails and to whom. Anyone have one. Very Imported. Thanks. Fred --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Store and Forward Spam Filtering to Multiple IPs

2005-09-28 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Sandy, Well at least the idea was good. I will wait for your next post. Thank you Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Store and Forward Spam Filtering to Multiple IPs

2005-09-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Or is it just a bad idea in general to do this and we will just have to change the IP manually if one ISP goes down? Being able to use the DNS MX algorithm for gatewayed domains is not a bad idea at all -- it's preferable to hard-coding a single MX route in HOSTS. However, to do this you

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Store and Forward Spam Filtering to Multiple IPs

2005-09-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
It's a lot of work to create an extra level of complexity to handle something that is almost never an issue and can be resolved smoothly if there ever was. I heartily disagree. It doesn't take a company with tens of thousands of accounts to justify the use of the MX algorithm for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Store and Forward Spam Filtering to Multiple IPs

2005-09-28 Thread Matt
Sandy, Naturally Ipswitch's method is a major root of the issue. I like IMail's Spool and it's simplicity in finding and understanding messages. MS SMTP however encodes the equivalent of the Q file and it is important to be able to see that information. So all other things being equal, I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Store and Forward Spam Filtering to Multiple IPs

2005-09-28 Thread Matt
BTW, you can trick IMail. You need to be gatewaying through another server, MS SMTP for instance and set up that address (gateway) in the allowed addresses under the IMail SMTP service. That takes care of IMail accepting everything from your gateway(s) regardless of the Hosts file entries.

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Store and Forward Spam Filtering to Multiple IPs

2005-09-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
BTW, you can trick IMail. You need to be gatewaying through another server, MS SMTP for instance and set up that address (gateway) in the allowed addresses under the IMail SMTP service. Not really a trick -- that's by design. That's why I said that Dan could plug in MS SMTP as

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Store and Forward Spam Filtering to Multiple IPs

2005-09-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
If IMail allowed for multiple forwarding IP's per domain, I would consider setting up some bogus DNS entries. I'm not totally sure that IMail's method can't be tricked in some way. I can see the possibility that it could be and I'm all about finding ways to make software do what

[Declude.JunkMail] OT:AOL report spam - add a tool?

2005-09-28 Thread Marc Catuogno
I have an agent who is sending out a stupid e-mail letter every Friday. I have set up the AOL feedback loop and two to three people report her as spam every week. I don't know what AOL's tolerance is, but I really don't want to get listed by them again. SOMEONE at AOL told her this: IT person

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:AOL report spam - add a tool?

2005-09-28 Thread Darin Cox
I think what someone's trying to say is to add information to the header to help in identifying the person reporting the spam so they can be removed from her distribution list. While you can add ALLRECIPS via Declude's headers, probably the best thing is to add the spoolname so you're not

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:AOL report spam - add a tool?

2005-09-28 Thread Matt
Marc, Sounds odd. There is a standardized header List-Unsubscribe which can contain a mailto and/or http tag for unsubscribing, and some people insert headers indicating that they don't spam and where to report it to, but that's almost always associated with services that have issues with

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:AOL report spam - add a tool?

2005-09-28 Thread Dave Beckstrom
I dislike generalizing about anything but I do have to say that people on AOL are a real pain in the ass. I have had people tell me that they thought the report as spam icon was how you delete email. AOLers will register for my web based discussion forum and they will elect to receive an email