Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Held Notifier

2006-05-30 Thread Don Brown
Thanks, Craig. I don't have the FileFunctions object installed (the script errors on it). Where do I get it? Also, shouldn't the last line of the script be Set FFunc = Nothing ? Thanks, Sunday, May 28, 2006, 11:20:41 AM, Craig Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CE CE Hi Don, CE Try this.

[Declude.JunkMail] Mail Backlogging

2006-05-30 Thread Will
I have had a problem with my Imail server backlogging mail for years now where the spool directory will fill with hundreds of thousands of messages. Now it's the proc folder with the new version of declude. This issue has been ongoing throughout the years as I have upgraded both Imail and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Backlogging

2006-05-30 Thread Matt
Will, Do you have any catch-all (nobody) aliases for any of your domains? If so, a single such domain can overwhelm a server when under dictionary attack. Catch-alls must be removed. The traffic will disappear immediately if this is the case. Also, it is definitely not uncommon for a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Backlogging

2006-05-30 Thread Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I have had a problem with my Imail server backlogging mail for years now where the spool directory will fill with hundreds of thousands of messages. Now it's the proc folder with the new version of declude. This issue has been ongoing throughout the years as I have upgraded both Imail and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Held Notifier

2006-05-30 Thread Craig Edmonds
Hi Don, The site where you can get it is here. http://www.xs4all.nl/~jarit/asp/filefunc/ The license about 30 bucks. Well worth it in my eyes. Kindest Regards Craig Edmonds 123 Marbella Internet W: www.123marbella.com E : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marbella Guide Web Portal W: www.marbellaguide.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Backlogging

2006-05-30 Thread Craig Edmonds
I would also recommend the declude hijack filter. It has saved me a couple of times. Kindest Regards Craig Edmonds 123 Marbella Internet W: www.123marbella.com E : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marbella Guide Web Portal W: www.marbellaguide.com E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Backlogging

2006-05-30 Thread Will
I am using hijack with its default settings. My Declude seems to function just fine as I'm watching but every other or third weekend it seems like I come in on a Monday to see a couple hundred thousand messages in the proc folder. I only allow 50 recipients per message, have no loops, no

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Backlogging

2006-05-30 Thread Matt
Will, You want to attach your Declude.cfg and not your Global.cfg. If you haven't tweaked those settings, you will likely have issues at 140,000 per day. If you post it I'm sure that there will be some recommendations that will take care of your issues. Matt Will wrote: I am using

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Backlogging

2006-05-30 Thread David Barker
Will, I am not sure what you mean by country command, but this may be helpful http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=6 David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 3:18

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Backlogging

2006-05-30 Thread Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
It would be nice to have a declude log analyzer that would display a list of IP's organized by spam counts so I could start blacklisting some subnets, If that would be at all helpful to me. DLAnalyzer has that exact report you are looking for. - IP Spam Report

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Backlogging

2006-05-30 Thread Will
Here is my declude.cfg file: #THREADS 15 THREADS 75 #WAITFORMAIL Defined in milliseconds eg. 5000 = 5 seconds this can be changed to set the #wait time that decludeproc will wait before checking the \proc directory once empty for new messages. WAITFORMAIL 5000 #INVITEFIX

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Backlogging

2006-05-30 Thread Matt
Will, You should change the following settings: WAITFORMAIL 1000 WAITFORTHREADS 100 WINSOCKCLEANUP OFF If you have two virus scanners configured and external tests like Sniffer, Eradispam, invURIBL, etc. configured, I would recommend dropping the threads down to 40. If you have less than a

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x

2006-05-30 Thread Sanford Whiteman
That link indicates that they actually work in reverse by whitelisting things from greylisting instead this is the other way around where it qualifies messages for greylisting. Nope. Whitelister creates a hierarchical system by which messages may be explicitly included or

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x

2006-05-30 Thread Matt
Sanford Whiteman wrote: I am not denying _you_ shared credit for the concept with the Postfix people, but the idea that your "friend" the vendor can claim it as intellectual property, when you spec'd it out and have documentation of same -- and that that's why you're playing