: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version 1.79 and Delog
But who wants 800MB to 1GB spam log files?
The server is so busy doing declude processes there isn't enough time to
run
a log analyzer on the local machine.
It takes to long to transfer the log file to a different machine.
Robert
I noticed after I upgraded to Declude 1.79, Delog 1.08b is no longer able to
calculate the number of failed messages from the declude log files. It
returns that 0 failed. Apparently the log files for declude have changed
with this new version. Does anybody know if there is a newer version of
Delog
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version 1.79 and Delog
I noticed after I upgraded to Declude 1.79, Delog 1.08b is no longer able to
calculate the number of failed messages from the declude log files. It
returns that 0 failed. Apparently the log files for declude have
Scott,
I've noticed the logging problem as well and I do have LOGLEVEL MID
in my global.cfg.
That doesn't resolve the issue.
Aaron
On Jun 1, 2004, at 9:01 AM, R. Scott Perry wrote:
I noticed after I upgraded to Declude 1.79, Delog 1.08b is no longer
able to
calculate the number of failed
I've noticed the logging problem as well and I do have LOGLEVEL MID in
my global.cfg.
That doesn't resolve the issue.
Do you have the Msg failed lines in your log file? If not, then you
should go to LOGLEVEL HIGH.
-Scott
---
Declude
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version 1.79 and Delog
I've noticed the logging problem as well and I do have LOGLEVEL MID
in my global.cfg.
That doesn't resolve the issue.
Do you have the Msg failed lines in your log file? If not, then you
should go to LOGLEVEL
Perry
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version 1.79 and Delog
Did the Msg Failed line under LOGLEVEL MID to report the
individual line numbers that it failed in a filter test get moved to
HIGH?
With v1.78 and earlier
Thanks, we have been running along with MID since the beginning,
all along, upgrading the interim releases. We just this week needed to
know which line it failed on in one of our filter files. This is what
we get now in our log. I will up to HIGH this week. Thanks,
Qff4f4d2301429a89
Scott,
Changing to Loglevel High seems to have added the Msg Failed lines to
the log.
I run delog at the end of the day and see what the results are, but I'm
pretty sure it works now.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Jun 1, 2004, at 10:16 AM, R. Scott Perry wrote:
Did the Msg Failed line under
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version 1.79 and Delog
Thanks, we have been running along with MID since the beginning,
all along, upgrading the interim releases. We just this week needed to
know which line
But who wants 800MB to 1GB spam log files?
The server is so busy doing declude processes there isn't enough time to
run
a log analyzer on the local machine.
It takes to long to transfer the log file to a different machine.
Once a week, I zip the previous weeks logs, ftp them to my
I downloaded and installed the interim version of Delcude, and added
'banext ezip' to the virus.cfg file, but an encryptedzip file still got
through. 'banext zip' wroks OK, though. I want to confirm that I've got
the right declude executable, but am having cranial flatulence trying to
I downloaded and installed the interim version of Delcude, and added
'banext ezip' to the virus.cfg file, but an encryptedzip file still got
through. 'banext zip' wroks OK, though. I want to confirm that I've got
the right declude executable, but am having cranial flatulence trying to
:[Declude.JunkMail] Declude version
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I downloaded and installed the interim version of Delcude, and added
'banext ezip' to the virus.cfg file, but an encryptedzip file still
got through. 'banext zip' wroks OK, though. I want to confirm that
I've got the right declude
R. Scott Perry wrote:
I downloaded and installed the interim version of Delcude, and added
'banext ezip' to the virus.cfg file, but an encryptedzip file still
got through. 'banext zip' wroks OK, though. I want to confirm that
I've got the right declude executable, but am having cranial
If you type \IMail\Declude from a command prompt, it should show
1.78i9. If not, you aren't running the latest interim release, and
will need to copy the new Declude.exe file to the \IMail\ directory.
C:\\imail\declude
Declude 1.78i9 (C) Copyright 2000-2004 Computerized Horizons.
That's good.
16 matches
Mail list logo
