No. You can't have multiple actions per test -- to do what
you want, you
would need to create a new test, such as WEIGHT10A, that is
identical to
the WEIGHT10 test (except fort the name). Then you could have:
WEIGHT10SUBJECT [Spam]
WEIGHT10AHEADER [This E-mail is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: 21. juli 2004 13:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Tagging a mail if its weighted as spam
I know it's possible to do this in subject line but I
Hi
I know it's possible to do this in subject line but I wonder if its possible to add a
line or two in the start of the mail. with a
link ot a FAQ of why its marked as spam.
Benny
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
Hi
If i put a [ spam ] marking i subject line at a certain weight level in the global.cfg
how will this interrupt with the per domain
settings?
Which wil run first
Benny
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the
The global.cfg file is used for outgoing E-mail, whereas the
per-domain
settings are used for incoming E-mail, so this would only be
an issue if an
E-mail was sent to one of the per-domain domains *and* an external
user. In this case, [ spam ] would be added to the
subject, and any
Neither runs first. The actions are handled after all the tests are
run. Declude JunkMail then goes through each recipient, and
handles the
actions for all the tests failed for each recipient.
If the first recipient is a local user, and the second one is
a remote
user, the local
In this case, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm assuming you
don't own the
domain.com domain
:-) would loved to own that but no I am not
-- the RFCs request that people use example.com for
examples) will use the settings in the
\IMail\Declude\example.com\$default$.JunkMail file.
Ok
Does that mean we can approve feature requests that we know
you'd like? ;)
Enjoy your time away from us,
Greg
As long as he does not say otherwise it must be so :-)
Damm so many new features we can get here hehehehehe
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Title: Message
Spamcop is NOT ever reliable for deleting spam, as one of
several tests its ok but never ever based on them alone.
An example. The largest broadband company here in Norway
tries to force all there customers to use there mailservers as SMTP, they ended
up on Spamcop's list in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
System Administrator
Sent: 21. april 2004 20:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New test
on 4/21/04 1:40 PM, John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
I assume you are relaying
No its not declude changing anything
This happens if you have automatic making of new mailboxes turned on in Imail, its
that by default
If you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you alove this it will create a mail box
like do-do
Have seen this several times with aliases in Imail and
Forgot to post the solution I came upp with
Full mailadress instead of just spam seems to solve the problem
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ISPHuset Nordic
Sent: 15. april 2004 20:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
I am cloce to agree with you but as one of those who is tired of Imail and the high
cost on hardware needed to handle mail per
customer comparing to Linux systems I would loved to have declude on linux with
postfix fex.
Declude is the only thing keeping me on Imail.
Benny
-Original
And me too :-)
Just an idea... If you ask Scott im sure he will make a link on the webpage for
download
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason
Sent: 13. april 2004 17:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Where do I find and updated version of the rbl's used per default ? And there settings
Or has they not been changed for the last 6 -8 months ?
Benny
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
found it out myself... Just have to read all the manual :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: 13. april 2004 18:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Updates to the confic file
Where do
Thanks the only place I didn't look
I now have user her who wants the mail marked in the subject line with SPAM and the
WEIGHT result how do I get that to show up.
Benny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: 13.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Updates to the confic file
I use the ATTACH action and have edited the .eml to include
%WEIGHT% in the subject line.
-Original Message-
From: ISPHuset Nordic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:19:37
To:[EMAIL
http://crm114.sourceforge.net/
Big words but is is working ?
Benny
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Hi a little off topic
Anyone knowing off a free or nearly free zip utility which can pack some files to a
zip archive.
unpacking isn't a problem
It is a must that it can run for a command prompt
Benny
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt
Winzip has a command line utility add in.
Darrell
ISPhuset Nordic AS writes:
Hi a little off topic
Anyone knowing off a free or nearly free zip utility which
can pack some files to a zip archive
the unix tools did the trick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Fritts
Sent: 15. januar 2004 15:18
To: Hosting Support
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt
From my own experience PKZIP (the new one)
Is it possibble to set an iprange in IFBYPASS ?
So that all 128 ips are set there ? Instead og using all the entrys for this ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Kulman
Sent: 6. desember 2003 09:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.unsubscribenow.org/
Are they a serius company `?
Benny
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Is it possible to hide not write this to the mailheader ?
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-RBL-Warning: ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent with spam
What effect will this have on the endless work we are doing on here fighting spam ?
Benny
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Where can i find this versjon of DLAnalyzer(v2.0.B.I)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: 25. november 2003 16:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] EasyNet Replacements
Well,
Here is how
yeah yeah
but how to find more info about route problem
Isn't this a faily high amount of routing failure ?
Report Start Time: 11.25.2003 00:00:00
Report End Time: 11.25.2003 23:59:59
Total Messages: 28 149
Messages That Failed: 19 519
Spam Percentage: 69,34%
TEST # FAILED
IPBYPASS193.217.93.5 an extern server forwarding mail
IPBYPASS213.236.237.186 a mail gateway local
IPBYPASS213.236.237.163 a mail server local sending trough 186
IPBYPASS213.236.237.227 a mail server local sending trough 186
IPBYPASS213.236.237.228 a mail
So you say that i should take it out ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: 25. november 2003 18:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] EasyNet Replacements
Isn't this a faily high amount of
but for an example
Received: from mailgw1.mailserveren.com [213.236.237.228] by mailserveren.com with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.13) id AFA214230116; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:13:22 +0100
Received: from mail.fluidhosting.com (mail.fluidhosting.com [66.150.201.72])
by mailgw1.mailserveren.com (Postfix)
Me to :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarelli
Sent: 6. november 2003 23:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: Jason (by way of R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Anyone found a way to stop this ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: 18. september 2003 19:33
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Foreign language Spam Mail
And here's a nasty Babelfish translation:
so if it contains scandianvian letters it will also cached
isn't there any other way to block this crap
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: 18. september 2003 22:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
what dns are u using ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: 22. september 2003 08:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] VeriSteal is stealing traffic from your domain.
Very strange. I just confirmed
Title: Message
Which
ip adresses are there on the servers u hve set up as dns on that maschine
?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Matthew BrambleSent: 22. september 2003
08:57To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
Thats
why you are supposed to use fex .loc
This
is a deathsin in my opinion
if fex
someone register this domain u use and then someone on the inside want to send
an email to to them it will never get trough
Jesus
this is so basic in AD i thought most people know about those
omeone had registered the
domain they used as an internal domain... 600 users couldnt send mail for 8
weeks cost them big money to fix this
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
BrambleSent: 22. september 2003 20:19To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISPhuset Nordic / Benny
ney to fix this
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Matthew BrambleSent: 22. september 2003
20:19To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISPhuset Nordic / Benny Samuelsen wrote:
Thats why you are supposed to use fex
.locThat makes some sense, however there has
b
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: 22. september 2003 07:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] VeriSteal is stealing traffic from your domain.
I didn't realize this until a second ago, but VeriCorrupt
19:07
To: ISPhuset Nordic / Benny Samuelsen
...or make a line in declude.junkmail which goes to a global file
where u change the settings for all of those having this profile
See the REDIRECT keyword.
-Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Lists every IP address. Should not be used. This one was included because it has a
good point: you REALLY should know what and why a
test blocks before using it. Confirmed 09 Apr 2002.
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/support/ip4r.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure this would be nice but pls do not use IIS as a webserver for doing this
it would be muxh better having a standalone thing which we can set the port for us
self with so many different configs that woule be
the best
Benny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
]] On Behalf Of ISPhuset Nordic AS
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] User Interface
Sure this would be nice but pls do not use IIS as a webserver for doing
this
it would be muxh better having a standalone thing which we can set
anyone have any good replacements after this one died ?
Benny
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
trying again
anyone have any good replacements after this one died ?
Benny
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type
But what can you use instead `?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: 29. august 2003 21:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number of spam messages not caught has gone up since the tests went down.
John Tolmachoff MCSE
47 matches
Mail list logo
