to uncheck
Fill empty strings
Dan
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 23:39:58 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPAM: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: COMBO tests
Gotcha. Did not know of the standard ver limits
Beside
remarkable precision and dexterity. Just be sure to uncheck
"Fill empty strings"
Dan
From: "Markus Gufler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 23:39:58 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPAM: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
I know Scott's out (hope he's enjoying it!), but
wanted to post this one while I was thinking about it.
I would like to be able to group tests together and
give a weight to the group rather than the individual tests. That way if
one or multiple tests fail, only one weight is added.
This
My feeling is since it can be done to some extent using testsfailed filters, I'd
rather see development on things we can't do. The NOTCONTAINS arguement has simplified
these COMBO filters so most only take one filter to perform.
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL
]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: COMBO tests
Hi Darin -
On 19 May 2004 at 15:10, Darin Cox wrote:
I would like to be able to group tests together and give a weight to
the group rather than the individual tests. That way if one or
multiple
Hi Darin -
On 19 May 2004 at 15:10, Darin Cox wrote:
I would like to be able to group tests together and give a weight to
the group rather than the individual tests. That way if one or
multiple tests fail, only one weight is added.
The answer is:
I realize others have found a workaround
: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: COMBO tests
My feeling is since it can be done to some extent using testsfailed filters,
I'd rather see development on things we can't do. The NOTCONTAINS arguement
has simplified these COMBO filters so most only take one
Gotcha. Did not know of the standard ver limits
Beside the limitation for pro users (who knows if future COMBO test - if
they become true - will be available in the standard version?) I consider
the TESTSFAILED/END solution a little bit inflexible and inefficient and
so as Matt (who has
- Original Message -
From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:48 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Feature request: COMBO tests
Hi Darin -
On 19 May 2004 at 15:10, Darin Cox wrote:
I would like to be able
